on Tue Dec 04 2012, Timo Sirainen <tss-AT-iki.fi> wrote: > On 4.12.2012, at 18.59, Dave Abrahams wrote: > >> on Tue Dec 04 2012, Timo Sirainen <tss-AT-iki.fi> wrote: >> >>> On 4.12.2012, at 18.46, Dave Abrahams wrote: >>> >>>> Subject says all. Timo, would you write something up where the world >>>> will find it? Also, it would be great if doveadm fts was covered in the >>>> doveadm manpage. >>> >>> It runs the Lucene's optimize function with fts-lucene backend. Does >>> nothing with others. Basically I think it just gathers multiple Lucene >>> index files together and packs them into a single file, dropping all >>> deleted data (Lucene documentation has more details I think). Similar >>> to what "doveadm purge" does to mdbox files. fts-lucene runs the >>> optimize also internally automatically once in a while, so I'm not >>> sure if that doveadm command should necessarily even exist. >> >> I think the answer lies in your perception of benefits vs maintainance >> (including documentation) costs... ;-) > > Based on the awesome explanation I just gave, I wouldn't mind if > someone converts something based on it to a man page patch!
The lack of a working Git mirror really raises the barrier for me to contribute. I was just wondering if you had tried to reinstate it with a recent version of the hggit plugin? It appears to be officially under development at https://bitbucket.org/durin42/hg-git... -- Dave Abrahams BoostPro Computing Software Development Training http://www.boostpro.com Clang/LLVM/EDG Compilers C++ Boost
