Re: replication and backup

>> Yes I think it is depending on your storage format (mdbox only?). I >> am running "doveadm purge -u" every two months. If I would make a >> new server I would also use the LAYOUT=index this does not give you >> issues with mailbox names, however there were some other issues, but >> I think new v

Re: [EXT] Replication going away?

>>> A 50-100 mailbox user server will run Dovecot CE just fine. Pro would >>> be overkill. >> >> What is overkill? I always thought it had a bit more features and support. > > For Pro 2.3, you need (at minimum) 7 Dovecot nodes + HA authentication + HA > storage + (minimum) 3 Cassandra nodes if

Re: Replication going away?

>> While I understand it takes effort to maintain the replication plugin, this >> is especially problematic for small active/active high-availability >> deployments. > > To clarify: replication absolutely does not provide "active/active". > Replication was meant to copy data to a standby serve

Re: Replication going away?

> Le 19/07/2023 à 19:53, Michael Peddemors a écrit : >> Real world is a bit different.. DNS Caching.. While DNS Round Robin is good >> enough to distribute loads, it isnt' a very good method for failover, even >> with a very short TTL. Many home routers, still insist on caching results >> for a

Re: Replication going away?

>> While I understand it takes effort to maintain the replication plugin, this >> is especially problematic for small active/active high-availability >> deployments. >> I guess there are lots of servers that use replication for just 50 or 100 >> mailboxes. Cloudstorage (like S3) would be overkil

Re: Replication going away?

>> Just to understand that correctly: I could setup a (cron) based process for >> doveadm sync, but no longer a setup like >> plugin { >> mail_replica = tcp:$IMAP_REPLICA_SERVER:$IMAP_REPLICA_PORT >> } >> where the cron would lead to some delay and would have to check for >> concurrent job

Re: dovecot crash with Panic: file istream-header-filter.c: line 663

>>> After the above, it's no longer crashing, and my email client's "pending >>> operations" have >>> cleared. >> >> Does your server use ECC memory and if so, are there any errors logged >> (bitflip, ...)? >> >> Best regards, >> Gerald > > I don't have the logs from that time them nor do I

Re: dovecot crash with Panic: file istream-header-filter.c: line 663

> After the above, it's no longer crashing, and my email client's "pending > operations" have > cleared. Does your server use ECC memory and if so, are there any errors logged (bitflip, ...)? Best regards, Gerald

Re: Replication not working - GUIDs conflict - will be merged later

> (we're using maildir, so I can just rsync the individual mails/folders) I'm curious if anybody experienced this issue using mdbox. As far as I remember it's better suited for replication as filenames and location do not change on disk (index only). Best regards Gerald

Re: [External] reconsidering my (your?) current setup

>> The CentOS community manager is a friend and he understands that they really >> missed the mark on the messaging around CentOS8 Stream. >> In short, I'm not sure it's going to be that bad of a solution. > > > People think that because Redhat has repeatedly said stream is not Centos or > a

Re: Timo - is the v2.3.15 GCC limitation really necessarily or it's just a bug?

> You can use Developer Toolset. It comes with newer GCC versions. I > don't know the precise CentOS repository layout, but there is a > devtoolset-7-gcc package somewhere. SCL is included with CentOS, see: https://www.softwarecollections.org/en/scls/rhscl/devtoolset-7/ https://www.softwarecol

Re: function for whitelisting IPs

> I run a personal email server. I can't emphasize enough how geofencing has > reduced the useless hacking on my email server. I only leave port 25 open to > the world. I use port 587. Unfortunately that's not an option for commercial mailservers. You have to be open to communicate with the wor

Re: function for whitelisting IPs

> Do you have any examples of such a function and how/where it is used ? >I have a better idea: >Have a function for whitelisting IPs, possible /24's or similiar, where a > login to roundcube or other webmail client (with 2FA) will add the IP onto a > whitelist for that account. For s

Re: Feature request.

