On 4.4.2015 10:02, Harondel J. Sibble wrote:
Don't need to block anyone like in the "Re: Dovecot Oy merger with
Open-Xchange AG" thread, but when I have my vacation recipie active, I'd like
it to NOT reply to certain addresses.
The commented out condition in the rule you posted seems syntactica
On 13.2.2015 16:59, Kevin Laurie wrote:
Dear Jiri,
I tried the following to try to get the inbox deduplicated. My inbox is
quite large and urgently need to remove the duplicated messages.
Is there an easy way to do this?
Sorry for being so presistant but I need help.
The command I tried:-
do
On 13.2.2015 15:54, Kevin Laurie wrote:
Hello,
I just migrated my emails from gmail using getmail.
In the process I got some emails that have been doubled or tripled
How do I run the doveadm command to delete copies of same emails?
I tried running the following:-
doveadm deduplicate -u u...@doma
On 02/03/2015 03:35 PM, Ron Cleven wrote:
We are gradually rolling out Dovecot (IMAP only, no POP3) to our
customer base. We are replicating between a pair of CentOS 7 boxes. All
has been working wonderfully. However, to be sure our rollout continues
to go smoothly, we put together a simple ben
On 30.1.2015 16:03, Evgeny Basov wrote:
Hello.
I'm tried to use domain quota:
Search the list archives. Unless something changed in that regard,
domain quotas don't work. When you use recalc, domain quota is updated
to values which are valid for last mailbox that was recalculated.
The way
On 14.11.2014 15:29, Chris Szilagyi wrote:
1) have enabled quotas on /home/username/mail,
2) have reloaded Dovecot after config change,
3) have read dovecot logs, if there are errors, and
4) maybe you need to configure a limit, in order to enable quotas in
Dovecot at all.
Tried on my server,
1) have enabled quotas on /home/username/mail,
2) have reloaded Dovecot after config change,
3) have read dovecot logs, if there are errors, and
4) maybe you need to configure a limit, in order to enable quotas in
Dovecot at all.
Tried on my server, seems like you're right - Dovecot is ignoring
On 14.10.2014 15:38, Rick van den Hof wrote:
Hi,
In our setup, we use two quota roots. One for user quota and one for
domain quota. If a user has no quota, then the domain quota is applied.
The recalc action has updated the domain usage to reflect the specific
user's usage (my 12876 messages ar
On 13.10.2014 11:11, Gedalya wrote:
On 10/13/2014 04:47 AM, Jiri Bourek wrote:
As a hack: you can just not run quota recalc ;-) or more realistically,
separately track user quotas individually (you really should!), and post
recalc immediately update the domain by running something like
update
On 13.10.2014 00:08, Gedalya wrote:
On 10/12/2014 01:28 PM, Filip Bartmann wrote:
After running `doveadm quota recalc -A` I have in my db:
---
+---++--+
| domain| bytes | messages |
+---++--+
| debian.jd | 50575
The mail is forwarded, but no vacation response is sent, and the mail is
not forwarded. I find the lda error like this:
_discarding_vacation_response_for_implicitly_delivered_message;
_no_known_(envelope)_recipient_address_found_in_message_headers_
(recipient=,_and_no_additional_
`:addresses'_
Background: I’m in the only user on this system, but this server is accessed by
my phone, my laptop, my tablet, and perhaps a web interface.
But there are some interesting values when I look at the output of doveconf.
Specifically, vsz_limit is 18,447 PB… yeah, that’s pretty big.
servic
On 6.9.2014 22:38, Dan Langille wrote:
I encountered this error on FreeBSD 9.3 with dovecot2-2.2.13_3
Short version; vsz_limit is 18,447 PB and it ran out of RAM. Suggestions for
change?
