Timo Sirainen wrote:
> On 24.8.2012, at 16.13, Sven Hartge wrote:
quota_rule = *:storage=1G:ignoredeleted
quota_rule2 = Trash:storage=+100M
>>
>>> This can't be implemented race-condition-free without huge changes to code.
>>
>> Damn, too bad.
>> I know for sure either my users or my
On 24.8.2012, at 16.13, Sven Hartge wrote:
>>> quota_rule = *:storage=1G:ignoredeleted
>>> quota_rule2 = Trash:storage=+100M
>
>> This can't be implemented race-condition-free without huge changes to code.
>
> Damn, too bad.
>
> I know for sure either my users or my 1st level support team are g
Hi Timo,
I'm trying to share two folders. The first one it's public and the other is per
user based, using acl's to control access etc . Dovecot create the folders, but
when I'll subscribe using ThunderBird client both of them seens like
watermarked and has a "mailboxes" folder inside. I can s
Sven Hartge wrote:
> Nope, does not compile (dovecot-dev headers are installed):
OK, trying to fix this, without having any deeper knowlege of C
(anymore):
> deleted-to-trash-plugin.c: In function ‘mailbox_open_or_create’:
> deleted-to-trash-plugin.c:79: error: ‘MAILBOX_FLAG_KEEP_RECENT’ undecl
Sven Hartge wrote:
> Robert Schetterer wrote:
>> Am 24.08.2012 15:13, schrieb Sven Hartge:
>>> Is is possible to forcibly expunge a message at once, directly after
>>> a client has marked it as deleted? Kind of the opposite of the
>>> lazy_expunge plugin?
>> hm perhaps as workaround
>> http://
Robert Schetterer wrote:
> Am 24.08.2012 15:13, schrieb Sven Hartge:
>> Timo Sirainen wrote:
>>> On 24.8.2012, at 15.02, Sven Hartge wrote:
>>
Ignoring the content (or increasing the quota) of the Trash folder is
easy and no problem, but ignoring deleted messages seems impossible
My next guess was the upstream data rate. My router states that the
upstream is 10x slower than downstream so I guess this is the culprit.
Time to move to a VPS methinks...
On 24/08/12 13:50, Stan Hoeppner wrote:
On 8/24/2012 5:53 AM, Tim Smith wrote:
Hay Tim,
Having set up my mail server (
Hello,
We currently use qmail with vpopmail for e-mail and are looking to switch
from courier-imap to dovecot for IMAP on our RedHat EL 5 systems. Our goal
is to use the dovecot RPM supplied by RH (v1.0.7) if at all possible. We
can do this if we are able to dynamically load the vpopmail auth mo
Am 24.08.2012 15:13, schrieb Sven Hartge:
> Timo Sirainen wrote:
>> On 24.8.2012, at 15.02, Sven Hartge wrote:
>
>>> Ignoring the content (or increasing the quota) of the Trash folder is
>>> easy and no problem, but ignoring deleted messages seems impossible
>>> without changes to the code.
>> ..
Timo Sirainen wrote:
> On 24.8.2012, at 15.02, Sven Hartge wrote:
>> Ignoring the content (or increasing the quota) of the Trash folder is
>> easy and no problem, but ignoring deleted messages seems impossible
>> without changes to the code.
> ..
>> So I propose an additional flag for the quota_r
On 24.8.2012, at 15.02, Sven Hartge wrote:
> Ignoring the content (or increasing the quota) of the Trash folder is
> easy and no problem, but ignoring deleted messages seems impossible
> without changes to the code.
..
> So I propose an additional flag for the quota_rule config option to be
> able
On 8/24/2012 5:53 AM, Tim Smith wrote:
Hay Tim,
> Having set up my mail server (Dovecot/Postfix), users are experiencing
> long delays (a couple of minutes) when sending mail from mail client
> such as Thunderbird - this increases with attachments. Having had a
> brief discussion with someone, th
Hi!