> I have to say I'm totally baffled since I do nothing when LetsEncrypt renews > the certificate. > > I know the cert has been updated because the mail clients asks me if I trust > the certificate. > > If it makes a difference I use the bash LetsEncrypt not the Python code. I don't like al

Re: Version controlled (git) Maildir generated by Dovecot

>> -- Původní e-mail -- >> Od: Gerald Galster >> Komu: dovecot@dovecot.org >> Datum: 7. 10. 2020 14:36:43 >> Předmět: Re: Version controlled (git) Maildir generated by Dovecot >> >>> Could you please tell me / do you know if tho

Re: Version controlled (git) Maildir generated by Dovecot

> Could you please tell me / do you know if those dovecot* files have to be > also backed / archived? IIRC the plain files from cur/ and new/ should suffice. You can try it: create a new IMAP folder, then close your mail app. Copy some mail files from another cur/ to this imap folder's cur/ di

Re: Mail replication does not work

Hi, > I have installed two Debian 10.5 (SSH server) systems > and I would like replicate mails between them. > But the replication is very unstable. > mail_location = mbox:~/mail:INBOX=/var/mail/%u I don't think mbox is suitable for replication. Try mdbox or sdbox. Best regards Gerald

Re: RHEL7/CentOS7 RPM of dovecot 2.3.11.3-3 seems to have dropped tcpwrap support

At a guess it was removed from the spec for el8 (which does not support tcpwrap) and somehow got removed from el7 by accident. The ghettoforge dovecot23 packages have tcpwrap support for el7: > > So is el8 truly incompatible with tcpwrap? Or is it just too much > effort to contin

Re: Apple Mail Since upgrade to dovecot 2.3.x unable to connect

>> You need to set >> >> ssl_min_protocol = TLSv1.2 # or TLSv1 > > Thanks, tried both, but unsuccessfully. Again, is there any debug > setting that allows me to see what SSL version was requested? Without > this, this is fumbling in the dark. In the german version of Apple Mail go to menu "Fenst

Re: Stuck here - help please

> Thank you for the details. As per your suggestion, I have made the changes to > dovecot.conf file. Still I don't see any replication is happening. Please see > the dovecot.conf file. > > I do not see "/etc/dovecot/conf.d/12-replication.conf" in my servers. So I > had put everything in the d

Re: Stuck here - help please

> I have done the sync manually with "doveadm sync" command. But, I have not > configured the replication yet. If you don't tell dovecot where to replicate, nothing gets replicated. > I am looking at the below webpage for the replication. > > https://wiki.dovecot.org/Replication

Re: Stuck here - help please

> I have 2 test servers with the below configuration. > > == > Linux OS- Red Hat Enterprise Linux Server release 7.7 (Maipo) > Dovecot version - 2.2.36 (1f10bfa63) > Postfix version - 2.10.1 > == > > Trying to create High Availability.

Re: NFS vs Replication

>> With DNS this happens automatically because ips are rotated by resolvers >> and the mailclient gets the same ip for all its connections. Failover >> is builtin as mailclients just connect to the second ip when the first >> is not reachable. > > I don't trust DNS load balancing. I saw too many t

Re: NFS vs Replication

> Some missing infos... > > - As load balancer I'm using a pair of keepalived with simple setup and > not the DNS > - Load balancer algorithm is "Weighted Least-Connection" > - About 20 domains and 3000 email > - I'm monitoring my backend servers with poolmon > - The backend servers are virtual

Re: NFS vs Replication

> I built an email system using a proxy / director pair (IMAP, POP3, LMTP) > and a backend pair. > > To have an HA system, I would like to understand if it is better to use > an NFS export or replication to save emails and index files > > NFS is provided by a NAS (in HA), while for replication

Re: Dovecot and MySQL aborted connections.

> We also spotted these sql connections getting aborted, upon upgrading MySQL > from 5.6 to 5.7. (Going back to 5.6 we don't see them!) I have a mailserver running MySQL 5.6.44 which is not very busy that logs these warnings. Another busy one running MySQL 5.6.45 does not log any warnings. My

Re: Dovecot and MySQL aborted connections.

Hi, > Is anyone else using Dovecot (2.3.8) with MySQL (5.7) seeing a lot of these > in MySQL logs? > > 2019-10-28T11:08:20.384428+02:00 58378 [Note] Aborted connection 58378 to db: > 'vmail' user: 'vmail' host: 'localhost' (Got an error reading communication > packets) > 2019-10-28T11:10:09.82

Re: dovecot disk space settings

> > is there an option to leave some disk space free? > Let's say, don't store new mails if the storage mount point has less > than 1% free disk space. > What's the way to go? > > I don't want to restrict each mailbox size. It's just to prevent running > out space completely. emails are often ac

Re: Dovecote IMAPSieve user scripts

> I wonder how to configure IMAPSieve with user scripts. I can't find much > information on the internet. try to enable managesieve: service managesieve-login { inet_listener sieve { port = 4190 } } https://wiki2.dovecot.org/Pigeonhole/ManageSieve/Configuration

Re: Random duplicated emails

> I migrated our mail infrastructure to Dovecot on Ubuntu 18.04 some months > ago. It works fine, but recently some users told me that they sometime > receive duplicated emails. Same email content, same headers including > message-id. > > I'm using two dovecot servers on two sites. Both server

Re: Dovecot and Apple's Mail.app not playing nicely?