Sep 6 03:39:32 mailjail dovecot: imap(dan): Panic: file imap-fetch.c: line 556
(imap_fetch_more): assert
On 2.9.2014 17:52, Jogi Hofmüller wrote:
Hi,
Am 2014-09-02 15:26, schrieb Jiri Bourek:
I think your question is answered by first sentence in
http://wiki2.dovecot.org/Quota/Configuration#Quota_grace
I guess I totally misunderstood the quota_grace option then. To be
clear: if the last mail
On 2.9.2014 14:26, Jogi Hofmüller wrote:
Hi all,
Since I did not manage to get quota for individual subfolders working I
tried toying with quota_grace, which also does not work for me :( My
approach was this:
plugin {
quota = maildir:User quota
quota_grace = 20%%
quota_rule = *:storag
On 29.8.2014 13:00, Alex Crow wrote:
Hi Vijay,
No, this will not work properly. 50% of the time the client will still
try to connect to the downed server.
You need something like keepalived or corosync/pacemaker.
Cheers
Alex
AFAIK some clients - with Thunderbird among them - will try the o
On 27.8.2014 15:25, Michael wrote:
Quoting Philipp Faeustlin :
Am 27.08.2014 um 14:52 schrieb Michael:
I've already been aware of this web site. I saw that they offer only
packages for Ubuntu 12.04. I'm Using Ubuntu 14.04. I know that often
it's not a problem to take packages from another v
On 12.8.2014 13:04, Jochen Bern wrote:
On -10.01.-28163 20:59, Jiri Bourek wrote:
On 10.8.2014 06:18, Will Yardley wrote:
Depends on the environment; in many cases, the admin could, or may even
be expected to, raise the quota.
If you're expected to raise the quota in case it'
On 12.8.2014 12:23, Jon Hulatt wrote:
Hi,
Not sure if this is a PBKAC or not:-
root@ds3:/usr/share/postfixadmin# doveadm pw -s SHA512-CRYPT -p password
{SHA512-CRYPT}$6$aUgGXP0UshkMj7hY$9JV4yMRsjIe/98CzmglYrMjf.9NJ.FXzxcLE9B0v3doCRUWo2wRncc6hg6VCs0DCUHQbeC/bRDZdGCge/nB/h/
root@ds3:/usr/share/p
On 12.8.2014 00:42, Andrzej A. Filip wrote:
On 08/10/2014 12:31 AM, Timo Sirainen wrote:
On 10 Aug 2014, at 01:19, Timo Sirainen wrote:
I'd really like to hear Timo's view on having lmtp do a (configurable)
DEFER when the disk is full which is, most likely, a "temporary" error.
My opinion:
On 10.8.2014 06:18, Will Yardley wrote:
On Sun, Aug 10, 2014 at 01:31:47AM +0300, Timo Sirainen wrote:
Problems that admins can solve are temporary errors for users and
the'll need an error logged. Problems that are caused by users
themselves (like over quota) are usually not temporary errors a
On 8.8.2014 12:08, Nick Edwards wrote:
sod off dictator who the fuck do you think you are to tell people how to post
A: Because it messes up the order in which people normally read text.
Q: Why is top-posting such a bad thing?
A: Top-posting.
Q: What is the most annoying thing in e-mail?
Post
On 2.8.2014 12:57, Jerry wrote:
Sat, 2 Aug 2014 06:53:58 -0400
Presently, I have: "virtual_transport = dovecot" in my Postfix main.cf file
and
dovecot unix - n n - - pipe
flags=DRhu user=vmail:vmail argv=/usr/local/libexec/dovecot/dovecot-lda -f
${sender} -d
On 31.7.2014 12:05, Jogi Hofmüller wrote:
Hi Harald, all,
Am 2014-07-30 17:36, schrieb Reindl Harald:
normally you announce a mainantaince window for such migrations
That's what we do.
why do you need dsync at all for such a migration?
Migrating from cyrus to dovecot in a transparent man
On 30.7.2014 11:27, Reindl Harald wrote:
Am 30.07.2014 11:10, schrieb Jogi Hofmüller:
We are not planning on multiple runs of doveadm backup. The question is
what to do with LMTP _while_ the doveadm backup migration is happening?
just shutdown the MTA so you don't receive new mail
senders w
On 29.7.2014 15:48, Jogi Hofmüller wrote:
Hi all,
Another question regarding migration. While migrating a mailbox with
dsync is it safe to deliver mail via LMTP to the new (target) mailbox or
is it wiser to deactivate LMTP delivery to this mailbox until it's fully
migrated?
