It only works without :addresses for me
And even when getting this on confirmation the logs:
Feb 24 09:03:52 localhost dovecot: lmtp(7895, a...@dum.li):
yeIlOfjN61TXHgAA0J78UA: sieve:
msgid=<451bb443b8ad815c205a2cce07ac31aec0727c47@vm-atmail7>: sent
vacation response to
It wasn't working.
This
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Thu, 19 Jun 2014, Florin Portase wrote:
It seems I found the error:
it was this variable "submission_host"
I had to setup "submission_host=localhost"
fine
If I'll change submission_host=medianetork.ro, vacation response did
not work.
Also
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 06/19/2014 12:04 AM, Steffen wrote:
> Florin Portase wrote:
>> Hello,
>
>> Here is my setup:
>
>> dovecot- 2.2.11 pigeonhole - 0.4.2 qmail
>
>> I was trying to create a vacation message, but after the sive
>> script has been created and I w
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Florin Portase wrote:
> Hello,
>
> Here is my setup:
>
> dovecot- 2.2.11 pigeonhole - 0.4.2 qmail
>
> I was trying to create a vacation message, but after the sive
> script has been created and I was checking the logs I saw some
> strange error
On 3/19/2014 6:43 AM, azurIt wrote:
>> Od: Stephan Bosch
>> Komu: azurIt ,
>> Dátum: 19.03.2014 01:45
>> Predmet: Re: [Dovecot] Sieve vacation attach original message
>>
>> On 3/14/2014 7:48 AM, azurIt wrote:
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> is it, s
Joseph Tam:
"azurIt" writes:
is it, somehow, possible to attach the original message to the vacation
autoreply?
Hmm. Allowing a sender control over both the recipient (via spoofing),
and the content seems like perfect recipe to turn your mail server into
a spam relay cannon.
I would lik
> Od: Stephan Bosch
> Komu: azurIt ,
> Dátum: 19.03.2014 01:45
> Predmet: Re: [Dovecot] Sieve vacation attach original message
>
>On 3/14/2014 7:48 AM, azurIt wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> is it, somehow, possible to attach the original message to the vacation
>&
> Od: Stephan Bosch
> Komu: azurIt ,
> Dátum: 19.03.2014 01:45
> Predmet: Re: [Dovecot] Sieve vacation attach original message
>
>On 3/14/2014 7:48 AM, azurIt wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> is it, somehow, possible to attach the original message to the vacation
>&
On 3/14/2014 7:48 AM, azurIt wrote:
> Hi,
>
> is it, somehow, possible to attach the original message to the vacation
> autoreply? Thank you.
Not currently. The exttracttext extension could be used for that
(http://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc5703), but it is not supported at the
moment. Also, this wo
"azurIt" writes:
is it, somehow, possible to attach the original message to the vacation
autoreply?
Hmm. Allowing a sender control over both the recipient (via spoofing),
and the content seems like perfect recipe to turn your mail server into
a spam relay cannon. If you do do this, you shou
On 10 Sep 2013, at 05:05 , Charles Marcus wrote:
> On 2013-09-09 8:29 AM, Gene Heskett wrote:
>> On Monday 09 September 2013 08:28:26 Charles Marcus did opine:
>>> What I'd like is to be able to set a company (domain-wide) auto-response
>>> for when our company is closed for holidays... more sp
On 2013-09-10 9:56 AM, Steffen Kaiser wrote:
On Tue, 10 Sep 2013, Charles Marcus wrote:
On 2013-09-09 8:29 AM, Gene Heskett wrote:
On Monday 09 September 2013 08:28:26 Charles Marcus did opine:
What I'd like is to be able to set a company (domain-wide)
auto-response
for when our company is c
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Tue, 10 Sep 2013, Charles Marcus wrote:
On 2013-09-09 8:29 AM, Gene Heskett wrote:
On Monday 09 September 2013 08:28:26 Charles Marcus did opine:
What I'd like is to be able to set a company (domain-wide) auto-response
for when our company is
On Tuesday 10 September 2013 08:34:24 Charles Marcus did opine:
> On 2013-09-09 8:29 AM, Gene Heskett wrote:
> > On Monday 09 September 2013 08:28:26 Charles Marcus did opine:
> >> What I'd like is to be able to set a company (domain-wide)
> >> auto-response for when our company is closed for hol
On 2013-09-09 8:29 AM, Gene Heskett wrote:
On Monday 09 September 2013 08:28:26 Charles Marcus did opine:
What I'd like is to be able to set a company (domain-wide) auto-response
for when our company is closed for holidays... more specifically, extra
holidays (often the boss will close an extra
Am 09.09.2013 10:26 schrieb Stephan Bosch:
> Well, Sieve is certainly not meant for something like that. To echo
> the complete message back verbatim you could do the following:
...
