Any chance of getting multiple ports per protocol in 1.1 or is that a major undertaking?
On Feb 4, 2008 4:23 AM, Timo Sirainen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Sun, 2008-02-03 at 17:25 -0500, Eric Hester wrote: > > I got this working using %l for the ip, but I'd really rather do > > multiple ports so I don't have to have 4 ips on 16 different machines. > > Oh, somehow I wasn't thinking and thought %l was the same as port :) > > > I was trying to use the new 1.1 %a variable as the local port in my > > query but it seems to always return 0 in 1.1beta14, does this variable > > not work yet? > > This should fix it: http://hg.dovecot.org/dovecot/rev/83fb5f84a270 > >
