On Sun, May 25, 2008 at 3:30 PM, Jason Forester <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Sun, May 25, 2008 at 9:18 AM, Timo Sirainen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
>
>> I think there are two issues:
>>
>> 1) Your recalculation is probably quite slow, assuming you don't have the
>> S=sizes in filenames. del
On May 26, 2008, at 4:30 AM, Jason Forester wrote:
2) Most people specify the limits in Dovecot's userdb, so this
isn't an
issue.
What userdb do you use?
We are using ldap for auth/user. I will take a look at specifying it
there so that the quotas don't vanish, but won't reporting still fa
On Sun, May 25, 2008 at 9:18 AM, Timo Sirainen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I think there are two issues:
>
> 1) Your recalculation is probably quite slow, assuming you don't have the
> S=sizes in filenames. deliver adds these to new mails, but it doesn't help
> for old ones.
We just changed to
On May 25, 2008, at 10:09 PM, Jason Forester wrote:
Maildir++ quota recalculation works like:
Go through all files and sum up their sizes. Keep track of the
highest
directory mtime. Once everything is calculated, again go through all
directories and find the highest mtime. If the highest mti
Hi Timo, thanks for replying. My comments are inline:
On Sun, May 25, 2008 at 2:25 AM, Timo Sirainen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> However almost immediately a maildirsize folder vanished. Soon after
>> another, then another, and now we're missing nearly 40 of them.
>
> Maildir++ quota recalc
On Wed, 2008-05-21 at 12:21 -1000, Jason Forester wrote:
> We have 3 RH5.1 boxes running the stock Postfix 2.3.3, but due to issues
> with the stock Dovecot 1.0rc15, Redhat supplied us with the version of
> Dovecot 1.0.7 that will be in Redhat 5.2.
There is one change to Maildir++ quota since v1.0
Charles Marcus wrote:
>> Jason Forester wrote:
>> We have 3 RH5.1 boxes running the stock Postfix 2.3.3, but due to issues
>> with the stock Dovecot 1.0rc15, Redhat supplied us with the version of
>> Dovecot 1.0.7 that will be in Redhat 5.2.
>>
>> The mail store is automounted per-user from a Sun
Jason Forester wrote:
We have 3 RH5.1 boxes running the stock Postfix 2.3.3, but due to issues
with the stock Dovecot 1.0rc15, Redhat supplied us with the version of
Dovecot 1.0.7 that will be in Redhat 5.2.
>
The mail store is automounted per-user from a Sun box via NFS.
Timo strongly recomm
Aloha,
I've searched the list and have found no similar reports, so I'm asking
here.
We have 3 RH5.1 boxes running the stock Postfix 2.3.3, but due to issues
with the stock Dovecot 1.0rc15, Redhat supplied us with the version of
Dovecot 1.0.7 that will be in Redhat 5.2.
The mail store is automou
