On June 2, 2019 10:36:11 AM EDT, "@lbutlr via dovecot"
wrote:
>
>On Jun 2, 2019, at 8:23 AM, Nikolai Lusan via dovecot
> wrote:
>> I have attached my current /etc/dovecot/conf.d/10-stats.conf
>
>The list does not allow attachments, so a link to the file somewhere
>like pastern or dropbox or w
I can't provide specific details as I'm on the road, but I successfully used
mmv utility to accomplish something similar - changed mail home from
domain/local@domain to just domain/local for about 65 users, took less than a
second once I worked out the command (it supports wildcards) . The trick
Or. maybe it is the holidays and people actually have a life?
On December 31, 2016 4:38:53 AM EST, mj wrote:
>Hi,
>
>Does the lack of replies mean that what I'm asking is not possible?
>
>(or am I missing something SO obvious that nobody bothers to point it
>out..?)
>
>MJ
>
>On 12/29/2016 09:23
On July 16, 2016 4:02:33 AM EDT, Spyros Tsiolis wrote:
>Since I have quite some experiece with thunderbird, I know most of
>its shortcomings
Care to elaborate? Thunderbird is far from perfect, but is by far the best IMAP
client available.
Most times you can work around supposed short comings
On 4/29/2016 5:58 AM, Carl A Jeptha wrote:
> I have an old postfix + dovecot + Roundcube mailserver
> (mail.domain.Tld). Server clock is loosing time and adjusting it causes
> dovecot to kill itself, we cannot install more memory, bigger
> hard-drives, etc.
>
> I have built a new server box
We
Greetings Mike and Timo,
A question about BURL support in Thunderbird came up, and while there is
an open bug, it apparently is still not implemented.
I'd love to see this get done, so I've been checking on the status of
this in both postfix and dovecot...
Can someone comment on whether or not t
On 3/18/2016 5:58 PM, Aaron Lindsay wrote:
> Is anyone opposed to changing dovecot's handling of
> recipient_delimiter so that it's the same as that of postfix? If not,
> I am willing to rebase/merge/address review comments on Lennart
> Weller's patch[1] to get this functionality upstream.
>
> Whi
On 3/10/2016 7:56 PM, Timo Sirainen wrote:
>> On 11 Mar 2016, at 02:37, Charles Marcus wrote:
>>
>> On 3/9/2016 9:02 PM, Timo Sirainen wrote:
>>> On 08 Mar 2016, at 01:50, Pavel Stano wrote:
>>>> sis attachment deduplication is broken in 2.2.16 up
On 3/11/2016 9:58 AM, Juan Bernhard wrote:
> Be careful to no do any synchronous writes under ZFS. Every sync write
> can take up to 3 seconds of latency (under freebsd, I didnt test ZFS in
> linux). Im using it in a 3k user environment and works great with a 4TB
> raid 10, and dovecot cache fi
On 3/9/2016 9:02 PM, Timo Sirainen wrote:
> On 08 Mar 2016, at 01:50, Pavel Stano wrote:
>>
>> sis attachment deduplication is broken in 2.2.16 upwards.
>> It is caused by this commit.
>> https://github.com/dovecot/core/commit/664bf3e236c214aee86294483c379e4fa66c2e63
>>
>> in src/lib-fs/fs-sis.c
fen Kaiser wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> On Mon, 8 Feb 2016, Charles Marcus wrote:
>
>> My problem is, one of my most used folders, which was working fine up
>> until a week or so ago, stopped loading the messages, and after some
>>
Hello,
I have an el-cheapo shared hosting account on Dreamhost, and have had it
for a very long time.
For the most part everything usually works fairly well, considering I do
keep a lot of folders, and mail, on some of my accounts.
