This entire sub-thread is of no relation to dovecot, is of no interest
to the public, has no value of any kind, and is highly irritating.
It would be very kind if you all to do this in private.
From now on and into the future.
Please.
Am 03.04.2015 um 21:14 schrieb Benny Pedersen:
Andreas Kasenides skrev den 2015-04-03 15:53:
Please share. I know its easy to do, but share anyway!
require ["imap4flags"];
# rule:[h.rei...@thelounge.net]
if header :contains "From" "h.rei...@thelounge.net"
{
addflag "\\Seen";
}
this don
Andreas Kasenides skrev den 2015-04-03 15:53:
Please share. I know its easy to do, but share anyway!
require ["imap4flags"];
# rule:[h.rei...@thelounge.net]
if header :contains "From" "h.rei...@thelounge.net"
{
addflag "\\Seen";
}
this dont break threads
add this as the very first ru
On Fri, 03 Apr 2015 16:53:28 +0300, Andreas Kasenides stated:
>On 03/04/15 16:09, Jerry wrote:
>> On Fri, 03 Apr 2015 08:42:42 -0400, Charles Marcus stated:
>>
>>> People, PLEASE do not engage Reindl on the list, it always results in
>>> this kind of garbage that the adults on the list could do wi
Am 03.04.2015 um 15:53 schrieb Andreas Kasenides:
On 03/04/15 16:09, Jerry wrote:
On Fri, 03 Apr 2015 08:42:42 -0400, Charles Marcus stated:
People, PLEASE do not engage Reindl on the list, it always results in
this kind of garbage that the adults on the list could do without.
If you feel c
On 03/04/15 16:09, Jerry wrote:
On Fri, 03 Apr 2015 08:42:42 -0400, Charles Marcus stated:
People, PLEASE do not engage Reindl on the list, it always results in
this kind of garbage that the adults on the list could do without.
If you feel compelled to 'call him out', then by all means do so,
On Fri, 03 Apr 2015 08:42:42 -0400, Charles Marcus stated:
>People, PLEASE do not engage Reindl on the list, it always results in
>this kind of garbage that the adults on the list could do without.
>
>If you feel compelled to 'call him out', then by all means do so, but do
>it PRIVATELY.
It is no
People, PLEASE do not engage Reindl on the list, it always results in
this kind of garbage that the adults on the list could do without.
If you feel compelled to 'call him out', then by all means do so, but do
it PRIVATELY.
Thanks.
On 4/2/2015 11:28 PM, Nick Edwards wrote:
> you wouldnt know, y
Am 03.04.2015 um 05:28 schrieb Nick Edwards:
you wouldnt know, your not a developer, shit processor maybe, but not
a developer
you are just an idiot and nothing else
http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/spamassassin/users/189665
https://www.mail-archive.com/users@spamassassin.apache.org/msg9
you wouldnt know, your not a developer, shit processor maybe, but not
a developer
On 4/3/15, Reindl Harald wrote:
>
>
> Am 02.04.2015 um 18:19 schrieb Jogi Hofmüller:
>> Am 2015-04-02 um 17:49 schrieb Reindl Harald:
>>> Am 02.04.2015 um 14:30 schrieb Edwardo Garcia:
On 4/1/15, Reindl Hara
On 4/2/15, Edwardo Garcia wrote:
> On 4/1/15, Reindl Harald wrote:
>>
>>
>> Am 01.04.2015 um 14:33 schrieb Bernd Petrovitsch:
>>> On Mit, 2015-04-01 at 13:07 +0200, Reindl Harald wrote:
Am 01.04.2015 um 13:04 schrieb Bernd Petrovitsch:
> IMHO the larger the corporation is, the less are t
On 4/3/15, Jogi Hofmüller wrote:
>
>
> Am 2015-04-02 um 18:24 schrieb Reindl Harald:
>> Am 02.04.2015 um 18:19 schrieb Jogi Hofmüller:
>>> Am 2015-04-02 um 17:49 schrieb Reindl Harald:
Am 02.04.2015 um 14:30 schrieb Edwardo Garcia:
> On 4/1/15, Reindl Harald wrote:
>> Am 01.04.2015 u
Am 2015-04-02 um 18:24 schrieb Reindl Harald:
> Am 02.04.2015 um 18:19 schrieb Jogi Hofmüller:
>> Am 2015-04-02 um 17:49 schrieb Reindl Harald:
>>> Am 02.04.2015 um 14:30 schrieb Edwardo Garcia:
On 4/1/15, Reindl Harald wrote:
> Am 01.04.2015 um 14:33 schrieb Bernd Petrovitsch:
>> O
Am 02.04.2015 um 18:19 schrieb Jogi Hofmüller:
Am 2015-04-02 um 17:49 schrieb Reindl Harald:
Am 02.04.2015 um 14:30 schrieb Edwardo Garcia:
On 4/1/15, Reindl Harald wrote:
Am 01.04.2015 um 14:33 schrieb Bernd Petrovitsch:
On Mit, 2015-04-01 at 13:07 +0200, Reindl Harald wrote:
Am 01.04.20
Am 2015-04-02 um 17:49 schrieb Reindl Harald:
> Am 02.04.2015 um 14:30 schrieb Edwardo Garcia:
>> On 4/1/15, Reindl Harald wrote:
>>> Am 01.04.2015 um 14:33 schrieb Bernd Petrovitsch:
On Mit, 2015-04-01 at 13:07 +0200, Reindl Harald wrote:
> Am 01.04.2015 um 13:04 schrieb Bernd Petrovit
Am 02.04.2015 um 14:30 schrieb Edwardo Garcia:
On 4/1/15, Reindl Harald wrote:
Am 01.04.2015 um 14:33 schrieb Bernd Petrovitsch:
On Mit, 2015-04-01 at 13:07 +0200, Reindl Harald wrote:
Am 01.04.2015 um 13:04 schrieb Bernd Petrovitsch:
IMHO the larger the corporation is, the less are the
On 4/1/15, Reindl Harald wrote:
>
>
> Am 01.04.2015 um 14:33 schrieb Bernd Petrovitsch:
>> On Mit, 2015-04-01 at 13:07 +0200, Reindl Harald wrote:
>>> Am 01.04.2015 um 13:04 schrieb Bernd Petrovitsch:
IMHO the larger the corporation is, the less are the chances for
*long-term* benefits o
On Mit, 2015-04-01 at 14:42 +0200, Reindl Harald wrote:
> Am 01.04.2015 um 14:33 schrieb Bernd Petrovitsch:
> > On Mit, 2015-04-01 at 13:07 +0200, Reindl Harald wrote:
> >> Am 01.04.2015 um 13:04 schrieb Bernd Petrovitsch:
> >>> IMHO the larger the corporation is, the less are the chances for
> >>>
Am 01.04.2015 um 14:33 schrieb Bernd Petrovitsch:
On Mit, 2015-04-01 at 13:07 +0200, Reindl Harald wrote:
Am 01.04.2015 um 13:04 schrieb Bernd Petrovitsch:
IMHO the larger the corporation is, the less are the chances for
*long-term* benefits of the OSS/free software (mainly because: usually
c
On Mit, 2015-04-01 at 13:07 +0200, Reindl Harald wrote:
> Am 01.04.2015 um 13:04 schrieb Bernd Petrovitsch:
> > IMHO the larger the corporation is, the less are the chances for
> > *long-term* benefits of the OSS/free software (mainly because: usually
> > commercial success is driven and defined fr
Am 01.04.2015 um 13:04 schrieb Bernd Petrovitsch:
IMHO the larger the corporation is, the less are the chances for
*long-term* benefits of the OSS/free software (mainly because: usually
commercial success is driven and defined from marketing to sales[1] sown
to the techies which are forced into
On Don, 2015-03-26 at 17:01 +0200, Andreas Kasenides wrote:
> On 26/03/15 13:05, Bernd Petrovitsch wrote:
> > On Mon, 2015-03-23 at 16:08 +0200, Andreas Kasenides wrote:
> >> I am usually emotionally (at least) against of open-source projects
> >> loosing their independence to large corporations. P
On 26/03/15 13:05, Bernd Petrovitsch wrote:
On Mon, 2015-03-23 at 16:08 +0200, Andreas Kasenides wrote:
I am usually emotionally (at least) against of open-source projects
loosing their independence to large corporations. Possibly due to bad
OX-AG is a "large corporation"?