>>> On 3 Sep 2019, at 15.30, Coy Hile via dovecot wrote: >>> Hi all, >>> Is there anything cute one has to take into account when using Dovecot with >>> users of Apple’s Mail.app? >>> Behavior I’m seeing is that if I delete or move messages via Webmail >>> (Roundcube, Horde, or even ActiveSync

Re: Dovecot and Apple's Mail.app not playing nicely?

Hi Coy, > Is there anything cute one has to take into account when using Dovecot with > users of Apple’s Mail.app? > Behavior I’m seeing is that if I delete or move messages via Webmail > (Roundcube, Horde, or even ActiveSync > via Mail.app on my phone), they do get moved or deleted. However,

Re: doveadm backup mdbox - initial copy slow

> On 30.8.2019 12.33, Gerald Galster via dovecot wrote: >> Hello, >> >> when calling doveadm backup like in the following example, it seems to flush >> every email to disk >> maxing out harddrives (iops) and resulting in very poor performance: >> >&g

doveadm backup mdbox - initial copy slow

Hello, when calling doveadm backup like in the following example, it seems to flush every email to disk maxing out harddrives (iops) and resulting in very poor performance: Calling doveadm -o plugin/quota= backup -u "statusma...@domain.com" "mdbox:/backup/vmail/domain.com/statusmails" finished

Re: User / Pass SQL queries

Hi Michael, > Is there any reason Dovecot shows the 'user' variable (ie: u...@domain.tld) > being obtained in the password query and not the (more logical) user query? maybe prefetching is configured: https://wiki.dovecot.org/AuthDatabase/SQL Prefe

Re: Replication issue 2.3.7

Hello, this sounds like the replication problem that occured after 2.2.33.2: https://www.dovecot.nl/list/dovecot/2018-March/111422.html As far as I remember there is no fix yet. Best regards Gerald > Am 13.07.2019 um 14:18 schrieb Günther J. Niederwimmer via dovecot > : > > Hello, > > Tha

Re: High availability of Dovecot

> Am 11.04.2019 um 13:45 schrieb Patrick Westenberg via dovecot > : > > Gerald Galster via dovecot schrieb: > >> mail1.yourdomain.com <http://mail1.yourdomain.com> IN A 192.168.10.1 >> mail2.yourdomain.com <http://mail2.yourdomain.com> IN A 192.16

Re: Mail account brute force / harassment

> Am 11.04.2019 um 12:43 schrieb Marc Roos via dovecot : > > Please do not assume anything other than what is written, it is a > hypothetical situation > > > A. With the fail2ban solution > - you 'solve' that the current ip is not able to access you > - it will continue bothering other se

Re: Mail account brute force / harassment

> Am 11.04.2019 um 12:28 schrieb Odhiambo Washington via dovecot > : > > > > On Thu, 11 Apr 2019 at 13:24, Marc Roos via dovecot > wrote: > > > Say for instance you have some one trying to constantly access an > account > > > Has any of you made something cre

Re: High availability of Dovecot

> Am 11.04.2019 um 11:48 schrieb luckydog xf : > > As your statement, nothing speical is needed to do except setting up DNS MX > records, right? MX records are for incoming MAIL: yourdomain.com IN MX 100 mail1.yourdomain.com yourdomai

Re: High availability of Dovecot

> I'm going to deploy postfix + dovecot + CephFS( as Mail Storage). > Basically I want to use two servers for them, which is kind of HA. you may consider dovecot's builtin dsync replication which works great with two servers (while there still is one little bug that may duplicate mails u

Re: ssl_cert: Can't open file permission denied

> Am 10.04.2019 um 11:59 schrieb Laura Smith via dovecot : > > > On Wednesday, April 10, 2019 10:52 AM, Aki Tuomi via dovecot > wrote: > >> On 10.4.2019 12.36, Laura Smith via dovecot wrote: >> >>> Dovecot 2.3.3 (dcead646b) >>> openSUSE Leap 15.0 >>> I am getting a weird error message: >>>

Re: protocols: Unknown protocol: sieve

> Am 10.04.2019 um 11:24 schrieb luckydog xf via dovecot : > > Hi, list, > > I downloaded dovecot-2.3-pigeonhole-0.5.5.tar.gz and installed it, after > I enabled > > #/etc/dovecot/conf.d/20-managesieve.conf > protocols = $protocols sieve > > it said " protocols: Unknown protocol: sieve

Re: CentOS Repository broken ?

