Hello,
You should read Wietses post again.
He told you to not rely on not documented settings since they can
silently disappear.
With postfix you can rely on the documented behaviour. So it is
natural that there will be no warning for officially unsupported
features.
yes, i know that. nob
OK thank you Stan
gonna try this
Le 08/03/2011 22:39, Stan Hoeppner a écrit :
> Frank Bonnet put forth on 3/8/2011 2:07 PM:
>> disk space I need to gain a bit space
>> before migrate to the new server
>
> After you shut down the Dovecot daemons in preparation for copying the
> mailbox files to t
Hi,
I'm getting: "Fatal: postmaster_address setting not given" errors in my
log file
dovecot ver: 1.2.12
Recently I tried to follow:
http://postfixmail.com/blog/index.php/postfixadmin-on-ubuntu-9-10/ on
ubuntu 10.10
(which works fine on ubunto 9.10)
I note that in 10.10 their is no dovecot-
On 03/08/2011 10:37 PM, Robert Schetterer wrote:
Am 08.03.2011 21:38, schrieb Attila Nagy:
On 03/08/2011 06:51 PM, Charles Marcus wrote:
On 2011-03-08 12:42 PM, Thierry de Montaudry wrote:
On 08 Mar 2011, at 19:37, Charles Marcus wrote:
So... if the httpd process is the one consuming all o
On 03/08/2011 09:58 PM, Charles Marcus wrote:
I think this is clearly related to Dovecot. It handles load very badly
Whoa, pardner, fyi, there are many, many installations humming along
smoothly.
No offense. It may be more correct to say situations, where the OS can't
deliver prompt resources
Frank Bonnet put forth on 3/8/2011 2:07 PM:
> disk space I need to gain a bit space
> before migrate to the new server
After you shut down the Dovecot daemons in preparation for copying the
mailbox files to the new sever, simply delete all the index directories.
That will free up a huge amount of
Am 08.03.2011 21:38, schrieb Attila Nagy:
> On 03/08/2011 06:51 PM, Charles Marcus wrote:
>> On 2011-03-08 12:42 PM, Thierry de Montaudry wrote:
>>> On 08 Mar 2011, at 19:37, Charles Marcus wrote:
So... if the httpd process is the one consuming all of the CPU, doesn't
it stand to reason
For anyone who is interested:
http://www.aboutmyip.com/AboutMyXApp/ImapProxy.jsp
They also have one for troubleshooting smtp (smtpProxy)...
--
Best regards,
Charles
On 2011-03-08 3:38 PM, Attila Nagy wrote:
> On 03/08/2011 06:51 PM, Charles Marcus wrote:
>> You don't see how it might be possible that 2.0.x does something that
>> 1.1.x didn't do that your webmail app might not like, without it being a
>> dovecot bug?
>>
>> I'm not saying it is or it isn't, but
On 03/08/2011 06:51 PM, Charles Marcus wrote:
On 2011-03-08 12:42 PM, Thierry de Montaudry wrote:
On 08 Mar 2011, at 19:37, Charles Marcus wrote:
So... if the httpd process is the one consuming all of the CPU, doesn't
it stand to reason that it might be something to do with one of your web
app
During a stress test dovecot-2.0.11 logs many warnings:
Mar 8 06:19:52 gromit dovecot[59204]: imap(pid 68864 user user15): Warning:
/Volumes/Mail/user15/dovecot-uidlist: Duplicate file entry at line 183:
1299556557.M571530P31883.gromit.example.com,S=21175,W=21549 (uid 67 -> 250)
Mar 8 06:20:10
When I set imap_id_log=* in dovecot-2.0.11 and a client sends, say,
tag id ("a" "b" "c" "d")
then dovecot logs:
ID sent: a=b, b=c, c=d
The following patch makes it log instead:
ID sent: a=b, c=d
--- a/dovecot/src/lib-imap/imap-id.c(revision 113366)
+++ b/dovecot/src/lib
On Tue, Mar 08, 2011 at 05:07:49PM +0100, Hajo Locke wrote:
> Hello,
>
> sorry, iam digest reader, always creating a new message...
On http://dovecot.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/dovecot you can login to
change your membership options ;)
[..]
> >The initial version, yes, but it has been heavily
On 3/8/2011 12:52 PM, Charles Marcus wrote:
On 2011-03-08 12:47 PM, Tom Talpey wrote:
(dovecot 2.0.11 / TB 3.0.4)
I think you're on to something here.
You do need to update TB too you know...
The number of bugs squashed since 3.0.4 are too vast too even begin to
contemplate...
It's actual
On 2011-03-08 12:47 PM, Tom Talpey wrote:
> (dovecot 2.0.11 / TB 3.0.4)
>
> I think you're on to something here.
