On 9/5/2010 6:08 PM, Jerry wrote:
> On Sun, 05 Sep 2010 17:15:10 -0400
> Charles Marcus articulated:
>> On 9/5/2010 7:27 AM, Jerry wrote:
>>> On Sun, 05 Sep 2010 00:55:27 -0400
>>> Charles Marcus articulated:
>> The HTML rendering engine in Word (2007 and 2010) blows goats. MS's
>> decision to sw
On Sun, 05 Sep 2010 17:15:10 -0400
Charles Marcus articulated:
> On 9/5/2010 7:27 AM, Jerry wrote:
> > On Sun, 05 Sep 2010 00:55:27 -0400
> > Charles Marcus articulated:
> >> The biggest problem now with Outlook, imo, is its reliance on
> >> WORD's totally broken HTML rendering engine (in both 2
On 9/5/2010 7:27 AM, Jerry wrote:
> On Sun, 05 Sep 2010 00:55:27 -0400
> Charles Marcus articulated:
>> The biggest problem now with Outlook, imo, is its reliance on WORD's
>> totally broken HTML rendering engine (in both 2007 and 2010) instead
>> of IE. The only possible reason I can think of why
On Sun, 05 Sep 2010 00:55:27 -0400
Charles Marcus articulated:
> On 9/3/2010 6:19 PM, Jerry wrote:
> > I have several associates using the latest version of MS Office
> > that includes Outlook. None of them have complained to me regarding
> > Outlook's usability. I sporadically use Outlook(2007)
On 9/3/2010 6:19 PM, Jerry wrote:
> I have several associates using the latest version of MS Office that
> includes Outlook. None of them have complained to me regarding
> Outlook's usability. I sporadically use Outlook(2007) with IMAP
> without any problems.
>
> In any case, Outlook has undergo
On Fri, 2010-09-03 at 23:30 +0200, Samuel Kvasnica wrote:
>
> Well, David, if evolution was not such an instable beast... we did few
> evaluations from openSuSE10.3 up to 11.2 recently,
> and it was a no-go, except for basic imap usage. As soon as more
> connectors/plugins are involved, it is a ni
On Fri, 2010-09-03 at 22:48 +0200, Samuel Kvasnica wrote:
> most cell phones simply haven't got any ssh
> terminal but have own IMAP clients.
Any J2ME-capable phone has an SSH client: http://www.xk72.com/midpssh/
My experience of the native IMAP clients in phones has been extremely
poor. My N97
On Fri, 03 Sep 2010 23:30:01 +0200
Samuel Kvasnica articulated:
[snip]
> outlook (but that one does not really work with IMAP...)
I have several associates using the latest version of MS Office that
includes Outlook. None of them have complained to me regarding
Outlook's usability. I sporadical
On 08/19/2010 01:48 PM, David Woodhouse wrote:
> On Sat, 2010-08-14 at 23:36 +0200, Samuel Kvasnica wrote:
>> Well, it looks like at least Thunderbird v3.1.2 is buggy then. Are there
>> any non-buggy clients anyway ...?
> Evolution (>=2.30.2) with the imapx back end gets it right. I know this
> b
On 08/19/2010 01:43 PM, David Woodhouse wrote:
> On Wed, 2010-08-18 at 12:48 +0200, Samuel Kvasnica wrote:
>> This is a very nasty mess. If there are some ancient clients like pine
>> or whatever we used on vt100 in the 90th that need broken LIST command,
>> there should be a workaround setting fo
On Sat, 2010-08-14 at 23:36 +0200, Samuel Kvasnica wrote:
> Well, it looks like at least Thunderbird v3.1.2 is buggy then. Are there
> any non-buggy clients anyway ...?
Evolution (>=2.30.2) with the imapx back end gets it right. I know this
because I fixed it myself a few weeks ago.
--
David Wo
On Wed, 2010-08-18 at 12:48 +0200, Samuel Kvasnica wrote:
> This is a very nasty mess. If there are some ancient clients like pine
> or whatever we used on vt100 in the 90th that need broken LIST command,
> there should be a workaround setting for that.
Hey! I still use pine. With mouse-in-xterm
On Wed, 2010-08-18 at 12:48 +0200, Samuel Kvasnica wrote:
> This is a very nasty mess. If there are some ancient clients like pine
> or whatever we used on vt100 in the 90th that need broken LIST command,
> there should be a workaround setting for that. But currently, we use a
> workaround setting
On 08/17/2010 11:58 PM, Timo Sirainen wrote:
> but the bug I observe is about
>> misbehaving LIST command for argument "folder/*" which causes failed
>> resubscription of the subfolders due to parent folder not found.
