, I noticed that if I remove the 'fq=' part from
the query then I get a bunch of hits. Alas, I don't know whether those are to
be expected or not.
Does anybody have an idea what might cause this, or what the meaning of that
'box' checksum is?
--
Frerich Raabe - ra...@froglogic.com
www.froglogic.com - Multi-Platform GUI Testing
On 2014-06-10 17:23, Koenraad Lelong wrote:
op 10-06-14 17:12, Reindl Harald schreef:
than you have crap software somewhere on your side
What did I do to get such reply ?
Don't bother paying too much attention, Harald has been quite the primadonna
ever since I joined this list. Pretty sure
27;t seem to contain much).
--
Frerich Raabe - ra...@froglogic.com
www.froglogic.com - Multi-Platform GUI Testing
right now) I
greatly
appreciated your elaborate response and the insight. It's pearls like
this
one which keep me on the list despite the occasional flamewar. ;-)
--
Frerich Raabe - ra...@froglogic.com
www.froglogic.com - Multi-Platform GUI Testing
On 2013-12-19 17:51, Frerich Raabe wrote:
On 2013-12-19 16:07, Przemysław Orzechowski wrote:
Is it possible to compress incoming mails delivered via dovecots LDA
when using
dovecot --version
1.2.9
or do i have to compress them via cron?
There is a zlib plugin for Dovecot 1.x you could use
--
Frerich Raabe - ra...@froglogic.com
www.froglogic.com - Multi-Platform GUI Testing
ould match the *uncompressed* file size, for
plain files the S= value should match the physical file sie). The
script the attempts to print appropriate 'mv' commands for renaming
the files as needed. Maybe it helps, I attached it to this mail.
--
Frerich Raabe - ra...@froglogic.com
www.frog
On 2013-11-25 14:35, Jan-Frode Myklebust wrote:
On Mon, Nov 25, 2013 at 09:53:14AM +0100, Frerich Raabe wrote:
I run a small IMAP server for a dozen guys in the office, serving
about 55GB of Maildir. I recently became aware of the Zlib plugin (
http://wiki2.dovecot.org/Plugins/Zlib ) and
ld be much
appreciated - thanks!
--
Frerich Raabe - ra...@froglogic.com
www.froglogic.com - Multi-Platform GUI Testing
On 2013-10-30 16:03, Miquel van Smoorenburg wrote:
On 28/10/13 23:22, Frerich Raabe wrote:
You could imagine a system which requires users to generate a key
pair
and then submit their public key. The mail system will encrypt all
mail
received for a user with that users public key. When
ccessing sensitive data which is stored on an
untrusted system is an old and solved problem, I wouldn't be surprised
if you just have to consider implementation details in the case of a
mail server.
--
Frerich Raabe - ra...@froglogic.com
www.froglogic.com - Multi-Platform GUI Testing
On 2013-10-23 13:21, Reindl Harald wrote:
Am 23.10.2013 13:16, schrieb BONNET, Frank:
my first question is : does postfix and dovecot are able to use an
encrypted filesystem such as Encfs?
dovecot and postfix are userland-applications
it's not their job to bother about a filesystem
this is a k
a
fileinto "INBOX";
before the "stop;" to have the message get stored in the INBOX of the
recipient
and then stop any further processing.
--
Frerich Raabe - ra...@froglogic.com
www.froglogic.com - Multi-Platform GUI Testing
On 2013-08-02 14:25, Timo Sirainen wrote:
On Tue, 2013-07-30 at 14:55 +0200, Frerich Raabe wrote:
I'm running Dovecot 2.1.7 on Debian. Exim is the MTA. I was recently
made aware of the fact that the way in which Exim invokes
dovecot-lda is
prone to code injection:
dovecot_virtual_del
only returns when the server
adds
new mail to the folder. Hence, the IDLE call blocks the connection,
which
is why mail clients which use IDLE have to establish multiple IMAP
connections, one per folder which is monitored using this feature.
