Put index/control files elsewhere. See
http://wiki2.dovecot.org/SharedMailboxes/Public#Read-only_Maildirs
On 5.12.2012, at 9.21, Muhammad Yousuf Khan wrote:
> Thanks, i also notice that it is keep changing. but how could i manage
> that. because read only users are also unable to read emails. i
Thanks, i also notice that it is keep changing. but how could i manage
that. because read only users are also unable to read emails. i just
keep working on it for many days but no luck.
and my need is very simple. a public folder with 1 owner and everyone
read only access. i don't know why it is n
Like it says, it's missing write permissions to /public/.News directory.
Dovecot keeps recreating the dovecot-uidlist file so it's not enough to change
only its permissions.
On 5.12.2012, at 7.31, Muhammad Yousuf Khan wrote:
> Please help. my error log is flooded with thousands of entries like
Thanks
On 11/23/12, Timo Sirainen wrote:
> On 15.11.2012, at 6.55, Nick Edwards wrote:
>
>> Timo,
>>
>> I have much suspicion that our quota system is not working correctly
>> since we migrate to 2.1
>> Currently using 2.1.10
>> Previously we had for issue of warnings
>>
>> quota_warning = stora
Please help. my error log is flooded with thousands of entries like this
Dec 4 19:48:15 mailsrv dovecot: IMAP(testmail):
file_dotlock_create(/public/.News/dovecot-uidlist) failed: Permission
denied (euid=1002(testmail) egid=1002(testmail) missing +w perm:
/public/.News)
util i restart the service
Op 04-12-12 15:15, Marc Perkel schreef:
Just wondering if there's an open source Linux alternative to MS
Exchange so that all the features of outlook work?
You may want to check out Zimbra (www.zimbra.com).
/rolf
On Dec 4, 2012, at 12:57 PM, Daniel Parthey wrote:
> e-frog wrote:
>> On 04.12.2012 19:27, wrote Dave Abrahams:
>> See http://wiki2.dovecot.org/Mountpoints
>
> Just being curious:
>
> Is it possible to ignore all mountpoints with this command?
> doveadm mount add '*' ignore
>
> Where does dovec
e-frog wrote:
> On 04.12.2012 19:27, wrote Dave Abrahams:
> See http://wiki2.dovecot.org/Mountpoints
Just being curious:
Is it possible to ignore all mountpoints with this command?
doveadm mount add '*' ignore
Where does dovecot store ignored mountpoints?
Regards
Daniel
--
https://plus.google.
* Charles Marcus :
> On 2012-12-04 9:20 AM, Jakob Curdes wrote:
> >Am 04.12.2012 15:15, schrieb Marc Perkel:
> >>Just wondering if there's an open source Linux alternative to MS
> >>Exchange so that all the features of outlook work?
> >Did you have a look at zarafa? Most part of it is open source;
On 04.12.2012 19:27, wrote Dave Abrahams:
Dovecot seems to be warning about every volume it's ever seen in the
past. Is this normal? Can I make it stop?
--8<---cut here---start->8---
12/4/12 12:33:38.148 PM dovecot[2658]: master: Warning: /Volumes/fs is no
Am 04.12.2012 19:07, schrieb Bob Miller:
for outlook you need a 20 euro plugin to support caldav and
outlook is a terrible imap client, thunderbird doesn't support the
shared address book thing yet,
Outlook is a terrible imap client until including office 2007, with 2010
things have changed a
on Tue Dec 04 2012, Timo Sirainen wrote:
> On 4.12.2012, at 20.24, Dave Abrahams wrote:
>
>>> Based on the awesome explanation I just gave, I wouldn't mind if
>>> someone converts something based on it to a man page patch!
>>
>> The lack of a working Git mirror really raises the barrier for me
On 4.12.2012, at 20.24, Dave Abrahams wrote:
>> Based on the awesome explanation I just gave, I wouldn't mind if
>> someone converts something based on it to a man page patch!
>
> The lack of a working Git mirror really raises the barrier for me to
> contribute. I was just wondering if you had t
Dovecot seems to be warning about every volume it's ever seen in the
past. Is this normal? Can I make it stop?
--8<---cut here---start->8---
12/4/12 12:33:38.148 PM dovecot[2658]: master: Warning: /Volumes/fs is no
longer mounted. See http://wiki2.dovecot.or
I just found this in my logs. Any idea?
