On 15.9.2010, at 0.17, interfaSys sàrl wrote:
> configure:20543: error: possibly undefined macro: AS_MESSAGE_LOG_FDdnl
> If this token and others are legitimate, please use m4_pattern_allow.
> See the Autoconf documentation.
There's no such thing in Dovecot's configure.in. AS_MESSAGE_LO
autogen.sh fails on FreeBSD 8.1
m4 1.4.15
autoconf 2.67
Here is the error message:
libtoolize: Consider adding `AC_CONFIG_MACRO_DIR([m4])' to configure.in and
libtoolize: rerunning libtoolize, to keep the correct libtool macros
in-tree.
libtoolize: Consider adding `-I m4' to ACLOCAL_AMFLAGS in M
I hope so. Let me know if not.
On 14.9.2010, at 20.24, Henrique Fernandes wrote:
> Thanks.
>
> Now i can do dsync both ways ?
>
> []'sf.rique
>
>
> On Tue, Sep 14, 2010 at 12:22 PM, Timo Sirainen wrote:
>
>> On Fri, 2010-09-03 at 21:33 -0300, Henrique Fernandes wrote:
>>> Hey, why i am gett
Op 14-9-2010 17:51, Donny Brooks schreef:
I think I will have to stay with the 1.x branch since we have to stick to using
approved rpm's (internal policy) and fedora 13 does not have a 2.x branch that
I see yet. So maildir it is for now.
I see my error on the inbox not getting the new mail. Th
Thanks.
Now i can do dsync both ways ?
[]'sf.rique
On Tue, Sep 14, 2010 at 12:22 PM, Timo Sirainen wrote:
> On Fri, 2010-09-03 at 21:33 -0300, Henrique Fernandes wrote:
> > Hey, why i am getting this error ?
> > dsync(u...@example.com): Error: Can't rename mailbox
> > VoIP_08300a224c41694c0d0
"Timo Sirainen" wrote on 14.9.2010 19:24:14:
>On Tue, 2010-09-14 at 19:08 +0200, Miha Vrhovnik wrote:
>> When removing/receiving new message and same in case of doveadm recalc.
>> SELECT with key..
>> if not found
>> INSERT
>> else
>> UPDATE
>
>I don't think this kind of code exists
On Tue, 2010-09-14 at 19:08 +0200, Miha Vrhovnik wrote:
> When removing/receiving new message and same in case of doveadm recalc.
> SELECT with key..
> if not found
> INSERT
> else
> UPDATE
I don't think this kind of code exists anywhere? It's possible that
doveadm does a SELECT, but
"Timo Sirainen" wrote on 14.9.2010 18:51:29:
>On Tue, 2010-09-14 at 17:49 +0100, Timo Sirainen wrote:
>> On Tue, 2010-09-14 at 18:07 +0200, Miha Vrhovnik wrote:
>>
>> > I'm trying to set Dovecot 2.0 with postgresql dict. It's kind of working
>> > but not as I'd like to. Dovecot expects to get a
On Tue, 2010-09-14 at 17:49 +0100, Timo Sirainen wrote:
> On Tue, 2010-09-14 at 18:07 +0200, Miha Vrhovnik wrote:
>
> > I'm trying to set Dovecot 2.0 with postgresql dict. It's kind of working
> > but not as I'd like to. Dovecot expects to get a dedicated table for quota
> > management. When I'v
On Tue, 2010-09-14 at 18:07 +0200, Miha Vrhovnik wrote:
> I'm trying to set Dovecot 2.0 with postgresql dict. It's kind of working but
> not as I'd like to. Dovecot expects to get a dedicated table for quota
> management. When I've run *doveadm quota recalc -A* I've noticed in the logs
> that D
On 14/09/2010 16:51, Donny Brooks wrote:
I think I will have to stay with the 1.x branch since we have to stick to using
approved rpm's (internal policy) and fedora 13 does not have a 2.x branch that
I see yet.
I agree sticking to the standard binary packages where possible is
generally a go
Hi,
I'm trying to set Dovecot 2.0 with postgresql dict. It's kind of working but
not as I'd like to. Dovecot expects to get a dedicated table for quota
management. When I've run *doveadm quota recalc -A* I've noticed in the logs
that Dovecot tries to run DELETE statements. Fortunately it didn't
On 2010-09-14 11:51 AM, Donny Brooks wrote:
> So once I setup postfix to deliver the mail properly and the dovecot
> convert plugin is setup, is there a way to gradually migrate the
> users so I don't kill the server? We have about 220GB or so of mail
> between about 160+/- users. What would be th
I think I will have to stay with the 1.x branch since we have to stick to
using approved rpm's (internal policy) and fedora 13 does not have a 2.x branch
that I see yet. So maildir it is for now.
