> Oh. I missed that.
> I had a look at your plugin, quite some time ago, and did not think
> you would have modified it in such a way.
http://johannes.sipsolutions.net/Projects/dovecot-antispam
> I should definitely give it a look; how to you figure out where the
> mail comes from?
TBH, I f
Quoting Johannes Berg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> I do think, however, that the two plugins could possibly converge.
I don't think they can converge, they work in very different ways,
since yours work at the IMAP level while mine works at the storage
level.
Actually, I work at storage level too no
> It certainly is a matter of taste, but that also was the reason why I
> did not like your plugin... ;-)
Aha, but with what I proposed that becomes a matter of configuration,
hence my SPAM>* rule in there.
> Lastly, I'd prefer my user to make some explicit action to learn a
> message rather
Quoting Johannes Berg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> plugin {
> (...)
> pipe = /var/learn/%u/.spam:spamc -d some.host -L spam
> pipe2 = /var/learn/%u/.ham:spamc -d some.host -L ham
> (...)
And here I define that any message stored to /var/learn/%u/.spam where
%u is the username (that is learn.spa
> > plugin {
> > (...)
> > pipe = /var/learn/%u/.spam:spamc -d some.host -L spam
> > pipe2 = /var/learn/%u/.ham:spamc -d some.host -L ham
> > (...)
>
> And here I define that any message stored to /var/learn/%u/.spam where
> %u is the username (that is learn.spam in the user's IMAP namespace)
On Thu, 2007-12-06 at 15:29 +0100, Nicolas Boullis wrote:
> > I think write() can return partially written data if the other side
> > isn't reading it fast enough. Using write_full() instead would anyway be
> > better/safer.
>
> I just reread my code, and I think my use of write looks safe, since
Timo Sirainen wrote:
>
> I downloaded it when you first mentioned it, but looks like I never got
> around to actually looking at it. Yes, something like this would be
> nice..
>
> One thing at least that should be changed is to configure it using
> virtual mailbox names instead of full mailbox pa
Hi,
Ben Schumacher wrote:
>
> Could you maybe explain how the configuration works in a little more
> detail? For some reason I'm having a bit of trouble wrapping my head
> around how this works:
What is the part you don't understand?
> namespace private {
>separator = .
>location = mai
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Wed, 5 Dec 2007, Nicolas Boullis wrote:
It's on my todo list in order to support user-site SPAM training.
BTW: Could you please add the example of your first message into the
plugin tgz? So the useage info is with the package.
Bye,
- --
Stef
On Wed, December 5, 2007 3:29 pm, Nicolas Boullis wrote:
...
> A few months ago, I sent a message to this list asking if people would
> be interested by a "pipe" plugin
...
> Since then, I have received no feedback...
...
> So, is anyone using this plugin? Is anyone using it?
>
Haven't tried it so
On Wed, 2007-12-05 at 15:29 +0100, Nicolas Boullis wrote:
> Timo, on my first message, you seemed to be interested to merge such a
> feature (see http://dovecot.org/pipermail/dovecot/2007-May/023055.html
> ). Are you still interested?
I downloaded it when you first mentioned it, but looks like I n
On 05.12.2007 17:29, Nicolas Boullis wrote:
Hi,
A few months ago, I sent a message to this list asking if people would
be interested by a "pipe" plugin (see
http://dovecot.org/pipermail/dovecot/2007-May/023005.html ). I received
a few answers of people who told they were intersted.
A few months
On Dec 5, 2007 7:29 AM, Nicolas Boullis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> A few months ago, I sent a message to this list asking if people would
> be interested by a "pipe" plugin (see
> http://dovecot.org/pipermail/dovecot/2007-May/023005.html ). I received
> a few answers of people who told they were
Hi,
A few months ago, I sent a message to this list asking if people would
be interested by a "pipe" plugin (see
http://dovecot.org/pipermail/dovecot/2007-May/023005.html ). I received
a few answers of people who told they were intersted.
A few months later, I sent a new message announcing the av
Hi,
Charles Marcus wrote:
>
> This looks interesting - how does it differ from the DSPAM plug-in?
> Maybe a generic plug-in could be created that would allow it to be used
> with any anti-spa, solution (I prefer ASSP myself)...
This plugin has nothing spamassassin-specific. Although I don't know
Nicolas Boullis, on 8/11/2007 5:49 PM, said the following:
Hi,
Long ago (more than 2 month ago), I told about a "pipe" plugin I had
written to perform some spam/ham learning (see the attached message).
I'm now proud to say that I can make it available for use by anyone.
You can get it from
Hi,
Long ago (more than 2 month ago), I told about a "pipe" plugin I had
written to perform some spam/ham learning (see the attached message).
I'm now proud to say that I can make it available for use by anyone.
You can get it from
http://nicolas.boullis.free.fr/pipe.tar.gz
Note that this is
17 matches
Mail list logo
