On 27.11.2012, at 9.37, Nikita Koshikov wrote:
>>> Here is the problem:
>>> I have few:
>>> passdb {
>>> #1
>>> }
>>> passdb {
>>> #2
>>> }
>>> And relative userdb sections. If user not found in 1) section it
>> fallbacks
>>> to next one - it's expected and right, IMHO. But when the user exists in
On Tue, Nov 27, 2012 at 3:04 AM, Timo Sirainen wrote:
> On 23.11.2012, at 9.46, Nikita Koshikov wrote:
>
> > Hello list,
> >
> > Here is the problem:
> > I have few:
> > passdb {
> > #1
> > }
> > passdb {
> > #2
> > }
> > And relative userdb sections. If user not found in 1) section it
> fallback
Could you try with the attached patch, and with only the problematic
client running? What does it log (the beginning of the session until it
starts repeating the same lines)?
On Sat, 2012-11-24 at 00:16 -0800, Erik A Johnson wrote:
> Thanks, Timo. Nope, still an infinite loop. Anything I can try
On 2.11.2012, at 17.55, Steffen Kaiser wrote:
> Please add the information to this error, which socket has the problem and
> which uid access is and what is expected.
>
> For instance, when the quota dict request fails, because of permission
> problems, you get a very detailed info about the cu
On 27.11.2012, at 8.48, Dominic Malolepszy wrote:
> I have observed that after deleting a mailbox and removing the user from the
> userdb, immediately accessing the mail account via POP3/IMAP causes Dovecot
> to auto create an empty mailbox, because the userdb/passdb details are still
> cached
Hi
I have observed that after deleting a mailbox and removing the user from
the userdb, immediately accessing the mail account via POP3/IMAP causes
Dovecot to auto create an empty mailbox, because the userdb/passdb
details are still cached for 10minutes. Is there any option to tell
Dovecot PO
On 27.11.2012, at 8.39, Timo Sirainen wrote:
>> userdb {
>> driver = passwd
>> }
>
> Both of these lookups should be done by auth-worker processes. So why is it
> the auth process that complains?
Because of a bug in v2.0.16+ :(
http://hg.dovecot.org/dovecot-2.1/rev/8e5d9d88e250
As a workaroun
On 26.11.2012, at 22.03, Kelsey Cummings wrote:
>>> auth: Error: malloc: 58012: Cannot allocate memory
>>> auth: Error: Unable to allocate memory for mutexes from the region
>>> auth: Error: PANIC: Cannot allocate memory
>>> auth: passwd(test,1.1.1.1,<8HTlNHzNIQBAjhKC>): unknown user
..
>> Memory
1. clear the log
2. Send message
3. show mail.log mail.err
you should add following in main.cf
dovecot_destination_recipient_limit = 1
27.11.12 1:15, /#!/JoePea пишет:
Hi, thanks for the reply,
What's the difference between dovecot-lda and deliver? Are they the
same? The manpages are identic
On 27.11.2012, at 7.50, Timo Sirainen wrote:
>> Nov 26, 2012 8:49:29 PM org.apache.solr.common.SolrException log
>> SEVERE: org.apache.solr.common.SolrException: Illegal character ((CTRL-CHAR,
>> code 8))
>> at [row,col {unknown-source}]: [1011144,197790]
>
> Something's wrong. The Solr code was
On 27.11.2012, at 6.51, Daniel L. Miller wrote:
> On 11/26/2012 5:50 PM, Timo Sirainen wrote:
>> On 18.11.2012, at 16.54, Robert Strötgen wrote:
>>
>>> Nov 18, 2012 2:59:09 PM org.apache.solr.common.SolrException log
>>> SEVERE: org.apache.solr.common.SolrException: Invalid UTF-8 start byte
>>> 0
On 11/26/2012 5:50 PM, Timo Sirainen wrote:
On 18.11.2012, at 16.54, Robert Strötgen wrote:
Nov 18, 2012 2:59:09 PM org.apache.solr.common.SolrException log
SEVERE: org.apache.solr.common.SolrException: Invalid UTF-8 start byte
0xfc (at char #25214836, byte #26687495)
Annoying. I guess these f
On 11/26/2012 5:50 PM, Timo Sirainen wrote:
On 18.11.2012, at 16.54, Robert Strötgen wrote:
Nov 18, 2012 2:59:09 PM org.apache.solr.common.SolrException log
SEVERE: org.apache.solr.common.SolrException: Invalid UTF-8 start byte
0xfc (at char #25214836, byte #26687495)
Annoying. I guess these f
On 21.11.2012, at 15.05, Ramon Frontera wrote:
> we have a problem with our director proxy configuration.
