So if i understand this fully, you must define ALL potentional aliases which user is member of ?
When create new alias ali...@domain.tld and it is alias for u...@domain.tld i must edit vacation script and add :address "ali...@domain.tld" ? If yes, is little stupid and unmaintainable. Can be used some wildcard * or something similar ? 2010/2/12 Martin F. Foster <martin_fos...@pacific.net.au>: > Following from Steffen Kaiser's response, RFC5230 explains the conditions > necessary for the Sieve Vacation extension to trigger a response. > This says: > > "Vacation" MUST NOT respond to a message unless the recipient user's > email address is in a "To", "Cc", "Bcc", "Resent-To", "Resent-Cc", or > "Resent-Bcc" line of the original message. > > > So your scenario 4 happens when the sender is only in the envelope, and not > in the headers. > > For example: this transaction will get a response because the mailbox > address is in the To: header > > ehlo there.com > mail from: <d...@there.com> > rcpt to: <u...@domain.tld> << envelope recipient, mailsystem routes with > this information > data > To: "Some User" <u...@domain.tld> << header recipient must be correlated for > Sieve Vacation to send a response > From: "Dude" <d...@there.com> > Subject: message > > Hi there > . > > This transaction will not get a response, and will trigger the "discarding > vacation response for message implicitly delivered to <u...@domain.tld> " > log: > > ehlo there.com > mail from: <d...@there.com> > rcpt to: <u...@domain.tld> > data > Subject: message > > Hi there > . > > > Cheers, > > -Martin Foster > > > Le 12-Feb-10 21:00, dovecot-requ...@dovecot.org a écrit : >> >> Message: 9 >> Date: Fri, 12 Feb 2010 09:18:23 +0100 >> From: Lampa<lamp...@gmail.com> >> Subject: [Dovecot] sieve vacation >> To: Dovecot Mailing List<dovecot@dovecot.org> >> Message-ID: >> <9aef75b11002120018v69f185b5hb0a9e0f7dad1e...@mail.gmail.com> >> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 >> >> Hello, >> >> scenario: >> >> OK 1. created vacation script (see below) >> OK 2. send message fromu...@anotherdomain.tld tou...@domain.tld => >> got auto vacation response (2010-02-11T19:42:13) >> OK 3. send message fromu...@anotherdomain.tld tou...@domain.tld => >> no response (is ok because ":days 1" settings) (2010-02-11T19:47:46) >> BAD 4. send message fromanotheru...@anotherdomain.tld to >> u...@domain.tld => no response (2010-02-11T19:48:04) >> >> >> Why is discarding vacation response for message implicitly delivered >> to<u...@domain.tld> ? >> >> log: >> 2010-02-11T19:42:13.669321+01:00 hermes dovecot: >> deliver(u...@domain.tld): sieve: >> msgid=<052a01caab49$ec4752e0$c4d5f8...@tld>: sent vacation response to >> <u...@anotherdomain.tld> >> 2010-02-11T19:42:13.732541+01:00 hermes dovecot: >> deliver(u...@domain.tld): sieve: >> msgid=<052a01caab49$ec4752e0$c4d5f8...@tld>: stored mail into mailbox >> 'INBOX' >> 2010-02-11T19:47:46.271534+01:00 hermes dovecot: >> deliver(u...@domain.tld): sieve: >> msgid=<053201caab4a$b295ece0$17c1c6...@tld>: discarded duplicate >> vacation response to<u...@anotherdomain.tld> >> 2010-02-11T19:47:46.275891+01:00 hermes dovecot: >> deliver(u...@domain.tld): sieve: >> msgid=<053201caab4a$b295ece0$17c1c6...@tld>: stored mail into mailbox >> 'INBOX' >> 2010-02-11T19:48:04.958622+01:00 hermes dovecot: >> deliver(u...@domain.tld): sieve: >> msgid=<053701caab4a$bda90220$38fb06...@tld>: discarding vacation >> response for message implicitly delivered to<u...@domain.tld> >> 2010-02-11T19:48:04.965875+01:00 hermes dovecot: >> deliver(u...@domain.tld): sieve: >> msgid=<053701caab4a$bda90220$38fb06...@tld>: stored mail into mailbox >> 'INBOX' >> >> vacation script: >> ----------- >> require "vacation"; >> >> vacation >> :days 1 >> :subject "Auto reply" >> >> "auto reply message"; >> -------------- >> >> Thank you >> -- Lampa ------------------------------ > > -- Lampa
