After several trouble free months and without any obvious reason our server
just stopped working. I cannot even re-start it:
[r...@dsmail /]# service dovecot start
Starting Dovecot Imap: Can't open log file /var/log/dovecot.log: Permission
denied
If I create those manually (touch /var/log/do
Oops, now I finally understand why Mail.app kept asking for my password for
each mail I sent: it helpfully decided to start signing mails with the only
client cert I had, without asking me.. Forget about those signatures in the
last two mails :)
On 16.12.2010, at 18.33, Mark Moseley wrote:
>> http://lkml.org/lkml/2010/12/15/470
>
> Timo, if we apply the above kernel patch, do we still need to patch
> dovecot or is it just an either-or thing?
Either-or.
> I'm guessing the reason I saw so many less context switches when using
> a client_
On 16.12.2010, at 22.09, Daniel L. Miller wrote:
> You mean these past two months of grief - concern over Dovecot 2.0's
> underlying design, exploring various configurations and settings, and general
> hysteria came down to...a two line patch?!?!?!
At least now I know much more about context sw
Holger Mauermann wrote:
Am 16.12.2010 01:38, schrieb Holger Mauermann:
With LIST "Shared/" the other users INBOX is missing, so with namespace
capable clients like Thunderbird it is impossible to see or subscribe
this folder.
After restarting Thunderbird now I can see and subscribe the other u
Am 16.12.2010 01:38, schrieb Holger Mauermann:
> With LIST "Shared/" the other users INBOX is missing, so with namespace
> capable clients like Thunderbird it is impossible to see or subscribe
> this folder.
After restarting Thunderbird now I can see and subscribe the other users
INBOX. However, I
hi cor,
> For those interested, graph showing the difference before and after patch:
>
> context switches: http://grab.by/7W9u
> load:http://grab.by/7W9x
which patch, timo's patch on dovecot or the also posted lkml patch
christoph
You mean these past two months of grief - concern over Dovecot 2.0's
underlying design, exploring various configurations and settings, and
general hysteria came down to...a two line patch?!?!?!
I know it was more than that - and that in fact this exposed a Linux
kernel flaw - but I'm still lau
Apparently that's not it, the include is configured as !include
conf.d/*.conf - when I changed the conf.d/ files to .conf.ext it simple
didn't read the file and it gave me no error. Back to square one.
-Original Message-
From: PA [mailto:ra...@meganet.net]
Sent: Thursday, December 16, 201
I had the config files in the conf.d/ directory as *.conf instead of
*conf.ext. When I renamed the files to include .ext that seemed to fix the
problem. Coming from Dovecot 1.x I never used extended config files in the
conf.d directory, apparently they have to be named .ext.
Thanks, Paul
-Ori
Hello,
I forgot to mention the dovecot version number. It is version 2.0.7.
Regards
Christoph
Timo Sirainen put forth on 12/16/2010 9:34 AM:
> On Thu, 2010-12-16 at 09:26 -0500, Charles Marcus wrote:
>> On 2010-12-16 8:59 AM, Holger Mauermann wrote:
>>> Here is the full doveconf -n output:
>>>
>>> # 2.0.8: /etc/dovecot/dovecot.conf
>>> # OS: Linux 2.6.35-23-virtual x86_64 Ubuntu 10.10
>>
>>
For those interested, graph showing the difference before and after patch:
context switches: http://grab.by/7W9u
load:http://grab.by/7W9x
Cor
Hello,
I followed the instructions on http://wiki2.dovecot.org/Plugins/Expire to
configure the expire plugin, but when I move a message to the Trash folder, I
get the following error messages in my logfile:
dovecot: dict: Error: sqlite: exec(INSERT INTO expires
(expire_stamp,username,mailbox)
On 16.12.2010 15:25, Charles Marcus wrote:
On 2010-12-16 8:55 AM, Javier de Miguel Rodríguez wrote:
El 16/12/10 14:50, Sebastian Urbanneck escribió:
Following:
We've got a Dovecot 1.0.10 running on Ubuntu Hardy. Till now we used
to have only mail accounts under our own domain, but since we're
2010/12/16 Jose Celestino :
> On Qui, 2010-12-16 at 12:56 +0100, Ralf Hildebrandt wrote:
>> * Cor Bosman :
>
>> > I saw someone also posted a patch to the LKML.