--
Frerich Raabe - ra...@froglogic.com
www.froglogic.com - Multi-Platform GUI Testing
On 2013-07-30 14:55, Frerich Raabe wrote:
Now, the reason I invoked dovecot like that is to pass a plausible
value for the HOME environment variable, so that dovecot-lda can
determine where the Maildir directory of the recipient is.
...for the sake of completeness: this stems from the fact
a can
determine where the Maildir directory of the recipient is. Is there any
way to achieve this without requiring HOME to be set correctly? I looked
at the -m switch but as far as I can see that merely defines the
destination mailbox, but not the path to the Maildir directory, correct?
--
Fr
nably well,
i.e.
rsync just copies those files which need to be copide, and rsnapshot
creates hardlinks to previous backups as far as possible. So our
nightly
backups are actually fairly small, most of them consist of hardlinks to
the next older backup we did.
--
Frerich Raabe - ra...@fro
/var/log/maillog you might have to check another
file (it depends on your Dovecot setup).
--
Frerich Raabe - ra...@froglogic.com
www.froglogic.com - Multi-Platform GUI Testing
1.2.x up to now, and trying to document a system
> install. So is it in the main distribution now?
It's part of the pigeonhole plugin, I think; see
/usr/ports/mail/dovecot2-pigeonhole
--
Frerich Raabe - ra...@froglogic.com
www.froglogic.com - Multi-Platform GUI Testing
On Jun 14, 2013, at 7:05 PM, Ben Morrow wrote:
> At 6PM -0700 on 14/06/13 you (Frerich Raabe) wrote:
>>
>> Nice, judging from the source code it looks very much like what I was
>> thinking of! However, as it happens my IMAP server is *very* minimalistic
>> (it
hing like - a
user logs in with his IMAP credentials, uploads a random mail and then
the web server uses the Sieve script which is currently active?
--
Frerich Raabe - ra...@froglogic.com
www.froglogic.com - Multi-Platform GUI Testing
I did that once and it was fairly
straightforward).
--
Frerich Raabe - ra...@froglogic.com
www.froglogic.com - Multi-Platform GUI Testing
is, though - I
wouldn't have thought it's than uncommon a requirement. :-)
OTOH, that's some incentive for me to write something which is reasonably
reusable as opposed to being specific to my particular setup.
--
Frerich Raabe - ra...@froglogic.com
www.froglogic.com - Multi-Platform GUI Testing
On Jun 14, 2013, at 11:07 AM, Ben Morrow wrote:
> At 9AM -0700 on 14/06/13 you (Frerich Raabe) wrote:
>>
>> One thing which came up repeatedly is that clients using the IMAP
>> server I run (using Dovecot 2.1) wonder whether they broke their Sieve
>> scripts, i.e.
On Jun 14, 2013, at 9:50 AM, Thomas Harold wrote:
> On 6/14/2013 12:40 PM, Frerich Raabe wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> One thing which came up repeatedly is that clients using the IMAP server I
>> run (using Dovecot 2.1) wonder whether they broke their Sieve scripts, i.e.
>
pt, and then it runs
sieve-script and prints the output of that? I wonder how other people do that.
--
Frerich Raabe - ra...@froglogic.com
www.froglogic.com - Multi-Platform GUI Testing
one is
> created).
Is there some documentation on the semantics of INDEXPVT? I checked the Wiki
page http://wiki2.dovecot.org/SharedMailboxes/Public and also performed a
full-text search for "INDEXPVT", but couldn't find anything.
--
Frerich Raabe - ra...@froglogic.com
www.froglogic.com - Multi-Platform GUI Testing
to replace a FreeBSD-based Dovecot setup
(serving just IMAP) to Debian. I already have the Debian system set up, but I'm
still undecided how to do the move in a way which is a) preferrably transparent
to users and b) possibly even allows me to quickly switch back to the old
syste
my workaround consists running this cron script every night:
#!/bin/sh
chown -R vmail:vmail /home/vmail/
find /home/vmail/ -type d -print0 | xargs -0 chmod 0750
find /home/vmail/ -type f -print0 | xargs -0 chmod 0640
--
Frerich Raabe - ra...@froglogic.com
www.froglogic.com - Multi-Platform GUI Testing
Am 1/8/2013 9:40 PM, schrieb Frerich Raabe:
Hi,
I'm running Dovecot 2.1.12 on FreeBSD. I configured Dovecot to use
the Squat plugin to provide faster full-text searches. The output of
'dovecot -n' is attached to this mail.
