It only works without :addresses for me
And even when getting this on confirmation the logs:
Feb 24 09:03:52 localhost dovecot: lmtp(7895, a...@dum.li):
yeIlOfjN61TXHgAA0J78UA: sieve:
msgid=<451bb443b8ad815c205a2cce07ac31aec0727c47@vm-atmail7>: sent
vacation response to
It wasn't working.
This
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Thu, 19 Jun 2014, Florin Portase wrote:
It seems I found the error:
it was this variable "submission_host"
I had to setup "submission_host=localhost"
fine
If I'll change submission_host=medianetork.ro, vacation response did
not work.
Also
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 06/19/2014 12:04 AM, Steffen wrote:
> Florin Portase wrote:
>> Hello,
>
>> Here is my setup:
>
>> dovecot- 2.2.11 pigeonhole - 0.4.2 qmail
>
>> I was trying to create a vacation message, but after the sive
>> script has been created and I w
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Florin Portase wrote:
> Hello,
>
> Here is my setup:
>
> dovecot- 2.2.11 pigeonhole - 0.4.2 qmail
>
> I was trying to create a vacation message, but after the sive
> script has been created and I was checking the logs I saw some
> strange error
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hello,
Here is my setup:
dovecot- 2.2.11
pigeonhole - 0.4.2
qmail
I was trying to create a vacation message, but after the sive script
has been created and I was checking the logs I saw some strange errors:
DOVECOT LOG
Jun 18 16:52:24 lda(po
On 3/19/2014 6:43 AM, azurIt wrote:
>> Od: Stephan Bosch
>> Komu: azurIt ,
>> Dátum: 19.03.2014 01:45
>> Predmet: Re: [Dovecot] Sieve vacation attach original message
>>
>> On 3/14/2014 7:48 AM, azurIt wrote:
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> is it, s
Joseph Tam:
"azurIt" writes:
is it, somehow, possible to attach the original message to the vacation
autoreply?
Hmm. Allowing a sender control over both the recipient (via spoofing),
and the content seems like perfect recipe to turn your mail server into
a spam relay cannon.
I would lik
> Od: Stephan Bosch
> Komu: azurIt ,
> Dátum: 19.03.2014 01:45
> Predmet: Re: [Dovecot] Sieve vacation attach original message
>
>On 3/14/2014 7:48 AM, azurIt wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> is it, somehow, possible to attach the original message to the vacation
>&
> Od: Stephan Bosch
> Komu: azurIt ,
> Dátum: 19.03.2014 01:45
> Predmet: Re: [Dovecot] Sieve vacation attach original message
>
>On 3/14/2014 7:48 AM, azurIt wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> is it, somehow, possible to attach the original message to the vacation
>&
On 3/14/2014 7:48 AM, azurIt wrote:
> Hi,
>
> is it, somehow, possible to attach the original message to the vacation
> autoreply? Thank you.
Not currently. The exttracttext extension could be used for that
(http://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc5703), but it is not supported at the
moment. Also, this wo
"azurIt" writes:
is it, somehow, possible to attach the original message to the vacation
autoreply?
Hmm. Allowing a sender control over both the recipient (via spoofing),
and the content seems like perfect recipe to turn your mail server into
a spam relay cannon. If you do do this, you shou
Hi,
is it, somehow, possible to attach the original message to the vacation
autoreply? Thank you.