>>
>> I guess I missed that one
>>
>
> http://lkml.org/lkml/2010/12/15/470
Timo, if we apply the above kernel patch, do we still need to
Hi, after deciding to use Dovecot 2.0.8 as a postfix LDA using mysql DB I'm
running into some issues. I started to follow,
http://wiki.dovecot.org/HowTo/DovecotLDAPostfixAdminMySQL but noticed that
the auth settings on the config changed, after looking through the dovecot
wiki I think I have that i
On Thu, 2010-12-16 at 09:26 -0500, Charles Marcus wrote:
> On 2010-12-16 8:59 AM, Holger Mauermann wrote:
> > Here is the full doveconf -n output:
> >
> > # 2.0.8: /etc/dovecot/dovecot.conf
> > # OS: Linux 2.6.35-23-virtual x86_64 Ubuntu 10.10
>
> Timo - am I crazy, or did this output used to inc
Hi,
I try to upgrade my dovecot server to the 2.x branch.
But i have a big problem with the mailbox which are over quota.
Server works fine, but when a mail arrived to user who is over
quota, i have this error:
Dec 16 14:54:42 lda(...@***.com): Panic: stream doesn't
support seeking bac
Timo, sorry to get back to this, but im still confused :) It seems every time I
want to add a director, or other need to restart one or work on its config, im
having a hard time making things work again without service disruption (or
minimal service disruption).
Lets say I have the following si
On 2010-12-16 8:59 AM, Holger Mauermann wrote:
> Here is the full doveconf -n output:
>
> # 2.0.8: /etc/dovecot/dovecot.conf
> # OS: Linux 2.6.35-23-virtual x86_64 Ubuntu 10.10
Timo - am I crazy, or did this output used to include the filesystem too?
--
Best regards,
Charles
On 2010-12-16 8:55 AM, Javier de Miguel Rodríguez wrote:
> El 16/12/10 14:50, Sebastian Urbanneck escribió:
>> Following:
>>
>> We've got a Dovecot 1.0.10 running on Ubuntu Hardy. Till now we used
>> to have only mail accounts under our own domain, but since we're also
>> a webhoster the people be
Thanks a lot !
On 12/16/2010 02:34 PM, Oliver Eales wrote:
Am 16.12.2010 13:49, schrieb Frank Bonnet:
Hello
As I would like to setup some shared mailboxes, is it possible to have
MBOX format for normal users ( UNIX NIS users ) and Maildir format
for shared mailboxes to gain access to the per-u
Am 16.12.2010 13:39, schrieb Charles Marcus:
> On 2010-12-15 7:38 PM, Holger Mauermann wrote:
>> Here is the relevant doveconf -n output:
>> ...
>
> Please always include *full* doveconf -n output, not just what you
> *think* is relevant... its not that much more, and includes extra info
> that pe
El 16/12/10 14:50, Sebastian Urbanneck escribió:
Following:
We've got a Dovecot 1.0.10 running on Ubuntu Hardy. Till now we used
to have only mail accounts under our own domain, but since we're also
a webhoster the people began to ask if there is a possibility to use
there own Domains in ther
Following:
We've got a Dovecot 1.0.10 running on Ubuntu Hardy. Till now we used to
have only mail accounts under our own domain, but since we're also a
webhoster the people began to ask if there is a possibility to use there
own Domains in there mail address.
For addressing this we changed o
Am 16.12.2010 13:49, schrieb Frank Bonnet:
Hello
As I would like to setup some shared mailboxes, is it possible to have
MBOX format for normal users ( UNIX NIS users ) and Maildir format
for shared mailboxes to gain access to the per-user \Seen flag
Or do I have to convert ALL my server to Mail
On Qui, 2010-12-16 at 12:56 +0100, Ralf Hildebrandt wrote:
> * Cor Bosman :
> > I saw someone also posted a patch to the LKML.
>
> I guess I missed that one
>
http://lkml.org/lkml/2010/12/15/470
--
Jose Celestino | http://japc.uncovering.org/files/japc-pgpkey.asc
Hello
I solved my previous SSL problem by reinstalling dovecot2 ... :-)
at FreeBSD 8.1
Now I'm using dovecot 2 , cool ...