> All is correct on my system also a yum clean is make. > > But the dovecot = 2.3.5.1-1 is MISSING on the repositories !! Sorry, this is wrong, it's there. Have a look at: http://repo.dovecot.org/ce-2.3-latest/centos/7/RPMS/x86_64/2.3.5.1-1_ce/

Re: CentOS Repository broken ?

> Am 30.03.2019 um 00:06 schrieb Peter via dovecot : > > On 30/03/19 1:31 AM, Günther J. Niederwimmer via dovecot wrote: >> I have a CentOS 7 server with dovecot Repository enabled. >> But it is not possible to Update with Yum Update >> I have this Error? >> The dovecot package is missing? >> F

Re: CentOS Repository broken ?

you could also try to download the rpms and update them with yum locally: http://repo.dovecot.org/ce-2.3-latest/centos/7/RPMS/x86_64/2.3.5.1-1_ce/ > Am 29.03.2019 um 14:54 schrieb Gerald Galster via dovecot > : > > or something has been cached, try: yum clean all and the

Re: CentOS Repository broken ?

or something has been cached, try: yum clean all and then yum update > Am 29.03.2019 um 14:49 schrieb Gerald Galster via dovecot > : > > Hello, > > can you please check if the dovecot repository is enabled? > Is it mentioned at the top of the output when you do &qu

Re: CentOS Repository broken ?

Hello, can you please check if the dovecot repository is enabled? Is it mentioned at the top of the output when you do "yum update": (1/10): base/7/x86_64/group_gz (2/10): updates/7/x86_64/primary_db ... Verfügbar / available: > Verfügbar: 1:dovecot-2.2.36-3.el7.i686 (base) T

CVE-2019-7524 backport patch for 2.2.33.2

Hello Aki, I'm currently stuck with 2.2.33.2 as 2.2.36 still duplicates mails after pop3 deletion on a two node dsync cluster. Therefore I've created a small patch and it seems only these two files are affected: dovecot-2.2.36.3/src/lib-storage/index/index-pop3-uidl.c dovecot-2.2.36.3/src/plug

Re: Removing a mailbox from a dovecot cluster

> Am 08.03.2019 um 14:46 schrieb Francis : > > Le jeu. 7 mars 2019 à 17:03, Gerald Galster via dovecot <mailto:dovecot@dovecot.org>> a écrit : > > Why does "doveadm replicator status " not return? > > I've tried the following commands on

Re: Removing a mailbox from a dovecot cluster

> Am 07.03.2019 um 20:43 schrieb Francis : > > Le mar. 5 mars 2019 à 10:08, Gerald Galster via dovecot <mailto:dovecot@dovecot.org>> a écrit : > > you could try to stop replication for the user you are deleting: > doveadm replicator remove [-a repli

Re: Removing a mailbox from a dovecot cluster

> Am 04.03.2019 um 22:19 schrieb Francis via dovecot : > > Le lun. 4 mars 2019 à 12:48, Gerald Galster via dovecot <mailto:dovecot@dovecot.org>> a écrit : > > Hallo Francis, > > have you tried removing the account from your ldap? If dovecot has no > inform

Re: Removing a mailbox from a dovecot cluster

> Am 04.03.2019 um 16:35 schrieb Francis via dovecot : > > Le jeu. 28 févr. 2019 à 11:18, Francis > a écrit : > Le mar. 26 févr. 2019 à 22:58, David Myers > a écrit : > Hello Francis, > > I wonder if this is due to how a cluster i

Re: new Centos server install yum dependancy error

> Am 23.02.2019 um 03:33 schrieb Voytek Eymont via dovecot > : > > > > On Sat, February 23, 2019 10:41 am, Gerald Galster via dovecot wrote: > >> >> >> you can't install it yet because dovecot-2.3.4-2.x86_64 is not shown, >> probably du