azur
On 10 Sep 2013, at 05:05 , Charles Marcus wrote:
> On 2013-09-09 8:29 AM, Gene Heskett wrote:
>> On Monday 09 September 2013 08:28:26 Charles Marcus did opine:
>>> What I'd like is to be able to set a company (domain-wide) auto-response
>>> for when our company is closed for holidays... more sp
On 2013-09-10 9:56 AM, Steffen Kaiser wrote:
On Tue, 10 Sep 2013, Charles Marcus wrote:
On 2013-09-09 8:29 AM, Gene Heskett wrote:
On Monday 09 September 2013 08:28:26 Charles Marcus did opine:
What I'd like is to be able to set a company (domain-wide)
auto-response
for when our company is c
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Tue, 10 Sep 2013, Charles Marcus wrote:
On 2013-09-09 8:29 AM, Gene Heskett wrote:
On Monday 09 September 2013 08:28:26 Charles Marcus did opine:
What I'd like is to be able to set a company (domain-wide) auto-response
for when our company is
On Tuesday 10 September 2013 08:34:24 Charles Marcus did opine:
> On 2013-09-09 8:29 AM, Gene Heskett wrote:
> > On Monday 09 September 2013 08:28:26 Charles Marcus did opine:
> >> What I'd like is to be able to set a company (domain-wide)
> >> auto-response for when our company is closed for hol
On 2013-09-09 8:29 AM, Gene Heskett wrote:
On Monday 09 September 2013 08:28:26 Charles Marcus did opine:
What I'd like is to be able to set a company (domain-wide) auto-response
for when our company is closed for holidays... more specifically, extra
holidays (often the boss will close an extra
Am 09.09.2013 10:26 schrieb Stephan Bosch:
> Well, Sieve is certainly not meant for something like that. To echo
> the complete message back verbatim you could do the following:
...
> I haven't tested the above only with sieve-test and not in the wild.
Stephan,
thanks for your response. I tried
Am 09.09.2013 14:29, schrieb Gene Heskett:
> On Monday 09 September 2013 08:28:26 Charles Marcus did opine:
>
>> Hello,
>>
>> I've been using vacation.pl from postfixadmin for many years, and since
>> the most recent modification that allows me to specify my own strings to
>> test for for when NOT
On Monday 09 September 2013 08:28:26 Charles Marcus did opine:
> Hello,
>
> I've been using vacation.pl from postfixadmin for many years, and since
> the most recent modification that allows me to specify my own strings to
> test for for when NOT to send a message, I'm extremely happy with it (no
Hello,
I've been using vacation.pl from postfixadmin for many years, and since
the most recent modification that allows me to specify my own strings to
test for for when NOT to send a message, I'm extremely happy with it (no
more auto-responses to linked-in/facebook crap, etc)...
But, there
Op 6-9-2013 22:40, Andreas Schulze schreef:
Hello Stephan,
I love to use the vacation extension to build an echo service.
I have not to worry about whether to answer or not if the sender is a list,
postmaster, mailer-daemon or other crasy thing.
But i like to echo the *complete headers* back.
I
Hello Stephan,
I love to use the vacation extension to build an echo service.
I have not to worry about whether to answer or not if the sender is a list,
postmaster, mailer-daemon or other crasy thing.
But i like to echo the *complete headers* back.
I did not found a solution with sieve yet. Is i
On 8/21/2013 7:51 PM, mego...@inboxalias.com wrote:
[mail.err] dovecot: lda(exampleuser): Error: sieve: original envelope recipient
address 'exampleuser@dovecot_localhost' is unparsable
This is the core of your problem. The '_' is not an allowed character
according to the SMTP `Domain' synta
Hello Dovecot community,
I have an annoying problem with successfully activating Sieve vacation replies
- on which I have been working hard the last days without success :(
I'm using Dovecot 2.2 + Sendmail + Sieve connected with Horde web-mailer IMP H3
which is generally working fine.
BUT: When
On Tue, Jul 16, 2013 at 6:53 PM, Axel Luttgens wrote:
Hello Simon,
>
> You might go to:
>
> http://www.rfc-editor.org/search/rfc_search.php
>
> and perform there a search on "sieve".
>
> For the vacation extension, there's document RFC 5230.
> The overall working of sieve is described in R
Le 16 juil. 2013 à 02:15, Simon a écrit :
> Hi There.
>
> [...]
>
> is there a definitive list of things like "days", "subject" etc?
Hello Simon,
You might go to:
http://www.rfc-editor.org/search/rfc_search.php
and perform there a search on "sieve".