They are running dovecot, but still don't have a response as to
On 1/27/2016 9:32 AM, Steffen Kaiser wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> On Wed, 27 Jan 2016, Charles Marcus wrote:
>
>> On 1/27/2016 1:30 AM, Steffen Kaiser wrote:
>>> Sending bandwitdh can be reduced by using BCC instead of the IMAP
On 1/27/2016 1:30 AM, Steffen Kaiser wrote:
> Sending bandwitdh can be reduced by using BCC instead of the IMAP append
> to the sent mailbox.
Hi Steffen,
Can you elaborate on this?
I would have thought that the IMAP Append command would *save* bandwidth
(as opposed to having the client save a
On 6/9/2015 8:36 AM, Charles Marcus wrote:
> On 6/8/2015 5:11 PM, Pali Rohár wrote:
>> Still I want read/write access to storage and want to use mbox as
>> storage (also for easier backup and copy)...
>>
>> And my question was how to properly read and write from/to mb
On 6/8/2015 5:11 PM, Pali Rohár wrote:
> Still I want read/write access to storage and want to use mbox as
> storage (also for easier backup and copy)...
>
> And my question was how to properly read and write from/to mbox files
> which are used by dovecot.
There is no method for doing this. Any
On 6/1/2015 7:27 PM, SH Development wrote:
> Using SSL, ports 993, 587 PLAINTEXT.
Outlook Express won't work with the submission port (587) with STARTTLS.
You have to use port 465 (SSL/wrappermode)
On 5/29/2015 10:58 AM, Dominik Breu wrote:
> hello,
>
> in which way do you login ?
>
> loginuser*masteruser or just masteruser?
>
> You have to do the login with loginuser*masteruser masterpass
Thanks dominik, but I figured out what I did wrong...
I changed the password using htpasswd again, bu
ce imap-login {
> inet_listener imap {
> port = 143
> }
> inet_listener imaps {
> port = 993
> ssl = yes
> }
> service_count = 0
> }
> service imap {
> process_limit = 2048
> }
> ssl = required
> ssl_cert = ssl_key = userdb {
> ar
On 5/29/2015 9:25 AM, Dominik Breu wrote:
> Hello Charles,
>
> the bare minimum ist just the first passdb entry
> auth_master_user_separator = *
> passdb {
>driver = passwd-file
>args = /etc/dovecot/passwd.masterusers
>master = yes
>pass = yes
> }
>
> this will do the trick.
Ok,
On 5/29/2015 9:25 AM, Dominik Breu wrote:
> Hello Charles,
>
> the bare minimum ist just the first passdb entry
> auth_master_user_separator = *
> passdb {
>driver = passwd-file
>args = /etc/dovecot/passwd.masterusers
>master = yes
>pass = yes
> }
>
> this will do the trick.
Than
Hi all,
Ok, just need a quick-n-dirty way to enable a master user for a migration...
Reading the docs, I'm not sure what the bare minimum is I need to do this...
At: http://wiki2.dovecot.org/Authentication/MasterUsers
The Example config shows:
auth_master_user_separator = *
passdb {
driver =
On 4/28/2015 1:40 PM, Tobias Franzén wrote:
> On 2014-01-08 14:32, Charles Marcus wrote:
>> On 2012-04-09 8:53 AM, Timo Sirainen wrote:
>>> On 9.4.2012, at 15.50, Charles Marcus wrote:
>>>>> LMTP adds a new Delivered-To: header when there is
>>>>&g
Since you have confirmed that someone else you know is using it on
FreeBSD+ZFS without these problems, have you tried asking on the FreeBSD
support list(s)?
Seems like that may be your best bet, since it is certainly not a
generic dovecot problem (but may indeed be one or more of the settings
you
People, PLEASE do not engage Reindl on the list, it always results in
this kind of garbage that the adults on the list could do without.
If you feel compelled to 'call him out', then by all means do so, but do
it PRIVATELY.
Thanks.