Actually my production mail server runs with MBOX format but reading
the dovecot 2 wiki I read shared mailboxes are only working well with
Maildir format.
As I would like t
On Thu, 2010-12-16 at 10:41 -0200, Alex Baule wrote:
> I Search in lib to see how the nfs_flush* works , and i see this too.
>
> int nfs_safe_stat(const char *path, struct stat *buf);
>
> can i use this too ? it's get a better handle with this + nfs_flush* before
> ?!
The nfs_safe_stat() is abo
* Charles Marcus :
> On 2010-12-16 6:53 AM, Cor Bosman wrote:
> > It looks like Timo's patch fixes the problem. Context switches are
> > now back to normal, and the load graph is smooth and lower. I saw
> > someone also posted a patch to the LKML.
>
> Out of curiosity, when you say lower - how doe
On 2010-12-16 6:53 AM, Cor Bosman wrote:
> It looks like Timo's patch fixes the problem. Context switches are
> now back to normal, and the load graph is smooth and lower. I saw
> someone also posted a patch to the LKML.
Out of curiosity, when you say lower - how does the load actually
compare now
Hi timo...
I Search in lib to see how the nfs_flush* works , and i see this too.
int nfs_safe_stat(const char *path, struct stat *buf);
can i use this too ? it's get a better handle with this + nfs_flush* before
?!
Tks !
2010/12/16 Timo Sirainen
> On Thu, 2010-12-16 at 09:30 -0200, Alex Bau
On 2010-12-15 7:38 PM, Holger Mauermann wrote:
> Here is the relevant doveconf -n output:
> ...
Please always include *full* doveconf -n output, not just what you
*think* is relevant... its not that much more, and includes extra info
that people sometimes forget - like dovecot version (and filesys
* Cor Bosman :
> It looks like Timo's patch fixes the problem. Context switches are now
> back to normal, and the load graph is smooth and lower.
Same here.
> I saw someone also posted a patch to the LKML.
I guess I missed that one
--
Ralf Hildebrandt
Geschäftsbereich IT | Abteilung Netzwe
It looks like Timo's patch fixes the problem. Context switches are now back to
normal, and the load graph is smooth and lower. I saw someone also posted a
patch to the LKML.
Cor
On Thu, 2010-12-16 at 09:30 -0200, Alex Baule wrote:
> I Made a plugin that's works fine in a Normal Partition and a GlusterFS
> enviroment too.
> in NFS it's intermitent, some times works, some times don't.
> Only the expunge part have this issue, i use stat to get the amont of hard
> link in a f
Hi timo.
I Made a plugin that's works fine in a Normal Partition and a GlusterFS
enviroment too.
in NFS it's intermitent, some times works, some times don't.
Only the expunge part have this issue, i use stat to get the amont of hard
link in a file.
There is because of that (stat, hard link cou
On Thu, 2010-12-16 at 10:52 +, Timo Sirainen wrote:
> On Thu, 2010-12-16 at 13:00 +0300, Vasiliy G Tolstov wrote:
> > Hello. Does anybody write fts xapian plugin to dovecot 2?
>
> Not as far as I know.
>
> > If nobody -
> > can You suggest me what i need to read and what source files i need
On Thu, 2010-12-16 at 13:00 +0300, Vasiliy G Tolstov wrote:
> Hello. Does anybody write fts xapian plugin to dovecot 2?
Not as far as I know.
> If nobody -
> can You suggest me what i need to read and what source files i need no
> read to write own xapian fts plugin.
src/plugins/fts/fts-api*.h
Hello. Does anybody write fts xapian plugin to dovecot 2? If nobody -
can You suggest me what i need to read and what source files i need no
read to write own xapian fts plugin.
Thank You for any comments.
--
Vasiliy G Tolstov
Selfip.Ru
Yes I know but it does not work !
On 12/15/2010 06:33 PM, Odhiambo Washington wrote:
You can change the "ssl = yes" to "ssl = no" and try again or specify the
correct paths to your SSL certs. That is what it is telling you.
On Wed, Dec 15, 2010 at 3:36 PM, Frank Bonnet wrote:
hello
tryin
42 matches
Mail list logo
