Le 09.08.2007 12:45, Timo Sirainen a écrit :
>> Aug 7 19:34:36 rouge dovecot: IMAP(stransky): quota-fs: remote rquota
>> call failed: RPC: Authentication error
>
> Did you include http://hg.dovecot.org/dovecot/rev/0f6d4f8dd587
You are right, this was not included, thanks ! Now I have included t
On Thu, 2007-08-09 at 12:00 +0200, Nicolas STRANSKY wrote:
> Le 07.08.2007 18:05, Mike Brudenell a écrit :
>
> > 0. Apply the patches.
> > 1. cd to the top level of the distribution directory tree (above "src")
> > 2. Run: autoconf
> > 3. Run: autoheader
> > 4. Run: automake
> > 5. Run: conf
Le 07.08.2007 18:05, Mike Brudenell a écrit :
> 0. Apply the patches.
> 1. cd to the top level of the distribution directory tree (above "src")
> 2. Run: autoconf
> 3. Run: autoheader
> 4. Run: automake
> 5. Run: configure
> 6. Compile
Thanks, this seems to work at last !
But unfortunately
Greetings -
On 7 Aug 2007, at 14:36, Nicolas STRANSKY wrote:
In fact the patch applies well, dovecot compiles well, but rquota is
still not functionnal. I have this in config.log:
HAVE_RQUOTA_FALSE='#'
HAVE_RQUOTA_TRUE=''
#define HAVE_RQUOTA
But there is no RPC string in quota-fs.o. Where am I
In fact the patch applies well, dovecot compiles well, but rquota is
still not functionnal. I have this in config.log:
HAVE_RQUOTA_FALSE='#'
HAVE_RQUOTA_TRUE=''
#define HAVE_RQUOTA
But there is no RPC string in quota-fs.o. Where am I wrong ?
--
Nico
Greetings -
On 7 Aug 2007, at 13:54, Stewart Dean wrote:
Sorry to be so clueless, but all the activity about rquotad drives
me to admit my puzzlement (or ignorance)...
I run rquotad on my mail server that also runs DCrquotad is
used by the other 3 hosts (a login/FTP server, a mailing lis
> Sorry to be so clueless, but all the activity about rquotad drives me to
> admit my puzzlement (or ignorance)...
> I run rquotad on my mail server that also runs DCrquotad is used by
> the other 3 hosts (a login/FTP server, a mailing list server and a user
> mgmnt server) that NFS mount th
Sorry to be so clueless, but all the activity about rquotad drives me to
admit my puzzlement (or ignorance)...
I run rquotad on my mail server that also runs DCrquotad is used by
the other 3 hosts (a login/FTP server, a mailing list server and a user
mgmnt server) that NFS mount the folder a
It's also working here.
In my RHEL4, make crashed because it didn't get any value for SED.
export SED=/bin/sed
before autoconf solved the issue, and now it up and running.
Thanks a lot!
Agur.
El Martes, 7 de Agosto de 2007 13:17, Nicolas STRANSKY escribió:
> Le 07.08.2007 12:37,
Le 07.08.2007 12:37, Mike Brudenell a écrit :
> Greetings -
>
> On 7 Aug 2007, at 11:28, Nicolas STRANSKY wrote:
>
>> OK, thanks for the answer, but unfortunately, these don't apply well to
>> 1.0.3..
>
> They applied just fine to 1.0.3 here.
You are right, they applied just fine, I just couldn
Greetings -
On 7 Aug 2007, at 11:28, Nicolas STRANSKY wrote:
OK, thanks for the answer, but unfortunately, these don't apply
well to
1.0.3..
They applied just fine to 1.0.3 here. I started off with pristine
copies of the files from the 1.0.3 distribution then applied the
patches using
Le 07.08.2007 10:36, Timo Sirainen a écrit :
> On Tue, 2007-08-07 at 10:29 +0200, Nicolas STRANSKY wrote:
>> Le 06.08.2007 18:08, Timo Sirainen a écrit :
>>
>> So both http://hg.dovecot.org/dovecot/rev/078d9dde99c8 and
>> http://hg.dovecot.org/dovecot/rev/abec53314897 are needed to have rquota
>> s
On Tue, 2007-08-07 at 10:29 +0200, Nicolas STRANSKY wrote:
> Le 06.08.2007 18:08, Timo Sirainen a écrit :
>
> So both http://hg.dovecot.org/dovecot/rev/078d9dde99c8 and
> http://hg.dovecot.org/dovecot/rev/abec53314897 are needed to have rquota
> support with 1.0.x or is there anything else ?
http
Le 06.08.2007 18:08, Timo Sirainen a écrit :
So both http://hg.dovecot.org/dovecot/rev/078d9dde99c8 and
http://hg.dovecot.org/dovecot/rev/abec53314897 are needed to have rquota
support with 1.0.x or is there anything else ?