I see my error on the inbox not getting the new mail. That was one of those
"all nighter" errors
On Fri, 2010-09-03 at 17:31 +0200, Burckhard Schmidt wrote:
> 1. autocreate
> The plugin autocreate = AutoCleanSpam is activated for lda and imap.
> There is no user with such folder.
> dsync ceates two:
>
> dsync(account): Info: AutoCleanSpam: only in source
> dsync(account): Info: AutoCleanSpam:
On Fri, 2010-09-03 at 21:33 -0300, Henrique Fernandes wrote:
> Hey, why i am getting this error ?
> dsync(u...@example.com): Error: Can't rename mailbox
> VoIP_08300a224c41694c0d0f20ce4ec5 to VoIP: Target mailbox already exists
These should fix this:
http://hg.dovecot.org/dovecot-2.0/rev/ba92
On 09/14/2010 05:25 PM, Timo Sirainen wrote:
On Tue, 2010-09-14 at 15:28 +0300, alex wrote:
On 09/14/2010 01:30 PM, Timo Sirainen wrote:
On Tue, 2010-09-14 at 12:54 +0300, alex wrote:
* LSUB () "/" "shared//INBOX"
This is wrong .. What do you have in subscriptions file?
I know..
Can you
On Tue, 2010-09-14 at 15:28 +0300, alex wrote:
> On 09/14/2010 01:30 PM, Timo Sirainen wrote:
> > On Tue, 2010-09-14 at 12:54 +0300, alex wrote:
> >
> >> * LSUB () "/" "shared//INBOX"
> >
> > This is wrong .. What do you have in subscriptions file?
>
> I know..
Can you try v2.0? I think there's a
Hi Timo,
There's probably some problem with Dovecot detecting that process on the
other side of pipe has died. What does "dovecot --build-options" say?
Build options: ioloop=poll ipv6 openssl io_block_size=8192
Try if configure --with-ioloop=select happens to fix this?
No success after "conf
On Tue, 2010-09-14 at 14:36 +0100, interfaSys sàrl wrote:
> There is a new error showing up in my logs
> Sep 14 11:04:57 lda(u...@domain.com): Panic: file istream-crlf.c: line
> 101 (i_stream_crlf_read_crlf): assertion failed: (src == ptr + 1)
http://hg.dovecot.org/dovecot-2.0/rev/2e1226259979 sho
There is a new error showing up in my logs
Sep 14 11:04:57 lda(u...@domain.com): Panic: file istream-crlf.c: line
101 (i_stream_crlf_read_crlf): assertion failed: (src == ptr + 1)
It seems to only happen with one account
Cheers,
Olivier
On Tue, 14 Sep 2010 14:31:28 +0200, Tom Hendrikx
wrote:
> On 14/09/10 10:15, Paweł Madej wrote:
>> Hello,
>>
>> Is there any possibility to make dspam transport validated emails
>> directly to dovecot LDA? for now I use such schema:
>
> You can setup dovecot LDA as delivery agent in dspam.conf.
On 14/09/10 10:15, Paweł Madej wrote:
> Hello,
>
> Is there any possibility to make dspam transport validated emails
> directly to dovecot LDA? for now I use such schema:
You can setup dovecot LDA as delivery agent in dspam.conf. Never tried
it but I think that would work.
However, I remeber som
On 09/14/2010 01:30 PM, Timo Sirainen wrote:
On Tue, 2010-09-14 at 12:54 +0300, alex wrote:
* LSUB () "/" "shared//INBOX"
This is wrong .. What do you have in subscriptions file?
I know..
This is the user2 subscription file:
# cat /home/sites/domain.tld/mail/user2/Maildir/subscriptions
T
Charles Marcus wrote:
> On 2010-09-14 8:21 AM, Per Jessen wrote:
>> I have some per-user, read-only mailboxes that I'm auto-subscribing
>> users to. With Thunderbird I have no problems, but with Outlook, the
>> contents of the 'To:' column is not shown until a user actually
>> retrieves the mail
On Tue, 14 Sep 2010 11:41:49 +0100, Timo Sirainen wrote:
> On Tue, 2010-09-14 at 10:15 +0200, Paweł Madej wrote:
>
>> Is there any possibility to make dspam transport validated emails
>> directly to dovecot LDA?
