On Wed, 4 Apr 2012, Timo Sirainen wrote:
On 29.3.2012, at 8.25, Gerhard Wiesinger wrote:
2.0.x: with Prefix ~/Mail
A0003 LIST "" ~/Mail/sent
A0003 OK List completed.:
mail_full_filesystem_access = yes
mail_location = mbox:~:INBOX=/var/mail/%u
Yes, the problem happens only with mail_full_
On 4.4.2012, at 20.52, Mike Jones! wrote:
> Dovecot is not binding or listening on port 993 when I start it.
Try adding protocols=imap setting.
you should configure imap\pop3 services as far as i remeber...
Regards,
Eliezer
On 04/04/2012 20:52, Mike Jones! wrote:
Hello.
Dovecot is not binding or listening on port 993 when I start it.
$ sudo netstat -tlnp | grep -c 993
0
Dovecot starts fine and runs without complaints.
$ sudo servi
On 2012-04-04 15:10, Patrick Ben Koetter wrote:
Or would I be able to modify this with a post-login script?
Just one note: as far as I know, if your mail directory depends on a
post-login script, it might be tricky to get LMTP or doveadm commands to
work properly.
Cheers,
Christoph
Hello.
Dovecot is not binding or listening on port 993 when I start it.
$ sudo netstat -tlnp | grep -c 993
0
Dovecot starts fine and runs without complaints.
$ sudo service dovecot restart
Restarting IMAP/POP3 mail server: dovecot.
$ sudo tail /var/log/mail.log
Apr 4 13:42:39 mwjones dovecot:
Timo Sirainen wrote:
On 2.4.2012, at 18.45, Artur Zaprzała wrote:
Running strace on lmtp reveals that when lmtp delivers a message to multiple
recipients it saves the message to a file in the first mailbox and hard links
that file to other mailboxes. But when in the meantime of delivery that
On 4.4.2012, at 16.57, Patrick Domack wrote:
> Quoting Timo Sirainen :
>
>> On 4.4.2012, at 16.04, Patrick Westenberg wrote:
>>
>>> Timo Sirainen schrieb:
>>>
where lmtp.example.com expands to your two IP addresses. DNS server
handles load balancing by returning IPs in round robin an
Quoting Timo Sirainen :
On 4.4.2012, at 16.04, Patrick Westenberg wrote:
Timo Sirainen schrieb:
where lmtp.example.com expands to your two IP addresses. DNS
server handles load balancing by returning IPs in round robin and
Postfix handles fallbacking to the second IP if the first one
do
On 4.4.2012, at 16.10, Patrick Ben Koetter wrote:
> I need to authenticate users via LDAP either by mailaddress or login name.
> In both cases the mailbox location is /src/mail/%d/%n. I can easily deduct
> that path from the mailaddress, but not so from the login name.
If you have something like
I need to authenticate users via LDAP either by mailaddress or login name.
In both cases the mailbox location is /src/mail/%d/%n. I can easily deduct
that path from the mailaddress, but not so from the login name.
Can I get the mail address as part of fetching user_attrs and modify it on the
fly?
On 4.4.2012, at 16.04, Patrick Westenberg wrote:
> Timo Sirainen schrieb:
>
>> where lmtp.example.com expands to your two IP addresses. DNS server handles
>> load balancing by returning IPs in round robin and Postfix handles
>> fallbacking to the second IP if the first one doesn't work. Dovecot
Timo Sirainen schrieb:
where lmtp.example.com expands to your two IP addresses. DNS server handles
load balancing by returning IPs in round robin and Postfix handles fallbacking
to the second IP if the first one doesn't work. Dovecot has similar behavior in
several places.
As far as I under
Quoting Timo Sirainen :
On 4.4.2012, at 15.29, Jerry wrote:
Now I use relay_transport = lmtp:unix:private/dovecot-lmtp.
Even if I change this to lmtp:tcp:1.2.3.4:24 it is still only one
director.
I don't know if Postfix supports that. Typically people use a load
balancer (cluster).
Perhaps
On 4.4.2012, at 15.29, Jerry wrote:
>>> Now I use relay_transport = lmtp:unix:private/dovecot-lmtp.
