On 23/06/15 15:34, Steffen Kaiser wrote:
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
On Tue, 23 Jun 2015, lejeczek wrote:
I wonder if it is safe (and wise) to have two passw-user
databases for the same one user.
I'm thinking,
mail to me via pam
mail to me@this.domain via ldap
the first passdb wins. No problem.
whole Maildir would be essentially the same one storage
target, I see permissions have to be mangled, available
to write for both vmail and actual uid.
again, the first userdb wins. Your users can auth agains
pam, but the data may come from LDAP or a static userdb.
If you auth agains PAM successfully, does _not_ mean that
you automatically use system users or Dovecot changes uids
or something. All such information come from the userdb.
If both users match the same userdb entry, they appear the
same for Dovecot.
my working setup as above brakes if the target storage
misses o=rwx (very weird again)
Even if I stick an ACL to it with vmail=rwX it still fails
and quite silently leaving one clueless.
me via pam = actual UID
me@this.domain via ldap = vmail UID
and that shared storage target seems must have o=rwx ??? (Or
I still got it wrong somewhere?)
- -- Steffen Kaiser
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1
iQEVAwUBVYluhnz1H7kL/d9rAQI4gAgAy1K6C96H/L26Jb67AElPtOZ/2YUZQdqA
IZQP6aD+WVEfy1brpwEkOs4EOYBRNGTN3ifTQSyKu5lcDffFIOEloXSc3PLuqR/e
oc0l/g9qBzuCdITPHvDer+37pPn/lg70Ye/Aqc8EIiuNNNtt1EXnF0TMZYOLv/Uj
SgWlCkW31iJBq83DJ/hRDQQO1CvDA/3pPl33vLRBXepICZXiPJhvMkzeqsy2wAEL
VanIWuPRVhautE23ko7u/hjzIDKHEkFmXQgDQxVR9/bT5D0BGW6Ma+13EIGnnKZe
/8aYu3l+TTzIcnyK3rXdW2tME0nqhGAg5bX/FgnBJ5uHGldg63zDjg==
=QLx9
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
