Original-Nachricht
> Datum: Tue, 23 Feb 2010 14:59:43 -0500
> Von: Dan Swartzendruber
> An: dovecot@dovecot.org
> Betreff: [Dovecot] dspam plugin and updating of headers?
>
> Forgive me if this is a stupid question. I know that when I drag a
> message t
Forgive me if this is a stupid question. I know that when I drag a
message to the SPAM folder, it is being trained properly, since the
stats indicate so. Dragging back to the inbox retrains it as ham. I
happened to notice that despite the fact that dspam says this in the
debug log:
"appe
On Mon, 2007-06-11 at 18:06 +0200, Goran Mekić wrote:
> When I drag n drop spam mail to SPAM folder, I get this error:
> Jun 11 17:58:46 sparrow dspam[28452]: Unable to open file for
> reading:
> /var/spool/dspam/data/local/mymail/mymail.sig/466d652f315451306914567.sig:
> No such file or dir
On Wed, 2007-07-11 at 20:14 +0200, Wicher Minnaard wrote:
> For my needs, '[EMAIL PROTECTED]' could be taken as the login
> name I use for logging in to Dovecot. As I'm not a C-programmer by a
> long shot, I was wondering if one of you could help me use the
> bincimap-API to import the login name
On Thu, 2007-09-20 at 16:45 +0300, Timo Sirainen wrote:
> > that leads to the question how big those changes are and if it would be
> > feasible to #if on some DOVECOT_VERSION define to avoid forking the
> > plugin for 1.1.
>
> Hmm. Looks like there aren't any easy to #if macros available. But I'
On Thu, 2007-09-20 at 13:48 +0200, Marcus Rueckert wrote:
> > Feel free to send patches to get it working with 1.1 :)
>
> that leads to the question how big those changes are and if it would be
> feasible to #if on some DOVECOT_VERSION define to avoid forking the
> plugin for 1.1.
Hmm. Looks like
On 2007-09-20 13:42:03 +0200, Andreas Schneider wrote:
> Trever L. Adams wrote:
> >
> > Hello, Andreas,
> >
> > I have not had a chance to look at your plugin. I am wondering if you
> > have updated the plugin for the API changes in 1.1 alpha series
> > (particularly alpha6). If so, I am at a poi
Trever L. Adams wrote:
>
> Hello, Andreas,
>
> I have not had a chance to look at your plugin. I am wondering if you
> have updated the plugin for the API changes in 1.1 alpha series
> (particularly alpha6). If so, I am at a point I can test the plugin out
> and possibly contribute code.
Hi Trev
Hi,
the git address has changed.
git clone git://git.cynapses.org/gladiac/dovecot-dspam-plugin.git
-- andreas
Hello, Andreas,
I have not had a chance to look at your plugin. I am wondering if you
have updated the plugin for the API changes in 1.1 alpha series
(particularly al
Andreas Schneider wrote:
>
> Ok, I've added now support to set the spam folder and
> the trash folder in the dovecot configuration file.
>
> git clone git://git.cynapses.org/dovecot-dspam-plugin.git \
> dovecot-dpsam-plugin
>
Hi,
the git address has changed.
git clone git://git.cynapses.org/g
Marcin Michal Jessa escribió:
> Andreas Schneider wrote:
>> Andraž 'ruskie' Levstik wrote:
>>
>>> Would it be possible to specify multiple spam folders?
>>>
>>> i.e. spam, Spam, SPAM, junk, Junk, etc... ?
>>>
>>> That would be very usefull...
>>>
>> Yes, this would be possible, but first th
On Fri, 2007-09-07 at 15:19 +0200, "Andraž 'ruskie' Levstik" wrote:
> Hence why the plugin would allow a list of names... and they would all
> work... Either by having aliases to the other folders or simply doing
> if something happens with folder $one_of_folders do this...
No, you didn't get the
It's none of my business, but here's a suggestion for more work for
somebody. :-)
The idea behind the dspam plugin -- watching things move from folder
to folder -- seems very, very clever to me. I wonder if it might have
wider applicability, even if we can't see what it is today? Taking
account
On 14:33:07 2007-09-07 Marcin Michal Jessa <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Andraž 'ruskie' Levstik wrote:
> > On 13:56:24 2007-09-07 Marcin Michal Jessa <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> >> Andreas Schneider wrote:
> >>
> >>> Andraž 'ruskie' Levstik wrote:
> >>>
> >>>
> Woul
Andraž 'ruskie' Levstik wrote:
> On 13:56:24 2007-09-07 Marcin Michal Jessa <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> Andreas Schneider wrote:
>>
>>> Andraž 'ruskie' Levstik wrote:
>>>
>>>
Would it be possible to specify multiple spam folders?
i.e. spam, Spam, SPAM, junk, Ju
On 13:56:24 2007-09-07 Marcin Michal Jessa <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Andreas Schneider wrote:
> > Andraž 'ruskie' Levstik wrote:
> >
> >> Would it be possible to specify multiple spam folders?