On 4/2/2015 11:28 PM, Nick Edwards wrote:
> you wouldnt know, y
On 2/19/2015 4:34 PM, Santiago Vila wrote:
> In such case we would love to know what is the commit that fixed this,
> so that we can apply it to the 2.2.13 version in Debian. We have
> frozen the distribution as we are about to release jessie as Debian 8,
> so no new upstream releases are allowed
On 1/9/2015 3:06 AM, Philipp Resch wrote:
> It seems as if claws mail is preferring SSLv3
And since dovecot is really not affected by the poodle vulnerability, if
you can't upgrade (I believe 2.2 is in the backports repo?), probably
easiest to just reenable SSLv3...
doveconf -n output?
On 1/9/2015 2:07 AM, m...@ruggedinbox.com wrote:
> Hi all, when hardening dovecot against the POODLE vulnerability,
> we followed the advise to disable SSL2 and SSL3
> but this is giving problems with some email clients (claws-mail).
>
> ssl_protocols = !SSLv2 !SSLv3
>
> resul
On 10/31/2014 3:02 PM, Hans Morten Kind wrote:
> We turned off SSLv3 support on our pop/imap running dovecot on Oct 16th,
> we did check that all users where using TLSv1 and there have been no
> complaints (except one old windows-phone).
>
> But at 13:00 UTC today, suddenly strange entries is seen
On 10/21/2014 8:49 AM, Reindl Harald wrote:
> Am 21.10.2014 um 14:45 schrieb Charles Marcus:
>> On 10/21/2014 8:40 AM, Brian wrote:
>>> Also, instead of
>>> submission inet n - - - - smtpd
>>> I did:
>>> 127.0.0.1:1025 inet n - - - - smtpd
>>&
On 10/21/2014 8:40 AM, Brian wrote:
> Also, instead of
> submission inet n - - - - smtpd
> I did:
> 127.0.0.1:1025 inet n - - - - smtpd
>
> After all is done, however, I'm unable to send any mail.
No surprise there.
You *must* use the submission port if you want it to work.
Not sure why you tho
On 9/5/2014 9:22 AM, Stefan Arentz wrote:
When you enable Push Email on OS X Server, that certificate will be generated
for you and stored in your Keychain.
There is no other way to generate this certificate. This is why you need a
legal copy of OS X Server.
You don’t actually have to run OS
On 9/4/2014 9:35 PM, Stefan Arentz wrote:
Although this is at version 0.1, it is working pretty well for me and I am
looking for some additional testers that are interested.
Please note that it is not possible to use this project without legally
running a copy
of OS X Server.
On 7/10/2014 11:29 AM, Timo Sirainen wrote:
On 9.7.2014, at 21.20, Jeff Rice wrote:
I'm transitioning my server over from using the deliver LDA and LMTP. Suddenly
a bunch of sieve filters stopped working, and I noticed the contents of the
Delivered-To header are different.
Using Dovecot's
On 6/19/2014 4:54 AM, Jiri Bourek wrote:
For example, let's say you have single config file and only single
line differs from default configuration - say "auth_verbose". When you
upgrade, the packaging system tells you "the configuration was
changed" and you need to either manually figure out
On 6/10/2014 12:32 PM, Ralf Hildebrandt wrote:
* Charles Marcus:
>On 6/9/2014 5:44 PM, Ralf Hildebrandt wrote:
> >That's probably the problem here. The user had LOTS of (duplicate!)
> >mails in his inbox.
>
>Anyone ever found a reliable way to do this?
To du
On 6/9/2014 5:44 PM, Ralf Hildebrandt wrote:
That's probably the problem here. The user had LOTS of (duplicate!)
mails in his inbox.
Anyone ever found a reliable way to do this?
It sure would be nice if dovecot could perform this on a per account
and/or per maildir/mailbox case with a simple
On 6/7/2014 10:46 AM, Kilburn Abrahams wrote:
These users
have 50GB+ mailboxes using IMAP.
What mailbox format (maildir? dbox? mbox?)?
