Re: dovecot 2 low TCP speed (fetching big mail)

2015-01-01 Thread Wojciech Puchar
tried with ipfw firewall turned off. no difference. anyway - thanks for advice. On Thu, 1 Jan 2015, Edgar Pettijohn wrote: I was just messing around with my pf.conf and then I read this, so just a thought do you have any kind of firewall that may be slowing the process?? On 01/01/15 06:29, Wo

Re: Sieve permissions issue following update

2015-01-01 Thread Stephan Bosch
On 1/1/2015 4:17 PM, Robert Blayzor wrote: > On Jan 1, 2015, at 9:58 AM, Robert Blayzor wrote: >>> Hmm. This smells like a bug. I notice that your modification times of >>> the .sieve and .svbin file are exactly the same (that is somewhat >>> unusual). I'm looking at a potential bug that would exp

Re: Sieve permissions issue following update

2015-01-01 Thread Robert Blayzor
On Jan 1, 2015, at 9:58 AM, Robert Blayzor wrote: > >> Hmm. This smells like a bug. I notice that your modification times of >> the .sieve and .svbin file are exactly the same (that is somewhat >> unusual). I'm looking at a potential bug that would explain your problem. >> >> To confirm, could y

Re: dovecot 2 low TCP speed (fetching big mail)

2015-01-01 Thread Edgar Pettijohn
I was just messing around with my pf.conf and then I read this, so just a thought do you have any kind of firewall that may be slowing the process?? On 01/01/15 06:29, Wojciech Puchar wrote: i use dovecot 2 under FreeBSD (dovecot2-2.2.15 compiled from ports). tried both with kqueue enabled or

Re: Sieve permissions issue following update

2015-01-01 Thread Robert Blayzor
On Jan 1, 2015, at 9:50 AM, Stephan Bosch wrote: > > Hmm. This smells like a bug. I notice that your modification times of > the .sieve and .svbin file are exactly the same (that is somewhat > unusual). I'm looking at a potential bug that would explain your problem. > > To confirm, could you try

Re: Sieve permissions issue following update

2015-01-01 Thread Stephan Bosch
On 1/1/2015 2:36 PM, Robert Blayzor wrote: > On Jan 1, 2015, at 8:10 AM, Stephan Bosch wrote: >> Could you enable mail_debug? That should show why it is trying to >> recompile the Sieve script. > > Well, that it does! And it's saying the script is "not up to date" and tries > to recompile it. H

Re: Sieve permissions issue following update

2015-01-01 Thread Robert Blayzor
On Jan 1, 2015, at 9:12 AM, Gene Heskett wrote: > > Obviously, the last 3 lines are showing a perms problem. Yes, I know it's a permissions problem. But there should be NO permissions problem as it should not be trying to recompile the script. The script was already pre-compiled and has not

Re: Sieve permissions issue following update

2015-01-01 Thread Gene Heskett
On Thursday 01 January 2015 08:36:40 Robert Blayzor did opine And Gene did reply: > On Jan 1, 2015, at 8:10 AM, Stephan Bosch wrote: > > Could you enable mail_debug? That should show why it is trying to > > recompile the Sieve script. > > Well, that it does! And it's saying the script is "not up

Re: Sieve permissions issue following update

2015-01-01 Thread Robert Blayzor
On Jan 1, 2015, at 8:10 AM, Stephan Bosch wrote: > > Could you enable mail_debug? That should show why it is trying to > recompile the Sieve script. Well, that it does! And it's saying the script is "not up to date" and tries to recompile it. However, I'm not sure why it would say it's NOT u

Re: Sieve permissions issue following update

2015-01-01 Thread Stephan Bosch
On 12/31/2014 5:05 PM, Robert Blayzor wrote: > On Dec 10, 2014, at 1:52 AM, Steffen Kaiser > wrote: > > I've been following this thread and have been seeing a similar problem. > Dovecot 2.2.5 and pigeonhole-0.4.6 > > Yet, dovecot still tries to compile it under the user in that path. > > > Dec

dovecot 2 low TCP speed (fetching big mail)

2015-01-01 Thread Wojciech Puchar
i use dovecot 2 under FreeBSD (dovecot2-2.2.15 compiled from ports). tried both with kqueue enabled or not. everything works very fast, EXCEPT fetching big mail. tried multiple clients (thunderbird on windows, alpine on the same server, alpine on other unix server connected by 1Gb/s LAN) and