For the vacation extension, there
Hi There.
We are using dovecot v2.2.4 with pigeonhole 0.4.1 (both compiled from source)
Centos 6.4.
Sorry for the dumb question in advance if I'm just missing an obvious link
somewhere (also if I've got the terminology all wrong!), but could someone
point me to the reference list for "vacation
On 4/3/2013 11:49 AM, Ivan Bogdanovic wrote:
Hi to all,
I have an issue with Dovecot Sieve on sending vacation message... Actually
Sieve is working and I can use all the filters but just vacation is causing
a problem and only in specific case...
I have Dovecot + Postfix + LDA running on Ubuntu
Hi to all,
I have an issue with Dovecot Sieve on sending vacation message... Actually
Sieve is working and I can use all the filters but just vacation is causing
a problem and only in specific case...
I have Dovecot + Postfix + LDA running on Ubuntu 11 without MySql database
for users but I'm usi
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Tue, 26 Mar 2013, Dave Gattis wrote:
Our emails are redirected from the home office causing all vacation responses
to fail with, "discarding vacation response for implicitly delivered message;
no known (envelope) recipient address found in messa
At 12PM -0700 on 26/03/13 you (rpsuprdave) wrote:
> Here's the headers for my emails:
>
> Return-Path:
> X-Original-To: dave.gat...@domain-b.com
> Delivered-To: dave.gat...@domain-b.com
[...]
> From: Dave Gattis
> To: SUMACO Gattis Dave
[...]
>
> From: Dave Gattis is the original sender.
> To
Here's the headers for my emails:
Return-Path:
X-Original-To: dave.gat...@domain-b.com
Delivered-To: dave.gat...@domain-b.com
Received: from spamcop.main.ch (spamcop.main.ch [83.144.241.40])
by domain-b.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0E4E81C101DE
for ; Tue, 26 Mar 2013 14:35:13 -0400
I think you might want to look at the :addresses paramerer
http://wiki2.dovecot.org/Pigeonhole/Sieve/Examples#Vacation_auto-reply
http://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc5230#page-7
On 03/26/2013 01:10 PM, Dave Gattis wrote:
I posted this elsewhere, but under an old post. I apologize for the
repeated
I posted this elsewhere, but under an old post. I apologize for the
repeated question.
Hello Dovecot Users,
Dovecot 2.1.7
Our emails are redirected from the home office causing all vacation
responses to fail with, "discarding vacation response for implicitly
delivered message; no known (env
Am 27.09.2012 19:12, schrieb Bob Miller:
> Robert,
>
>
>> The settings are listed in the example conf.d/15-lda.conf file. The
>> important settings are:
>>
>> sendmail_path is used to send mails. Note that the default is
>> /usr/sbin/sendmail, which doesn't necessarily work the same as
>> /us
Robert,
> The settings are listed in the example conf.d/15-lda.conf file. The
> important settings are:
>
> sendmail_path is used to send mails. Note that the default is
> /usr/sbin/sendmail, which doesn't necessarily work the same as
> /usr/lib/sendmail.
>
> Alternatively you can u
Am 27.09.2012 18:37, schrieb Bob Miller:
> the logs that dovecot is sending the vacation response, but the
> recipient never receives it.
show the logs
study
http://wiki2.dovecot.org/LDA
Common configuration
The settings are listed in the example conf.d/15-lda.conf file. The
important setti
Hello,
I set up pigeonhole on a server and am using roundcube's sieverules to
create a set of rules. When using the vacation feature, I can see in
the logs that dovecot is sending the vacation response, but the
recipient never receives it.
