Hi guys.
I see that with mailboxes stored on a network mount-point and more than one box
with Dovecot using such a mailbox, Dovecots step on each others toes.
...
lmtp(minem...@lemko.xyz)<2674357>: Error: lmtp-server:
conn unix:pid=2600068,uid=89 [2]: rcpt minemail@my.private: Mailbox INBOX:
Corru
On 05/11/2023 12:16, Benny Pedersen wrote:
lejeczek via dovecot skrev den 2023-11-05 12:09:
What might I have incorrect or wrong?
parrent dir miss write access for uid 2000 ?
___
dovecot mailing list -- dovecot@dovecot.org
To unsubscribe send
Hi guys.
I must be missing, having something misconfigured. I have:
-> $ gluster volume info VMAIL
Volume Name: VMAIL
Type: Distributed-Replicate
Volume ID: 462a1850-a31a-4a17-934d-26f3996dc9b8
Status: Started
Snapshot Count: 0
Number of Bricks: 1 x 2 = 2
Transport-type: tcp
Bricks:
Brick1: 10.
On 04/09/2023 09:32, Aki Tuomi via dovecot wrote:
On 04/09/2023 10:19 EEST lejeczek via dovecot wrote:
On 04/09/2023 08:54, Aki Tuomi via dovecot wrote:
On 04/09/2023 09:47 EEST lejeczek via dovecot wrote:
Hi guys.
I'm having quite bizarre situation where Dovecot
On 04/09/2023 08:54, Aki Tuomi via dovecot wrote:
On 04/09/2023 09:47 EEST lejeczek via dovecot wrote:
Hi guys.
I'm having quite bizarre situation where Dovecot logs:
...
pam_unix(dovecot:auth): check pass; user unknown
pam_unix(dovecot:auth): authentication failure; logname=
uid=0
Hi guys.
I'm having quite bizarre situation where Dovecot logs:
...
pam_unix(dovecot:auth): check pass; user unknown
pam_unix(dovecot:auth): authentication failure; logname=
uid=0 euid=0 tty=dovecot ruser=dupa rhost=AA.BB.CC.DD
imap-login: Login: user=, method=PLAIN,
rip=AA.BB.CC.DD, lip=AA.BB.
hi fellas
generic construct for(if possible): reply vacation message
if address is not from add1@com1 add2@com2
would you share?
many thanks
L.
On 29/06/15 08:34, lejeczek wrote:
nobody want to chip in, clarify this for me?
If replication should replicate everything what I might
have gotten wrong that remove/delete on messages does not
replicate?
On 26/06/15 15:20, lejeczek wrote:
hi,
novice question - is replication supposed to
nobody want to chip in, clarify this for me?
If replication should replicate everything what I might have
gotten wrong that remove/delete on messages does not replicate?
On 26/06/15 15:20, lejeczek wrote:
hi,
novice question - is replication supposed to replicate
maildir in it's entire
hi,
novice question - is replication supposed to replicate
maildir in it's entirety?
I get new mails replicated but not operations of
removal/deletion, is this normal?
many thanks
On 25/06/15 15:28, Felix Zielcke wrote:
Am Donnerstag, den 25.06.2015, 11:35 +0100 schrieb lejeczek:
I wonder if you know if Evolution works with dovecot TLS?
Of course. I use dovecot+Evolution fine.
You only need to enable PLAIN and/or LOGIN auth method in your config.
or the other ones
hi
I get with default (not declared)
replication_dsync_parameters above errors, and for users
that I'm trying to disable replication.
I'm trying to disable with: override_fields =
mail_replica="" in userdb and just in case (ldap) also
user_attrs = =mail_replica=""
my replication conf is pre
I wonder if you know if Evolution works with dovecot TLS?
On 18/06/15 07:45, Steffen Kaiser wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Wed, 17 Jun 2015, lejeczek wrote:
I think I'm near getting a simple replication, but on
server which is still "empty" I get:
Initialization failed: Namespace ''
On 23/06/15 15:34, Steffen Kaiser wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Tue, 23 Jun 2015, lejeczek wrote:
I wonder if it is safe (and wise) to have two passw-user
databases for the same one user.
I'm thinking,
mail to me via pam
mail to me@this.domain via ldap
the
On 23/06/15 15:41, Steffen Kaiser wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Tue, 23 Jun 2015, Steffen Kaiser wrote:
On Tue, 23 Jun 2015, lejeczek wrote:
I wonder if it is safe (and wise) to have two passw-user
databases for the
same one user.
I'm thinking,
mail to me vi
hi everybody
I wonder if it is safe (and wise) to have two passw-user
databases for the same one user.