Re: new Centos server install yum dependancy error

> Am 22.02.2019 um 22:10 schrieb Voytek Eymont via dovecot > : > > > > On Sat, February 23, 2019 3:47 am, Gerald Galster via dovecot wrote: >> > >> >> try: yum clean all > > > Gerald , thank you > > it shows in the output after 

Re: new Centos server install yum dependancy error

> Am 22.02.2019 um 14:43 schrieb Voytek Eymont via dovecot > : > > > > On Sat, February 23, 2019 12:31 am, Gerald Galster via dovecot wrote: >> Hello Voytek, >> >> >> the *-devel packages include header files that are only needed if you >>

Re: new Centos server install yum dependancy error

Hello Voytek, the *-devel packages include header files that are only needed if you want to compile something, they are not needed for running a dovecot server. Likewise the *debuginfo packages, they contain information that is helpful for debugging dovecot. Your problem is here: Error: Packag

Re: index problems after update

For replicated servers I'm stuck with 2.2.33.2 because of pop3/dsync problems, but on single servers I have no index problems after upgrading to dovecot-2.2.35-1.el7.centos.0.x86_64 or dovecot-2.2.36-3.el7.x86_64. All servers run CentOS 7 (RHEL 7) but use lmtp delivery with mdbox and sieve. Maybe

Re: Dovecot v2.2.36.1 released

Hello Aki, > https://dovecot.org/releases/2.2/dovecot-2.2.36.1.tar.gz > https://dovecot.org/releases/2.2/dovecot-2.2.36.1.tar.gz.sig > > - pop3_no_flag_updates=no: Don't expunge RETRed messages without QUIT is this in any way related to the problem that has first been reported in march last

Re: managesieve configuration

Hi Dominik, I have set ssl = required in 10-ssl.conf globally but no ssl here: service managesieve-login { inet_listener sieve { port = 4190 } ... } Nevertheless, STARTTLS is offered "IMPLEMENTATION" "Dovecot Pigeonhole" "SIEVE" "fileinto reject envelope encoded-character vacation

Re: repo.dovecot.org expired certificate

Hi Aki, it doesn't happen very often but the certificate renew can fail, so it's best to check daily. certbot will only try to renew those certificates that are about to expire in a few weeks. I'm using a little perl script via cron which may be more flexible: #!/usr/bin/perl my $reload_coun

Re: Dovecot Submission Proxy Auth

parameter in the MAIL FROM > > MAIL FROM: AUTH=ja...@xxx.com SIZE=1430 > > But, it seems that postfix does not accept the AUTH= parameter and reject the > sender as no logged in. > > > Best regards, > > Jacky > > > > On 9/1/2019 5:49 PM,

Re: Dovecot Submission Proxy Auth

Hi Jacky, in postfix/main.cf you typically set something like smtpd_sasl_auth_enable=yes smtpd_sasl_type=cyrus smtpd_sasl_exceptions_networks=$mynetworks smtpd_sasl_security_options=noanonymous smtpd_sasl_authenticated_header=yes broken_sasl_auth_clients=yes smtpd_recipient_restrictions=permit_sa

Re: Replication fatal error

> Am 10.12.2018 um 19:39 schrieb Aki Tuomi : > > This has been fixed in a later version of Dovecot, so your best course of > action is to upgrade to some more recent version. I'd recommend 2.2.36. There is a replication bug that duplicates mails on deletion via pop3 under special circumstanc

Re: immediate delete of mails

Hello, most imap clients don't delete mails immediately, instead they are marked as deleted and expunged a few days or weeks later. From Sylpheed docs / Interface tab: https://sylpheed.sraoss.jp/doc/manual/en/sylpheed-8.html • If Execute immediately when moving or deleting messages is

Re: Duplicate mails on pop3 expunge with dsync replication on 2.2.35 (2.2.33.2 works)

Hi Jan, unfortunately no news on this topic after 6 months. I understand this bug might not be a top priority but perhaps someone from the dovecot team can clarify if they will investigate eventually or if we're on our own. Thanks, Gerald > Am 18.09.2018 um 23:20 schrieb Jan Münnich : > >

Re: How to send mail to mailbox with disabled domain?

