Dear all,
Thank you very much for your time and your big help.
I really appreciated all of you.
Best Regards,
Masaharu Kawada
Timo Sirainen wrote:
On Fri, 2009-01-23 at 15:17 +0900, Masaharu Kawada wrote:
Any idea what Dovecot version? rhel4 had 1.0.rc15 I think? I know there
were some
On Fri, 2009-01-23 at 15:17 +0900, Masaharu Kawada wrote:
> > Any idea what Dovecot version? rhel4 had 1.0.rc15 I think? I know there
> > were some LDAP bugs in it, but I don't really remember anymore. Did
> > Dovecot really try to access the server2, or was it simply unable to
> > reconnect to the
On 1/23/2009, Masaharu Kawada (mkaw...@redhat.com) wrote:
> Since the customer has been using RHEL4.3, Dovecot version should be
> something in between dovecot-0.99.11-2.EL4.1 and 0.99.11-9.EL4. These
> are all for RHEL4. I'm sorry that I have not been provided the version.
Well, you need to find
Hello,
Thank you very much for your respons.
I have been keeping this thread on the latest mail sent by Timo-san.
Regards,
Masaharu Kawada
Joseba Torre wrote:
El Martes, 20 de Enero de 2009 a las 08:47, geoffroy desvernay escribió:
Here we use "uris" parameter instead of "hosts", and w
Hello,
Thank you very much for your respons.
I have been keeping this thread on the latest mail sent by Timo-san.
Regards,
Masaharu Kawada
geoffroy desvernay wrote:
Masaharu Kawada a écrit :
I'm pretty sure that configuration will simply use both the servers
all the time more or less r
Dear all,
Thank you very much for your help.
Any idea what Dovecot version? rhel4 had 1.0.rc15 I think? I know there
were some LDAP bugs in it, but I don't really remember anymore. Did
Dovecot really try to access the server2, or was it simply unable to
reconnect to the LDAP server at all? If t
On Tue, 2009-01-20 at 13:53 +0900, Masaharu Kawada wrote:
> -2008/11/16
> The customer updated openldap package
> openldap-2.2.13-6.4E ⇒ openldap-2.2.13-12.el4
..
> For this reason, the customer wants to know why dovecot accessed only
> server2 since ldap package was updated on 2008/11/16 and also
El Martes, 20 de Enero de 2009 a las 08:47, geoffroy desvernay escribió:
> Here we use "uris" parameter instead of "hosts", and we seems to have
> expected behaviour: dovecot is always using the first listed uri except
> if it doesn't respond (switch to the second)
Same experience here (RHEL4 and
Masaharu Kawada a écrit :
>> I'm pretty sure that configuration will simply use both the servers
>> all the time more or less randomly. Unless OpenLDAP library has some
>> code that does something similar to what you're talking about, but
>> somehow I doubt that.
Here we use "uris" parameter
Dear list,
Thank you very much for your quick answer.
This question is actually due to a phenomenon that the customer
got about a month ago. For the detail of the phenomenon, please
see bellow.
**
-2008/11/16
The customer updated openldap package
openldap-2.2.13-6.4E ⇒ openldap-2.2.13-12
On Jan 19, 2009, at 3:04 AM, Masaharu Kawada wrote:
In /etc/dovecot-ldap.conf, 'hosts=' field is the one which can be used
to specify availabled ldap server to access from the clients to
authorize.
And also sevral ldap servers can be specified in 'hosts =' field as
shown
like below.
hosts
Dear team,
I'm sorry if this is a stupid question, but I'd like to know the behavior
of dovecot in a particular stuation. My questions are as follows.
In /etc/dovecot-ldap.conf, 'hosts=' field is the one which can be used
to specify availabled ldap server to access from the clients to authorize.
12 matches
Mail list logo