>>> Even if I change this to lmtp:tcp:1.2.3.4:24 it is still only one
>>> director.
>>
>> I don't know if Postfix supports that. Typically people use a load
>> balancer (cluster).
>
> Perhaps post
On Wed, 4 Apr 2012 15:06:29 +0300
Timo Sirainen articulated:
> On 4.4.2012, at 15.02, Patrick Westenberg wrote:
>
> > Timo Sirainen schrieb:
> >
> >> Another director. They're meant to connect to each others and do
> >> LB/HA.
> >
> > But what about my MTAs? How can I tell my two postfix server
On 4.4.2012, at 15.02, Patrick Westenberg wrote:
> Timo Sirainen schrieb:
>
>> Another director. They're meant to connect to each others and do LB/HA.
>
> But what about my MTAs? How can I tell my two postfix servers that there are
> two directors and it should/can use the other one if the
> fi
Timo Sirainen schrieb:
Another director. They're meant to connect to each others and do LB/HA.
But what about my MTAs? How can I tell my two postfix servers that there
are two directors and it should/can use the other one if the
first is down?
Now I use relay_transport = lmtp:unix:private/d
El Miércoles, 4 de Abril de 2012 13:21:33 Timo Sirainen escribió:
> On 4.4.2012, at 14.18, Miguel Tormo wrote:
>
> > I have a running setup with a dovecot imap4/pop3 proxy to a few dovecot
> > backend servers which actually store the mailboxes. This is running
> > smoothly and allows me to trans
On 4.4.2012, at 14.38, Patrick Westenberg wrote:
> Timo Sirainen schrieb:
>> On Fri, 2012-03-30 at 21:37 +0200, Patrick Westenberg wrote:
>>> MTA --(lmtp)--\ /--(lmtp)--> backend1 --\
>>> -- director -- -- NFS
>>> MTA --(lmtp)--/
Timo Sirainen schrieb:
On Fri, 2012-03-30 at 21:37 +0200, Patrick Westenberg wrote:
MTA --(lmtp)--\ /--(lmtp)--> backend1 --\
-- director -- -- NFS
MTA --(lmtp)--/ \--(lmtp)--> backend2 --/
IMAP-User --> frontend1 --\
On 4.4.2012, at 14.18, Miguel Tormo wrote:
> I have a running setup with a dovecot imap4/pop3 proxy to a few dovecot
> backend servers which actually store the mailboxes. This is running smoothly
> and allows me to transparently distribute mailboxes.
> I'm using some "extrafield" configured in t
On 4.4.2012, at 14.08, Jean Michel wrote:
> doveadm(acc@domain): Panic: file mail-storage.c: line 787
> (mailbox_check_mismatching_separators): assertion failed: (strncmp(vname,
> ns->prefix, ns->prefix_len-1) == 0)
That's a bit strange. Can you get a core of it?
http://dovecot.org/bugreport.htm
Hello,
I have a running setup with a dovecot imap4/pop3 proxy to a few dovecot backend
servers which actually store the mailboxes. This is running smoothly and allows
me to transparently distribute mailboxes.
I'm using some "extrafield" configured in the LDAP passdb.
However, now I would like t
Almost 100%, while running force-resync got this message this time:
doveadm(acc@domain): Error: Log synchronization error at seq=49,offset=3876
for
/storage/3/bd/05/server1/users/domain/cache/storage/dovecot.map.index:
Broken extension introduction: Record alignment is too large
doveadm(acc@do
El 04/04/2012, a les 3:49, Timo Sirainen va escriure:
> On 2.4.2012, at 19.11, Aleix Dorca wrote:
>
>> I recently tried to migrate from Exchange using imapsync. It didn't work
>> because it complained that dovecot had no namespace capablity. After looking
>> through Dovecot's config files I fou
Thank you!
I really don't know what I made, but now all works fine with Thunderbird and
Outlook 2007.
But something strange:
'uidvalidity' are the same for both servers, but UIDs of mesages are not:
Courier:
d fetch 1:* uid
* 1 FETCH (UID 64295)
* 2 FETCH (UID 64296)
* 3 FETCH (UID 64297)
Dovec
26 matches
Mail list logo