You do need to update TB too you know...
The number of bugs squashed since 3.0.4 are too vast too even begin to
contemplate...
--
Best regards,
Charles
On 2011-03-08 12:42 PM, Thierry de Montaudry wrote:
> On 08 Mar 2011, at 19:37, Charles Marcus wrote:
>> So... if the httpd process is the one consuming all of the CPU, doesn't
>> it stand to reason that it might be something to do with one of your web
>> apps, and not dovecot?
> But then why was
On 2011-03-08 12:30 PM, Thierry de Montaudry wrote:
> On 08 Mar 2011, at 19:11, Charles Marcus wrote:
>> The reason I asked about your webmail server is you had specifically
>> said that it was the httpd process that was consuming all of the CPU...
> Yes, because they were in the top of the top li
On 3/8/2011 11:55 AM, Knute Johnson wrote:
On 03/06/2011 03:46 PM, Timo Sirainen wrote:
On 7.3.2011, at 1.39, Dave McGuire wrote:
That said, I've been testing Timo's imap_capabilities suggestion
for about the past 45mins, and it seems to solve the problem for
me, at least so far.
So it sound
On 08 Mar 2011, at 19:37, Charles Marcus wrote:
> On 2011-03-08 12:30 PM, Thierry de Montaudry wrote:
>> On 08 Mar 2011, at 19:11, Charles Marcus wrote:
>>> The reason I asked about your webmail server is you had specifically
>>> said that it was the httpd process that was consuming all of the CP
On 2011-03-08 12:30 PM, Thierry de Montaudry wrote:
> On 08 Mar 2011, at 19:11, Charles Marcus wrote:
>> The reason I asked about your webmail server is you had specifically
>> said that it was the httpd process that was consuming all of the CPU...
> Yes, because they were in the top of the top li
On 08 Mar 2011, at 19:12, Charles Marcus wrote:
> On 2011-03-08 12:00 PM, Thierry de Montaudry wrote:
>> but moving from dovecot 1.10.13 to 2.0.9
>
> First time I thought it was a typo and ignored it...
>
> There has never been a version 1.10.xxx
>
> Maybe you mean 1.0.13?
>
Sorry, my mista
On 08 Mar 2011, at 19:11, Charles Marcus wrote:
> On 2011-03-08 11:49 AM, Thierry de Montaudry wrote:
>> Using HastyMail2-1.0. But the problem only started when we moved to
>> dovecot 2.0.9 (from 1.10.13), without changing anything else on any
>> of our 7 machines, and now it's happening randomly
On 2011-03-08 12:00 PM, Thierry de Montaudry wrote:
> but moving from dovecot 1.10.13 to 2.0.9
First time I thought it was a typo and ignored it...
There has never been a version 1.10.xxx
Maybe you mean 1.0.13?
--
Best regards,
Charles
On 2011-03-08 11:49 AM, Thierry de Montaudry wrote:
> Using HastyMail2-1.0. But the problem only started when we moved to
> dovecot 2.0.9 (from 1.10.13), without changing anything else on any
> of our 7 machines, and now it's happening randomly on any of them. So
> that's why I suspect it has to do
W dniu 2011-03-08 16:03, Hajo Locke pisze:
> i use plugin mail_log to see more activities like copy/delete/expunge caused
> by imap-users.
> unfortunately there is no log-line when a mail was sent and the copy was
> uploaded to "Sent-Folder".
It is Append action and as stated in documentation Ap
On 08 Mar 2011, at 18:26, Chris Wilson wrote:
> Hi Thierry,
>
> On Tue, 8 Mar 2011, Thierry de Montaudry wrote:
>> On 08 Mar 2011, at 13:24, Chris Wilson wrote:
>>>
top - 11:10:14 up 14 days, 12:04, 2 users, load average: 55.04, 29.13,
14.55
Tasks: 474 total, 60 running, 414
On 03/06/2011 03:46 PM, Timo Sirainen wrote:
On 7.3.2011, at 1.39, Dave McGuire wrote:
That said, I've been testing Timo's imap_capabilities suggestion
for about the past 45mins, and it seems to solve the problem for
me, at least so far.
So it sounds like there's a bug in someone's QRESYNC co
On 08 Mar 2011, at 18:14, Charles Marcus wrote:
> On 2011-03-08 10:40 AM, Thierry de Montaudry wrote:
>> On 08 Mar 2011, at 13:24, Chris Wilson wrote:
>>> There's nothing to debug in dovecot here. Your server is overloaded
>>> by about 55 times. Buy 55 times as many servers or do something
>>> ab
Em 08/03/11 12:57, Frank Bonnet escreveu:
On 03/08/2011 04:54 PM, Frank Bonnet wrote:
Hello
Is it possible to use compressed mailboxes ( MBOX format )
with dovecot using a plugin ?