>
> What methods does dspam support?
>
>> for now I use such schema:
>>
>> postfi
On 2010-09-14 8:21 AM, Per Jessen wrote:
> I have some per-user, read-only mailboxes that I'm auto-subscribing
> users to. With Thunderbird I have no problems, but with Outlook, the
> contents of the 'To:' column is not shown until a user actually
> retrieves the mail. Does this ring a bell with
I have some per-user, read-only mailboxes that I'm auto-subscribing
users to. With Thunderbird I have no problems, but with Outlook, the
contents of the 'To:' column is not shown until a user actually
retrieves the mail. Does this ring a bell with anyone?
/Per Jessen, Zürich
Hi Timo, hi all,
on my system ("AIX 6.1" 64bit) after "doveadm stop" there are some
processes still alive:
Do you have shutdown_clients=yes (default)?
Yes (as default).
After some minutes I can see less than before:
root 60293301 0 16:54:20 - 0:00 dovecot/ssl-params
On Tue, 2010-09-14 at 13:38 +0200, Andreas Kossack wrote:
> > There's probably some problem with Dovecot detecting that process on the
> > other side of pipe has died. What does "dovecot --build-options" say?
> Build options: ioloop=poll ipv6 openssl io_block_size=8192
Try if configure --with-io
On Tue, 2010-09-14 at 13:22 +0200, Per Jessen wrote:
> I have googled it some, and found a couple of references, but nothing
> specific - has anyone already started work on such a plugin?
I don't think so. Feel free to start. :)
On Tue, 2010-09-14 at 13:51 +0200, Andreas Kossack wrote:
> Hi Timo, hi all,
>
> >> There aren't any compiler error messages, in the "config.log" I can see
> >> the return value "1" from "conftest":
> >
> > A better way is to finish the configure,
> The "configure"-script breaks with error message
Hi Timo, hi all,
There aren't any compiler error messages, in the "config.log" I can see
the return value "1" from "conftest":
A better way is to finish the configure,
The "configure"-script breaks with error message
"fd passing is required for Dovecot to work"
then revert/modify fdpass.c
I have googled it some, and found a couple of references, but nothing
specific - has anyone already started work on such a plugin?
/Per Jessen, Zürich
On Tue, 2010-09-14 at 10:15 +0200, Paweł Madej wrote:
> Is there any possibility to make dspam transport validated emails
> directly to dovecot LDA?
What methods does dspam support?
> for now I use such schema:
>
> postfix > dspam > postfix > dovecot LDA but wanted to not return
> emails to
On Tue, 2010-09-14 at 12:54 +0300, alex wrote:
> * LSUB () "/" "shared//INBOX"
This is wrong .. What do you have in subscriptions file?
On Tue, 2010-09-14 at 10:46 +0200, Andreas Kossack wrote:
> Hi Timo, hi all,
>
> >> It seems, that the last changes in "src/lib/fdpass.c" are the reason.
> >
> > The compiler error message would have been useful to know.
> There aren't any compiler error messages, in the "config.log" I can see
> t
On 09/13/2010 05:40 PM, Timo Sirainen wrote:
Looking at the code.. It checks To: Cc: Bcc: Resent-To: Recent-Cc: and
Resent-Bcc: headers. If either ${original_recipient} or any address
listed in :addresses is found from any of those headers, it's ok. So one
of those has to match in your system. (H
ome/sites/domain.tld/mail/Maildir" filesystem folders , the one way I
reproduce their creation : I have delete
"/home/sites/domain.tld/mail/shared" and
"/home/sites/domain.tld/mail/Maildir", open TB, select user2 account and
open the "Subscribe..." option. Th
Hi Timo, hi all,
It seems, that the last changes in "src/lib/fdpass.c" are the reason.
The compiler error message would have been useful to know.
There aren't any compiler error messages, in the "config.log" I can see
the return value "1" from "conftest":
configure:19746: xlc -q64 -o conftes
Hello,
Is there any possibility to make dspam transport validated emails
directly to dovecot LDA? for now I use such schema:
postfix > dspam > postfix > dovecot LDA but wanted to not return
emails to postfix. I've found that such configuration is possible with
dspam+ cyrus IMAP.
Documentat
41 matches
Mail list logo