Did I miss something?
On Mon, 2015-03-23 at 16:08 +0200, Andreas Kasenides wrote:
> I am usually emotionally (at least) against of open-source projects
> loosing their independence to large corporations. Possibly due to bad
OX-AG is a "large corporation"?
Did I miss something?
Kind regards,
Bernd
--
"I disl
Agreed. I think this is a positive move for Dovecot and Timo, Mikko, et
al. I think only good will come of this for open source communications.
On 3/25/15 2:46 PM, Andreas Kasenides wrote:
I hate to have started this, especially the "sister" thread that has
dissented into a flame war of what
I hate to have started this, especially the "sister" thread that has
dissented into a flame war of what is OSS.
Let me say that I believe there is nothing wrong trying to make money on
ones efforts. Actually it is a must. How can anyone continue to put
efforts into a project when there is no r
On 3/19/2015 3:26 AM, Timo Sirainen wrote:
Hi all,
Today I can finally announce that Dovecot Oy company has merged with
Open-Xchange AG. This helps us to get more Dovecot developers, support people
and so on. Most importantly, eventually it should allow me to get back to doing
what I like the
On 03/25/15 15:34, Benny Pedersen wrote:
Brad Smith skrev den 2015-03-25 20:20:
only paid here by compileing time, still have dovecot v1 working, so
open source it not complete free, as long it compiles fine i am happy
Not making any sense.
punktum ?
if i really need to install precompiled
Am 25.03.2015 um 20:34 schrieb Benny Pedersen:
Brad Smith skrev den 2015-03-25 20:20:
only paid here by compileing time, still have dovecot v1 working, so
open source it not complete free, as long it compiles fine i am happy
Not making any sense.
punktum ?
"only paid here by compileing
Brad Smith skrev den 2015-03-25 20:20:
only paid here by compileing time, still have dovecot v1 working, so
open source it not complete free, as long it compiles fine i am happy
Not making any sense.
punktum ?
if i really need to install precompiled problems i could aswell install
windows
On 03/25/15 13:03, Benny Pedersen wrote:
Brad Smith skrev den 2015-03-25 16:58:
On 03/25/15 08:46, Peter Chiochetti wrote:
Am 25.03.2015 um 13:23 schrieb Nick Edwards:
So there *is* a chance it will be commercialised
Hasn't it been commercial for a long time?
When was the last time you paid
Am 25.03.2015 um 18:28 schrieb Benny Pedersen:
Reindl Harald skrev den 2015-03-25 18:08:
with your argumentation making a shit would also not be completly free
because you need to pinch ass bakes.
and you write this on public walls?
DON'T QUOTE OUT OF CONTEXT BOY, YOU HAVE MISSED YOUR
Reindl Harald skrev den 2015-03-25 18:08:
with your argumentation making a shit would also not be completly free
because you need to pinch ass bakes.
and you write this on public walls ?
Am 25.03.2015 um 18:03 schrieb Benny Pedersen:
Brad Smith skrev den 2015-03-25 16:58:
On 03/25/15 08:46, Peter Chiochetti wrote:
Am 25.03.2015 um 13:23 schrieb Nick Edwards:
So there *is* a chance it will be commercialised
Hasn't it been commercial for a long time?