--8<---cut here---start->8---
12/4/12 12:33:43.831 PM dovecot[2660]: indexer-worker(dave): Panic: file
mailbox-list-fs.c: line 156 (fs_list_get_path): assertion failed:
(mailbox_list_is_valid_pattern(_list, name))
12/4
on Tue Dec 04 2012, Timo Sirainen wrote:
> On 4.12.2012, at 18.59, Dave Abrahams wrote:
>
>> on Tue Dec 04 2012, Timo Sirainen wrote:
>>
>>> On 4.12.2012, at 18.46, Dave Abrahams wrote:
>>>
Subject says all. Timo, would you write something up where the world
will find it? Also, it
If you are into building the system, you can run an IMAP server and a
caldav server. Davical gives shared calendars and shared address books,
as well as a todo function that nobody every seems to use. In terms of
limiations; for outlook you need a 20 euro plugin to support caldav and
outlook is a
On 2012-12-04 9:20 AM, Jakob Curdes wrote:
Am 04.12.2012 15:15, schrieb Marc Perkel:
Just wondering if there's an open source Linux alternative to MS
Exchange so that all the features of outlook work?
Did you have a look at zarafa? Most part of it is open source; the
outlook connector ist clos
On 4.12.2012, at 19.33, Thomas Hummel wrote:
> Hello Timo,
>
> The last time I checked my understanding about director was that :
>
> 1. backend/"real" imap servers should not be on the same host (or the same
> dovecot instance) to
> avoid proxying loops.
>
> Is it still the case with the la
on Tue Dec 04 2012, Timo Sirainen wrote:
> On 4.12.2012, at 18.57, Dave Abrahams wrote:
>
>> Here's a further experience report with questions inline:
>>
>> 1. "doveadm index '*'" crashes in clucene (for me), so it must be trying
>> to update the FTS indexes, somehow. Is that (the updating,
On 4/12/2012 4:15 μμ, Marc Perkel wrote:
Just wondering if there's an open source Linux alternative to MS
Exchange so that all the features of outlook work?
Keep in mind that many solutions out there like Zarafa and Open-Xchange
are not free (though they are open source).
On the other ha
Hello Timo,
The last time I checked my understanding about director was that :
1. backend/"real" imap servers should not be on the same host (or the same
dovecot instance) to
avoid proxying loops.
Is it still the case with the latest 2.1 stable release ? Is there a plan to be
able to run dir
On 4.12.2012, at 18.57, Dave Abrahams wrote:
> Here's a further experience report with questions inline:
>
> 1. "doveadm index '*'" crashes in clucene (for me), so it must be trying
> to update the FTS indexes, somehow. Is that (the updating, not the
> crashing) intended behavior, and if so,
Here's a further experience report with questions inline:
1. "doveadm index '*'" crashes in clucene (for me), so it must be trying
to update the FTS indexes, somehow. Is that (the updating, not the
crashing) intended behavior, and if so, should it be documented?
2. "doveadm search text SO
On 4.12.2012, at 18.59, Dave Abrahams wrote:
> on Tue Dec 04 2012, Timo Sirainen wrote:
>
>> On 4.12.2012, at 18.46, Dave Abrahams wrote:
>>
>>> Subject says all. Timo, would you write something up where the world
>>> will find it? Also, it would be great if doveadm fts was covered in the
>>>
on Tue Dec 04 2012, Timo Sirainen wrote:
> On 4.12.2012, at 18.46, Dave Abrahams wrote:
>
>> Subject says all. Timo, would you write something up where the world
>> will find it? Also, it would be great if doveadm fts was covered in the
>> doveadm manpage.
>
> It runs the Lucene's optimize fun
On 4.12.2012, at 17.10, Thomas Hummel wrote:
> I've been using dovecot from many years now using Maildir mailbox format with
> default layout (Maildir++, everthing in a single directory).
>
> What would be the reason(s) to convert to Layout=fs ?
Some people already are using fs layout for their
On 4.12.2012, at 18.46, Dave Abrahams wrote:
> Subject says all. Timo, would you write something up where the world
> will find it? Also, it would be great if doveadm fts was covered in the
> doveadm manpage.