> >>
> >> i.e. spam, Spam, SPAM, junk, Junk, etc... ?
> >>
> >> That would be very usefull...
> >>
Andreas Schneider wrote:
> Andraž 'ruskie' Levstik wrote:
>
>> Would it be possible to specify multiple spam folders?
>>
>> i.e. spam, Spam, SPAM, junk, Junk, etc... ?
>>
>> That would be very usefull...
>>
>
> Yes, this would be possible, but first the current code should be tested ;)
>
>
On 13:10:54 2007-09-07 Andreas Schneider <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Andraž 'ruskie' Levstik wrote:
> > Would it be possible to specify multiple spam folders?
> >
> > i.e. spam, Spam, SPAM, junk, Junk, etc... ?
> >
> > That would be very usefull...
>
> Yes, this would be possible, but first t
Andraž 'ruskie' Levstik wrote:
> Would it be possible to specify multiple spam folders?
>
> i.e. spam, Spam, SPAM, junk, Junk, etc... ?
>
> That would be very usefull...
Yes, this would be possible, but first the current code should be tested ;)
Thanks for the suggestion.
-- andreas
-
On 00:34:23 2007-09-07 Andreas Schneider <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > We want to use signatures if it is present, if not, then we can use
> > the raw message. I would suggest the code do an if on the present of
> > the signature. I haven't yet looked a the code. Maybe tomorrow. (I am
> > a bit be
> We want to use signatures if it is present, if not, then we can use the
> raw message. I would suggest the code do an if on the present of the
> signature. I haven't yet looked a the code. Maybe tomorrow. (I am a bit
> behind on my schedule.)
Ok, I've added now support to set the spam folder and
On Fri, 2007-08-31 at 00:57 -0600, Trever L. Adams wrote:
> This is correct, the signature is attached, so to say, to a already
> tokenized version of the message. This is a large part of the overhead
> of dspam. Also, to do a retrain, you need a pristine message. So if a
> signature has been a
Johannes Berg wrote:
Note that passing dspam the signature is likely more efficient. There
are two possibilities:
(1) dspam extracts the signature
-> dovecot is more efficient at extracting headers because of cache
(2) dspam uses the mail
-> it has to re-tokenize etc which afaik it do
On Thu, 2007-08-30 at 15:09 +0200, Andreas Schneider wrote:
> with libdspam you can pass simply the whole message.
>
> -- snip --
> /* Call DSPAM */
> if (dspam_process(ctx, message) != 0) {
> syslog(LOG_ERR, "dspam_process failed");
> return -1;
> }
> -- snip --
Note that passing dspam the
Trever L. Adams wrote:
> Andreas,
Hi Trever,
>
> Please, do not take this poorly. I am simply asking questions to make
> sure this patch/plugin is a good idea in the form you suggest.
>
> I am a user of the other patch. I am wondering if this is worth it. Your
> patch, if it links against libds
ng it work some how
with dovecots autoconf/automake system?
Depending on your answers, I will try your patch and help you clean it up.
Trever Adams
Andreas Schneider wrote:
Hi,
I've found the dovecot dspam plugin and looked at the code. I forks and
calls the dspam binary for every mail. I d
Hi,
I've found the dovecot dspam plugin and looked at the code. I forks and
calls the dspam binary for every mail. I didn't like this behavior, so
I've migrated it to use libdspam.
The plugin still needs more love:
* Use cmake instead of a Makefile
* Make the spam folder conf
Hello,
I'm trying to install the dspam plugin to dovecot.
So far, I've
Installed dovecot 1.0.2 from RPM and set up
Installed dspam 3.8.0, set up and integrated with postfix, using
dspam as local delivery agent before dovecot's deliver
Downloaded the dovecot 1.0.2 source in order to compile
Hi Wicher,
[now I know who it was on jabber. heh]
> I'm trying to use the dovecot-dspam plugin (
> http://johannes.sipsolutions.net/Projects/dovecot-dspam-integration )
> with vpopmail's virtual users.
> All seems well, except for the fact that dspam should be called
Hi list, hi Johannes,
I'm trying to use the dovecot-dspam plugin (
http://johannes.sipsolutions.net/Projects/dovecot-dspam-integration )
with vpopmail's virtual users.
All seems well, except for the fact that dspam should be called with
'--user [EMAIL PROTECTED]' at
When I drag n drop spam mail to SPAM folder, I get this error:
Jun 11 17:58:46 sparrow dspam[28452]: Unable to open file for
reading:
/var/spool/dspam/data/local/mymail/mymail.sig/466d652f315451306914567.sig:
No such file or directory
mymail is user that runs dovecot transport (postfix co
31 matches
Mail list logo