What method does dovecot use to send the response? D
Op 8/8/2012 4:12 PM, asier.ci...@externo.uam.es schreef:
The problem is solved
In the library "src/lib-sieve/plugins/vacation/cmd-vacation.c", in the
package "dovecot-sieve" or "dovecot-pigeonhole" modify:
smtp_handle = sieve_smtp_open(senv, reply_to, NULL, &f);
smtp_handle = sie
The problem is solved
In the library "src/lib-sieve/plugins/vacation/cmd-vacation.c", in the
package "dovecot-sieve" or "dovecot-pigeonhole" modify:
smtp_handle = sieve_smtp_open(senv, reply_to, NULL, &f);
smtp_handle = sieve_smtp_open(senv, reply_to, reply_from, &f);
You can c
s and was prevented from being forwarded on to the list
membership. You are receiving the only remaining copy of the
discarded message.
FROM:Asier Cidon Periañez
DATE:27. heinäkuuta 2012 16.01.59 UTC+3.00
TO:dovecot@dovecot.org
SUBJECT:RE: [DOVECOT] SIEVE VACATION MESSAGES TROUBLE
Hi,
I have a pr
lto:dovecot-boun...@dovecot.org] En nombre
de asier.ci...@externo.uam.es
Enviado el: lunes, 30 de julio de 2012 9:06
Para: dovecot@dovecot.org
Asunto: [Dovecot] sieve vacation messages trouble
FROM:mailman-boun...@dovecot.org
DATE:27. heinäkuuta 2012 16.58.35 UTC+3.00 TO:dovecot-ow...@
rship. You are receiving the only remaining copy of the
discarded message.
FROM:Asier Cidon Periañez
DATE:27. heinäkuuta 2012 16.01.59 UTC+3.00
TO:dovecot@dovecot.org
SUBJECT:RE: [DOVECOT] SIEVE VACATION MESSAGES TROUBLE
Hi,
I have a problem when I define a Filter SIEVE vacation with Horde,
Am 25.04.2012 17:48, schrieb Robert Schetterer:
> Am 25.04.2012 16:30, schrieb Timo Sirainen:
>> On 25.4.2012, at 17.16, Robert Schetterer wrote:
>>
>>> Am 25.04.2012 16:11, schrieb Timo Sirainen:
p *set
>>>
>>> hope doing it right
>>>
>>> (gdb) p *set
>>> $1 = {postmaster_address = 0xaa33d0 "
Am 25.04.2012 16:30, schrieb Timo Sirainen:
> On 25.4.2012, at 17.16, Robert Schetterer wrote:
>
>> Am 25.04.2012 16:11, schrieb Timo Sirainen:
>>> p *set
>>
>> hope doing it right
>>
>> (gdb) p *set
>> $1 = {postmaster_address = 0xaa33d0 "P6\252", hostname = 0x0,
>> submission_host = 0x0, sendmai
Am 25.04.2012 16:54, schrieb Chris:
> 2012/4/25 Robert Schetterer :
>> Am 25.04.2012 16:47, schrieb Chris:
>>> 2012/4/25 Robert Schetterer :
> That's totally broken.. You sure you recompiled Pigeonhole correctly
> against the same Dovecot version?
>
its from latest
http:
2012/4/25 Robert Schetterer :
> Am 25.04.2012 16:47, schrieb Chris:
>> 2012/4/25 Robert Schetterer :
That's totally broken.. You sure you recompiled Pigeonhole correctly
against the same Dovecot version?
>>>
>>> its from latest
>>> http://xi.rename-it.nl/debian/pool/testing-auto/dov
Am 25.04.2012 16:47, schrieb Chris:
> 2012/4/25 Robert Schetterer :
>>> That's totally broken.. You sure you recompiled Pigeonhole correctly
>>> against the same Dovecot version?
>>>
>>
>> its from latest
>> http://xi.rename-it.nl/debian/pool/testing-auto/dovecot-2.1/
>> recompiled the debain way
2012/4/25 Robert Schetterer :
>> That's totally broken.. You sure you recompiled Pigeonhole correctly against
>> the same Dovecot version?
