On 8.1.2011, at 2.19, Dave Brenner wrote:
> Has anyone tried patching the 1.2.x source to force logging of all passwords
> submitted during authentication, not just those that fail?
It depends on what you need.. but, as the subject suggests,
auth_debug_passwords=yes does basically that for pla
Has anyone tried patching the 1.2.x source to force logging of all
passwords submitted during authentication, not just those that fail?
Timo Sirainen wrote:
On 7.1.2011, at 23.03, Nick Rosier wrote:
I'm trying to migrate from Dovecot 1.2.16 to 2.0.7. Initially the mails were stored in
Maildir format but I changed them to dbox using "fast Maildir migration" and
some mails are still in the old maildir format.
I'm trying to migr
On 1/7/2011 10:45 PM, Patrick Ben Koetter wrote:
What catches my eye is the "?" in the msgid:
Jan 5 21:10:47 mail dovecot: deliver(consulting): msgid=?
<14847_1294258245_ZZh0g1h9eLfxL.00_fc2fe6e910f03.4d24de54 at
uni-bielefeld.de>: saved mail to INBOX
Is this with Pigeonhole or without? (I hop
This is a shameless copy of the original mail. I deleted the other one...
Here's what I scratched from the web archive including my answer:
> On 6.1.2011, at 22.57, Patrick Ben Koetter wrote:
>
> > Running dovecot 1.2.9 on a Ubuntu 10.04.1 LTS virtual machine.
> > Postfix receives messages and ha
On 7.1.2011, at 23.03, Nick Rosier wrote:
> I'm trying to migrate from Dovecot 1.2.16 to 2.0.7. Initially the mails were
> stored in Maildir format but I changed them to dbox using "fast Maildir
> migration" and some mails are still in the old maildir format.
> I'm trying to migrate these mails
Hi,
I'm trying to migrate from Dovecot 1.2.16 to 2.0.7. Initially the mails
were stored in Maildir format but I changed them to dbox using "fast
Maildir migration" and some mails are still in the old maildir format.
I'm trying to migrate these mails using dsync but dsync panics:
% dsync -D -
>From the log:
Jan 7 20:03:11 postamt dovecot: imap-login: Login: user=,
method=PLAIN, rip=10.47.32.220, lip=141.42.206.36, mpid=2176, TLS
Jan 7 20:03:11 postamt dovecot: imap(hl): Disconnected: Disconnected in
IDLE bytes=8855/771339
Jan 7 20:03:11 postamt dovecot: imap(hl): Panic: Me
to...@tuxteam.de wrote:
Hm. I think I didn't express my idea correctly. The decryption has to
happen client-side if it has to be any worth, IMO.
As Timo said downthread, there is already such a plugin, but... this
would support decryption server-side (which IMO would be wrong anyway).
For clien
Hi Stan,
On Fri, 07 Jan 2011 13:28:16 -, Stan Hoeppner
wrote:
Stephen Feyrer put forth on 1/6/2011 11:20 AM:
Hi Stan,
Hi Stephen.
# OS: Linux 2.6.12.6-arm1 armv5tejl
Stephen, just curious:
Curiosity should be be encouraged, oddly though, this is best achieved
with answers.
>From the log:
Jan 7 16:16:44 postamt dovecot: imap(hnge): Panic: file squat-trie.c: line
876 (squat_build_word): assertion failed: (i + bytelen <= size)
Jan 7 16:16:44 postamt dovecot: imap(hnge): Error: Raw backtrace:
/usr/dovecot-2/lib/dovecot/libdovecot.so.0(+0x3bbe1) [0xb7745be1] -
On 07/12/2010 15:37, jj...@cornell.edu wrote:
I have a very bizarre problem that I hope someone can help me with. I
am not sure if this is a Dovecot problem, or IMAP client problem.
I recently used Transend's Migrator to move mail from Exchange 2007 to
my Dovecot 1.0.7 server. The program seem
Stephen Feyrer put forth on 1/6/2011 11:20 AM:
> Hi Stan,
Hi Stephen.
>>> # OS: Linux 2.6.12.6-arm1 armv5tejl
>
>> Stephen, just curious:
>
> Curiosity should be be encouraged, oddly though, this is best achieved
> with answers.
Always. :)
>> 1. Why are you running a 5 year old kernel? Is i
On Thu, Jan 06, 2011 at 02:05:29PM -0500, Michael Orlitzky wrote:
>
> This still doesn't work, because the administrator is the one who tells
> the system to encrypt messages as they arrive. He can peek at the
> messages before they're encrypted with the user's public key.
That's a small window o
On 7.1.2011, at 10.16, to...@tuxteam.de wrote:
> But the other techniques discussed here (e.g. having a Dovecot plugin
> decrypt the mails before serving) seem to me nearly useless (at least
> not worth the bother). Because at some point, this very plugin must have
> the key available in some unpr
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Thu, Jan 06, 2011 at 02:05:29PM -0500, Michael Orlitzky wrote:
> On 01/06/2011 06:54 AM, Christian Felsing wrote:
> > Am 04.01.2011 07:38, schrieb to...@tuxteam.de:
> >> The idea upthread (Jan-Frode) to keep a public key server-side and
> >> encrypt
16 matches
Mail list logo
