Hi all,
I have inherited an old Dovecot installation which is causing headaches almost
every day.
I know that one of the rules says "Don't bother asking questions about v0.99.x
versions. They're no longer supported."...but please bear with me, this will be
quick as I only need some advise from
Yes that is the google thread that I saw.
I don't see the relevance of your reference to dsync.
As I read the man pages for dsync it is used to sync separate servers, to make
backups or to convert mailbox formats.
When I upgraded from 1.2.15 to 2.1.1 I saw nothing in the doco to suggest that
ds
I have downloaded and built dovecot 2.1.1 using gcc on AIX 6.1.
(The output of "dovecot -n" is at the bottom of this email.)
I'm trying "baby steps" to get it up, before I give it the final configuration.
(My apologies: I was pointed to RFC3501 and told to get an IMAP server,
build it, configure
On 8.3.2012, at 21.18, Markus Petri wrote:
> after upgrading from 2.0.18 to 2.1.1 I noticed that I could not use
> shared folders with mutt anymore. 2.1 lists the shared namespace prefix
> once per user sharing an folder in LIST "" "%".
>
> I also noticed, that with 2.1 the user folder (Shared/)
Hi,
after upgrading from 2.0.18 to 2.1.1 I noticed that I could not use
shared folders with mutt anymore. 2.1 lists the shared namespace prefix
once per user sharing an folder in LIST "" "%".
I also noticed, that with 2.1 the user folder (Shared/) is no
longer tagged as \NoSelect.
Is this the in
I've set up a list of ciphers that excludes SSLv2 ciphers (and other weak
ones) in the hope of preventing SSLv2 connections:
ssl_cipher_list = TLSv1+HIGH : !SSLv2 : RC4+MEDIUM : !aNULL : !eNULL : !3DES
: @STRENGTH
However, this doesn't prevent the SSLv2 connection being allowed as our Nessus
On 8.3.2012, at 19.56, Christoph Bußenius wrote:
> On 03/04/2012 03:10 PM, Timo Sirainen wrote:
>> BTW. The script should some day be updated for Dovecot v2.0.13+ which
>> supports storing separate POP3 and IMAP message order.
>
> Oh, I was not aware that this feature exists.
>
> I was just exp
Thank you for your help, Timo.
> use Dovecot v2.0's dsync
I gather from your reply that it's OK to use Dovecot 2.0 utilities (eg dsync)
on a dovecot (v1) installation; presumably with its own configuration file(s).
> You could set mail_drop_priv_before_exec=yes ... chgrp vmail ...
Yes, I thin
On 03/04/2012 03:10 PM, Timo Sirainen wrote:
BTW. The script should some day be updated for Dovecot v2.0.13+ which supports
storing separate POP3 and IMAP message order.
Oh, I was not aware that this feature exists.
I was just experimenting with the "O" flag in dovecot-uidlist to see how
the
On 07.03.2012 19:17, wrote e-frog:
# 2.1.1 (94de7605f50f)
1 namespace
* NAMESPACE (("" "/")("virtual/" "/")) NIL NIL
* OK Namespace completed.
Please note that the "OK Namespace completed." is send untagged.
Ok, it's working again today with 2.1.1 (7a26c427fc78).
Am 08.03.2012 17:27, schrieb Micah Anderson:
> Willie Gillespie writes:
>
>> On 03/07/2012 12:43 PM, Micah Anderson wrote:
>>>
>>> When a user makes a folder called 'x.y' it actually creates a folder
>>> called 'x' with a folder called 'y' inside, rather than a folder called
>>> 'x.y'. I'm guessi
Vincent Schut writes:
> Debian currently has dovecot 1.2.15 in its repositories; not that much
> newer...