> Can you be more specific? What commands does TB send to Dovecot and what does
On 17.8.2010, at 21.51, Samuel Kvasnica wrote:
> On 08/17/2010 07:40 PM, Timo Sirainen wrote:
>>
>> What errors does it give with that workaround enabled? Because it should
>> have fixed your previous errors:
>
> Timo, just a short additional notice: I looked at your code around the
> WORKAROUND
On 08/17/2010 07:40 PM, Timo Sirainen wrote:
>
> What errors does it give with that workaround enabled? Because it should
> have fixed your previous errors:
Timo, just a short additional notice: I looked at your code around the
WORKAROUND_TB_EXTRA_MAILBOX_SEP and it is NOT
related in any way to t
On 08/17/2010 07:40 PM, Timo Sirainen wrote:
>
> There are other differences between LAYOUT=fs and LAYOUT=maildir++, not
> just that one. I guess ideally there wouldn't be any, but for now
> LAYOUT=maildir++ works the way Courier/Cyrus does, and LAYOUT=fs works
> the way UW-IMAP does. I'm not goin
On Tue, 2010-08-17 at 19:31 +0200, Samuel Kvasnica wrote:
> Well, given the fact it is listed ONLY if using LAYOUT=fs (if using
> normal maildir layout it works correclty) it IS definitely a dovecot bug.
> Whatever the correct behavior is, the result should not depend on
> setting LAYOUT=fs => this
On 08/17/2010 07:22 PM, Timo Sirainen wrote:
> On Sun, 2010-08-15 at 16:50 +0200, Samuel Kvasnica wrote:
12 subscribe "Trash/aaa/"
12 NO Invalid mailbox name: Trash/aaa/ <=== non-existing child folder,
ERROR
13 unsubscribe "aaa/"
13 NO Invalid mailbox name: aaa/ <=== non
On Sun, 2010-08-15 at 16:50 +0200, Samuel Kvasnica wrote:
> >> 12 subscribe "Trash/aaa/"
> >> 12 NO Invalid mailbox name: Trash/aaa/ <=== non-existing child folder,
> >> ERROR
> >> 13 unsubscribe "aaa/"
> >> 13 NO Invalid mailbox name: aaa/ <=== non-existing child folder, ERROR
> > Set:
> >
> > i
On 08/15/2010 02:24 PM, Timo Sirainen wrote:
> On 15.8.2010, at 7.54, Samuel Kvasnica wrote:
>
>> 12 subscribe "Trash/aaa/"
>> 12 NO Invalid mailbox name: Trash/aaa/ <=== non-existing child folder,
>> ERROR
>> 13 unsubscribe "aaa/"
>> 13 NO Invalid mailbox name: aaa/ <=== non-existing child fold
On 08/15/2010 02:24 PM, Timo Sirainen wrote:
> On 15.8.2010, at 7.54, Samuel Kvasnica wrote:
>
>> 12 subscribe "Trash/aaa/"
>> 12 NO Invalid mailbox name: Trash/aaa/ <=== non-existing child folder,
>> ERROR
>> 13 unsubscribe "aaa/"
>> 13 NO Invalid mailbox name: aaa/ <=== non-existing child fold
On 15.8.2010, at 7.54, Samuel Kvasnica wrote:
> 12 subscribe "Trash/aaa/"
> 12 NO Invalid mailbox name: Trash/aaa/ <=== non-existing child folder,
> ERROR
> 13 unsubscribe "aaa/"
> 13 NO Invalid mailbox name: aaa/ <=== non-existing child folder, ERROR
Set:
imap_client_workarounds = tb-extra-ma
On 08/14/2010 10:27 PM, Timo Sirainen wrote:
> On 14.8.2010, at 21.15, Samuel Kvasnica wrote:
>
>> Well, I did try other servers and e.g. on scalix I'm getting this:
>>
>> * LIST (\X-DirectRef=000d7f94a4731510 \X-ModDate=20100814200222) "/"
>> "six\"wafer"
>>
>> I cannot find anything relevant in
On 08/14/2010 10:27 PM, Timo Sirainen wrote:
> On 14.8.2010, at 21.15, Samuel Kvasnica wrote:
>
>> Well, I did try other servers and e.g. on scalix I'm getting this:
>>
>> * LIST (\X-DirectRef=000d7f94a4731510 \X-ModDate=20100814200222) "/"
>> "six\"wafer"
>>
>> I cannot find anything relevant in
On 14.8.2010, at 21.15, Samuel Kvasnica wrote:
> Well, I did try other servers and e.g. on scalix I'm getting this:
>
> * LIST (\X-DirectRef=000d7f94a4731510 \X-ModDate=20100814200222) "/"
> "six\"wafer"
>
> I cannot find anything relevant in RFC3501
ABNF is the relevant part. You'll get to th
Hi Timo,
>> * LIST (\HasNoChildren) "/" "folder1"
>> * LIST (\HasNoChildren) "/" "folder2"
>> * LIST (\HasNoChildren) "/" {9}
>> six"wafer
>> . OK List completed.
>>
>> Note the {9} length of the following real folder name. Is this normal
>> handling of special folder names ?
>Yes.
Well, I d
On 14.8.2010, at 20.52, Samuel Kvasnica wrote:
> * LIST (\HasNoChildren) "/" "folder1"
> * LIST (\HasNoChildren) "/" "folder2"
> * LIST (\HasNoChildren) "/" {9}
> six"wafer
> . OK List completed.
>
> Note the {9} length of the following real folder name. Is this normal
> handling of special folde
28 matches
Mail list logo