> When we run on proxy server the doveadm command with -A switch, fails with
> the error:
>
> # doveadm -D quota get -A
> doveadm(user1): Debug: auth input: user=user1 proxy starttls=any-ce
On 27.11.2012, at 3.24, Sven Hartge wrote:
>> For implementing shared mailboxes between all user servers, I think
>> what would need to be developed is:
>
>>> imapc_host = m-st-sh-01.example.com
>>> imapc_master_user = %u
>>> imapc_user = shared
>
>> Somehow being able to set "imapc_user = %%u"
On 19.11.2012, at 16.02, Ken Mandelberg wrote:
> We are running Dovecot 2.0.12. It runs on only one server and /var/mail is
> local where all the INBOX's are stored. Users other IMAP folders are NFS
> mounted on the server.
>
> We see frequent
>
> Error: nfs_flush_file_handle_cache_dir: rmdir(
On 18.11.2012, at 16.54, Robert Strötgen wrote:
> Nov 18, 2012 2:59:09 PM org.apache.solr.common.SolrException log
> SEVERE: org.apache.solr.common.SolrException: Invalid UTF-8 start byte
> 0xfc (at char #25214836, byte #26687495)
Annoying. I guess these fix it:
http://hg.dovecot.org/dovecot-2.1
Timo Sirainen wrote:
> On 23.11.2012, at 17.53, Sven Hartge wrote:
> BTW. Do you have multiple Dovecot backend servers? Director works
> only when you're not using shared mailboxes..
>>
>>> You can't reliably do it if the mailboxes are accessed directly via
>>> NFS. The current idea to
On 21.11.2012, at 19.34, Andreas Kasenides wrote:
> I could not determine if when using filesystem quotas
> (http://wiki2.dovecot.org/Quota/FS)
> Dovecot will use the reported quota and limits without the need of
> configuring them
> via "quota_rules". Is this possible somehow? Such a feature wo
On 22.11.2012, at 17.06, Richard Platel wrote:
> We use Dovecot for IMAP and POP (but not LDA), we want to do something when a
> user has an INBOX that becomes empty, or becomes not empty (set a flag in
> memcached, but that's not really important).
>
> I'm writing a plugin (for Dovecot 2.1.7
On 23.11.2012, at 13.54, Keith Edmunds wrote:
> Problem: We have some folders (eg, Trash) appearing both as sibling folders
> to INBOX and as subfolders to INBOX. We want them only to appear at the
> sibling level.
You're breaking all the assumptions that IMAP clients can make about mailbox
name
On 23.11.2012, at 9.46, Nikita Koshikov wrote:
> Hello list,
>
> Here is the problem:
> I have few:
> passdb {
> #1
> }
> passdb {
> #2
> }
> And relative userdb sections. If user not found in 1) section it fallbacks
> to next one - it's expected and right, IMHO. But when the user exists in
> bot
On 27.11.2012, at 3.00, Timo Sirainen wrote:
>> Now the mentioned quirk: Because all connections on the shared-server
>> are made to the same user "shared" and are coming from very few IPs
>> (the 1 to X user-servers), you need to set a very high
>> mail_max_userip_connections value.
>>
>> I set
On 23.11.2012, at 17.53, Sven Hartge wrote:
BTW. Do you have multiple Dovecot backend servers? Director works
only when you're not using shared mailboxes..
>
>> You can't reliably do it if the mailboxes are accessed directly via
>> NFS. The current idea to solve this is to use imapc ba
On 26.11.2012, at 18.07, Steffen Kaiser wrote:
> I'm running Dovecot v2.1 and enabled the
>
> lmtp_rcpt_check_quota
>
> option in conf.d/20-lmtp.conf, because I just found it in the sample config.