And what methods co
On 19.7.2014 00:54, Nathan Schultheiss wrote:
Hello,
For a few days I try to understand what program (Dovecot Director or
Dovecot Proxy) I should use for my email architecture.
We are a hospital, and for security reasons, we must host ourselves our
emails, and we must leave Google Apps...
OT:
On 17.7.2014 16:40, Jochen Bern wrote:
On -10.01.-28163 20:59, Daniele Nicolodi wrote:
Unfortunately I'm receiving some useful automated messages that lack a
Date header and this screws up the sorting in my imap clients. I have a
script to fix those acting on the Maildir storage, but I would pr
On 15.7.2014 11:13, Nick Edwards wrote:
On 7/14/14, Jiri Bourek wrote:
On 14.7.2014 00:24, Nick Edwards wrote:
On 7/12/14, Steve Litt wrote:
experience with Debian Wheezy is that lo "goes down" a lot, so this is
one of the first things I do when odd stuff happens.
Use a better
I have an idea how such a transition could go:
1. Upgrade the old dovecot 1.2.15 to 2.1.whateveritis from debian
squeeze backports.
Backports version is a bit outdated so you might want to consider using
version from jessie, which seems to follow the upstream more closely.
The trad
On 14.7.2014 00:24, Nick Edwards wrote:
On 7/12/14, Steve Litt wrote:
experience with Debian Wheezy is that lo "goes down" a lot, so this is
one of the first things I do when odd stuff happens.
Use a better operating system then
Blaming operating system after *one* person reports somethin
On 13.7.2014 08:55, Edwardo Garcia wrote:
Halo,
This might seem like another indirect thread.
I Monday started new job, first task must replace courier. The job use
POP3. and IMAP only for webmail, but must server support 4K POP3 at one
times. I see from similar thread current settings not adequa
On 3.7.2014 21:35, Timo Sirainen wrote:
On 10.6.2014, at 14.05, Charles Marcus wrote:
On 6/9/2014 5:44 PM, Ralf Hildebrandt wrote:
That's probably the problem here. The user had LOTS of (duplicate!)
mails in his inbox.
Anyone ever found a reliable way to do this?
It sure would be nice if
On 3.7.2014 23:55, A. Schulze wrote:
Timo Sirainen:
But now I'm wondering if no-compression should be enabled by default?..
to not potential break something I would not change the default now
but maybe later...
Thanks!
Andreas
Not sure if it's upstream change, but Debian disabled compress
On 1.7.2014 15:55, Leonardo Rodrigues wrote:
Em 01/07/14 10:06, Eliezer Croitoru escreveu:
On 07/01/2014 03:06 PM, Jiri Bourek wrote:
That really depends, rebuilding indexes can increase your downtime for
hours, so it may be better to pay a bit for extra storage space instead
of not being
On 1.7.2014 13:45, Leonardo Rodrigues wrote:
Em 01/07/14 00:16, Charles Cazabon escreveu:
deoren wrote:
Right now I'm using LVM snapshots + tarballs for daily backups, but
I'd like to get better coverage for incremental changes that occur
throughout the day. The size of existing content is low
On 1.7.2014 13:10, Jerry wrote:
When mail is relayed to dovecot from postfix, I am getting this error message
in the maillog:
Jul 1 07:05:19 scorpio postfix/pipe[45488]: 3h2jQl3Xldz3FMPc:
to=, relay=dovecot, delay=0.16, delays=0.12/0.01/0/0.03,
dsn=4.3.0, status=deferred (temporary failure. C
On 1.7.2014 00:28, deoren wrote:
I'm still pretty new to running a mail server, but one thing I've come
to appreciate over the years is a good backup strategy. Since I have
always run my own servers for practice and for personal use I don't have
access to Enterprise backup solutions. Because of t
On 30.6.2014 12:33, Nick Edwards wrote:
On 6/29/14, Alexandre Ellert wrote:
Le 29 juin 2014 à 06:24, Nick Edwards a écrit :
it is the job of postfix to do this, aliases are just that, aliases of
the real mail account, they do not exist in real storage, else, they
would not be alias.