> I haven't tested the above only with sieve-test and not in the wild.
Stephan,
thanks for your response. I tried
Am 09.09.2013 14:29, schrieb Gene Heskett:
> On Monday 09 September 2013 08:28:26 Charles Marcus did opine:
>
>> Hello,
>>
>> I've been using vacation.pl from postfixadmin for many years, and since
>> the most recent modification that allows me to specify my own strings to
>> test for for when NOT
On Monday 09 September 2013 08:28:26 Charles Marcus did opine:
> Hello,
>
> I've been using vacation.pl from postfixadmin for many years, and since
> the most recent modification that allows me to specify my own strings to
> test for for when NOT to send a message, I'm extremely happy with it (no
Op 6-9-2013 22:40, Andreas Schulze schreef:
Hello Stephan,
I love to use the vacation extension to build an echo service.
I have not to worry about whether to answer or not if the sender is a list,
postmaster, mailer-daemon or other crasy thing.
But i like to echo the *complete headers* back.
I
On 8/21/2013 7:51 PM, mego...@inboxalias.com wrote:
[mail.err] dovecot: lda(exampleuser): Error: sieve: original envelope recipient
address 'exampleuser@dovecot_localhost' is unparsable
This is the core of your problem. The '_' is not an allowed character
according to the SMTP `Domain' synta
On Tue, Jul 16, 2013 at 6:53 PM, Axel Luttgens wrote:
Hello Simon,
>
> You might go to:
>
> http://www.rfc-editor.org/search/rfc_search.php
>
> and perform there a search on "sieve".
>
> For the vacation extension, there's document RFC 5230.
> The overall working of sieve is described in R
Le 16 juil. 2013 à 02:15, Simon a écrit :
> Hi There.
>
> [...]
>
> is there a definitive list of things like "days", "subject" etc?
Hello Simon,
You might go to:
http://www.rfc-editor.org/search/rfc_search.php
and perform there a search on "sieve".
For the vacation extension, there
On 4/3/2013 11:49 AM, Ivan Bogdanovic wrote:
Hi to all,
I have an issue with Dovecot Sieve on sending vacation message... Actually
Sieve is working and I can use all the filters but just vacation is causing
a problem and only in specific case...
I have Dovecot + Postfix + LDA running on Ubuntu
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Tue, 26 Mar 2013, Dave Gattis wrote:
Our emails are redirected from the home office causing all vacation responses
to fail with, "discarding vacation response for implicitly delivered message;
no known (envelope) recipient address found in messa
At 12PM -0700 on 26/03/13 you (rpsuprdave) wrote:
> Here's the headers for my emails:
>
> Return-Path:
> X-Original-To: dave.gat...@domain-b.com
> Delivered-To: dave.gat...@domain-b.com
[...]
> From: Dave Gattis
> To: SUMACO Gattis Dave
[...]
>
> From: Dave Gattis is the original sender.