If you want to accept delivery for one address only and reject all other adresses in the domain, you can do this with postfix's access table: http://www.postfix.org/access.5.html A hint to transport tables: us...@example1.com lmtp:$HOW_TO_REACH_THE_MX us...@example1.com

Re: How to send mail to mailbox with disabled domain?

Is this a dovecot problem on your side? dovecot usually accepts mail from MTA like postfix, so it would be better to remove example1.com from postfix relaydomains (mailbox domains, alias domains, ...). Then there is no delivery to dovecot. Most MTAs ignore MX records - if a domain is configured loc

Re: Duplicate mails on pop3 expunge with dsync replication on 2.2.35 (2.2.33.2 works)

Hi Tim, > Do you have any new insights on the problem with reappearing mail using > dovecot replication + pop3? > > It's driving me mad. I'm running dovecot 2.2.34 (874deae) on OpenBSD and it > looks like I have the same problem as you have. unfortunately there has been no response, I'm stuck

Re: Replication problems

Hello Thomas, which version of dovecot do you use? I'm running a dovecot cluster with 2 servers and dsync replication with ssh (no loadbalancer but active/active with same priority dns mx records). dsync replicates some emails back after they have been deleted on one node. For me this started a

Re: auth: Error - Request timed out

> Am 29.05.2018 um 11:00 schrieb Aki Tuomi : > > > > On 29.05.2018 11:35, Hajo Locke wrote: >> Hello, >> >> >> Am 29.05.2018 um 09:22 schrieb Aki Tuomi: >>> >>> On 29.05.2018 09:54, Hajo Locke wrote: Hello List, i use dovecot 2.2.22 and have the same problem described here:

Re: replicator: User listing returned failure

> Am 08.05.2018 um 23:37 schrieb Alexey : > > Wow. Sorry, maybe it works from morning or maybe somethings changes at the > evening, but I may say that replication works fine. But I can confirm it now > only with "less on mdbox file". But replication works!!! > > Thanks Gerald. That's great,

Re: replicator: User listing returned failure

> What about automatic replication without manually running of doveadm sync? >>> As I can see nothing happens automatically. >>> But mx2:~# doveadm -D sync -u ab...@example.com -d -N -l 30 -U >>> successfully executed and getting mails from mx1. I don't know if it makes a difference, I don't h

Re: [sieve][regex] Matching multiple strings in the "Received" header

Hello Adi, did you try: " from.*(outbound.protection.outlook.com|.google.com|.yahoo.com|mx.aol.com) " If you need to specify the posix character class: [[:blank:]] means space and tab. With pcre it would be like [ \t] [[:space:]] includes space, tab, newline, linefeed, formfeed, vertical tab (i

Re: replicator: User listing returned failure

Hello Alexey, > mx1:~# dovecot --version > 2.2.27 (c0f36b0) > > From dovecot.log: > May 07 19:27:41 auth-worker(34348): Warning: mysql: Query failed, retrying: > Unknown column 'username' in 'field list' > May 07 19:27:41 auth-worker(34348): Debug: sql(*): SELECT username, domain > FROM users >

Re: v2.2.36 release candidate released

Hello Timo, > Am 30.04.2018 um 16:11 schrieb Timo Sirainen : > > https://dovecot.org/releases/2.2/rc/dovecot-2.2.36.rc1.tar.gz > https://dovecot.org/releases/2.2/rc/dovecot-2.2.36.rc1.tar.gz.sig > > v2.2.36 is hopefully going to be the last v2.2.x release. Please test this RC > well, so we'll

Re: LDAP Homedir location: Needs dovecot restart after change it

Hello Andre, try to flush the auth cache: doveadm auth cache flush u...@example.com or: doveadm auth cache flush Best regards, Gerald > Am 16.04.2018 um 20:39 schrieb Andre Luiz Paiz : > > Dear group members. > > I work with Dovecot and Openldap authentication. Sometimes users change > depart

Re: 2.3.1 Replication is throwing scary errors

Hi, > There is also a second issue of a long standing race with replication > occurring somewhere whereby if a mail comes in, is written to disk, is > replicated and then deleted in short succession, it will reappear again to > the MUA. I suspect the mail is being replicated back from the remo

Duplicate mails on pop3 expunge with dsync replication on 2.2.35 (2.2.33.2 works)

Hello, consider the following setup with dovecot 2.2.35: smtp/587 (subject: test 1535) | | mx2a.example.com --> dsync/ssh --> mx2b.example.com | pop3 fetch/expunge (uid 23)