Fri, Feb 06, 2009 at 05:50:57PM +0100, Jehan Pag?s wrote:
> Hi all,
Hello again,
sorry for delay, I was on short holiday ;)
> just to say that finally the patch of Marcin worked great. Just my
> configuration is different from yours to get it work:
>
> antispam_signature = X-DSPAM-Signatu
Hi all,
just to say that finally the patch of Marcin worked great. Just my
configuration is different from yours to get it work:
antispam_signature = X-DSPAM-Signature
antispam_trash = trash;Trash;Deleted Items
antispam_spam = SPAM;Junk
antispam_dspam_binary = /usr
Wed, Feb 04, 2009 at 12:12:44PM +0100, Jehan Pag?s wrote:
> I saw this piece of code and did the same as you in my change of course.
> Unfortunately, it didn't work (no logged "marked as SPAM", nor change in my
> stats. I have dovecot 1.1.7-r1 though, so it is probably the reason.
Logging '...mark
Hi,
On Wed, Feb 4, 2009 at 12:45 AM, Marcin Rzepecki
wrote:
> Yes, it checks if dspam was called correctly, but it didn't worked
> with dovecot >=1.1
> I've comment out checking call_dspam exit status, but:
> ---
> + call_dspam(item->sig, item->wanted);
>item = ite
On 2/3/2009, Timo Sirainen (t...@iki.fi) wrote:
> ..And my opinion is that "reply to all" is the correct behavior most of
> the time. I just hate it when I'm sending questions to other lists which
> I don't actively follow and people reply to me a few days later but
> don't Cc: me. I can easily los
Tue, Feb 03, 2009 at 10:36:12PM +0100, Jehan Pag?s wrote:
>
> and that the dspam training is indeed called? Because if I read well this
> piece of code, it looks like it was checking if the dspam training was
> successful. We commented out this check, so now maybe it fails and we copy
> the messag
On Tue, 2009-02-03 at 16:59 -0500, Charles Marcus wrote:
> On 2/3/2009, Harlan Stenn (harlan.st...@pfcs.com) wrote:
> > I bet there are a *lot* of people (me included) who think the ml is very
> > well configured precisely because it does not set Reply-to: the list.
>
> Please lets not go there (I
On 2/3/2009, Harlan Stenn (harlan.st...@pfcs.com) wrote:
> I bet there are a *lot* of people (me included) who think the ml is very
> well configured precisely because it does not set Reply-to: the list.
Please lets not go there (I'm on the other side, since most people
don't use mutt (a mail cli
Jehan wrote:
> ... Apparently the ml is not very well configured because a reply
> does not reply to the whole ml, but to the single sender. I will take
> care now.
I bet there are a *lot* of people (me included) who think the ml is very
well configured precisely because it does not set Reply-to
Hi Marcin and everyone,
On Tue, Feb 3, 2009 at 7:08 PM, Marcin Rzepecki wrote:
> Tue, Feb 03, 2009 at 06:14:08PM +0100, Jehan Pag?s wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > first of all, thanks for the answer.
> > "(Un)fortunately", I don't have these error messages. For information, I
> am
> > using dovecot 1.1.7
Tue, Feb 03, 2009 at 03:29:40PM +0100, Jehan Pag?s wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I have installed dovecot-antispam and configured it this way (as in the doc)
> [...]
> But it does not work and really I cannot figure it out for two days, because
> I can find no log wherever, where it writes it does (or try to
Hi,
I have installed dovecot-antispam and configured it this way (as in the doc)
with the dspam exe:
protocol imap {
mail_plugins = antispam
mail_plugin_dir = /usr/lib64/dovecot/imap
}
plugin {
# For dovecot-antispam:
antispam_signature = X-DSPAM-Signature
antispam_trash =
12 matches
Mail list logo
