Am 08.11.2012 09:34, schrieb Patrick Ben Koetter:
> * Robert Schetterer :
>> Am 08.11.2012 01:18, schrieb Massimiliano Cianelli:
>>> Yes, different teams, but I think Google is still a lot more reasonable
company to deal with things like this than Microsoft. Although
surprisingly even Mic
* Robert Schetterer :
> Am 08.11.2012 01:18, schrieb Massimiliano Cianelli:
> > Yes, different teams, but I think Google is still a lot more reasonable
> >>company to deal with things like this than Microsoft. Although
> >>surprisingly even Microsoft appears to support SPECIAL-USE in the next
> >>O
Am 08.11.2012 01:18, schrieb Massimiliano Cianelli:
> Yes, different teams, but I think Google is still a lot more reasonable
>>company to deal with things like this than Microsoft. Although
>>surprisingly even Microsoft appears to support SPECIAL-USE in the next
>>Outlook(?) client.
yeah it works
Am 08.11.2012 00:24, schrieb Massimiliano Cianelli:
> Hi,
>
> Yes w/o prefix work as expected, try to add a prefix like courier does (eg.
> Inbox.) It will not work as expected.
I see you point, but as i have seen other mail clients have problems
with prefix namespace in the past, i am using the
* Timo Sirainen :
> Yes, different teams, but I think Google is still a lot more reasonable
> company to deal with things like this than Microsoft. Although surprisingly
> even Microsoft appears to support SPECIAL-USE in the next Outlook(?) client.
confirmed.
p@rick
--
[*] sys4 AG
http://sy
If you give a look to Google code there are a lot of important bugs keep open
from years.
I like a lot android... but they have to spent a little more on it. Only in
that way it will be the best mobile os around.
Now it have some goods and some bads things.. like every os around us.. the
only
Yes, different teams, but I think Google is still a lot more reasonable company
to deal with things like this than Microsoft. Although surprisingly even
Microsoft appears to support SPECIAL-USE in the next Outlook(?) client.
On 8.11.2012, at 2.01, Massimiliano Cianelli wrote:
> Yes, but namespa
Yes, but namespace is in prelogin... and anyway they will say that the team
which will make the gmail app is different then the email app.
IMHO there is only a commercial reason.. keep people use gmail and force
company and private to use Google apps... in that way they will not have issue
and
Even gmail itself isn't advertising all capabilities before login:
* CAPABILITY IMAP4rev1 UNSELECT IDLE NAMESPACE QUOTA ID XLIST CHILDREN
X-GM-EXT-1 XYZZY SASL-IR AUTH=XOAUTH AUTH=XOAUTH2
vs.
* CAPABILITY IMAP4rev1 UNSELECT IDLE NAMESPACE QUOTA ID XLIST CHILDREN
X-GM-EXT-1 UIDPLUS COMPRESS=DEF
I've noticed an error in my sentence about the change log, it was referred to
blackberry.. not to Google
Google need only 'namespace', I will try to update the issue (due that every
IMAP server that will respect the rfc will not work as expected in that
condition).. pointing the problem on post
On 8.11.2012, at 1.24, Massimiliano Cianelli wrote:
> Due that Google act like BlackBerry, Microsoft,etc.. (hovewer they will not
> fix it soon, or really respect the rfc), it's much simple add Namespace on
> prelogin banner then wait or have to tell someone to install another client
> for that
Hi,
Yes w/o prefix work as expected, try to add a prefix like courier does (eg.
Inbox.) It will not work as expected.
Due I'm upgrading an old installed server, I've to keep everything as much
transparent I can... it includes IMAP folder and subscription.
Looking at that I've encountered that
Am 07.11.2012 08:13, schrieb Massimiliano Cianelli:
> Hello,
>
> My phone:
> Android ics 4.1.2 on galaxy nexus.
> And yes, stock mean the default client that come with the os in IMAP mode.
>
> I already know about that configuration parameter, but it will display two
> time namespace in postlog
Hello,
My phone:
Android ics 4.1.2 on galaxy nexus.
And yes, stock mean the default client that come with the os in IMAP mode.
I already know about that configuration parameter, but it will display two time
namespace in postlogin capabilities, and so I like much more to adjust the
source code
Am 06.11.2012 07:08, schrieb Ben Morrow:
> At 6AM +0100 on 6/11/12 you (Massimiliano Cianelli) wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> My setup:
>> Dovecot 2 latest, installed to replace courrier IMAP, and off course
>> configured with the dot separator and all folder under INBOX.*.
>>
>> The problem:
>> My phone w
At 6AM +0100 on 6/11/12 you (Massimiliano Cianelli) wrote:
> Hi,
>
> My setup:
> Dovecot 2 latest, installed to replace courrier IMAP, and off course
> configured with the dot separator and all folder under INBOX.*.
>
> The problem:
> My phone was driving me mad during the test, due that it wi
Hi,
My setup:
Dovecot 2 latest, installed to replace courrier IMAP, and off course configured
with the dot separator and all folder under INBOX.*.
The problem:
My phone was driving me mad during the test, due that it will only recognize
Inbox.
How found the solution:
I've started sniffing IMA
17 matches
Mail list logo