On 5/24/2014 8:00 AM, Subscriptions wrote:
Made the changes, so entries in 10-master.conf are now:
--
service auth {
unix_listener auth-userdb {
#mode = 0666
#user =
#group =
}
# Postfix smtp-auth
unix_listener /var/spool/postfix/private/auth {
mode = 0660
On 5/16/2014 3:03 PM, Oscar del Rio wrote:
Unfortunately, many servers out there reject emails with NULL sender.
Unfortunately, there are many clueless mail admins and/or badly/mis
configured mail servers out there.
The reality is that the RFCs mandate that the null sender envelope
address
On 5/14/2014 1:49 PM, Maciej Uhlig wrote:
He said the mail client doesn't show the Return-Path and I said it's not
true because Thunderbird shows not only the From header line but also it
_does_ show Return-Path line.
It shows the return path buried deep in the headers, yes, but virtually
e
On 5/14/2014 12:29 PM, Maciej Uhlig wrote:
Reindl Harald - 2014-05-14 17:04:
the mail cient on the receiver shows the FROM-HEADER and not
the Return-Path
I'm actually looking at your mail using the newest Thunderbird and guess
what I see? I see your mistake:
Return-Path:
??? He didn't say
On 5/14/2014 10:44 AM, Steffen Kaiser wrote:
Yep, those using different <> null senders should be aware, that there
envelope sender rewritings, such as BATV and SRS0, that make the
address unique each time by adding hashed timestamps or something like
that. Those rewritings undermine the vacat
On 5/13/2014 3:02 PM, Stephan Bosch wrote:
If you know what you are doing (think twice about that!), you can
override this behavior using the sieve_vacation_send_from_recipient
setting (if your Pigeonhole is recent enough):
http://wiki2.dovecot.org/Pigeonhole/Sieve/Extensions/Vacation#Configur
On 5/13/2014 1:58 PM, Maciej Uhlig wrote:
Return-Path: <>
Would be nice to get:
Return-Path:
No, no, no, null sender is *required* for these kinds of messages.
--
Best regards,
Charles
On 5/13/2014 5:46 AM, Alexander 'Leo' Bergolth wrote:
May 13 10:38:08 samba dovecot: imap(xxx): Disconnected: Internal error
occurred. Refer to server log for more information. [2014-05-13 10:38:07]
in=794 out=264037
So... what does server log show?
--
Best regards,
Charles
On 5/13/2014 6:58 AM, Selcuk Yazar wrote:
[root@trakyamail ~]# dovecot -n
# 2.0.9: /etc/dovecot/dovecot.conf
2.0.9 is too old and unsupported. You need to upgrade first (be sure to
read the upgrade info on the wiki)...
--
Best regards,
Charles
On 5/11/2014 5:14 AM, Alexandru Bostina wrote:
Nevermind, I think I found the problem.
It seems that Ubuntu's default settings for Dovecot are wrong, they
lack the "<" character before the certificate/key path.
So either of the following works:
ssl_cert_file = /dat/etc/ssl/certs/server.cr
On 5/8/2014 5:59 AM, Alexander 'Leo' Bergolth wrote:
I am using a single server, mbox, local disks (/home and /var is XFS on
HP SmartArray).
Hmmm... could be an mbox specific issue (I seem to recall issues in the
past that ended up being mbox related, and I think Timo doesn't give
mbox as mu
On 5/7/2014 4:38 PM, Alexander 'Leo' Bergolth wrote:
I am getting "Cached message size smaller than expected" errors since
dovecot-2.1.x.
Please provide enough info for someone to actually be able to attempt to
help you.
At a bare minimum, you should *always* (not just for dovecot) provide
On 5/1/2014 7:17 PM, Joseph Tam wrote:
This setting:
first_valid_uid = 1010
will need to be changed to "0",
Worst ... advice ... ever.