T
On 23.6.2014 20:29, Robert Schetterer wrote:
Am 23.06.2014 19:56, schrieb Steve Litt:
Hi all,
In switching from Ubuntu to Debian Wheezy (7.5 64bit, network install),
I'm finding some surprises in getting Dovecot to work.
PROBLEM:
As installed, the package manager doesn't give you the dovecot
e
On 18.6.2014 22:25, Egbert wrote:
Hi! We will soon start upgrading our Ubuntu mail server (running 2.0.19)
from 12.04.1 LTSto 14.04 LTS.
The dovecot config is still pretty much in 1.x style; one flat file
called dovecot.conf. I can easily switch to a dovecot.conf with the
"!include" lines and ren
On 14.5.2014 13:29, Axel Luttgens wrote:
Le 14 mai 2014 à 11:41, Jiri Bourek a écrit :
[...]
AFAIK PigeonHole can read scripts only from file. Being able to use SQL
database as data source would sure be nice and I recall there was some short
discussion about it, but - again, AFAIK - it was
On 14.5.2014 02:15, Andrew Beverley wrote:
On Tue, 2014-05-13 at 16:21 +0200, Stephan Bosch wrote:
This should provide what you need:
http://sieve.info/
http://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc5435
http://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc5436
http://wiki2.dovecot.org/Pigeonhole
Fantastic, thanks, exactly what I
Andreas Meyer wrote:
Hello all!
# dovecot --version
2.1.17
Sometimes I have this in the logfile:
May 11 16:55:52 master: Warning: service(imap-login): process_limit (100)
reached, client connections are being dropped
May 11 17:35:03 master: Warning: service(imap-login): process_limit (100)
r
On 8.5.2014 17:27, Rick Romero wrote:
Quoting Reindl Harald :
Am 08.05.2014 17:13, schrieb Rick Romero:
Quoting Reindl Harald :
Am 08.05.2014 16:56, schrieb Alessio Cecchi:
Il 08/05/2014 08:06, Davide ha scritto:
Hi to all, i have qmail installed on my system with dot-qmail files
format
On 8.5.2014 17:03, Reindl Harald wrote:
Am 08.05.2014 16:56, schrieb Alessio Cecchi:
Il 08/05/2014 08:06, Davide ha scritto:
Hi to all, i have qmail installed on my system with dot-qmail files
format to deliver to mailbox (maildir format with dovecot 2.2.12);
currently i use LDA to delivery a
It is not dead, but I haven't seen much interest for it either.
Well I was thinking about switching from dovecot-lda to LMTP and use
the extdata plugin to check whether the message should go through
spamc (via extprograms filter extension). All that in sieve_before script
That proved problemat
It is not dead, but I haven't seen much interest for it either.
Well I was thinking about switching from dovecot-lda to LMTP and use the
extdata plugin to check whether the message should go through spamc (via
extprograms filter extension). All that in sieve_before script
That proved proble
Is it possible to use backend's passdb on the relay server in your setup?
If you are - for example - using SQL database as passdb on the backend,
you can access it from relay server as well. Let's say you have
"relay_enabled" column in the table of users, then you can use something
like:
sel
Hi,
I'd like to ask about status of extdata plugin for sieve. The wiki page
(http://wiki2.dovecot.org/Pigeonhole/Sieve/Plugins/Extdata) mentions
versions for PigeonHole 0.2 and 0.3, but there seems to be no version
for 0.4 and Dovecot 2.2.
Is the plugin dead or is it planned to make version
I set the host to 127.0.0.1 now. And my pg_hba.conf looks like that:
# TYPE DATABASE USER ADDRESS METHOD
# Mail stuff
host mail mailreader 127.0.0.1/32 md5
Shouldn't the last column here match your "default_pass_scheme" above?
