Am 20.01.2012 01:13, schrieb Timo Sirainen:
> On 20.1.2012, at 1.51, Stan Hoeppner wrote:
>
>> I spent a decent amount of time last night researching the NFS cache
>> issue. It seems there is no way to completely disable NFS client
>> caching (in lie of rewriting the code oneself--a daunting tak)
On 1/19/2012 6:13 PM, Timo Sirainen wrote:
> On 20.1.2012, at 1.51, Stan Hoeppner wrote:
>
>> I spent a decent amount of time last night researching the NFS cache
>> issue. It seems there is no way to completely disable NFS client
>> caching (in lie of rewriting the code oneself--a daunting tak),
On Fri, 2012-01-20 at 02:13 +0200, Timo Sirainen wrote:
> There are several huge Dovecot+NFS setups. They use director. It works well
> enough (and with the recent fixes, I'd hope perfectly).
Not to mention other huge NFS setups that don't use director, and also
have no problems.
signatur
On 20.1.2012, at 1.51, Stan Hoeppner wrote:
> I spent a decent amount of time last night researching the NFS cache
> issue. It seems there is no way to completely disable NFS client
> caching (in lie of rewriting the code oneself--a daunting tak), which
> would seem to be the real solution to the
On 1/19/2012 1:18 PM, Timo Sirainen wrote:
> On 19.1.2012, at 6.39, Stan Hoeppner wrote:
>
>>> You're going to run into NFS caching troubles with the above split
>>> setup. I don't recommend it. You will see error messages about index
>>> corruption with it, and with dbox it can cause metadata los
On 19.1.2012, at 23.03, Eric Broch wrote:
>> Have you checked if the files are actually still there in the maildir?
> I've done a list (ls -la) of the directory where the files reside
> (path.to.share.sub.dir/cur). They exist.
>> You can check if this is a server problem or a client problem by ru
Timo,
> So the folder itself exists, but it just appears empty?
Yes.
> Have you tried with another IMAP client?
Yes, both Outlook and Thunderbird
> Have you checked if the files are actually still there in the maildir?
I've done a list (ls -la) of the directory where the files reside
(path.to.sh
On 19.1.2012, at 14.02, Bohlken, Henning wrote:
> i want to send mails direct into a public folder. If i send an email via my
> local postfix the mail will be handled as a normal private mail. Dovecot does
> create a mailbox in the private Namespace and do use not the mailbox in
> public one.
On 18.1.2012, at 16.20, Eric Broch wrote:
> I have dovecot installed with the configuration below.
> One of the subfolders created (using the email client) under the
> '/home/vpopmail/domains/mydomain.com/shared/projects' share no longer
> (it used to) displays the files located in it. There are a
On 19.1.2012, at 19.08, Mark Moseley wrote:
>> namespace {
>> separator = /
>> prefix = "#mbox/"
>> location = mbox:~/mail:INBOX=/var/mail/%u:INDEX=MEMORY
>> inbox = yes
>> hidden = yes
>> list = no
>> }
>>
>> Client access to new mail might be a little slower, but if it eliminates
>> the i
On 19.1.2012, at 6.39, Stan Hoeppner wrote:
>> You're going to run into NFS caching troubles with the above split
>> setup. I don't recommend it. You will see error messages about index
>> corruption with it, and with dbox it can cause metadata loss.
>> http://wiki2.dovecot.org/NFS http://wiki2.do
On Tue, Jan 17, 2012 at 12:22:35AM +, Ed W wrote:
> Note I personally believe there are valid reasons to store
> plaintext passwords - this seems to cause huge criticism due to
> the ensuing disaster which can happen if the database is pinched,
> but it does allow for enhanced security in the p
On Wed, Jan 18, 2012 at 8:39 PM, Stan Hoeppner wrote:
> On 1/18/2012 7:54 AM, Timo Sirainen wrote:
>> On Wed, 2012-01-18 at 20:44 +0800, Lee Standen wrote:
>
>>> * All mail storage presented via NFS over 10Gbps Ethernet (Jumbo Frames)
>>>
>>> * Postfix will feed new email to Dovecot via LMTP
>>>
>
On Thu, 2012-01-12 at 22:20 +0200, Timo Sirainen wrote:
> On 12.1.2012, at 1.09, Mike Abbott wrote:
>
> > In 2.0.17 you increased LOGIN_MAX_INBUF_SIZE from 1024 to 4096.
> > Should you also have increased MASTER_AUTH_MAX_DATA_SIZE from (1024*2) to
> > (4096*2)?
> > /* This should be kept in sync
Hi,
i want to send mails direct into a public folder. If i send an email via my
local postfix the mail will be handled as a normal private mail. Dovecot does
create a mailbox in the private Namespace and do use not the mailbox in public
one.
I hope you can help me with my little problem.
Here
15 matches
Mail list logo