I am currently in the process of preparing a migration of our old
Courier-based IMAP/POP server setup to a Dovecot-based one.
During this process I came across the following problem with the
difference Courier and Dovecot handle deleted messages and mail quota.
Quote from http://www.courier-
Am 24.08.2012 13:35, schrieb Jahnke-Zumbusch, Dirk:
> Hi all,
>
Having set up my mail server (Dovecot/Postfix), users are experiencing
long delays (a couple of minutes) when sending mail from mail client
such as Thunderbird - this increases with attachments. Having had a
>
> While
Am 24.08.2012 13:18, schrieb Matthew Powell:
> On 2012-08-24, at 7.01, Jerry wrote:
>
>> I would personally recommend supporting it. If history teaches us
>> anything, it is that sooner or later, and usually sooner, someone will
>> require that block. Being prepared for it in advance would seem
Hi all,
>>> Having set up my mail server (Dovecot/Postfix), users are experiencing
>>> long delays (a couple of minutes) when sending mail from mail client
>>> such as Thunderbird - this increases with attachments. Having had a
While in the first place sending e-mail has to do with SMTP and not I
On 2012-08-24, at 7.01, Jerry wrote:
> I would personally recommend supporting it. If history teaches us
> anything, it is that sooner or later, and usually sooner, someone will
> require that block. Being prepared for it in advance would seem like
> the prudent thing to do.
I wonder whether it
Thanks Robert. That's what I thought. I couldn't make the connection.
Will try the Postfix list!
On 24/08/12 12:06, Robert Schetterer wrote:
Am 24.08.2012 12:53, schrieb Tim Smith:
Hi,
I didn't know where to post this one so I'll start off with you guys and
then try Postfix if I'm barking up
Am 24.08.2012 12:53, schrieb Tim Smith:
> Hi,
>
> I didn't know where to post this one so I'll start off with you guys and
> then try Postfix if I'm barking up the wrong tree!
>
> Having set up my mail server (Dovecot/Postfix), users are experiencing
> long delays (a couple of minutes) when sendi
On Fri, 24 Aug 2012 10:10:42 +0200
Warren Baker articulated:
> Yeah as others have mentioned - also not sure whether it is worth the
> effort to support IPv6's 'private' network (fc00::/7)?
> I havent seen anyone making use of this for their v6 enabled sites but
> others may have input here.
I wo
Hi,
I didn't know where to post this one so I'll start off with you guys and
then try Postfix if I'm barking up the wrong tree!
Having set up my mail server (Dovecot/Postfix), users are experiencing
long delays (a couple of minutes) when sending mail from mail client
such as Thunderbird - th
El 23/08/12 22:05, Timo Sirainen escribió:
On 20.8.2012, at 14.47, Angel L. Mateo wrote:
The origin of the problem why lmtp didn't use user's mail_plugin is
that I had it configured it in the pass_attrs option (and read with prefetch)
and not in user_attrs, so lmtp didn't get it.
On Thu, Aug 23, 2012 at 10:49 PM, Timo Sirainen wrote:
>>
>> Is there a reason why 172.16.0.0/12 was left out of the change ^^ ?
>
> Is it actually used? :) I've used 192.168 in my home network and all
> corporate networks I've seen have been 10/8. But yeah, I guess since there
> aren't more th
Hi Timo,
[Timo Sirainen; Di 21 Aug 2012 12:22:04 CEST]
Unfortunatly this can't be a fix because in file_set_size() dovecot
defines an array 'char block[IO_BLOCK_SIZE]'. On the other hand the
default block size is predestined for file ops.
Does the attached patch fix it? (not a very good fix)
On Thu, 23 Aug 2012, Timo Sirainen wrote:
> On 18.8.2012, at 0.12, Lutz Preßler wrote:
>
> >>> inthread refs younger 604800
> >>>
> >>> This works as expected for the first time. But later on, also older
> >>> messages/
> >>> threads are included until I delete the virtual/.week/dovecot.index*.
25 matches
Mail list logo
