On 1/1/2015 2:36 PM, Robert Blayzor wrote: > On Jan 1, 2015, at 8:10 AM, Stephan Bosch <step...@rename-it.nl> wrote: >> Could you enable mail_debug? That should show why it is trying to >> recompile the Sieve script. > > Well, that it does! And it's saying the script is "not up to date" and tries > to recompile it. However, I'm not sure why it would say it's NOT up to date, > it most certainly was manually compiled by me and not touched afterwards. > Would commented likes, starting with "#" in the script have anything to do > with it? > > > Jan 01 13:32:30 lda(rt): Debug: sieve: file storage: Using script storage > path: /etc/dovecot/sieve/default.sieve > Jan 01 13:32:30 lda(rt): Debug: sieve: file script: Opened script `default' > from `/etc/dovecot/sieve/default.sieve' > Jan 01 13:32:30 lda(rt): Debug: sieve: Using the following location for > user's Sieve script: /etc/dovecot/sieve/default.sieve > Jan 01 13:32:30 lda(rt): Debug: sieve: Loading script > /etc/dovecot/sieve/default.sieve > Jan 01 13:32:30 lda(rt): Debug: sieve: Script binary > /etc/dovecot/sieve/default.svbin is not up-to-date > Jan 01 13:32:30 lda(rt): Debug: sieve: Script `default' from > /etc/dovecot/sieve/default.sieve successfully compiled > Jan 01 13:32:30 lda(rt): Error: sieve: binary save: failed to create > temporary file: > open(/etc/dovecot/sieve/default.svbin.dogpile.devnull.us.679.) failed: > Permission denied (euid=1002(rt) egid=1002(rt) missing +w perm: > /etc/dovecot/sieve, dir owned by 26:0 mode=0755)
Hmm. This smells like a bug. I notice that your modification times of the .sieve and .svbin file are exactly the same (that is somewhat unusual). I'm looking at a potential bug that would explain your problem. To confirm, could you try running sievec again, so that the .svbin is actually newer than the .sieve? Regards, Stephan.