> To
Here's the headers for my emails:
Return-Path:
X-Original-To: dave.gat...@domain-b.com
Delivered-To: dave.gat...@domain-b.com
Received: from spamcop.main.ch (spamcop.main.ch [83.144.241.40])
by domain-b.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0E4E81C101DE
for ; Tue, 26 Mar 2013 14:35:13 -0400
I think you might want to look at the :addresses paramerer
http://wiki2.dovecot.org/Pigeonhole/Sieve/Examples#Vacation_auto-reply
http://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc5230#page-7
On 03/26/2013 01:10 PM, Dave Gattis wrote:
I posted this elsewhere, but under an old post. I apologize for the
repeated
Am 27.09.2012 19:12, schrieb Bob Miller:
> Robert,
>
>
>> The settings are listed in the example conf.d/15-lda.conf file. The
>> important settings are:
>>
>> sendmail_path is used to send mails. Note that the default is
>> /usr/sbin/sendmail, which doesn't necessarily work the same as
>> /us
Robert,
> The settings are listed in the example conf.d/15-lda.conf file. The
> important settings are:
>
> sendmail_path is used to send mails. Note that the default is
> /usr/sbin/sendmail, which doesn't necessarily work the same as
> /usr/lib/sendmail.
>
> Alternatively you can u
Am 27.09.2012 18:37, schrieb Bob Miller:
> the logs that dovecot is sending the vacation response, but the
> recipient never receives it.
show the logs
study
http://wiki2.dovecot.org/LDA
Common configuration
The settings are listed in the example conf.d/15-lda.conf file. The
important setti
Op 8/8/2012 4:12 PM, asier.ci...@externo.uam.es schreef:
The problem is solved
In the library "src/lib-sieve/plugins/vacation/cmd-vacation.c", in the
package "dovecot-sieve" or "dovecot-pigeonhole" modify:
smtp_handle = sieve_smtp_open(senv, reply_to, NULL, &f);
smtp_handle = sie
The problem is solved
In the library "src/lib-sieve/plugins/vacation/cmd-vacation.c", in the
package "dovecot-sieve" or "dovecot-pigeonhole" modify:
smtp_handle = sieve_smtp_open(senv, reply_to, NULL, &f);
smtp_handle = sieve_smtp_open(senv, reply_to, reply_from, &f);
You can c
Il 30.07.2012 09:06 asier.ci...@externo.uam.es ha scritto:
FROM:mailman-boun...@dovecot.org
DATE:27. heinäkuuta 2012 16.58.35 UTC+3.00
TO:dovecot-ow...@dovecot.org
SUBJECT:CONTENT FILTERED MESSAGE NOTIFICATION
The attached message matched the dovecot mailing list's content
filtering rules and wa
Hello everybody,
We have the same problem with the vacation response.
Why dovecot leaves the from empty?
Does it something to do with this NULL field?
src/deliver/mail-send.c:smtp_client =
smtp_client_open(return_addr, NULL, &f);
We have tried changing that line for this one, wit
Am 25.04.2012 17:48, schrieb Robert Schetterer:
> Am 25.04.2012 16:30, schrieb Timo Sirainen:
>> On 25.4.2012, at 17.16, Robert Schetterer wrote:
>>
>>> Am 25.04.2012 16:11, schrieb Timo Sirainen:
p *set
>>>
>>> hope doing it right
>>>
>>> (gdb) p *set
>>> $1 = {postmaster_address = 0xaa33d0 "
Am 25.04.2012 16:30, schrieb Timo Sirainen:
> On 25.4.2012, at 17.16, Robert Schetterer wrote:
>
>> Am 25.04.2012 16:11, schrieb Timo Sirainen:
>>> p *set
>>
>> hope doing it right
>>
>> (gdb) p *set
>> $1 = {postmaster_address = 0xaa33d0 "P6\252", hostname = 0x0,
>> submission_host = 0x0, sendmai
Am 25.04.2012 16:54, schrieb Chris:
> 2012/4/25 Robert Schetterer :
>> Am 25.04.2012 16:47, schrieb Chris:
>>> 2012/4/25 Robert Schetterer :
> That's totally broken.. You sure you recompiled Pigeonhole correctly
> against the same Dovecot version?
>
its from latest
http:
2012/4/25 Robert Schetterer :
> Am 25.04.2012 16:47, schrieb Chris:
>> 2012/4/25 Robert Schetterer :
That's totally broken.. You sure you recompiled Pigeonhole correctly
against the same Dovecot version?