It runs the Lucene's optimize function with fts-lucene backend. Does nothing
with oth
Subject says all. Timo, would you write something up where the world
will find it? Also, it would be great if doveadm fts was covered in the
doveadm manpage.
Thanks,
--
Dave Abrahams
BoostPro Computing Software DevelopmentTraining
http://www.boostpro.com C
On 12/04/2012 05:22 PM, Timo Sirainen wrote:
On 4.12.2012, at 16.20, Jakob Curdes wrote:
Am 04.12.2012 15:15, schrieb Marc Perkel:
Just wondering if there's an open source Linux alternative to MS Exchange so
that all the features of outlook work?
Did you have a look at zarafa? Most part of i
On 4.12.2012, at 16.20, Jakob Curdes wrote:
> Am 04.12.2012 15:15, schrieb Marc Perkel:
>> Just wondering if there's an open source Linux alternative to MS Exchange so
>> that all the features of outlook work?
> Did you have a look at zarafa? Most part of it is open source; the outlook
> connect
This CVE isn't worthy of existence. A user can crash his/her own IMAP session
by issuing a specific SEARCH command, which is just slightly worse than user
issuing a LOGOUT command. It took years for people to notice this bug, because
just about no IMAP client issues such a command.
i finally manage to control access on public folder by File system permission.
i have 3 test users.
1. tom
2. fmaster
3 . testmail
tom and fmaster are a group called "news-own" and testmail user is a
readonly one.
here is my folder structure ill share dovecot -n output at the end of
this email.
Hello Timo,
I've been using dovecot from many years now using Maildir mailbox format with
default layout (Maildir++, everthing in a single directory).
What would be the reason(s) to convert to Layout=fs ? I can only think of one :
to allow dots in mailbox names. And even in that case, I guess I s
Horde groupware? www.Horde.org
I tried horde but for real Outlook connectivity, which is done via
ActiveSync, my experience ist not so good; then and now I got contacts
that kepte replicating themselves and dates that would not show up in
Outlook or the Web GUI. If you use it with Thunderbir
On Dec 4, 2012 9:20 AM, "Martin Rabl" wrote:
>
> Am 04.12.2012 15:15, schrieb Marc Perkel:
>
>> Just wondering if there's an open source Linux alternative to MS
>> Exchange so that all the features of outlook work?
>
> Give SOGo a try ... http://www.sogo.nu
Horde groupware? www.Horde.org
Simon
Hey Marc,
On 04.12.2012 15:15, Marc Perkel wrote:> Just wondering if there's an
open source Linux alternative to MS
> Exchange so that all the features of outlook work?
Open-Xchange. They have a module called OLOX2 that enables you to make
MS Outlook think it's connected to a Microsoft Exchange.
On 4/12/2012 4:15 μμ, Marc Perkel wrote:
Just wondering if there's an open source Linux alternative to MS
Exchange so that all the features of outlook work?
Try SoGo (http://www.sogo.nu/english.html) together with your basic mail
software (e.g. Postfix/Dovecot).
Nick
Am 04.12.2012 15:15, schrieb Marc Perkel:
Just wondering if there's an open source Linux alternative to MS
Exchange so that all the features of outlook work?
Did you have a look at zarafa? Most part of it is open source; the
outlook connector ist closed source however and requires a license fee
Am 04.12.2012 15:15, schrieb Marc Perkel:
Just wondering if there's an open source Linux alternative to MS
Exchange so that all the features of outlook work?
Give SOGo a try ... http://www.sogo.nu
--
Viele Grüße,
Martin Rabl
At 12PM + on 4/12/12 Ben Morrow wrote:
>
> Well, it looks to me as though xnu/bsd/kern/uipc_socket.c:soreceive will
> indeed return ENOTCONN for a socket which was once successfully
> connected but has now been disconnected. This happens when the socket is
> in the DEFUNCT state, which is a s
Just wondering if there's an open source Linux alternative to MS
Exchange so that all the features of outlook work?
At 2AM -0800 on 3/12/12 you (Erik A Johnson) wrote:
> At 10AM -0800 on 1/12/12 Erik A Johnson wrote:
> >> Should the "#ifdef __APPLE__" remain? or would any of these tests be
> >> appropriate for other platforms as well?
>
>
> On 12/1/2012 at 11:07:36am PST, Ben Morrow wrote:
> > I had a go at
43 matches
Mail list logo
