Re: dsync with vurtial folder leads to mess of msg ID

2024-01-25 Thread Kirill A . Korinsky
On Sun, 21 Jan 2024 17:31:37 +0100, Kirill A. Korinsky wrote: > > mail_replica = tcps:mx2.catap.net > I've discovered that using TCP+SSL replication leads to errors in logs: Error: Couldn't lock ../.dovecot-sync.lock: fcntl(../.dovecot-sync.lock, write-lock, F_SETLKW) locking failed: Time

Re: Please do not remove replication

2024-01-25 Thread Jörg Schulz
and, as stated in this thread, the doveadm sync command will persist. For a 8 user environment, it should be enough to do this via crontab, every some minutes. Am 25.01.24 um 19:22 schrieb pgnd: Currently, replication is my life saver. depending on your use case, and how critical that is,

sieve filter generated email- sent folder

2024-01-25 Thread joe a
dovecot 2.3.21 pigeonhole 0.5.21. Filters created via roundcube. Attempting to have filters detect certain email, send a notification text message to mobile via email, and copy that notification email to "Sent" folder. Filter(s) detect condition, move the email to desired folder and appear,

Re: Please do not remove replication

2024-01-25 Thread Narcis Garcia
+1 El 24/1/24 a les 23:33, Gerben Wierda ha escrit: Respectfully, I would like to ask: please do not remove replication, please rethink this. Currently, replication is my life saver. I run two postfix/dovecot combos (on different operating systems), with dovecot synchronising via replication. B

Re: Error activating filter set

2024-01-25 Thread joe a
Resolved by correcting error for sieve script location in 90-sieve.conf. >> On 1/24/2024 16:02:20, joe a wrote: Some success creating and using filters, created via roundcube, but, when testing activate and deactivating filter sets, received an error. However, I can edit and add filters witho

RE: Please do not remove replication

2024-01-25 Thread Aki Tuomi via dovecot
> On 25/01/2024 11:57 EET Michael Grant via dovecot wrote: > > > I keep seeing this come up over and over. My understanding is it’s not > getting removed, it’s just moving to the paid version of Dovecot. What is > the cost for a small user license of dovecot that incudes replication anyway

RE: Please do not remove replication

2024-01-25 Thread Marc
Ok, very very nice of you to make such redundant setup for these people. For such small amount I would just keep one server, and have everyone wait when it fails. ;) Ok with such small user group you do not have any issues with performance with any hardware. I was creating recently a test clus

RE: Please do not remove replication

2024-01-25 Thread Michael Grant via dovecot
I keep seeing this come up over and over.  My understanding is it’s not getting removed, it’s just moving to the paid version of Dovecot.  What is the cost for a small user license of dovecot that incudes replication anyway?  Is the price that outrageous?  __

Re: Please do not remove replication

2024-01-25 Thread Gerben Wierda
I have two postfix/(replicating)dovecot/rspamd/etc servers, 6-8 human users, on a total of 15-20 devices (iOS and macOS) Yours,  Gerben Wierda (LinkedIn, Mastodon) R&A_IT_Strategy (main site) Book: Chess_and_the_Art_of_Enterprise Architecture Book: Mastering_ArchiMate YouTube_Channel On 25

RE: Please do not remove replication

2024-01-25 Thread Marc
How many servers do you have? How many active clients do you have? > > Respectfully, I would like to ask: please do not remove replication, please > rethink this. > > Currently, replication is my life saver. I run two postfix/dovecot combos > (on different operating systems), with dovecot synchr