Hello,
I started full reindex of whole emails base (doveadm index -A '*') and
solr crashed due to out of memory. I had plenty of such messages:
doveadm(gzt): Error: fts_solr: Indexing failed: Connection lost:
read((conn:127.0.0.1:8983,id=621)) failed: EOF (Request queued 40.832
secs ago, 1 s
> Hi Dovecot community,
>
> We're looking at running multiple Dovecot backend servers in parallel, all
> using the same shared NFSv4.1 mount to store mailboxes in the maildir
> format.
>
Just my experience, you can use multi-IMAP proxy in front of the real IMAP
server which has powerful hardwar
Hi Andrzej,
Am 19.05.23 um 17:17 schrieb Andrzej Milewski:
Hello,
I may be mistaken, but I don't see "auth_mechanism = plain login" in
your configuration. It's possible that you are using something
different for authentication, but I don't see it in the configuration.
The config file was out
+1 NFSv3 has always been more stable in our testing..
Will have to put it on the road map to run full testing again, but you
know the old adage, if it ain't broke, don't fix it.. ;)
On 2023-05-19 08:23, Adrian Minta wrote:
Hi Pierre,
when we tested NFSv4 couple of years ago, we found out th
Hi Pierre,
when we tested NFSv4 couple of years ago, we found out that NFSv4 has a
caching feature witch delegate file caching to a specific client. This
was a problem with same share mounted on multiple servers. The
contention will explode the load on the clients due to I/O waits and in
som
Hello,
I may be mistaken, but I don't see "auth_mechanism = plain login" in your
configuration. It's possible that you are using something different for
authentication, but I don't see it in the configuration.
On Wed, May 17, 2023 at 4:04 PM Ralf Becker via dovecot
wrote:
> Dovecot 2.3.20 includ
Hi Dovecot community,
We're looking at running multiple Dovecot backend servers in parallel, all
using the same shared NFSv4.1 mount to store mailboxes in the maildir format.
We've read in multiple places that running multiple backends with a shared NFS
can result in issues like index files cor
Am 17.05.23 um 20:03 schrieb dovecot--- via dovecot:
Dovecot ... submission server works well with all sorts of clients,
but Outlook.
I thought that was M$ intent. They purposefully design their ecosystem
to not play well with others so the average person will think
something is wrong with th
> On 19/05/2023 09:44 EEST Sean Gallagher wrote:
>
>
> > What is your use-case for validation here? Did you mean submission? It has
> > actual authentication and can do client cert name validation with
> > auth_ssl_username_from_cert.
>
> I've been pulling apart an old monolithic server and