>>
>
> its from latest
> http://xi.rename-it.nl/debian/pool/testing-auto/dovecot-2.1/
> recompiled the debain way , never had bugged
You are using packages co
Am 25.04.2012 16:30, schrieb Timo Sirainen:
> On 25.4.2012, at 17.16, Robert Schetterer wrote:
>
>> Am 25.04.2012 16:11, schrieb Timo Sirainen:
>>> p *set
>>
>> hope doing it right
>>
>> (gdb) p *set
>> $1 = {postmaster_address = 0xaa33d0 "P6\252", hostname = 0x0,
>> submission_host = 0x0, sendmai
On 25.4.2012, at 17.16, Robert Schetterer wrote:
> Am 25.04.2012 16:11, schrieb Timo Sirainen:
>> p *set
>
> hope doing it right
>
> (gdb) p *set
> $1 = {postmaster_address = 0xaa33d0 "P6\252", hostname = 0x0,
> submission_host = 0x0, sendmail_path = 0x7fbaf6e41f50
> "H\211\\$\360H\211l$\370H\20
Am 25.04.2012 16:11, schrieb Timo Sirainen:
> p *set
hope doing it right
(gdb) p *set
$1 = {postmaster_address = 0xaa33d0 "P6\252", hostname = 0x0,
submission_host = 0x0, sendmail_path = 0x7fbaf6e41f50
"H\211\\$\360H\211l$\370H\203\354\030\200=\207A%",
rejection_subject = 0x7fbaf6e42b90
"H\211\
On 25.4.2012, at 17.03, Robert Schetterer wrote:
> Program received signal SIGSEGV, Segmentation fault.
> smtp_client_open (set=0x252b0b0, destination=0x254e410
> "ncitest...@onmotive.de", return_path=0x24e4148
> "r...@mail02.mailspooler.com", file_r=0x7fff2040a748) at smtp-client.c:146
> 146
Am 25.04.2012 15:51, schrieb Stephan Bosch:
> Op 4/25/2012 3:29 PM, Robert Schetterer schreef:
>> Am 25.04.2012 15:06, schrieb Robert Schetterer:
>>> Hi , since upgrade
>>> sieve vacation, redirect stopped working getting
>>>
>>> postfix error
>>> while sending end of data -- message may be sent mo
Am 25.04.2012 15:46, schrieb Timo Sirainen:
> bt full
Program received signal SIGSEGV, Segmentation fault.
smtp_client_open (set=0x252b0b0, destination=0x254e410
"ncitest...@onmotive.de", return_path=0x24e4148
"r...@mail02.mailspooler.com", file_r=0x7fff2040a748) at smtp-client.c:146
146 smtp
Op 4/25/2012 3:29 PM, Robert Schetterer schreef:
Am 25.04.2012 15:06, schrieb Robert Schetterer:
Hi , since upgrade
sieve vacation, redirect stopped working getting
postfix error
while sending end of data -- message may be sent more than once
i played a lot about sieve , lda submission host co
On 25.4.2012, at 16.29, Robert Schetterer wrote:
> master: service(lmtp): child 31952 killed with signal 11 (core not dumped)
Can you get a gdb backtrace? Might be a bit difficult to get a core dump from
lmtp, but you should be able to attach gdb into it:
service lmtp {
process_min_avail = 1
Am 25.04.2012 15:06, schrieb Robert Schetterer:
> Hi , since upgrade
> sieve vacation, redirect stopped working getting
>
> postfix error
> while sending end of data -- message may be sent more than once
>
> i played a lot about sieve , lda submission host conf entries etc but
> all failed , i am
Hi , since upgrade
sieve vacation, redirect stopped working getting
postfix error
while sending end of data -- message may be sent more than once
i played a lot about sieve , lda submission host conf entries etc but
all failed , i am not seeing any heavy bug in the logs
--
Best Regards
MfG Rob
Am Dienstag, den 02.08.2011, 20:14 +0200 schrieb Stéphane Wartel:
> Hi Stephan,
>
> Yep, after some tests you 're right, it's not possible.
