On 08 Mar 2011, at 19:37, Charles Marcus wrote: > On 2011-03-08 12:30 PM, Thierry de Montaudry wrote: >> On 08 Mar 2011, at 19:11, Charles Marcus wrote: >>> The reason I asked about your webmail server is you had specifically >>> said that it was the httpd process that was consuming all of the CPU... > >> Yes, because they were in the top of the top list. > > So... if the httpd process is the one consuming all of the CPU, doesn't > it stand to reason that it might be something to do with one of your web > apps, and not dovecot? > But then why was it fine with 1.1.13, which never had once this problem in 2 years? or is 2.0.9 slower, or consuming more resources to create the problem?
- Re: [Dovecot] POP3 error Timo Sirainen
- Re: [Dovecot] POP3 error Thierry de Montaudry
- Re: [Dovecot] POP3 error Timo Sirainen
- Re: [Dovecot] POP3 error Thierry de Montaudry
- Re: [Dovecot] POP3 error Thierry de Montaudry
- Re: [Dovecot] POP3 error Charles Marcus
- Re: [Dovecot] POP3 error Thierry de Montaudry
- Re: [Dovecot] POP3 error Charles Marcus
- Re: [Dovecot] POP3 error Thierry de Montaudry
- Re: [Dovecot] POP3 error Charles Marcus
- Re: [Dovecot] POP3 error Thierry de Montaudry
- Re: [Dovecot] POP3 error Charles Marcus
- Re: [Dovecot] POP3 error Attila Nagy
- Re: [Dovecot] POP3 error Charles Marcus
- Re: [Dovecot] POP3 error Attila Nagy
- Re: [Dovecot] POP3 error Robert Schetterer
- Re: [Dovecot] POP3 error Attila Nagy
- Re: [Dovecot] POP3 error Timo Sirainen
- Re: [Dovecot] POP3 error Thierry de Montaudry
- Re: [Dovecot] POP3 error Charles Marcus
- Re: [Dovecot] POP3 error Chris Wilson