On Thu, 2011-12-22 at 08:42 +0100, Robert Schetterer wrote:
> Am 22.12.2011 08:27, schrieb Noel Butler:
> > On Thu, 2011-12-22 at 08:08 +0100, Robert Schetterer wrote:
> >
> >> Am 22.12.2011 00:49, schrieb Christopher Stolzenberg:
> >>> 2011/12/22 Jim Knuth :
> am 22.12.11 00:15 schrieb Chri
Am 22.12.2011 08:27, schrieb Noel Butler:
> On Thu, 2011-12-22 at 08:08 +0100, Robert Schetterer wrote:
>
>> Am 22.12.2011 00:49, schrieb Christopher Stolzenberg:
>>> 2011/12/22 Jim Knuth :
am 22.12.11 00:15 schrieb Christopher Stolzenberg
:
>> Indeed; very many of us
Am 22.12.2011 08:23, schrieb Noel Butler:
> On Wed, 2011-12-21 at 23:18 -0500, Simon Brereton wrote:
>
>>
>> I'm with Jim. Debian has served me well for years. This is just
>> distro-bias. Sure, you need modicum more sense and hands on experience,
>
>
> distro holy ways will outlast the real
On Thu, 2011-12-22 at 08:08 +0100, Robert Schetterer wrote:
> Am 22.12.2011 00:49, schrieb Christopher Stolzenberg:
> > 2011/12/22 Jim Knuth :
> >> am 22.12.11 00:15 schrieb Christopher Stolzenberg
> >>
> >> :
> >>
> >>
> Indeed; very many of us use Debian stable. Which kernel did you instal
On Wed, 2011-12-21 at 23:18 -0500, Simon Brereton wrote:
>
> I'm with Jim. Debian has served me well for years. This is just
> distro-bias. Sure, you need modicum more sense and hands on experience,
distro holy ways will outlast the real world holy wars, we each have a
distro we all stand by
Am 22.12.2011 00:49, schrieb Christopher Stolzenberg:
> 2011/12/22 Jim Knuth :
>> am 22.12.11 00:15 schrieb Christopher Stolzenberg
>>
>> :
>>
>>
Indeed; very many of us use Debian stable. Which kernel did you install
that is 2.0.16-friendly, and was this from Debian stable's updates
>>>
Am 22.12.2011 00:15, schrieb Christopher Stolzenberg:
> 2011/12/20 Ron Leach :
>> On 20/12/2011 09:11, Cor Bosman wrote:
>>>
>>> I installed a newer kernel on these boxes, and it's fixed. Seems to be
>>> a problem with the stock debian squeeze kernel. Not a dovecot issue, but
>>> others with a stab
On Dec 21, 2011 9:13 PM, "Noel Butler" wrote:
>
> On Thu, 2011-12-22 at 00:49 +0100, Christopher Stolzenberg wrote:
>
> > 2011/12/22 Jim Knuth :
> > > am 22.12.11 00:15 schrieb Christopher Stolzenberg
> > >
> > > :
> > >
> > >
> > >>> Indeed; very many of us use Debian stable. Which kernel did yo
On Wed, Dec 21, 2011 at 1:29 AM, Timo Sirainen wrote:
> On 21.12.2011, at 6.09, Gary Chodos wrote:
>
>> We created a new virtual domain and created a user in that domain in
>> our pgsql database. Instead of creating any directory structure in
>> /home/virtual/mail//, I just sent a test email to s
On Thu, 2011-12-22 at 00:49 +0100, Christopher Stolzenberg wrote:
> 2011/12/22 Jim Knuth :
> > am 22.12.11 00:15 schrieb Christopher Stolzenberg
> >
> > :
> >
> >
> >>> Indeed; very many of us use Debian stable. Which kernel did you install
> >>> that is 2.0.16-friendly, and was this from Debian
I'm in the process of migrating a large number of maildirs to a 3rd
party dovecot server (from a dovecot server). Tests have shown that
using imap to sync the accounts doesn't preserve the uidl for pop3 access.
My current attempt is to convert the maildir to mbox and add an X-UIDL
header in the pr
On Mon, 19 Dec 2011, Cor Bosman wrote:
# OS: Linux 2.6.32.36-xsserver x86_64 Debian 6.0.3
Are you sure you didn't roll your own kernel? Debian kernels I know don't
use the ".36" suffix, but ship as 2.6.32-something and use their own
internal version numbering.
For example, I found this on
2011/12/22 Jim Knuth :
> am 22.12.11 00:15 schrieb Christopher Stolzenberg
>
> :
>
>
>>> Indeed; very many of us use Debian stable. Which kernel did you install
>>> that is 2.0.16-friendly, and was this from Debian stable's updates
>>> system?
>>>
>>> regards, Ron
>>
>>
>> Debian for production se
am 22.12.11 00:15 schrieb Christopher Stolzenberg
:
Indeed; very many of us use Debian stable. Which kernel did you install
that is 2.0.16-friendly, and was this from Debian stable's updates system?
regards, Ron
Debian for production servers??? That sounds dangerous.
sorry, but that`s abs
2011/12/20 Ron Leach :
> On 20/12/2011 09:11, Cor Bosman wrote:
>>
>> I installed a newer kernel on these boxes, and it's fixed. Seems to be
>> a problem with the stock debian squeeze kernel. Not a dovecot issue, but
>> others with a stable squeeze box might see similar problems so good
>> to have
On 21.12.2011, at 21.56, Patrick Ben Koetter wrote:
> if I read the specs correctly http://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc6154#section-5.2
> says the following command should work too:
>
> C: t3 LIST (SPECIAL-USE) "" "*"
Yes.
