Thank you for pushing me in the right direction!
I originally used "lock_method = dotlock" on this server. I had
gotten to a point in trouble-shooting where i thought I should
change to fcntl, which I did. BUT I did not restart dovecot! I
just did that, and now "vsize" works.
I don't have a th
Hi Mark,
Am 19.07.2016 um 21:23 schrieb Mark Costlow:
I have converted some test users and they generally work fine. But
when I run "doveadm mailbox status" I get a Panic if I ask for the
vsize field (or "all"), but other fields work fine. For example:
# doveadm mailbox status -u bubbache
Sorry, meant to include the dovecot version.
root@4s-mail:~# dovecot --version
2.0.19
-Original Message-
From: Joseph Mays
Sent: Tuesday, July 19, 2016 7:03 PM
To: dovecot@dovecot.org
Subject: Managesieve problem
Trying to get either avelsieve or server side filters to work with
mana
Trying to get either avelsieve or server side filters to work with managesieve.
Managesieve is running but whenever avelsieve or the server settings backend
try to talk to it the same thing happens. So I guess it's really a problem with
something about managesieve at this point. I hit the Messag
> On July 19, 2016 at 10:23 PM Mark Costlow wrote:
>
>
> I'm using dovecot 2.2.24 on FreeBSD 10.3. I'm working on converting
> users from maildir to mdbox, for the usual reasons.
>
> I have converted some test users and they generally work fine. But
> when I run "doveadm mailbox status" I ge
I'm using dovecot 2.2.24 on FreeBSD 10.3. I'm working on converting
users from maildir to mdbox, for the usual reasons.
I have converted some test users and they generally work fine. But
when I run "doveadm mailbox status" I get a Panic if I ask for the
vsize field (or "all"), but other fields w
Please do NOT send to me directly, I am on the list.
Anyone who wishes direct responses should say so by setting explicit
Reply-To.
On 7/19/2016 11:42 AM, Miquel van Smoorenburg wrote:
> On 18/07/16 11:46, Stephan Bosch wrote:
>>
>>
>> Op 16-7-2016 om 18:12 schreef Charles Marcus:
>>>
>>> On Jul
On 18/07/16 11:46, Stephan Bosch wrote:
>
>
> Op 16-7-2016 om 18:12 schreef Charles Marcus:
>>
>> On July 16, 2016 4:02:33 AM EDT, Spyros Tsiolis
>> wrote:
>>> Since I have quite some experiece with thunderbird, I know most of
>>> its shortcomings
>> Care to elaborate? Thunderbird is far from perf
I have been banging my head to the walls for the past couple of days to make
virtual mailboxes work and I finally found the problem. It seems when prefetch
is used the user_query is not working at all. However, I have not found any
reference to this one.
http://wiki.dovecot.org/Plugins/Virtual
On 2016.07.19. 15:03, Luescher Claude wrote:
Hello,
Are you sure about that I would need so recent version? That is ok to
have some bugfixes but you are talking about the latest cutting edge
debian jessie backports package.
Even the mainline debian jessie only have 2.2.13 in it and my system is
Hello,
Are you sure about that I would need so recent version? That is ok to
have some bugfixes but you are talking about the latest cutting edge
debian jessie backports package.
Even the mainline debian jessie only have 2.2.13 in it and my system is
a complex wheezy installation, the last thi
Op 19-7-2016 om 11:30 schreef Luescher Claude:
Hello,
Following up on old thread:
http://www.dovecot.org/pipermail/dovecot/2014-December/099003.html
I have the exact same issue with 2.2.10:
It did not help. If there is one way I would like to get this work
without upgrading dovecot.
Many
Hello,
Following up on old thread:
http://www.dovecot.org/pipermail/dovecot/2014-December/099003.html
I have the exact same issue with 2.2.10:
ii dovecot-antispam 2.0+20130822-2amd64
Dovecot plugins for training spam filters
ii dovecot-core
Hi,
Trying to understand what the version numbers mean. I typically build
from the stable tarball and then apply patches as needed.. however since
2.2.25 this hasn't been working (not sure if it worked before or never
really looked closely TBH).
http://dovecot.org/releases/2.2/dovecot-2.2.25
14 matches
Mail list logo