Please do NOT EVER suggest to anyone else to EVER do that.
or better yet, as others have suggested,
alias root to some user with UID within 1010..1020
On 4/19/2014 3:30 AM, Stephan von Krawczynski wrote:
On Sat, 19 Apr 2014 09:22:07 +0200 Reindl Harald wrote:
Am 19.04.2014 09:14, schrieb Stephan von Krawczynski:
2) "real certs" issued from cert-dealers are no more safe than your
self-signed was.
yes but you can't change that nor can i
Please Reply-To-List, don't send to me directly, I'm on the list.
On 4/19/2014 3:14 AM, Stephan von Krawczynski wrote:
On Fri, 18 Apr 2014 13:57:47 -0400
Charles Marcus wrote:
Hi all,
Ok, been wanting to do this for a while, and I after the Heartbleed
fiasco, the boss finally agr
answer to your question is very
likely "yes".
Thanks for the confirmation...
I'm think I'm going to simply remove that DNS entry and deal with a few
support phone calls...
--
Best regards,
Charles Marcus
I.T. Director
Media Brokers International, Inc.
678.514.6224 | 678.514.6299 fax
On 4/18/2014 3:57 PM, Charles Marcus wrote:
Everything seems to be working, BUT... I'm now seeing some of these
errors, that were not showing up in the logs before:
2014-04-18T15:42:24-04:00 dinkumthinkum dovecot: imap-login:
Disconnected (no auth attempts in 0 secs): user=<>, TL
On 4/18/2014 3:32 PM, Alessandro Menti wrote:
2) open /etc/ssl/ourNewCerts/mail.ourdomain.com.crt and, at the end of
the file, paste the contents of /etc/ssl/ourNewCerts
/RapidSSL_Intermediate.crt; in the end, /etc/ssl/ourNewCerts
/mail.ourdomain.com.crt should contain the certificate f
ut enough to be concerning...
Could this just be from cached junk from some clients, and they will
resolve themselves over time?
--
Best regards,
Charles Marcus
I.T. Director
Media Brokers International, Inc.
678.514.6224 | 678.514.6299 fax
Hi all,
Ok, been wanting to do this for a while, and I after the Heartbleed
fiasco, the boss finally agreed to let me buy some real certs...
Until now, we've been using self-signed certs with the following dovecot
config:
ssl = required
ssl_cert = Now, I've created new keys/certs and the CS
Hi all,
Currently, I have mail_location = maildir:~/Maildir set and all passdb
and userdb lookups are SQL based (doveconf -n pasted below).
However, I want to override the users maildir location - and *only* the
maildir location - for just a few users.
I was thinking the easiest way would b
On 4/9/2014 1:03 PM, Robert Schetterer wrote:
Am 09.04.2014 18:42, schrieb Charles Marcus:
>What are the ramifications of changing this on a production server? Any
>possible problems/gotchas? user impact?
in my understanding change ssl key and crts , do all needed ssl updates
keep perfo
On 4/9/2014 5:45 AM, Timo Sirainen wrote:
By default Dovecot's login processes run in the "high security mode" where each IMAP/POP3
connection runs in its own process. This was done especially to avoid security bugs in OpenSSL from
leaking users' passwords. So unless you have switched to the "
On 4/1/2014 6:22 AM, Charles Marcus wrote:
What you are missing is that there is a very good reason that ONLY the
output of doveconf -n is wanted here...
Apologies Jeffrey, I didn't see your doveconf -n at the end, guess I got
distracted by someone else's nonsense...
--
Be
On 4/1/2014 6:56 AM, Jeffrey Walton wrote:
Obviously, I don't know how. That's the file that conf dovecot claims
it is using. It you know how to find out the conf file dovecot is
*really* using, then please let me know.
First read this:
http://wiki2.dovecot.org/BasicConfiguration
Especially
On 4/1/2014 6:34 AM, Jeffrey Walton wrote:
On Tue, Apr 1, 2014 at 6:22 AM, Charles Marcus
wrote:
...
