On 2013-05-15 8:12 AM, Timo Sirainen wrote:
On 7.5.2013, at 13.09, Charles Marcus wrote:
*Attachments*, yes (so, an image signature that was an *attachment*
would be de-duped, but if it was an *embedded* graphic, I'm pretty
sure it would *not* be.
SIS doesn't by default care about if a MIM
On 7.5.2013, at 13.09, Charles Marcus wrote:
> On 2013-05-07 2:22 AM, Angel L. Mateo wrote:
>> El 07/05/13 02:19, Tim Groeneveld escribió:
>>> I was thinking of splitting all of the mime parts and recombining
>>> them later when the message was requested.
>>>
>>> All of the parts would be hashe
On 2013-05-07 2:22 AM, Angel L. Mateo wrote:
El 07/05/13 02:19, Tim Groeneveld escribió:
I was thinking of splitting all of the mime parts and recombining
them later when the message was requested.
All of the parts would be hashed and stored separate to the
message. This would mean things like
El 07/05/13 02:19, Tim Groeneveld escribió:
- Original Message -
On 2013-04-30 8:00 PM, Tim Groeneveld wrote:
After thinking about it a little bit more, I have determined
that just recombining the messages to send them to the client
will be too intensive, and will cause extra latenci
- Original Message -
> On 2013-04-30 8:00 PM, Tim Groeneveld wrote:
> > After thinking about it a little bit more, I have determined
> > that just recombining the messages to send them to the client
> > will be too intensive, and will cause extra latencies when
> > retrieving emails.
>
On 2013-05-06 12:06 PM, Charles Marcus wrote:
Understood, and figured as much - I'll be using lvm snapshots and
rsnapshot (which keeps backups using hardlinks against previous backup
snapshots, making it easy to keep backups going back years without
taking up much more additional space.
Spec
On 2013-05-06 11:23 AM, Timo Sirainen wrote:
On 6.5.2013, at 18.03, Charles Marcus wrote:
Hey Timo - so, how will rsync be affected as a backup app? Will it
maintain the deduped state in the backup target?
Ideally you'd rsync from a filesystem snapshot instead of from live filesystem,
othe
On 6.5.2013, at 18.03, Charles Marcus wrote:
> On 2013-05-06 10:54 AM, Timo Sirainen wrote:
>> On 30.4.2013, at 12.22, Jan-Frode Myklebust wrote:
>>> Wasn't there also some issue with cleanup of attachments ? Not being able
>>> to delete the last copy, or something. I did some testing of using
On 2013-05-06 10:54 AM, Timo Sirainen wrote:
On 30.4.2013, at 12.22, Jan-Frode Myklebust wrote:
Wasn't there also some issue with cleanup of attachments ? Not being able
to delete the last copy, or something. I did some testing of using SIS on a
backup dsync destination a year (or two) ago, an
On 30.4.2013, at 12.22, Jan-Frode Myklebust wrote:
> Wasn't there also some issue with cleanup of attachments ? Not being able
> to delete the last copy, or something. I did some testing of using SIS on a
> backup dsync destination a year (or two) ago, and got quite confused..
> Don't quite remem
On 2013-04-30 8:00 PM, Tim Groeneveld wrote:
After thinking about it a little bit more, I have determined
that just recombining the messages to send them to the client
will be too intensive, and will cause extra latencies when
retrieving emails.
Scratching my head trying to figure out what you
El 30/04/13 11:22, Jan-Frode Myklebust escribió:
Wasn't there also some issue with cleanup of attachments ? Not being able
to delete the last copy, or something. I did some testing of using SIS on a
In tests I have done (with dovecot 2.1.16) cleanup is done well. When
the last copy of the mes
- Original Message -
> This only dedupes attachments - which, in my opinion, is the only
> part of deduplicating email that is really worth it.
>
> [snip]
>
> I am expecting at least a 40-60% reduction in our storage when I
> implement this on my new server soon.
Thanks guys for all of
On 2013-04-30 2:05 AM, Angel L. Mateo wrote:
El 30/04/13 03:28, Tim Groeneveld escribió:
I am wondering about mail deduplication. I am looking into the
possibility
of seperating out all of the message bodies with multiple parts
inside mail
that is recived from `dovecot` and hashing them all.
Tim,
oops, I read your message again and carefully. I see my mistake. You
don't want delete whole duplicated messages but only their parts. So
sorry for my reply, because It is quite out of topic.
Radek
Dne 30.4.2013 03:28, Tim Groeneveld napsal:
Hi Guys,
I am wondering about mail dedupl
Dne 30.4.2013 03:28, Tim Groeneveld napsal:
Hi Guys,
I am wondering about mail deduplication. I am looking into the
possibility
of seperating out all of the message bodies with multiple parts inside
mail
that is recived from `dovecot` and hashing them all.
The idea is that by hashing all of
Wasn't there also some issue with cleanup of attachments ? Not being able
to delete the last copy, or something. I did some testing of using SIS on a
backup dsync destination a year (or two) ago, and got quite confused..
Don't quite remember the problems I had, but I did lose confidence in it
and d
On 04/30/2013 08:05 AM, Angel L. Mateo wrote:
El 30/04/13 03:28, Tim Groeneveld escribió:
Hi Guys,
I am wondering about mail deduplication. I am looking into the
possibility
of seperating out all of the message bodies with multiple parts inside
mail
that is recived from `dovecot` and hashing t
El 30/04/13 03:28, Tim Groeneveld escribió:
Hi Guys,
I am wondering about mail deduplication. I am looking into the possibility
of seperating out all of the message bodies with multiple parts inside mail
that is recived from `dovecot` and hashing them all.
The idea is that by hashing all of th
19 matches
Mail list logo