>
> Is this option working somewhere?
>
> When I have the option enabled, I get _no_ response in
On 11/26/2012 3:39 PM, 1st WebDesigns wrote:
> Thanks, all your comments are noted.
>
>> As I said, you can migrate users individually. You could easily do 10
>> users a day during coffee breaks etc and be done in a month plus. Do 40
>> a day and you're done in 10 days. The only time you'll bur
At 6PM + on 26/11/12 you (cfowler) wrote:
> On 26-11-2012 17:59, Ben Morrow wrote:
> > At 5PM + on 26/11/12 you (cfowler) wrote:
> >> Problem : All vacation autoreplies come from the postmaster address.
> >> Expected behavior : vacation notice comes from the user who set the
> >> vacation
Thanks, all your comments are noted.
As I said, you can migrate users individually. You could easily do 10
users a day during coffee breaks etc and be done in a month plus. Do 40
a day and you're done in 10 days. The only time you'll burn is in the
learning curve, not the actual mailbox migra
On 11/26/2012 1:58 PM, 1st WebDesigns wrote:
>
>> So this is a step in the right direction. But still far less than
>> optimal. The read/write lock contention on mbox is unnecessarily eating
>> up system resources (mainly memory), and causing unnecessary delivery
>> delays to the mailbox. You s
Hi Ben,
Indeed, the mailq command shows my test messages sitting there with "mail
transport unavailable".
> ┌─[11:48:22/hypership/root/~]
> └─╼ mailq
> -Queue ID- --Size-- Arrival Time -Sender/Recipient---
> 2DCCB580C01 1901 Mon Nov 26 11:45:02 trus...@gmail.com
>
yes of course
this is only remarks
for easily understanding
27.11.12 0:33, Charles Marcus пишет:
You do know that inline comments as you have below are not supported
in postfix config files and WILL cause unexpected behavior depending
on where they are and what they contain, right?
On 2012-1
You do know that inline comments as you have below are not supported in
postfix config files and WILL cause unexpected behavior depending on
where they are and what they contain, right?
On 2012-11-26 3:13 PM, Николай Клименко wrote:
thx for answer
i use 1.x
I found the solution
in main.cf
c
On 11/26/2012 6:59 PM, Ben Morrow wrote:
At 5PM + on 26/11/12 you (cfowler) wrote:
This setting turns that check off, in which case Pigeonhole
will send a vacation response (despite the standard) but sends it from
Postmaster.
Actually, this shouldn't have happened. Originally, it would
On 11/26/2012 6:31 PM, cfowler wrote:
Problem : All vacation autoreplies come from the postmaster address.
Expected behavior : vacation notice comes from the user who set the
vacation.
Platform : Dovecot 2.1.7 on Debian Squeeze ( See below for example
reply, sieve script and dovecot -n output)
thx for answer
i use 1.x
I found the solution
in main.cf
content_filter=smtp-amavis:[127.0.0.1]:10026 #filter with dkim
and in master.cf
public_ip_external_user:smtp inet n - - -
- smtpd
#some smtpd_recipient_restrictions rules
#some smtpd_sender_rest
On Fri, Nov 23, 2012 at 08:36:37AM +0200, Timo Sirainen wrote:
> On 9.11.2012, at 2.49, Kelsey Cummings wrote:
> > One of our dovecot backend servers ran into a problem with it's auth
> > process a few days ago. This doesn't appear to be the error logged when
> > dovecot hits its internal limit so
So this is a step in the right direction. But still far less than
optimal. The read/write lock contention on mbox is unnecessarily eating
up system resources (mainly memory), and causing unnecessary delivery
delays to the mailbox. You should really start looking at migrating to
maildir. It's
On 11/26/2012 07:58 PM Николай Клименко wrote:
> message sent from the sieve-vacation does not contain dkim signature
>
> how to configure sieve to send messages via smtp transport with signing?
Configure a submission host:
http://hg.dovecot.org/dovecot-2.1/file/e95479f439aa/doc/example-config/c
may be this is the best way
dovecot unix - n n - - pipe
flags=DRhu user=vmail:vmail argv=/usr/lib/dovecot/deliver -f
${sender} -d ${recipient} -a ${recipient}
parameter-a $ {recipient}
allow to keep the recipient's address in the headers "from:"
19.11.12 2
message sent from the sieve-vacation does not contain dkim signature
how to configure sieve to send messages via smtp transport with signing?