>>>
>>> its from latest
>>> http://xi.rename-it.nl/debian/pool/testing-auto/dov
Am 25.04.2012 16:47, schrieb Chris:
> 2012/4/25 Robert Schetterer :
>>> That's totally broken.. You sure you recompiled Pigeonhole correctly
>>> against the same Dovecot version?
>>>
>>
>> its from latest
>> http://xi.rename-it.nl/debian/pool/testing-auto/dovecot-2.1/
>> recompiled the debain way
2012/4/25 Robert Schetterer :
>> That's totally broken.. You sure you recompiled Pigeonhole correctly against
>> the same Dovecot version?
>>
>
> its from latest
> http://xi.rename-it.nl/debian/pool/testing-auto/dovecot-2.1/
> recompiled the debain way , never had bugged
You are using packages co
Am 25.04.2012 16:30, schrieb Timo Sirainen:
> On 25.4.2012, at 17.16, Robert Schetterer wrote:
>
>> Am 25.04.2012 16:11, schrieb Timo Sirainen:
>>> p *set
>>
>> hope doing it right
>>
>> (gdb) p *set
>> $1 = {postmaster_address = 0xaa33d0 "P6\252", hostname = 0x0,
>> submission_host = 0x0, sendmai
On 25.4.2012, at 17.16, Robert Schetterer wrote:
> Am 25.04.2012 16:11, schrieb Timo Sirainen:
>> p *set
>
> hope doing it right
>
> (gdb) p *set
> $1 = {postmaster_address = 0xaa33d0 "P6\252", hostname = 0x0,
> submission_host = 0x0, sendmail_path = 0x7fbaf6e41f50
> "H\211\\$\360H\211l$\370H\20
Am 25.04.2012 16:11, schrieb Timo Sirainen:
> p *set
hope doing it right
(gdb) p *set
$1 = {postmaster_address = 0xaa33d0 "P6\252", hostname = 0x0,
submission_host = 0x0, sendmail_path = 0x7fbaf6e41f50
"H\211\\$\360H\211l$\370H\203\354\030\200=\207A%",
rejection_subject = 0x7fbaf6e42b90
"H\211\
On 25.4.2012, at 17.03, Robert Schetterer wrote:
> Program received signal SIGSEGV, Segmentation fault.
> smtp_client_open (set=0x252b0b0, destination=0x254e410
> "ncitest...@onmotive.de", return_path=0x24e4148
> "r...@mail02.mailspooler.com", file_r=0x7fff2040a748) at smtp-client.c:146
> 146
Am 25.04.2012 15:51, schrieb Stephan Bosch:
> Op 4/25/2012 3:29 PM, Robert Schetterer schreef:
>> Am 25.04.2012 15:06, schrieb Robert Schetterer:
>>> Hi , since upgrade
>>> sieve vacation, redirect stopped working getting
>>>
>>> postfix error
>>> while sending end of data -- message may be sent mo
Am 25.04.2012 15:46, schrieb Timo Sirainen:
> bt full
Program received signal SIGSEGV, Segmentation fault.
smtp_client_open (set=0x252b0b0, destination=0x254e410
"ncitest...@onmotive.de", return_path=0x24e4148
"r...@mail02.mailspooler.com", file_r=0x7fff2040a748) at smtp-client.c:146
146 smtp
Op 4/25/2012 3:29 PM, Robert Schetterer schreef:
Am 25.04.2012 15:06, schrieb Robert Schetterer:
Hi , since upgrade
sieve vacation, redirect stopped working getting
postfix error
while sending end of data -- message may be sent more than once
i played a lot about sieve , lda submission host co
On 25.4.2012, at 16.29, Robert Schetterer wrote:
> master: service(lmtp): child 31952 killed with signal 11 (core not dumped)
Can you get a gdb backtrace? Might be a bit difficult to get a core dump from
lmtp, but you should be able to attach gdb into it:
service lmtp {
process_min_avail = 1
Am 25.04.2012 15:06, schrieb Robert Schetterer:
> Hi , since upgrade
> sieve vacation, redirect stopped working getting
>
> postfix error
> while sending end of data -- message may be sent more than once
>
> i played a lot about sieve , lda submission host conf entries etc but
> all failed , i am
Am Dienstag, den 02.08.2011, 20:14 +0200 schrieb Stéphane Wartel:
> Hi Stephan,
>
> Yep, after some tests you 're right, it's not possible.