What you are missing is that there is a very good reason that ONLY the
output of doveconf -n is wanted here...
It proves that you are using the settings you think you are using.
# doveconf
On 3/31/2014 5:37 PM, Jeffrey Walton wrote:
My dovecot.conf has the following:
You still have yet to prove this (doveconf -n output).
# No results when searching the wiki
disable_plaintext_auth = no
Then you are searching the wiki wrong.
After entering the parameter in the searc
On 3/31/2014 5:47 PM, Jeffrey Walton wrote:
On Mon, Mar 31, 2014 at 5:39 PM, Reindl Harald wrote:
>and the settings are*really* in /etc/dovecot/dovecot.conf
>or in some ".d"-folder which may or may not be included?
I believe they are in /etc/dovecot/dovecot.conf:
# cat /etc/dovecot/dovecot.
On 3/26/2014 2:16 PM, Gedalya wrote:
On 03/26/2014 04:05 AM, Jesus Cea wrote:
What I feel from reading documentation [1][2] is that they
could be dropped in the backups, to be recreated on the fly if needed.
If you are using maildir, then yes, that's my understanding too, those
files don't con
On 3/25/2014 4:08 PM, Simon wrote:
On Wed, Mar 26, 2014 at 12:15 AM, Charles Marcus
wrote:
On 3/24/2014 7:10 PM, Simon wrote:
Mar 13 09:55:44 vmail1 dovecot: lda: Error: userdb lookup:
connect(/usr/local/dovecot/var/run/dovecot/auth-userdb) failed:
Connection refused
So, your SQL userdb
On 3/24/2014 7:10 PM, Simon wrote:
Mar 13 09:55:44 vmail1 dovecot: lda: Error: userdb lookup:
connect(/usr/local/dovecot/var/run/dovecot/auth-userdb) failed: Connection
refused
So, your SQL userdb is refusing connections from dovecot...
Fix this...
--
Best regards,
Charles
On 3/24/2014 3:55 PM, Simon wrote:
Some ideas:
1) Show full output of 'doveconf -n'
http://pastebin.com/wsUt0eEF
One more thing... please don't use pastebin... it breaks archives
(eventually).
Just copy/paste the output directly into the email body (this goes for
logs too)...
--
Bes
On 3/21/2014 12:00 PM, Milan Cvetkovic wrote:
Charles Marcus wrote:
On 3/21/2014 10:50 AM, Milan Cvetkovic
wrote:
I know that 2.1.7 is dated, but I would refrain from upgrading, if not
necessary.
Since dsync was always buggy in pre 2.2 releases, and was completely
rewritten for 2.2, I&#
On 3/21/2014 10:50 AM, Milan Cvetkovic wrote:
I know that 2.1.7 is dated, but I would refrain from upgrading, if not
necessary.
Since dsync was always buggy in pre 2.2 releases, and was completely
rewritten for 2.2, I'd say it has now become 'necessary' to update, if
you are experiencing ds
On 3/17/2014 8:50 AM, IT geek 31 wrote:
It might have been quicker to type "Yeah buddy, it can convert any two
mailbox formats".
Actually, it would have been much quicker had you simply read the text
that I ended up pointing out to you, without wasting everyone else's
time making it painfull
On 3/13/2014 2:27 PM, IT geek 31 wrote:
I found this:
http://wiki2.dovecot.org/Migration/MailFormat
But I think that is hinting at going mbox ---> Maildir ---> mdbox. Not
ideal.
Look at the three sentences directly before the examples there. It
specifically says:
"With dsync you can conv
On 3/14/2014 9:43 PM, Aleve Sicofante wrote:
2014-03-05 13:07 GMT+01:00 Charles Marcus:
Yes, dovecot's 'virtual mailboxes' is essentially the same thing
conceptually as Thunderbird's 'Virtual Folders', but dovecot does it
server-side (and all clients automaticall
On 3/4/2014 4:00 PM, Muzaffer Tolga Ozses wrote:
On 4 March 2014 19:21, Charles Marcus wrote:
On 3/3/2014 8:43 PM, Aleve Sicofante wrote:
I wish to know if someone knows an IMAP client (desktop or webmail) using
Dovecot's virtual mailboxes as server-side search folders.