> So, I use :addresses in sieve script and will try -a or -r arguments in
> LDA command from postfix with the next release.
did you get it working with -a o
Am 21.09.2011 08:52, schrieb René Neumann:
> Am 21.09.2011 01:09, schrieb Stephan Bosch:
>>
>> http://hg.rename-it.nl/dovecot-2.0-pigeonhole/rev/fe6df3425850
>>
>> This will be included in the next release.
>>
>> Regards,
>>
>> Stephan
>>
>
> Thanks a lot. I'll try it out.
>
> - René
>
Ok ... s
Am 21.09.2011 01:09, schrieb Stephan Bosch:
> Op 20-9-2011 23:48, René Neumann schreef:
>> Am 20.09.2011 22:38, schrieb René Neumann:
>>> Hi *,
>>>
>>> I am adding a generic way for vacation-replies in my sieve setup. There
>>> I set the handle and the reason using variables (see end of mail). My
>
Op 20-9-2011 23:48, René Neumann schreef:
Am 20.09.2011 22:38, schrieb René Neumann:
Hi *,
I am adding a generic way for vacation-replies in my sieve setup. There
I set the handle and the reason using variables (see end of mail). My
simple question now is: Though variable expansion is not done
Am 20.09.2011 22:38, schrieb René Neumann:
> Hi *,
>
> I am adding a generic way for vacation-replies in my sieve setup. There
> I set the handle and the reason using variables (see end of mail). My
> simple question now is: Though variable expansion is not done for
> subject and reason, is it don
Hi *,
I am adding a generic way for vacation-replies in my sieve setup. There
I set the handle and the reason using variables (see end of mail). My
simple question now is: Though variable expansion is not done for
subject and reason, is it done for the handle? Because else there seems
no way in co
On 9/1/2011 2:34 PM, Lampa wrote:
> Hello,
>
> i'm using 1.2.15 version on debian.
>
> I'm getting "discarding vacation response for message implicitly
> delivered to"
>
> I have domain domain.com which has alias do-main.com.
>
> When sending email to main domain (domain.com) seems to be ok, but f
Hello,
i'm using 1.2.15 version on debian.
I'm getting "discarding vacation response for message implicitly
delivered to "
I have domain domain.com which has alias do-main.com.
When sending email to main domain (domain.com) seems to be ok, but for
aliased domain getting discard ;(
I tried "sca
Hi Stephan,
Yep, after some tests you 're right, it's not possible.
So, I use :addresses in sieve script and will try -a or -r arguments in
LDA command from postfix with the next release.
Bye,
Stephane
Le 02/08/2011 18:02, Stephan Bosch a écrit :
On 8/2/2011 4:08 PM, Stephan Bosch wrote:
On
On 8/2/2011 4:08 PM, Stephan Bosch wrote:
On 8/2/2011 2:43 PM, swar...@zero-spam.fr wrote:
Hi Stephan,
Thanks for your reply.
After some more tests, it appears that mail aliases is the reason of
this error. The vacation mode has been enabled on a mailbox that
contains many aliases and one of
On 8/2/2011 2:43 PM, swar...@zero-spam.fr wrote:
Hi Stephan,
Thanks for your reply.
After some more tests, it appears that mail aliases is the reason of
this error. The vacation mode has been enabled on a mailbox that
contains many aliases and one of them has been used as the recipient.
We us
Hi Stephan,
Thanks for your reply.
After some more tests, it appears that mail aliases is the reason of
this error. The vacation mode has been enabled on a mailbox that
contains many aliases and one of them has been used as the recipient.
We used dovecot 2.0.12-0~auto+5 from debian old-stable
On 8/2/2011 12:21 PM, Stéphane Wartel wrote:
Hi,
I get the same error !
Any idea to fix it ?
This situation occurs when the message's To,CC,etc. headers do not
contain the recipient address (from the envelope). This can be caused by
a mailing list (to which it must not respond), but also by
Hi,
I get the same error !
Any idea to fix it ?
Regards,
Stephane
Le 17/05/2011 18:03, Wojciech Giel a écrit :
Hi,
I'm configuring postfix with dovecot and roundcube. I'm using flat
files as passwdb userdb.
