Well, then "noac" may be your best solution. Or tracking down
the possible issue with the 5.8 kernel client.
Either way, you should consider that NFSv3 will always be
vulnerable to this. Remember, that protocol was standardized
just over 25 years ago.
On 1/29/2021 7:16 AM, Maciej Milaszewski wr
Am 29.01.21 um 17:01 schrieb Odhiambo Washington:
Between the MTA and the IMAP4 who should be responsible for archiving?
I think if you need to keep copies of e-mails, it's better done at the
MTA level.
Deliver one copy to the recipient and another copy to the archive.
IMHO.
off topic at dov
Hi
we saw the same thing with EMC Unity and LMTP. With nfs v3 the situation
is somehow tolerable.
First time we switch to nfs v4.1 the servers crashed and later we found
out that we need to turn off delegation and switch to "lock_method =
dotlock". This will help some people if is added to w
Between the MTA and the IMAP4 who should be responsible for archiving?
I think if you need to keep copies of e-mails, it's better done at the MTA
level.
Deliver one copy to the recipient and another copy to the archive.
IMHO.
On Fri, 29 Jan 2021 at 17:12, Rupert Gallagher wrote:
> Hello, I wou
29.01.21, 12:32 +0100, Aki Tuomi:
> On 29/01/2021 13:24 Markus Schönhaber wrote:
>> Nevertheless, since this is a very low volume server and the user in
>> question only sends and receives a few dozen mails, weighing a hand full
>> of MB, per day, I'm at a loss to understand how it's possible th
Hello, I would like to know what is your strategy for legally compliant long
term archival of e-mails (up to 10 years). Thank you
Hi
Probably netapp fas8200 not support NFS 4.2 and NFS 4.1 not support auth
via exports (only kerberros)
On 28.01.2021 19:45, Tom Talpey wrote:
> On 1/28/2021 11:14 AM, Maciej Milaszewski wrote:
>> Hi
>> For test I crete a new director with 2.3.13 and node 2.3.13 I mount
>> storage via nfs with t
>
> Using mail_log plugin is always very recommended,
>
> https://doc.dovecot.org/configuration_manual/plugins/mail_event_logging/
>
I am not sure if I am correct, but I think this logs every deleted message not?
I was testing with this a while ago.
Is there also an option that only logs some
> On 29/01/2021 13:24 Markus Schönhaber wrote:
>
>
> 29.01.21 11:46 +0100, Aki Tuomi:
>
> >> On 29/01/2021 12:41 Markus Schönhaber
> >> wrote:
> >>
> >>
> >> Hello,
> >>
> >> on a system I administer the disk where Dovecot's mailstore (mdbox)
> >> resides got filled up to the brim althou
29.01.21 11:46 +0100, Aki Tuomi:
>> On 29/01/2021 12:41 Markus Schönhaber wrote:
>>
>>
>> Hello,
>>
>> on a system I administer the disk where Dovecot's mailstore (mdbox)
>> resides got filled up to the brim although the combined quotas for the
>> users are much smaller than the disk's capacity
> On 29/01/2021 12:41 Markus Schönhaber wrote:
>
>
> Hello,
>
> on a system I administer the disk where Dovecot's mailstore (mdbox)
> resides got filled up to the brim although the combined quotas for the
> users are much smaller than the disk's capacity.
>
> For one user I see the followin
Hello,
on a system I administer the disk where Dovecot's mailstore (mdbox)
resides got filled up to the brim although the combined quotas for the
users are much smaller than the disk's capacity.
For one user I see the following:
doveadm quota get -u @
Username Quota name Type Value
Am 29.01.21 um 09:09 schrieb Julian Kippels:
Am Fri, 29 Jan 2021 10:39:16 +0530
schrieb "Amol Kale" :
Hi,
We are looking for a tool for bulk SMTP testing / Email validation
using telnet or similar protocol ( which doesn't send the mails )
It generally involves steps like NSlookup to
On 2021-01-29 06:09, Amol Kale wrote:
Process example-
https://blog.mailtrap.io/verify-email-address-without-sending/ [1]
i think we are very offtopic, but "sendmail -bv root" could be a start
You broke this thread. In the original thread, I remember seeing Aki gave
you the configuration which he believed might work.
The next thing I thought was for you to go to
https://developers.google.com/identity/sign-in/web/devconsole-project and
get an access token.
PS: I have never configured thi
Am Fri, 29 Jan 2021 10:39:16 +0530
schrieb "Amol Kale" :
> Hi,
>
>
>
> We are looking for a tool for bulk SMTP testing / Email validation
> using telnet or similar protocol ( which doesn't send the mails )
>
>
>
> It generally involves steps like NSlookup to check MX of destination
> serve
16 matches
Mail list logo