I&#
On 3/13/2014 10:55 AM, IT geek 31 wrote:
Timo wrote this last month:
mbox format + dsync replication apparently doesn't work because of lock
ordering issues. Might not be easy to fix, or in any case it's pretty low
priority for me for now.
Sorry for "bumping the subject" again but is there any
On 3/12/2014 9:00 AM, Костырев Александр Алексеевич
wrote:
Good afternoon, I have a problem with replication is configured in
Dovecot, I have two servers, they are version 2.2.9. Here is their
configuration
/root@mx1:/etc/dovecot# dovecot -n//
//# 2.2.9: /etc/dovecot/dovecot.conf//
What's with
On 3/11/2014 7:03 PM, Nicholas Riley wrote:
In article
,
Chris Laif wrote:
Hi, I wonder if anyone has done some research on this subject. Apple
users are complaining loudly [1] about being not able to search the
inbox since Apple did not change the brain-dead
full-body-search-behaviour in i
On 3/6/2014 5:49 AM, Dieter Knopf wrote:
i added a existing MAILDIR as a Public Namespace and i can subscribe to
this Namespace without a problem.
I can access every folder except the INBOX. Thunderbird just shows a GREY
"INBOX".
Is there any way to access the INBOX of a maildir?
I'm really
On 3/4/2014 2:28 PM, Steve Campbell wrote:
Is the list down or have I been blocked.
List is not down (Replying All to send direct too)...
--
Best regards,
Charles
On 3/3/2014 8:43 PM, Aleve Sicofante wrote:
I wish to know if someone knows an IMAP client (desktop or webmail) using
Dovecot's virtual mailboxes as server-side search folders.
I'm also interested in this. What I'd really like to see is support in
Thunderbird for this.
Thunderbird already h
On 2/27/2014 9:20 AM, Traiano Welcome wrote:
I agree. Once upgraded to a reasonably recent version, though, what
configuration would I use to log plaintext passwords, then ?
http://wiki2.dovecot.org/Logging
Scroll down to the bottom...
--
Best regards,
Charles
On 2/27/2014 8:47 AM, Traiano Welcome wrote:
Dovecot version: 1.0.7 (from dovecot-1.0.7-7.el5_7.1 rpm)
No other response is possible except:
UPGRADE.
1.x has been unsupported forfar too long for anyone to waste time on it.
Best regards,
Charles
On 2/27/2014 3:48 AM, Götz Reinicke - IT Koordinator
wrote:
Am 27.02.14 09:41, schrieb Steffen Kaiser:
On Thu, 27 Feb 2014, Götz Reinicke - IT Koordinator wrote:
But on one mailbox I do get an error:
Error: user rechnnugseingang-animationsinstitut: Initialization failed:
Initializing mail stor
On 2/26/2014 3:59 AM, Francesco wrote:
so i tried adding
skip = found
in the userdb like this:
userdb {
driver = ldap
args = /etc/dovecot/dovecot-ldap.conf.ext
skip = found
}
but dovecot doesn't start up saying:
doveconf: Fatal: Error in configuration
file /etc/dovecot/conf.d/auth-ld
On 2/25/2014 2:44 PM, Si L wrote:
Here's my slightly redacted conf.
# grep -v ^# dovecot.conf|grep -v ^$
Don't do that.
Please post output of doveconf -n...
--
Best regards,
Charles
On 2/24/2014 10:07 AM, Götz Reinicke - IT Koordinator
wrote:
we still run dovecot 1.2.17 and upgrading is not planed for some time.
Well, since 1.x is no longer supported, you will most likely have more
and more issues that you won't get any help with.