Everything works fine except sieve vacation reply. when i send mail
from ex. user d
Per Jessen wrote:
> Environment: dovecot 2.0.9, postfix 2.6, Pigeonhole 0.2.2
>
> I'm in the process of setting up vacation auto-reply for the first
> time, (it's that time of the year) and it looks like
> .dovecot.lda-dupes is being updated, but not read (or just ignored).
>
> my vacation scrip
Environment: dovecot 2.0.9, postfix 2.6, Pigeonhole 0.2.2
I'm in the process of setting up vacation auto-reply for the first time,
(it's that time of the year) and it looks like .dovecot.lda-dupes is
being updated, but not read (or just ignored).
my vacation script:
require ["vacation","variab
Hi,
I'm configuring postfix with dovecot and roundcube. I'm using flat files
as passwdb userdb.
Everything works fine except sieve vacation reply. when i send mail from
ex. user dennis to tytus I get "discarding vacation response for message
implicitly delivered to".
What Am i doing wrong?
Steffen Kaiser wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Mon, 19 Apr 2010, Stephan Bosch wrote:
Now I'm wondering.. should this be configurable/optional?
Ideally I would suggest a vendor feature, which one has to require
before use.
But this would make problems using the featu
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Mon, 19 Apr 2010, Stephan Bosch wrote:
Now I'm wondering.. should this be configurable/optional?
Ideally I would suggest a vendor feature, which one has to require
before use.
But this would make problems using the feature from Webmail
fronte
Timo Sirainen wrote:
On Fri, 2010-04-09 at 03:05 +0200, David Berard wrote:
I propose to use the addresses found in addresses (if one match)
as From address in vacation reply.
I've made a little patch who do that [1].
Ok, I've implemented the desired functionality:
http://hg.rename
On Fri, 2010-04-09 at 03:05 +0200, David Berard wrote:
> I propose to use the addresses found in addresses (if one match)
> as From address in vacation reply.
>
> I've made a little patch who do that [1].
Stephan will probably do something about this, but until then: Your
patch uses memory in a
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi Dovecot list,
In my setup I have several email addresses that uses
same account.
When I set a vacation the answer is not necessarily send from
the destination address.
I propose to use the addresses found in addresses (if one match)
as From addre
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Thu, 18 Mar 2010, Lampa wrote:
Is there any hope that will be any "hack" in future to allow reply for
all addresses?
I've _my_ vision of how :addresses should be extended on my TODO list, but
active Dovecot development is currently a bit down
Hello,
>> be used some wildcard * or something similar ?
>
> No, currently.
>
> However, the Sieve implementation is open-source and it seems to be easy to
> spot the correct place to patch.
>
> Funnily, there are lots of different personal opinions about to which kind
> of messages an autorespond
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Mon, 22 Feb 2010, Lampa wrote:
So if i understand this fully, you must define ALL potentional aliases
which user is member of ?
Yes.
When create new alias ali...@domain.tld and it is alias for
u...@domain.tld i must edit vacation script and a
on response for message implicitly delivered to "
> log:
>
> ehlo there.com
> mail from:
> rcpt to:
> data
> Subject: message
>
> Hi there
> .
>
>
> Cheers,
>
> -Martin Foster
>
>
> Le 12-Feb-10 21:00, dovecot-requ...@dovecot.org a écri
On Tue, 2010-02-16 at 13:34 +0100, Lazy wrote:
> > lda is executed as
> > exec /var/qmail/bin/preline -f /usr/local/dovecot/libexec/dovecot/deliver -s
..