On 26-11-2012 17:59, Ben Morrow wrote:
At 5PM + on 26/11/12 you (cfowler) wrote:
Problem : All vacation autoreplies come from the postmaster address.
Expected behavior : vacation notice comes from the user who set the
vacation.
Platform : Dovecot 2.1.7 on Debian Squeeze ( See below for exam
At 5PM + on 26/11/12 you (cfowler) wrote:
> Problem : All vacation autoreplies come from the postmaster address.
> Expected behavior : vacation notice comes from the user who set the
> vacation.
> Platform : Dovecot 2.1.7 on Debian Squeeze ( See below for example
> reply, sieve script and do
Am 26.11.2012 18:31, schrieb cfowler:
> Problem : All vacation autoreplies come from the postmaster address.
<> is not really the postmaster address, its special for the mailer daemon
> Expected behavior : vacation notice comes from the user who set the
> vacation.
at my knowledge, does not work
Problem : All vacation autoreplies come from the postmaster address.
Expected behavior : vacation notice comes from the user who set the
vacation.
Platform : Dovecot 2.1.7 on Debian Squeeze ( See below for example
reply, sieve script and dovecot -n output)
Any help appreciated!
-
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hello,
I'm running Dovecot v2.1 and enabled the
lmtp_rcpt_check_quota
option in conf.d/20-lmtp.conf, because I just found it in the sample
config.
Is this option working somewhere?
When I have the option enabled, I get _no_ response in the RCPT
At 4PM +0200 on 26/11/12 you (Graham Leggett) wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I have some IMAP servers fronted with separate perdition processes,
> and it would be ideal if I could collapse this down to having dovecot
> do both the IMAP proxying and the IMAP serving at the same time on the
> same IP address
On 26 Nov 2012, at 4:24 PM, Graham Leggett wrote:
> I have some IMAP servers fronted with separate perdition processes, and it
> would be ideal if I could collapse this down to having dovecot do both the
> IMAP proxying and the IMAP serving at the same time on the same IP addresses.
A heartfel
Hi all,
I have some IMAP servers fronted with separate perdition processes, and it
would be ideal if I could collapse this down to having dovecot do both the IMAP
proxying and the IMAP serving at the same time on the same IP addresses.
One of the fields in my LDAP entries contains the canonical
At 2AM -0800 on 26/11/12 you (/#!/JoePea) wrote:
> Hi, thanks for the reply. I'm new to all this. How can I tell if postfix is
> deferring messages, or if it thinks they've been delieverd? Where is the
> postfix log?
You can tell if a message is still in the queue with 'mailq'. You can
find out w
Hi, I tried changing dovecot-lda to deliver in master.cf and also added the
acl plugin to the lda protocol like yours. It still won't work though.
*/#!/*JoePea
On Mon, Nov 19, 2012 at 9:04 AM, Fi4IT - Daniel Fischer
wrote:
> Hello Joe,
>
> i use this:
> main.cf
> virtual_transport = dovecot
>
>
Hi, thanks for the reply. I'm new to all this. How can I tell if postfix is
deferring messages, or if it thinks they've been delieverd? Where is the
postfix log?
How do I feed a message to dovecot-lda manually, as mailman?
How do I use LMTP instead of LDA?
*/#!/*JoePea
On Mon, Nov 19, 2012 at
Hello,
>> # doveadm mailbox list -u user001
>> doveadm(user001): Error: user user001: Auth PASS lookup failed
>> doveadm(user001): Fatal: passdb lookup failed
> Are you running this on a Dovecot proxy? It looks like doveadm wants to do a
> passdb lookup to find out which server should handle t
El 23/11/12 08:07, Timo Sirainen escribió:
On 16.11.2012, at 12.11, Angel L. Mateo wrote:
We are deploying shared mailboxes in our mail system. We are running
2.1.9 and mail backend is maildir.
As described at http://wiki.dovecot.org/SharedMailboxes/Shared when
shared namespa
53 matches
Mail list logo
