On Mon, 2008-02-04 at 12:54 -0500, Eric Hester wrote:
> Sorry, now that I reread the comment for listen I see it says space
> separated list. I'm not sure this is clear to everyone that it can be
> used to listen on multiple ports as there are wiki pages showing how
> to use iptables to get additio
Sorry, now that I reread the comment for listen I see it says space
separated list. I'm not sure this is clear to everyone that it can be
used to listen on multiple ports as there are wiki pages showing how
to use iptables to get additional ports:
http://wiki.dovecot.org/Iptables
The patch worked
On Mon, 2008-02-04 at 11:40 -0500, Eric Hester wrote:
> Any chance of getting multiple ports per protocol in 1.1 or is that a
> major undertaking?
It should already work:
listen = *:143 *:144 *:145
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
Any chance of getting multiple ports per protocol in 1.1 or is that a
major undertaking?
On Feb 4, 2008 4:23 AM, Timo Sirainen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Sun, 2008-02-03 at 17:25 -0500, Eric Hester wrote:
> > I got this working using %l for the ip, but I'd really rather do
> > multiple ports
On Sun, 2008-02-03 at 17:25 -0500, Eric Hester wrote:
> I got this working using %l for the ip, but I'd really rather do
> multiple ports so I don't have to have 4 ips on 16 different machines.
Oh, somehow I wasn't thinking and thought %l was the same as port :)
> I was trying to use the new 1.1
I got this working using %l for the ip, but I'd really rather do
multiple ports so I don't have to have 4 ips on 16 different machines.
I was trying to use the new 1.1 %a variable as the local port in my
query but it seems to always return 0 in 1.1beta14, does this variable
not work yet?
On Jan 3
On Thu, 2008-01-31 at 10:32 -0500, Eric Hester wrote:
> I use sql for my passwd db. So are you saying use some kind of
> conditional in my select that checks for @ in the username and if not
> found appends the domain based on the %l variable (using something
> like a join to a table that has port
I use sql for my passwd db. So are you saying use some kind of
conditional in my select that checks for @ in the username and if not
found appends the domain based on the %l variable (using something
like a join to a table that has port to domain mappings). Interesting.
Im worried that might add si
On Mon, 2008-01-28 at 12:11 -0500, Eric Hester wrote:
> I am looking for a way to append a domain to unqualified user names
> based on the port that the client connected to. Like this:
>
> port 9110 - @test.com
> port 9111 - @other.com
> port 9112 - @third.com
>
> it looks like auth-default-realm
I am looking for a way to append a domain to unqualified user names
based on the port that the client connected to. Like this:
port 9110 - @test.com
port 9111 - @other.com
port 9112 - @third.com
it looks like auth-default-realm does this, but you can only specify
it once for the whole process.
I
10 matches
Mail list logo