> + /* if DTLINE (qmail Delivered-To: header) is not null use it
> as a destination address */
> + if (destaddr == NULL) {
> +
2010/2/15 Lazy :
> Helloo,
>
> We are using dovectot lda with qmail-ldap,
>
> dovecot 1.2.10, sieve 0.1.15
>
> lda is executed as
> exec /var/qmail/bin/preline -f /usr/local/dovecot/libexec/dovecot/deliver -s
>
> preline adds Delivered-To: header,
>
> everything works fine except vacation
>
> Feb
Helloo,
We are using dovectot lda with qmail-ldap,
dovecot 1.2.10, sieve 0.1.15
lda is executed as
exec /var/qmail/bin/preline -f /usr/local/dovecot/libexec/dovecot/deliver -s
preline adds Delivered-To: header,
everything works fine except vacation
Feb 9 16:07:16 thebe dovecot: deliver(lazy)
ere
.
This transaction will not get a response, and will trigger the
"discarding vacation response for message implicitly delivered to
" log:
ehlo there.com
mail from:
rcpt to:
data
Subject: message
Hi there
.
Cheers,
-Martin Foster
Le 12-Feb-10 21:00, dovecot-requ...@dovecot.org a é
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Fri, 12 Feb 2010, Lampa wrote:
BAD 4. send message from anotheru...@anotherdomain.tld to
u...@domain.tld => no response (2010-02-11T19:48:04)
Why is discarding vacation response for message implicitly delivered
to ?
See: http://tools.ietf.or
Hello,
scenario:
OK 1. created vacation script (see below)
OK 2. send message from u...@anotherdomain.tld to u...@domain.tld =>
got auto vacation response (2010-02-11T19:42:13)
OK 3. send message from u...@anotherdomain.tld to u...@domain.tld =>
no response (is ok because ":days 1" settings) (201
Am Donnerstag, den 07.01.2010, 14:49 +0100 schrieb Steffen Kaiser:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> On Thu, 7 Jan 2010, Lukas Kolbe wrote:
>
> > I tried to use the sieve vacation plugin, but we're facing a little
> > problem: our user's addresses are @, and if they want to
>
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Thu, 7 Jan 2010, Lukas Kolbe wrote:
I tried to use the sieve vacation plugin, but we're facing a little
problem: our user's addresses are @, and if they want to
use imap and sieve, they can have a forward to @imap.. The
return-path, and hence the
Hi!
I tried to use the sieve vacation plugin, but we're facing a little
problem: our user's addresses are @, and if they want to
use imap and sieve, they can have a forward to @imap.. The
return-path, and hence the address the vacation message is sent to, is
then @ and not the original sender of t
On Wed, 2009-10-28 at 12:32 +0100, Stephan Bosch wrote:
> 1: Test 'UTF-8 Subject' FAILED: subject header is not encoded/decoded
> properly:
> expected: Auto: Я могу есть стекло, оно мне не вредит.
> decoded: Auto: Я мог�? е�?�?�? �?�?екло, оно мне не в�?еди�?.
The bug was actually that str_sani
Timo Sirainen wrote:
On Fri, 2009-10-16 at 11:48 +0400, Proskurin Kirill wrote:
Is this problem still not fixed in new sieve implementation?
I just implemented message header encoder:
http://hg.dovecot.org/dovecot-1.2/rev/bd4a6f500c75
So only thing left to do is for Stephan to start using it
On Fri, 2009-10-16 at 11:48 +0400, Proskurin Kirill wrote:
> Is this problem still not fixed in new sieve implementation?
I just implemented message header encoder:
http://hg.dovecot.org/dovecot-1.2/rev/bd4a6f500c75
So only thing left to do is for Stephan to start using it. :)
signature.asc
De
Nikita Koshikov wrote:
Hello list,
I have noticed that sieve vacation action breaks some non-english letters in
the subject.
I tested with russian language, if subject contains letters from specific
diapason russian alphabet, the message received with unreadable subject, but
text in the body
On 9/30/2009, Jacek Osiecki (jos...@hybrid.pl) wrote:
> So it seems that finally a big migration from 1.0rc21 to current version is
> much closer...
Cool - methinks you will be very pleased with the performance increase...
:)
--
Best regards,
Charles
1 - 100 of 175 matches
Mail list logo