I'm thinking,
mail to me via pam
mail to me@this.domain via ldap
whole Maildir would be essentially the same one storage
target, I see permissions have to be mangled, available to
write for
I wonder if queries to/via pam are formatable?
What I'm thinking I'd like to try is to use pam with
users@local.domain.
And I guess I'd have to loose domain part somehow.
many thanks
On 23/06/15 14:13, Jerry wrote:
On Tue, 23 Jun 2015 14:02:53 +0100, lejeczek stated:
this is freaking weird, and wrong! If I do no configure pam
nor passwd and no userdb+static then! ...ldap works.
I do use, well I'm trying, pam for system users which are
not in passwd. PAM gets those s
On 23/06/15 13:10, Steffen Kaiser wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Tue, 23 Jun 2015, lejeczek wrote:
On 23/06/15 09:32, Steffen Kaiser wrote:
On Mon, 22 Jun 2015, lejeczek wrote:
On 22/06/15 09:43, Steffen Kaiser wrote:
On Mon, 22 Jun 2015, lejeczek wrote:
On 22/06
On 23/06/15 09:32, Steffen Kaiser wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Mon, 22 Jun 2015, lejeczek wrote:
On 22/06/15 09:43, Steffen Kaiser wrote:
On Mon, 22 Jun 2015, lejeczek wrote:
On 22/06/15 09:16, lejeczek wrote:
to=,orig_to=,
relay=dovecot, delay=39296, delays
On 23/06/15 08:19, Daniel Tröder wrote:
Am 22.06.2015 um 18:21 schrieb lejeczek:
On 22/06/15 09:16, lejeczek wrote:
dear all
I have a postfix relaying to dovecot's lda but "strangely" it does not
work, I mean I imaging it's me doing something wrong, yet I cannot
figure out
On 22/06/15 09:16, lejeczek wrote:
dear all
I have a postfix relaying to dovecot's lda but "strangely"
it does not work, I mean I imaging it's me doing something
wrong, yet I cannot figure out what.
postfix logs:
to=,orig_to=, relay=dovecot,
delay=39296, delays=3
On 22/06/15 15:57, Steffen Kaiser wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Mon, 22 Jun 2015, lejeczek wrote:
On 22/06/15 09:43, Steffen Kaiser wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Mon, 22 Jun 2015, lejeczek wrote:
On 22/06/15 09:16, lejeczek wrote:
to
On 22/06/15 15:34, Felix Zielcke wrote:
Am Montag, den 22.06.2015, 10:05 +0100 schrieb lejeczek:
I wonder could there be some kind of collision between
user/passdbs, even though I do not configure anything but
ldap, when I do:
passdb {
driver = pam
}
passdb {
args = /etc/dovecot/ldap
On 22/06/15 09:43, Steffen Kaiser wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Mon, 22 Jun 2015, lejeczek wrote:
On 22/06/15 09:16, lejeczek wrote:
to=,orig_to=,
relay=dovecot, delay=39296, delays=39294/2.2/0/0.27,
dsn=4.3.0, status=deferred (temporary failure)
and dovecot
On 22/06/15 09:16, lejeczek wrote:
dear all
I have a postfix relaying to dovecot's lda but "strangely"
it does not work, I mean I imaging it's me doing something
wrong, yet I cannot figure out what.
postfix logs:
to=,orig_to=, relay=dovecot,
delay=39296, delays=3
On 22/06/15 09:16, lejeczek wrote:
dear all
I have a postfix relaying to dovecot's lda but "strangely"
it does not work, I mean I imaging it's me doing something
wrong, yet I cannot figure out what.
postfix logs:
to=,orig_to=, relay=dovecot,
delay=39296, delays=3
dear all
I have a postfix relaying to dovecot's lda but "strangely"
it does not work, I mean I imaging it's me doing something
wrong, yet I cannot figure out what.
postfix logs:
to=,orig_to=, relay=dovecot,
delay=39296, delays=39294/2.2/0/0.27, dsn=4.3.0,
status=deferred (temporary failur
On 19/06/15 15:13, Mauricio Tavares wrote:
On Jun 19, 2015 9:08 AM, "lejeczek" wrote:
I guess this would be a common case, I am hoping for some final
clarification.
a few Linux boxes share ldap (multi-master) backend that PAM/SSSD uses to
authenticated users, and these LDAPs a
I guess this would be a common case, I am hoping for some
final clarification.
a few Linux boxes share ldap (multi-master) backend that
PAM/SSSD uses to authenticated users, and these LDAPs are
also is used by Samba, users start @ uid 1000.
Boxes are in the same both DNS and Samba domains.