Maybe change "default_pass_scheme" to "md5-crypt" or "md5"?
Joseph
Andreas Schulze wrote:
Reindl Harald:
https://www.ssllabs.com/ssltest/ just don't alow anything other than
https and port 443 - what reports are you speaking about?
your free to configure pop3s/imaps/ssmtp on the "nonstandard" port 443
I have to explain this message from Qualys as not
relev
Jan Valvekens wrote:
Hi,
I'd like to move mail folders from one mail account to another mail
account on the same server. Moving the folders via my mail client
(Thunderbird) takes a long time. Therefore I wondered whether it's not
possible to simply move the files on the server itself. If I unsub
Yes, the new server is functional and all the users are able to log in, view
delivered messages and retrieve the messages into their mail clients.
However, they cannot view any old messages or retrieve any old messages.
If I wanted to do this, I'd probably use something along these lines:
- g
Charles Marcus wrote:
Hi all,
Currently, I have mail_location = maildir:~/Maildir set and all passdb
and userdb lookups are SQL based (doveconf -n pasted below).
However, I want to override the users maildir location - and *only* the
maildir location - for just a few users.
I was thinking the
The last sentence describes what happened to you: all new mail on the
new machine is a "change" and was discarded (by deleting new mail.) If
I'm not mistaken, this is correct behaviour for backup mode - you get
exact copy of the source side (maildir:/tmp/mail_backup) on
destination side (d...@dark
Hi
- where did I fail (ignoring the backups, please. That's .. something I
know)
From the man page: "backup - Backup mails from default mail location to
location2 (or vice versa, if -R parameter is given). No changes are ever
done to the source location. Any changes done in destination are
If you're trying to do this without reading, you can't read the sieve rules.
If you only want to prevent the delivery process from reading Maildir
data (messages) and don't mind when it reads dovecot-uidlist, one
possible solution may be moving dovecot-uidlist (and others) out of the
Maildir.
Hello,
I'm trying to create automated backup recovery using "doveadm import"
and "doveadm deduplicate". During testing I noticed that deduplicate
only deletes some duplicates and has to be called multiple times to find
them all. Here's what I've been trying (in shell commands):
First, expung
d...@stean.ch wrote:
Hello there,
I am working with dovecot v2.2.12, and have setup a user and domain
quota by using a quota/quota_rule for user and quota2/quota2_rule for
the domain.
This works fine when the limit configuration for both is stored inside
dovecot configuration files. However, I
Reindl Harald wrote:
Am 24.03.2014 12:47, schrieb Gedalya:
On 03/24/2014 07:34 AM, Jürgen Ladstätter wrote:
we use dovecot 2.0.9 and authentication against a mysql database. Everything
works fine, but we found some weird behavior – when the password is e.g.
“testpass” you also authenticate suc
Christian Rößner wrote:
Hi,
I had created an imap folder that has German Umlauts in it:
„RA Rößner - Merle“
When finished, the result looks like this on filesystem:
drwx-- 3 vmail vmail 4096 Dec 27 11:02 RA Ro&AwgA3w-ner - Merle/
I wrote this sieve script (with SOGo):
if anyof (address
Timo Sirainen wrote:
On 19.12.2013, at 10.54, Jiri Bourek wrote:
As far as I can tell, quota enforcing in dovecot-lda works
correctly. User is allowed one message which brings him over quota
(provided the message fits into filesystem quota hard limit and
quota_grace value), every other
Robert Schetterer wrote:
Am 19.12.2013 09:54, schrieb Jiri Bourek:
quota2_grace = 18%%
quota_grace = 18%%
i am not sure ,you can have two quota2_grace rules, that should be a
universal parameter
Documentation doesn't mention anything about multiple quota_grace rules
explicitly
Hello,
I have Dovecot 2.2.9 from Debian repository running on AMD64, ext4
filesystem for mail storage. Each mailbox has its own system user,
quotas are enforced by file system. Quota settings in configuration are
as follows (from doveconf -n):
quota = fs:Domain quota:group:inode_per_mail
65 matches
Mail list logo