Thanks
I found the doc about zlib plugin ...
so it is only possible with read only mailboxes huh ?
the p
On 03/08/2011 09:26 AM, Chris Wilson wrote:
Hi Thierry,
On Tue, 8 Mar 2011, Thierry de Montaudry wrote:
On 08 Mar 2011, at 13:24, Chris Wilson wrote:
top - 11:10:14 up 14 days, 12:04, 2 users, load average: 55.04, 29.13, 14.55
Tasks: 474 total, 60 running, 414 sleeping, 0 stopped, 0 z
Hello again
Is there a way to filter some attachments with dovecot ?
I don't want my users to keep video files in the IMAP folders
anymore ( disk is almost full ) .
Thank you.
Frank Bonnet put forth on 3/8/2011 9:54 AM:
> Hello
>
> Is it possible to use compressed mailboxes ( MBOX format )
> with dovecot using a plugin ?
What is your motivation?
--
Stan
Hi Thierry,
On Tue, 8 Mar 2011, Thierry de Montaudry wrote:
> On 08 Mar 2011, at 13:24, Chris Wilson wrote:
> >
> >> top - 11:10:14 up 14 days, 12:04, 2 users, load average: 55.04, 29.13,
> >> 14.55
> >> Tasks: 474 total, 60 running, 414 sleeping, 0 stopped, 0 zombie
> >> Cpu(s): 99.6%us,
On 2011-03-08 10:40 AM, Thierry de Montaudry wrote:
> On 08 Mar 2011, at 13:24, Chris Wilson wrote:
>> There's nothing to debug in dovecot here. Your server is overloaded
>> by about 55 times. Buy 55 times as many servers or do something
>> about your webmail interface (maybe a separate webmail clu
Hello,
sorry, iam digest reader, always creating a new message...
> > there are some warnings in log:
> > "when SASL type is "dovecot", SASL path "inet:localhost:1434" should
> > be a
> > socket pathname"
> > ( Datei src/xsasl/xsasl_dovecot_server.c )
>
> file xsasl_dovecot_server.c is in pos
On 03/08/2011 04:54 PM, Frank Bonnet wrote:
Hello
Is it possible to use compressed mailboxes ( MBOX format )
with dovecot using a plugin ?
Thanks
I found the doc about zlib plugin ...
so it is only possible with read only mailboxes huh ?
Hello
Is it possible to use compressed mailboxes ( MBOX format )
with dovecot using a plugin ?
Thanks
On 08 Mar 2011, at 13:24, Chris Wilson wrote:
> Hi Thierry,
>
> On Tue, 8 Mar 2011, Thierry de Montaudry wrote:
>> On 07 Mar 2011, at 19:15, Timo Sirainen wrote:
>>> On Mon, 2011-03-07 at 19:03 +0200, Thierry de Montaudry wrote:
> Mar 7 11:19:51 xxx dovecot: pop3-login: Error:
Hello,
i use plugin mail_log to see more activities like copy/delete/expunge caused
by imap-users.
unfortunately there is no log-line when a mail was sent and the copy was
uploaded to "Sent-Folder".
Isn't it a common imap-copy operation requested by client? How to log this?
Thanks,
Hajo
On Tue, 8 Mar 2011 13:55:03 +0200
Andrew Lewis wrote:
> Something seems very wrong here.
Ok I feel stupid...
My *other* new Dovecot instance (ie the one behind the proxy) was generating
this- so... that makes sense.
Apologies for the noise!
--
Andrew Lewis
___
Hello all,
I've set up a new instance of dovecot 2.0.9 to use as a POP3/IMAP proxy. On
trying to login I am told '-ERR Plaintext authentication disallowed on
non-secure (SSL/TLS) connections'.
I have set 'disable_plaintext_auth = no' (see output of doveconf attached).
More curious still is th
Hi all,
Debian Lenny, dovecot 1.0.15
My rkhunter script has picked up dovecot using port 1984 temporarily.
When I run it now however, it is gone.
Warning: Network TCP port 1984 is being used by /usr/lib/dovecot/imap.
Possible rootkit: Fuckit Rootkit
Use the 'lsof -i' or 'netstat -an' command to
On 07 Mar 2011, at 19:15, Timo Sirainen wrote:
> On Mon, 2011-03-07 at 19:03 +0200, Thierry de Montaudry wrote:
>>> Mar 7 11:19:51 xxx dovecot: pop3-login: Error: net_connect_unix(pop3)
>>> failed: Resource temporarily unavailable
>>> ..
>> As it is happening at least once a day, is ther
43 matches
Mail list logo