> So, I use :addresses in sieve script and will try -a or -r arguments in
> LDA command from postfix with the next release.
did you get it working with -a o
Am 21.09.2011 08:52, schrieb René Neumann:
> Am 21.09.2011 01:09, schrieb Stephan Bosch:
>>
>> http://hg.rename-it.nl/dovecot-2.0-pigeonhole/rev/fe6df3425850
>>
>> This will be included in the next release.
>>
>> Regards,
>>
>> Stephan
>>
>
> Thanks a lot. I'll try it out.
>
> - René
>
Ok ... s
Am 21.09.2011 01:09, schrieb Stephan Bosch:
> Op 20-9-2011 23:48, René Neumann schreef:
>> Am 20.09.2011 22:38, schrieb René Neumann:
>>> Hi *,
>>>
>>> I am adding a generic way for vacation-replies in my sieve setup. There
>>> I set the handle and the reason using variables (see end of mail). My
>
Op 20-9-2011 23:48, René Neumann schreef:
Am 20.09.2011 22:38, schrieb René Neumann:
Hi *,
I am adding a generic way for vacation-replies in my sieve setup. There
I set the handle and the reason using variables (see end of mail). My
simple question now is: Though variable expansion is not done
Am 20.09.2011 22:38, schrieb René Neumann:
> Hi *,
>
> I am adding a generic way for vacation-replies in my sieve setup. There
> I set the handle and the reason using variables (see end of mail). My
> simple question now is: Though variable expansion is not done for
> subject and reason, is it don
On 9/1/2011 2:34 PM, Lampa wrote:
> Hello,
>
> i'm using 1.2.15 version on debian.
>
> I'm getting "discarding vacation response for message implicitly
> delivered to"
>
> I have domain domain.com which has alias do-main.com.
>
> When sending email to main domain (domain.com) seems to be ok, but f
Hi Stephan,
Yep, after some tests you 're right, it's not possible.
So, I use :addresses in sieve script and will try -a or -r arguments in
LDA command from postfix with the next release.
Bye,
Stephane
Le 02/08/2011 18:02, Stephan Bosch a écrit :
On 8/2/2011 4:08 PM, Stephan Bosch wrote:
On
On 8/2/2011 4:08 PM, Stephan Bosch wrote:
On 8/2/2011 2:43 PM, swar...@zero-spam.fr wrote:
Hi Stephan,
Thanks for your reply.
After some more tests, it appears that mail aliases is the reason of
this error. The vacation mode has been enabled on a mailbox that
contains many aliases and one of
On 8/2/2011 2:43 PM, swar...@zero-spam.fr wrote:
Hi Stephan,
Thanks for your reply.
After some more tests, it appears that mail aliases is the reason of
this error. The vacation mode has been enabled on a mailbox that
contains many aliases and one of them has been used as the recipient.
We us
Hi Stephan,
Thanks for your reply.
After some more tests, it appears that mail aliases is the reason of
this error. The vacation mode has been enabled on a mailbox that
contains many aliases and one of them has been used as the recipient.
We used dovecot 2.0.12-0~auto+5 from debian old-stable
On 8/2/2011 12:21 PM, Stéphane Wartel wrote:
Hi,
I get the same error !
Any idea to fix it ?
This situation occurs when the message's To,CC,etc. headers do not
contain the recipient address (from the envelope). This can be caused by
a mailing list (to which it must not respond), but also by
Hi,
I get the same error !
Any idea to fix it ?
Regards,
Stephane
Le 17/05/2011 18:03, Wojciech Giel a écrit :
Hi,
I'm configuring postfix with dovecot and roundcube. I'm using flat
files as passwdb userdb.