> However if I send that command it fails:
>
> t2 LIST (SPECIAL-USE) ""
Timo,
if I read the specs correctly http://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc6154#section-5.2
says the following command should work too:
C: t3 LIST (SPECIAL-USE) "" "*"
S: * LIST (\Sent) "/" SentMail
S: * LIST (\Marked \Drafts) "/" MyDrafts
S: * LIST (\Trash) "/" Trash
S: t3 OK don
* Charles Marcus :
> On 2011-12-21 2:42 PM, Patrick Ben Koetter wrote:
> >Thanks for the clarification. I did some reading to get a better
> >understanding. We'll probably stick with this and may go for LIST if the
> >server does not announce LIST-EXTENTED
>
> So... out of curoisity, does dovecot
On 2011-12-21 2:42 PM, Patrick Ben Koetter wrote:
Thanks for the clarification. I did some reading to get a better
understanding. We'll probably stick with this and may go for LIST if the
server does not announce LIST-EXTENTED
So... out of curoisity, does dovecot support LIST-EXTENDED?
--
Be
* Michael M Slusarz :
> Quoting Patrick Ben Koetter :
> >we want to implement SPECIAL-USE in Thunderbird (TB), but we've run into
> >problems. I believe you could help change that.
> >
> >Here's the problem:
> >
> >By default TB only lists subscribed (LSUB) folders when it accesses an IMAP
> >serve
Cheers,
I've a running Dovecot 1.2.9, installed from the ubuntu 10.04 Lucid LTS
repository and trying to get the dovecot-sieve plugin (which seems to be
not included in the lucid repo) compiled.
Method 1 listed in http://wiki.dovecot.org/LDA/Sieve/Dovecot wont work,
seems the rpm was build wit
On 21.12.2011 07:26, wrote Timo Sirainen:
On 20.12.2011, at 22.02, Daniel L. Miller wrote:
On 12/20/2011 2:18 AM, Timo Sirainen wrote:
On Wed, 2011-12-14 at 19:27 -0800, Daniel L. Miller wrote:
Does "doveadm index -A INBOX" reindex everything? What about users with
multiple folders, both sub
On 21.12.2011, at 18.38, hydra wrote:
> I suspect, that dovecot v2.0.16 under Linux (tested on Gentoo 3.0.4
> Hardened, Gentoo 3.0.6, Gentoo 3.1.4) causes 100% cpu utilization when
> index.cache is broken and doveadm is lanched. Dovecot uses LDAP as the
> userdb and provides IMAP and LDA. Because
On 21.12.2011, at 18.51, Vasiliu Adrian wrote:
> Is there an option to disable (server-side) the deletion of read mails
> after fetching them via POP3, regardless of the MUA config?
Global ACL for INBOX that gives owner a read-only access would do it.
Or maybe http://wiki2.dovecot.org/Plugins/La
On 19-12-11 4:13 AM, Noel Butler wrote:
On Mon, 2011-12-19 at 02:32 +0100, Sven Hartge wrote:
Noel Butler wrote:
On Mon, 2011-12-19 at 00:32 +0100, Cor Bosman wrote:
# 2.0.16: /usr/local/etc/dovecot/dovecot.conf
# OS: Linux 2.6.32.36-xsserver x86_64 Debian 6.0.3
Have you tried using a m
The policy apparently doesn't cover archiving outgoing email ?
Typically you set up your SMTP service to 'BCC' an archive mailbox to
achieve a complete archive of both incoming and outgoing mail.
Rick
Quoting Vasiliu Adrian :
Hi all,
Is there an option to disable (server-side) the deletio
Hi all,
Is there an option to disable (server-side) the deletion of read mails
after fetching them via POP3, regardless of the MUA config?
Here are the issues I'm facing:
- my boss wants to force everyone into a server-side "no delete
message"-policy, for archiving, auditing and backup&reco
I suspect, that dovecot v2.0.16 under Linux (tested on Gentoo 3.0.4
Hardened, Gentoo 3.0.6, Gentoo 3.1.4) causes 100% cpu utilization when
index.cache is broken and doveadm is lanched. Dovecot uses LDAP as the
userdb and provides IMAP and LDA. Because each user has a quota, the
doveadm's expunge fu
Hi,
Dovecot, the "deliver" LDA and managesieve are all working. However, the sieve
rules do not seem to work:
System info:
CenOS 2.6.32-131.21.1.el6.x86_64 #1 SMP
dovecot-pigeonhole-2.0.9-2.el6_1.1.x86_64
dovecot-2.0.9-2.el6_1.1.x86_64
/etc/dovecot/dovecot.conf:
mbox_write_locks = fcntl
proto
I M writes:
Question: Why imap_open function doesn't work while getting a mailbox through
telnet works perfectly?
Note:?imap.so is loaded!?imap.ini is parsed!?
After the imap_open() invocation, you should check for error messages
in your PHP logs, or dump all the errors using
imap_e
Hello Timo
of course we have entries:
grep 'pop3.*mmanzoni.*del=0.*' deliver.log* |grep "Dec 12"
deliver.log.2:Dec 12 13:13:19 srv001 dovecot: pop3(mmanzoni):
Disconnected: Logged out top=0/0, retr=23/2025701, del=0/3920,
size=700800292
deliver.log.2:Dec 12 13:46:02 srv001 dovecot: pop3(mmanzoni
31 matches
Mail list logo