On 2/24/2014 12:12 PM, Stan Hoeppner wrote:
On 2/24/2014 8:42 AM, Charles Marcus wrote:
On 2/24/2014 8:39 AM, Stan Hoeppner wrote:
On 2/24/2014 6:58 AM, Charles Marcus wrote:
On 2/24/2014 3:58 AM, Steffen Kaiser
wrote:
I would add a BCC recipient in the MTA. It's more save in
On 2/24/2014 11:14 AM, Steffen Kaiser wrote:
On Mon, 24 Feb 2014, Charles Marcus wrote:
I'm talking about the 'always_bcc' feature in postfix, which
obviously must be enabled by the MTA sysadmin.
Ah, OK. But this is not what I meant, because it would sent all
messages to o
On 2/24/2014 10:13 AM, Steffen Kaiser wrote:
What changes are made by default, that are not implemented by the MTA
admin?
Sorry, I don't understand the question (language thing I'm sure).
I'm talking about the 'always_bcc' feature in postfix, which obviously
must be enabled by the MTA sysa
On 2/24/2014 9:25 AM, Steffen Kaiser wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Mon, 24 Feb 2014, Charles Marcus wrote:
On 2/24/2014 3:58 AM, Steffen Kaiser
wrote:
I would add a BCC recipient in the MTA. It's more save in such
situation. See the thread about qmail and mul
On 2/24/2014 8:39 AM, Stan Hoeppner wrote:
On 2/24/2014 6:58 AM, Charles Marcus wrote:
On 2/24/2014 3:58 AM, Steffen Kaiser wrote:
I would add a BCC recipient in the MTA. It's more save in such
situation. See the thread about qmail and multiple recipients for one
mail address.
The
On 2/23/2014 9:07 AM, Francesco wrote:
i was also planning to use shared folders + ACLS to have backup_alice
accessible as a read only mailbox directly from the alice imap account.
Hi Francesco,
I would be *very* interested in seeing what you come up with, as I have
been wanting to do the ex
On 2/24/2014 3:58 AM, Steffen Kaiser wrote:
I would add a BCC recipient in the MTA. It's more save in such
situation. See the thread about qmail and multiple recipients for one
mail address.
The only downside to this is all of the original headers are *not*
preserved in the BCC copy.
I to
On 2014-02-18 7:44 AM, pgala wrote:
i want use dovecot and plugin quota to inform users about exceeded space. I
also configure postfix to rewrite envelope_sender so
envelope_sender<>header: from.
Not sure I understand this, but if you are saying what I think you are
saying, why on earth would
On 2014-02-17 9:20 AM, Raphael GARCIA CTI wrote:
Is it possible to use DSYNC between dovecot 1.2.15 and 2.1.7 servers ?
Precisely replicate a dovecot 1.2.15 server to a 2.1.7 server ?
Short answer is, don't do it.
Dsync, prior to 2.2 (where it was completely rewritten), was unreliable
and
On 2014-01-27 4:15 AM, IT geek 31 wrote:
So I'm wondering... am I not asking the right questions? Or am I not
providing enough information... or do we just not know how this aspect of
the technology works?
I only see this one email from you...?
--
Best regards,
Charles
On 2014-01-27 2:19 AM, Kevin Holly wrote:
On 01/25/2014 01:38 PM, Charles Marcus wrote:
On 2014-01-25 5:56 AM, Kevin Holly wrote:
My client is Thunderbird, my dovecot version is 2.1.7-7 from the
official Debian repo. If you want to see my config i'll grab all the
fils together and send
On 2014-01-25 5:56 AM, Kevin Holly wrote:
My client is Thunderbird, my dovecot version is 2.1.7-7 from the
official Debian repo. If you want to see my config i'll grab all the
fils together and send it to you.
Have you asked on the debian list, since you're running their
old/outdated version?
1 - 100 of 2127 matches
Mail list logo