Everything works fine except sieve vacation reply. when i send mail
from ex. user d
Per Jessen wrote:
> Environment: dovecot 2.0.9, postfix 2.6, Pigeonhole 0.2.2
>
> I'm in the process of setting up vacation auto-reply for the first
> time, (it's that time of the year) and it looks like
> .dovecot.lda-dupes is being updated, but not read (or just ignored).
>
> my vacation scrip
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Thu, 18 Mar 2010, Lampa wrote:
Is there any hope that will be any "hack" in future to allow reply for
all addresses?
I've _my_ vision of how :addresses should be extended on my TODO list, but
active Dovecot development is currently a bit down
Hello,
>> be used some wildcard * or something similar ?
>
> No, currently.
>
> However, the Sieve implementation is open-source and it seems to be easy to
> spot the correct place to patch.
>
> Funnily, there are lots of different personal opinions about to which kind
> of messages an autorespond
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Mon, 22 Feb 2010, Lampa wrote:
So if i understand this fully, you must define ALL potentional aliases
which user is member of ?
Yes.
When create new alias ali...@domain.tld and it is alias for
u...@domain.tld i must edit vacation script and a
So if i understand this fully, you must define ALL potentional aliases
which user is member of ?
When create new alias ali...@domain.tld and it is alias for
u...@domain.tld i must edit vacation script and add :address
"ali...@domain.tld" ? If yes, is little stupid and unmaintainable. Can
be used s
Following from Steffen Kaiser's response, RFC5230 explains the
conditions necessary for the Sieve Vacation extension to trigger a
response.
This says:
"Vacation" MUST NOT respond to a message unless the recipient user's
email address is in a "To", "Cc", "Bcc", "Resent-To", "Resent-Cc", or
"Rese
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Fri, 12 Feb 2010, Lampa wrote:
BAD 4. send message from anotheru...@anotherdomain.tld to
u...@domain.tld => no response (2010-02-11T19:48:04)
Why is discarding vacation response for message implicitly delivered
to ?
See: http://tools.ietf.or
On Wed, 2009-10-28 at 12:32 +0100, Stephan Bosch wrote:
> 1: Test 'UTF-8 Subject' FAILED: subject header is not encoded/decoded
> properly:
> expected: Auto: Я могу есть стекло, оно мне не вредит.
> decoded: Auto: Я мог�? е�?�?�? �?�?екло, оно мне не в�?еди�?.
The bug was actually that str_sani
Timo Sirainen wrote:
On Fri, 2009-10-16 at 11:48 +0400, Proskurin Kirill wrote:
Is this problem still not fixed in new sieve implementation?
I just implemented message header encoder:
http://hg.dovecot.org/dovecot-1.2/rev/bd4a6f500c75
So only thing left to do is for Stephan to start using it
On Fri, 2009-10-16 at 11:48 +0400, Proskurin Kirill wrote:
> Is this problem still not fixed in new sieve implementation?
I just implemented message header encoder:
http://hg.dovecot.org/dovecot-1.2/rev/bd4a6f500c75
So only thing left to do is for Stephan to start using it. :)
signature.asc
De
Nikita Koshikov wrote:
Hello list,
I have noticed that sieve vacation action breaks some non-english letters in
the subject.
I tested with russian language, if subject contains letters from specific
diapason russian alphabet, the message received with unreadable subject, but
text in the body
On 9/30/2009, Jacek Osiecki (jos...@hybrid.pl) wrote:
> So it seems that finally a big migration from 1.0rc21 to current version is
> much closer...
Cool - methinks you will be very pleased with the performance increase...
:)
--
Best regards,
Charles
On Wed, 30 Sep 2009, Charles Marcus wrote:
On 9/30/2009 6:13 AM, Jacek Osiecki wrote:
http://wiki.dovecot.org/LDA/Sieve#Vacation_auto-reply
It says, that "List of autoreplied senders is stored in .dovecot.lda-dupes
file in user's home directory." - but what is the "user's home directory"
when I
On 9/30/2009 6:13 AM, Jacek Osiecki wrote:
> I just found here some info:
> http://wiki.dovecot.org/LDA/Sieve#Vacation_auto-reply
>
> It says, that "List of autoreplied senders is stored in .dovecot.lda-dupes
> file in user's home directory." - but what is the "user's home directory"
> when I am u
On Wed, 30 Sep 2009, Jacek Osiecki wrote:
[...]