When was the last time yo
Am 25.03.2015 um 16:58 schrieb Brad Smith:
On 03/25/15 08:46, Peter Chiochetti wrote:
Am 25.03.2015 um 13:23 schrieb Nick Edwards:
So there *is* a chance it will be commercialised
Hasn't it been commercial for a long time?
When was the last time you paid for Dovecot? The base product is
o
Brad Smith skrev den 2015-03-25 16:58:
On 03/25/15 08:46, Peter Chiochetti wrote:
Am 25.03.2015 um 13:23 schrieb Nick Edwards:
So there *is* a chance it will be commercialised
Hasn't it been commercial for a long time?
When was the last time you paid for Dovecot? The base product is
open sour
On 03/25/15 08:46, Peter Chiochetti wrote:
Am 25.03.2015 um 13:23 schrieb Nick Edwards:
So there *is* a chance it will be commercialised
Hasn't it been commercial for a long time?
When was the last time you paid for Dovecot? The base product is
open source and free for anyone to use.
--
T
Am 25.03.2015 um 13:23 schrieb Nick Edwards:
So there *is* a chance it will be commercialised
Hasn't it been commercial for a long time?
--
Peter
On 3/25/15, Timo Sirainen wrote:
> On 23 Mar 2015, at 19:41, Patrick Coffin wrote:
>>
>>
>> To Timo and the Dovecot guys - congratulations! I'm sure this merger with
>> OpenXchange is going to provide you with a lot of resources and
>> opportunities.
>>
>> As a longtime user of dovecot, I do hav
On Tue, Mar 24, 2015, at 04:34 AM, Philipp wrote:
> Show me OSS for cyrus, courier, .. on that level of "enterprisey".
Hey, FastMail has been contributing pretty advanced stuff to Cyrus for years,
and it's all open.
Back on topic - contrats Timo. Hope the merger works well for you. It's good
On 23 Mar 2015, at 19:41, Patrick Coffin wrote:
>
>
> To Timo and the Dovecot guys - congratulations! I'm sure this merger with
> OpenXchange is going to provide you with a lot of resources and opportunities.
>
> As a longtime user of dovecot, I do have a few concerns. I wonder if you can
>
On 3/24/15, Adrian Zaugg wrote:
> I think everyone shares your concerns. But there are no rules that the
> outcome of this merger must get something bad, so let's see what
> happens. I hope that it's true what Timo said and that dovecot can
> evolve and get even better as it is today. Good luck gu
To Timo and the Dovecot guys - congratulations! I'm sure this merger with
OpenXchange is going to provide you with a lot of resources and opportunities.
As a longtime user of dovecot, I do have a few concerns. I wonder if you can
answer some questions for me.
You say that OpenXchange really
Am 23.03.2015 15:08 schrieb Andreas Kasenides:
I am usually emotionally (at least) against of open-source projects
loosing their independence to large corporations. Possibly due to bad
experiences in the past when OSS were driven from Open to Obscure in
the process of trying to make money out of
I think everyone shares your concerns. But there are no rules that the
outcome of this merger must get something bad, so let's see what
happens. I hope that it's true what Timo said and that dovecot can
evolve and get even better as it is today. Good luck guys!
Regards, Adrian.
On 23.03.15 15:08,
I find it extremely interesting that no one has commented on the merger
of Dovecot Oy and Open-Xchange AG as announced by Timo on the 19th. Is
this something that was known a long time ago and I missed? OK checked
the on-line archive of the mailing list, no comments there - its not my
email set
Hi all,
Today I can finally announce that Dovecot Oy company has merged with
Open-Xchange AG. This helps us to get more Dovecot developers, support people
and so on. Most importantly, eventually it should allow me to get back to doing
what I like the most: Designing new and interesting stuff fo
47 matches
Mail list logo