No, Debian has 1.2.15 in its /stable (squeeze)/ repositories, there are
newer versions available in other Debian repositories.
micah
Willie Gillespie writes:
> On 03/07/2012 12:43 PM, Micah Anderson wrote:
>>
>> When a user makes a folder called 'x.y' it actually creates a folder
>> called 'x' with a folder called 'y' inside, rather than a folder called
>> 'x.y'. I'm guessing this has to do with an internal folder separator
>>
On 2012-03-08 8:53 AM, Vincent Schut wrote:
But maybe you also have something useful to say on the questions I *did*
ask? About dovecot versions, and/or maildir vs. dbox for example? As the
subject said, I was seeking advice, not rant nor war...
Yeah, sorry, and I wasn't offended, I just disli
On 3/7/2012 3:47 PM, Stan Hoeppner wrote:
On 3/6/2012 3:01 PM, Steve Campbell wrote:
I've experienced that type of locked mailbox before on the old server.
Users insist on accessing their email account as a pop account on their
desktop with the "check for new mail every so many minutes" turne
On 03/08/2012 01:03 PM, Charles Marcus wrote:
On 2012-03-08 4:56 AM, Vincent Schut wrote:
The old server was running gentoo linux (which is mainly the culprit of
the old dovecot version: gentoo was too much trouble to keep updating);
Please stop with the FUD...
I've been running gentoo for 8
On 08.03.2012 10:56, Vincent Schut wrote:
Debian currently has dovecot 1.2.15 in its repositories; not that much
newer...
I read in the docs about the auto-generated-from-hg debian dovecot
packages for 2.0, 2.1 and 2.2. Which leaves me to the choice what
version to use... OK, 2.2 is development
Hi --
On 08.03.2012 12:35, Timo Sirainen wrote:
On Thu, 2012-03-08 at 11:26 +0100, Michael Grimm wrote:
You can do for example:
service config {
unix_listener config {
user = vmail
}
}
I will try that later.
It seems to me, that whenever a larger number of mails arrive on
both
s
On 3/8/2012 12:56 PM, Leo Baltus wrote:
Op 23/02/2012 om 02:15:48 +0100, schreef Stephan Bosch:
The repository is at: http://hg.rename-it.nl/pigeonhole-0.3-sieve-duplicate
This plugin is only a few hours old, experimental, and largely
untested, so test it thoroughly before considering to use th
On 2012-03-08 4:56 AM, Vincent Schut wrote:
The old server was running gentoo linux (which is mainly the culprit of
the old dovecot version: gentoo was too much trouble to keep updating);
Please stop with the FUD...
I've been running gentoo for 8+ years, and it is a *breeze* to keep
updated,
Op 23/02/2012 om 02:15:48 +0100, schreef Stephan Bosch:
> On 2/22/2012 12:15 AM, Adam Szpakowski wrote:
> >On 22.02.2012 00:09, Timo Sirainen wrote:
> >>Well, it would be possible to build a doveadm script that
> >>deletes the duplicates after delivery, but currently there's no
> >>implementation t
On Thu, 2012-03-08 at 11:26 +0100, Michael Grimm wrote:
> Let me start with replicator's configuration ...
>
> > Below is a configuration for virtual user setup.
> [...]
> > service doveadm {
> > # if you're using a single virtual user, set this to
> > # start ssh as vmail (not root)
> > use
Hi --
On 04.03.2012 11:44, Timo Sirainen wrote:
In dovecot-2.1 hg you can now test dsync-based replication.
Everything isn't finished yet, but it appears to work and I've
enabled
it for my @dovecot.fi mails.
I did give it a try starting some days ago, and I can confirm that you
are right,
HI --
On 05.03.2012 10:56, Timo Sirainen wrote:
On 4.3.2012, at 13.54, Timo Sirainen wrote:
On 4.3.2012, at 13.41, Michael Grimm wrote:
By "undeletable" do you mean you have mails that always come back
after expunging them?
Yes. Deleting by the client will return them after the next dsync
Hi,
I'm currently migrating our old (colocated) mail server (running a
[terribly outdated, I know] dovecot 1.1.11) to a new VPS (virtual
private server). The old server was running gentoo linux (which is
mainly the culprit of the old dovecot version: gentoo was too much
trouble to keep updati
25 matches
Mail list logo