Here is my sieve file:
require ["vacation","fileinto"];
# rule:[wakacje]
if anyof (true)
{
vacation :days 7 text:
I am on vacation
.
;
And it seems, that sieve ignores ":days 7" parameter. Every time
I send the email to this account, I
Hello Timo,
Thanks for your answer.
I finally have solved the problem. The users accounts in my postfix LDAP
virtual table were mapped as firstname.lastn...@localhost, instead of
firstname.lastn...@domain.com. In this case, deliver was not trying at
all to send the vacation message.
I have chang
On Thu, 2009-09-24 at 09:14 +0100, Andre Rodier wrote:
>
> * I use virtual file for users on postfix, and I also have a LDAP
> server for authentication. Do I have something to configure on
> dovecot to be sure that vacation is working with this
> configuration ?
deliver wants to
On 9/24/2009 4:14 AM, Andre Rodier wrote:
> Hello everybody,
>
> First, I want to thank the development team for the quality and the
> stability of dovecot. It's now running without problem since two years
> on my debian box.
>
> Next, I'd like you help me to solve the problem I have with
> vacat
Andre Rodier wrote:
>* If the sieve vacation script had to use a counter for limits per
> day, where this counter is supposed to be stored ? I cant see any
> dovecot file. I have temporary try to use 0777 for
> home/sieve/maildir folders, but no file is created at all.
You don'
On Fri, 11 Sep 2009 18:05:34 -0400, Timo Sirainen wrote:
> On Sat, 2009-09-12 at 01:59 +0400, Sergey Grigorian wrote:
>> The script uses the "variables" extension to produce the "Re: [original
>> subject] (autoreply)" subject line for the vacation message.
>>
>> All is well except for cases when
On Fri, 2009-09-11 at 18:05 -0400, Timo Sirainen wrote:
> I think the main reason this hasn't been implemented yet is that this
> conversion isn't required anywhere else in Dovecot. So the first step
> would be to create RFC 2047 encoder for Dovecot. Feel free to implement
> one. :)
Well, I actual
On Sat, 2009-09-12 at 01:59 +0400, Sergey Grigorian wrote:
> The script uses the "variables" extension to produce the "Re: [original
> subject] (autoreply)" subject line for the vacation message.
>
> All is well except for cases when that [original subject] is written in
> Russian.
This is a TO
bart wrote:
Jure Pečar wrote:
Currently, you need to add all allowed aliases to the :addresses
argument of the vacation command. My TODO list contains a new feature
that lets you extract additional valid aliases directly from a
dictionary (e.g. an SQL database). It is not at the top of my TODO
Jure Pečar wrote:
>> Currently, you need to add all allowed aliases to the :addresses
>> argument of the vacation command. My TODO list contains a new feature
>> that lets you extract additional valid aliases directly from a
>> dictionary (e.g. an SQL database). It is not at the top of my TODO l
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Fri, 7 Aug 2009, Timo Sirainen wrote:
On Fri, 2009-08-07 at 20:26 +0200, Jure Pečar wrote:
On Fri, 07 Aug 2009 13:57:57 -0400
Timo Sirainen wrote:
Currently, you need to add all allowed aliases to the :addresses
argument of the vacation comma
On Fri, 2009-08-07 at 15:01 +0200, Jure Pečar wrote:
> And when sent and delivered to some...@example.com, we get this in the log:
..
