Re: [Dovecot] retr errors

2013-10-07 Thread Charles Marcus
On 2013-10-06 9:19 PM, Bill Morgan wrote: On 10/6/2013 5:58 PM, Daniel Parthey wrote: Hi Bill, any intercepting virus scanner or personal firewall software between your mail client and the dovecot server? McAfee Well, I'd just stop right there, fire whoever installed Macafee, remove

Re: [Dovecot] retr errors

2013-10-07 Thread Przemysław Orzechowski
W dniu 07.10.2013 03:33, Noel Butler pisze: On 07/10/2013 11:19, Bill Morgan wrote: On 10/6/2013 5:58 PM, Daniel Parthey wrote: Hi Bill, any intercepting virus scanner or personal firewall software between your mail client and the dovecot server? Regards Daniel McAfee I would sugges

Re: [Dovecot] retr errors

2013-10-06 Thread Noel Butler
On 07/10/2013 11:19, Bill Morgan wrote: On 10/6/2013 5:58 PM, Daniel Parthey wrote: Hi Bill, any intercepting virus scanner or personal firewall software between your mail client and the dovecot server? Regards Daniel McAfee As I'm sure Daniel was implying, did you also test without

Re: [Dovecot] retr errors

2013-10-06 Thread Bill Morgan
On 10/6/2013 5:58 PM, Daniel Parthey wrote: Hi Bill, any intercepting virus scanner or personal firewall software between your mail client and the dovecot server? Regards Daniel McAfee and the ISP wasn't interested in the wireshark traces. I know, I should change the ISP and see if the

Re: [Dovecot] retr errors

2013-10-06 Thread Daniel Parthey
Hi Bill, any intercepting virus scanner or personal firewall software between your mail client and the dovecot server? Regards Daniel

Re: [Dovecot] retr errors

2013-10-06 Thread Daniel Parthey
Hi Bill You should send the wireshark traces to your ISP and ask him to fix it. At least one would require the doveconf -n output and the version of dovecot. Probably a bug in an older dovecot version? Regards Daniel

[Dovecot] retr errors

2013-10-06 Thread Bill Morgan
My ISP uses Dovecot and I have had an ongoing problem for a while using several email clients. Sometimes the response to a retr request is mal-formed. The expected response "+OK nnn octets" is not returned. The response looks like it started somewhere in the message headers. Sometimes a retry