D
On 18/06/15 14:01, Teemu Huovila wrote:
On 06/17/2015 06:07 PM, lejeczek wrote:
On 16/06/15 14:27, lejeczek wrote:
On 16/06/15 14:16, lejeczek wrote:
On 16/06/15 13:14, B wrote:
P,
On Tue, Jun 16, 2015 at 01:07:52PM +0100, lejeczek wrote:
I've barely started reading on dsync and I w
On 18/06/15 14:01, Teemu Huovila wrote:
On 06/17/2015 06:07 PM, lejeczek wrote:
On 16/06/15 14:27, lejeczek wrote:
On 16/06/15 14:16, lejeczek wrote:
On 16/06/15 13:14, B wrote:
P,
On Tue, Jun 16, 2015 at 01:07:52PM +0100, lejeczek wrote:
I've barely started reading on dsync and I w
I think I'm near getting a simple replication, but on server
which is still "empty" I get:
Initialization failed: Namespace '':
mkdir(/var/spool/mail/ccnr.biotechnology/nr412/Maildir)
failed: Permission denied (euid=1187(nr412) egid=513(Domain
Users) missing +w perm: /var/spool/mail, we're no
On 16/06/15 14:27, lejeczek wrote:
On 16/06/15 14:16, lejeczek wrote:
On 16/06/15 13:14, B wrote:
P,
On Tue, Jun 16, 2015 at 01:07:52PM +0100, lejeczek wrote:
I've barely started reading on dsync and I wonder..
would you know if it is possible to sync/replicate only
specific
domain(
hi,
I'm fiddling with dsync and get these in the logs:
auth: Error: password(ps655@): Password data is not valid
for scheme SSHA: Input isn't valid base64 encoded data
..
auth: Error: ldap(ns580@,172.25.12.215):
ldap_search(base=ou=,ou=mail,dc=virtual,dc=hosting
filter=(&(objectclass=person)
On 16/06/15 14:16, lejeczek wrote:
On 16/06/15 13:14, B wrote:
P,
On Tue, Jun 16, 2015 at 01:07:52PM +0100, lejeczek wrote:
I've barely started reading on dsync and I wonder..
would you know if it is possible to sync/replicate only
specific
domain(users)? or it's always the whole
On 16/06/15 13:14, B wrote:
P,
On Tue, Jun 16, 2015 at 01:07:52PM +0100, lejeczek wrote:
I've barely started reading on dsync and I wonder..
would you know if it is possible to sync/replicate only specific
domain(users)? or it's always the whole lot?
See
http://blog.dovecot.o
hi everybody
I've barely started reading on dsync and I wonder..
would you know if it is possible to sync/replicate only
specific domain(users)? or it's always the whole lot?
many thanks
P.
On 18/02/15 07:39, Steffen Kaiser wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Wed, 18 Feb 2015, lejeczek wrote:
On 17/02/15 19:36, Pascal Volk wrote:
On 02/17/2015 04:03 PM, lejeczek wrote:
hi everybody.
I wonder if such a scenario is possible.
if yes would I configure multiple
On 17/02/15 19:36, Pascal Volk wrote:
On 02/17/2015 04:03 PM, lejeczek wrote:
hi everybody.
I wonder if such a scenario is possible.
if yes would I configure multiple passdb using ldap driver
or within one clause set up multiple args? How would this work?
Did you read http://wiki2
hi everybody.
I wonder if such a scenario is possible.
if yes would I configure multiple passdb using ldap driver
or within one clause set up multiple args? How would this work?
many thanks
P.
hi,
I might have been bit impatient,must have been Thunderbird
or something else that caused a bit of delay between when an
entry appeared in hosts.deny and mail client actually got
denied.
regards
On 07/03/2013 05:05 PM, lejeczek wrote:
hi everybody
having I believe sort of plain-vanilla
hi everybody
having I believe sort of plain-vanilla config with section
in 10-tcpwrapper.conf
as per docs
login_access_sockets = tcpwrap
service tcpwrap {
unix_listener login/tcpwrap {
group = $default_login_user
mode = 0600
user = $default_login_user
}
}
/etc/hosts.deny contai
dear all
probably something trivial, just cannot get my way around
it, my goal is to get sieve on local-system users too, so
postfix hands lda over to dovecot
errors with mail for system users:
lda(me): Fatal: setgid(12(mail)) failed with euid=501(me),
gid=513(Domain Users), egid=513(
Domain
is it configurable anywhere on the runtime level, is it configurable at all
selinux policy does not allow for transition between some domains
that subsequently results in deliver not being granted permissions it needs
to write to /tmp
instead of compiling a policy module I wonder what is the matte
46 matches
Mail list logo