> Our final recipients are in the form of usern...@fqdn.hostname.com; it looks
> like this is being matched in sieve as address. But we want to match against
> ori
Timo Sirainen schreef:
On Fri, 2009-08-07 at 19:21 +0200, Stephan Bosch wrote:
dovecot: deliver(username): sieve: msgid=<...>: discarding vacation response for
message implicitly delivered to
Our final recipients are in the form of usern...@fqdn.hostname.com; it looks
like this is being matc
On Fri, 07 Aug 2009 19:21:53 +0200
Stephan Bosch wrote:
> Currently, you need to add all allowed aliases to the :addresses
> argument of the vacation command. My TODO list contains a new feature
> that lets you extract additional valid aliases directly from a
> dictionary (e.g. an SQL database
On Fri, 07 Aug 2009 14:27:29 -0400
Timo Sirainen wrote:
> > > I don't think the above really needs a dict? Rather maybe there's a
> > > way to have the script check the original unexpanded address. Is it
> > > stored in some specific header, or how would Dovecot/Sieve know about
> > > it?
> >
>
On Fri, 2009-08-07 at 20:26 +0200, Jure Pečar wrote:
> On Fri, 07 Aug 2009 13:57:57 -0400
> Timo Sirainen wrote:
>
> > > Currently, you need to add all allowed aliases to the :addresses
> > > argument of the vacation command. My TODO list contains a new feature
> > > that lets you extract addit
On Fri, 07 Aug 2009 13:57:57 -0400
Timo Sirainen wrote:
> > Currently, you need to add all allowed aliases to the :addresses
> > argument of the vacation command. My TODO list contains a new feature
> > that lets you extract additional valid aliases directly from a
> > dictionary (e.g. an SQL
On Fri, 2009-08-07 at 19:21 +0200, Stephan Bosch wrote:
> > dovecot: deliver(username): sieve: msgid=<...>: discarding vacation
> > response for message implicitly delivered to
> >
> > Our final recipients are in the form of usern...@fqdn.hostname.com; it
> > looks like this is being matched in
Jure Pečar schreef:
Hello,
we're implementing a dovecot 1.2.1 with sieve 0.1.7 and managesieve 0.11.7.
We're having problems with creating sieve scripts so that vacation works.
Our script looks like this:
require ["fileinto", "vacation"];
if address :matches ["To", "Cc"] "*some...@example.com
On Sat, 11 Jul 2009 07:24:51 +0200 (CEST)
"Benny Pedersen" wrote:
>
> On Wed, July 8, 2009 12:04, Nikita Koshikov wrote:
>
> > Please tell, is it possible to fix this ?
>
> fix is nedded in sieve client what ever that is, not in anything dovecot does
>
> so to test:
> iconv the sieve script t
On Wed, July 8, 2009 12:04, Nikita Koshikov wrote:
> Please tell, is it possible to fix this ?
fix is nedded in sieve client what ever that is, not in anything dovecot does
so to test:
iconv the sieve script to unicode, and save it, then it works ?
--
xpoint
On Wed, 8 Jul 2009 12:41:38 +0200
Axel Luttgens wrote:
> Le 8 juil. 09 à 12:04, Nikita Koshikov a écrit :
>
> > Hello list,
> >
> > I have noticed that sieve vacation action breaks some non-english
> > letters in the subject.
> > I tested with russian language, if subject contains letters from
Oops forgot a few remarks.
Axel Luttgens wrote:
I don't know whether dovecot-sieve is supposed to do the conversion
automatically, but it is sure that an RFC822 header MUST be in US-ASCII
(so as to be 7bit-clean).
Sieve is supposed to do the conversion implicitly, yes.
The required encodings
Axel Luttgens wrote:
Le 8 juil. 09 à 12:04, Nikita Koshikov a écrit :
I don't know whether dovecot-sieve is supposed to do the conversion
automatically, but it is sure that an RFC822 header MUST be in US-ASCII
(so as to be 7bit-clean).
The required encodings are described in:
http://www
Le 8 juil. 09 à 12:04, Nikita Koshikov a écrit :
Hello list,
I have noticed that sieve vacation action breaks some non-english
letters in the subject.
I tested with russian language, if subject contains letters from
specific diapason russian alphabet, the message received with
unreadable
1 - 100 of 123 matches
Mail list logo