Thanks
--
Nico
On Fri, 2007-08-03 at 20:10 -0700, Steven Luo wrote:
> I've attached patches (against 1.0.3 with the rquota support applied) to
> add auth support
Applied directly.
> and to build the necessary XDR bits with rpcgen;
I did this a bit differently.
http://hg.dovecot.org/dovecot/rev/abec53314897
On Thu, Aug 02, 2007 at 05:12:07PM +0300, Timo Sirainen wrote:
> The other rquota patches had authunix_create_default() call. Is this
> needed/useful?
Without this, we get (Solaris 8 client talking to Solaris 10 rquotad):
> IMAP(xxx): quota-fs: permission denied to rquota service
After adding a c
Greetings -
On 3 Aug 2007, at 01:00, Nicolas STRANSKY wrote:
I think the configure failed to set HAVE_RQUOTA to config.h.
But this is what I had from ./configure:
checking rpcsvc/rquota.h usability... yes
checking rpcsvc/rquota.h presence... yes
checking for rpcsvc/rquota.h... yes
Yup, I go
Le 02.08.2007 19:53, Timo Sirainen a écrit :
> On Thu, 2007-08-02 at 19:47 +0200, Nicolas STRANSKY wrote:
>> Le 02.08.2007 18:06, Mike Brudenell a écrit :
>>
>>> Nicolas Stransky: Have you actually got it running yet, or just compiled?
>>> If running, did you have to do anything t
On Thu, 2007-08-02 at 19:47 +0200, Nicolas STRANSKY wrote:
> Le 02.08.2007 18:06, Mike Brudenell a écrit :
>
> > Nicolas Stransky: Have you actually got it running yet, or just compiled?
> > If running, did you have to do anything to overcome this
> > missing sy
Le 02.08.2007 18:06, Mike Brudenell a écrit :
> Nicolas Stransky: Have you actually got it running yet, or just compiled?
> If running, did you have to do anything to overcome this
> missing symbol?
Dovecot has compiled well and is running well. I don't get a m
On Thu, 2007-08-02 at 17:34 +0100, Mike Brudenell wrote:
> I've just tried #including the rquota_cdr.c file produced by running
> rpcgen on the rquota.x file (as in the code I sent out a few days ago).
>
> That compiled and runs OK, and successfully returns a storage when
> queries with the GE
Sorry for the flurry of messages! ...
On 2 Aug 2007, at 17:06, Mike Brudenell wrote:
However there doesn't seem to be anything in the existing 1.0.3
source or the three patches that provides this function.
Is there something missing from the patches at
http://hg.dovecot.org/dovecot/diff/
On 2 Aug 2007, at 16:56, Mike Brudenell wrote:
What am I missing?
(The especially annoying thing is that xdr_getquota_args is used in
the test program included in the source code I sent out a few days
ago and that worked... but I can't spot what is different in the
linking/runtime.)
Ah!
AAARRGGH!!
On 2 Aug 2007, at 16:19, Nicolas STRANSKY wrote:
This applied and compiled well with v1.0.3.
The patches applied (with fuzz and offsets) to 1.0.3 and compiled OK
under Solaris 10 with Sun's C compiler.
However when I try and start Dovecot I get:
Edlopen(/usr/local/dovecot-1.0.
Le 02.08.2007 16:12, Timo Sirainen a écrit :
> For v1.1, probably applies to v1.0 code pretty easily too:
>
> http://hg.dovecot.org/dovecot/rev/078d9dde99c8
>
> The other rquota patches had authunix_create_default() call. Is this
> needed/useful?
>
> The client is now always created+destroyed fo
For v1.1, probably applies to v1.0 code pretty easily too:
http://hg.dovecot.org/dovecot/rev/078d9dde99c8
The other rquota patches had authunix_create_default() call. Is this
needed/useful?
The client is now always created+destroyed for each quota lookup. I'd
think it would be faster if it was c
26 matches
Mail list logo