However, I just noticed that this plugin doesn&#x
hing which is related, except:
Jan 8 21:36:10 imap2 dovecot: indexer-worker(frerich): Indexed 0 messages in
INBOX
Does anybody have some idea how to get more logging out of index-worker, or
whether there's a flaw in my configuration?
--
Frerich Raabe - ra...@froglogic.com
www.fr
Am 11/28/2012 9:52 AM, schrieb Frerich Raabe:
Am 11/28/2012 2:26 AM, schrieb Timo Sirainen:
On 27.11.2012, at 15.06, Frerich Raabe wrote:
If I relax the ACL, I can mark the mail as seen myself. I guess
that means the question is - why didn't the sieve_before manage to
set the flag in all
Am 11/28/2012 2:26 AM, schrieb Timo Sirainen:
On 27.11.2012, at 15.06, Frerich Raabe wrote:
If I relax the ACL, I can mark the mail as seen myself. I guess
that means the question is - why didn't the sieve_before manage to
set the flag in all cases.
Difficult to say, but I don't
Am 11/27/2012 1:53 PM, schrieb Frerich Raabe:
I first suspected a client issue so I did a little IMAP session by hand:
[..]
Note how the first 'SEARCH UNSEEN' command shows that '27126' is unseen,
the subsequent 'STORE' command succeeds - but then 'SEARCH
of the Maildir directories,
and it all looks dandy to me.
Does anybody have some suggestions how to debug this further, or what
the reason for this may be?
--
Frerich Raabe - ra...@froglogic.com
www.froglogic.com - Multi-Platform GUI Testing
# 1.2.17: /usr/local/etc/dovecot.conf
# OS: FreeBSD
}
...and then had my Sieve script fileinto that. Works fine! Thanks for
your help!
--
Frerich Raabe - ra...@froglogic.com
www.froglogic.com - Multi-Platform GUI Testing
, with
a different prefix - and this namespace doesn't use private
CONTROL/INDEX files. However, I'd like to keep using the "Lists" prefix
if possible to avoid too many changes to the clients.
--
Frerich Raabe - ra...@froglogic.com
www.froglogic.com - Multi-Platform GUI Testing
P.S.: I wish this list would have a Reply-To configured. :-)
--
Frerich Raabe - ra...@froglogic.com
www.froglogic.com - Multi-Platform GUI Testing
Am 11.10.2012 um 22:10 schrieb Timo Sirainen:
> On 10.10.2012, at 11.06, Frerich Raabe wrote:
>> I already use this; as I mentioned, the index files of the public readonly
>> mailbox is stored per-user so that each user has his own set of \Seen flags.
>> Here&
).
--
Frerich Raabe - ra...@froglogic.com
www.froglogic.com - Multi-Platform GUI Testing
Am 10.10.2012 10:24, schrieb Robert Schetterer:
Am 10.10.2012 10:06, schrieb Frerich Raabe:
I already use this; as I mentioned, the index files of the public
readonly mailbox is stored per-user so that each user has his own set of
\Seen flags. Here's my public namespace:
namespace p
Am 10.10.2012 09:49, schrieb Robert Schetterer:
Am 10.10.2012 09:29, schrieb Frerich Raabe:
I'm running Dovecot 1.2.17 for serving mail via IMAP as well as for
providing access to a mailing list archive. The archive is implemented
as a public read-only mailbox with per-user index files
ystem user, but I wonder whether the indices are really the same (I
noticed their md5 checksums differ) and whether there may be file
locking issues in case two users search message bodies simultaneously.
Can anybody shed some light?
--
Frerich Raabe - ra...@froglogic.com
www.froglogic.com - Mult
44 matches
Mail list logo
