On 10.8.2010, at 23.07, Samuel Kvasnica wrote:
>> I think you can add :DIRNAME=mAildirMaiLs or something. Then e.g. cur/new
>> mailbox exists in directory Maildir/cur/new/mAildirMaiLs/
>>
>> INBOX should be then in Maildir/mAildirMaiLs/ (probably clearer if you also
>> added :INBOX=~/Maildir/IN
On 08/10/2010 12:33 AM, Timo Sirainen wrote:
> On 9.8.2010, at 21.15, Samuel Kvasnica wrote:
>
>>> Have you considered on getting rid of listescape plugin and simply
>>> using :LAYOUT=fs? :) That should be more reliable..
>> Yes, I actually started my dovecot1.2 setup using fs layout because I
>>
1. This doesn't seem to have anything to do with Dovecot. It's a Postfix
question.
2. Don't post a new message by replying to existing one. In-Reply-To: header is
still preserved and you mess up threading.
On 10.8.2010, at 22.45, Jerrale G wrote:
> smtpd_sender_login_maps = mysql:/etc/postfix/
smtpd_sender_login_maps = mysql:/etc/postfix/sender_login_maps.cf >>
query = SELECT CONCAT(username,'@',domain) FROM mailboxes WHERE CONCAT(
username, '@', domain ) = '%s' AND active = '1'* *UNION SELECT
CONCAT(email, '@', domain) FROM forwardings WHERE goto='%s' AND
isdomain='0' AND active='
On 8/10/2010 3:16 PM, Jerrale G wrote:
chmod -R 775 /var/run/dovecot
dovecot &
Warning: Corrected permissions for login directory /var/run/dovecot/login
ls -l /var/run/dovecot
srw-rw-rw- 1 root root 0 Aug 10 15:02 auth-master
srw--- 1 mail mail 0 Aug 10 15:02 auth-worker.2774
srw
On 8/9/2010 11:21 AM, Timo Sirainen wrote:
On Mon, 2010-08-09 at 17:02 +0200, Richard Gliebe wrote:
when a user tries to create a sub-subfolder in Archiv, he gets the message:
"Mailbox doesn't allow inferior mailboxes"
Like Phill said, the problem is mbox format. If you don't want to switch
On 10.8.2010, at 18.10, Thomas Hummel wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 10, 2010 at 12:52:48PM +0100, Timo Sirainen wrote:
>
>> The point of namespace list was for clients to be able to figure out
>> what the namespaces there are. With list=yes and hidden=yes for your
>> only namespace you wouldn't be listin
On 10.8.2010, at 18.12, Bradley Giesbrecht wrote:
> doveconf: Error: protocols: Unknown protocol: sieve
> doveconf: Fatal: Error in configuration file dovecot/dovecot.conf: protocols:
> Unknown protocol: sieve
This looks as if you haven't installed Pigeonhole.. Have you?
On 10.8.2010, at 20.16, Jerrale G wrote:
> Aug 10 15:07:57 server1 dovecot: dict: Fatal: dict_driver_register(mysql):
> Already registered
> Aug 10 15:08:09 server1 last message repeated 4428 times
This is broken.. How did you install Dovecot? What version? Do you have any
dict plugins (probabl
chmod -R 775 /var/run/dovecot
dovecot &
Warning: Corrected permissions for login directory /var/run/dovecot/login
ls -l /var/run/dovecot
srw-rw-rw- 1 root root 0 Aug 10 15:02 auth-master
srw--- 1 mail mail 0 Aug 10 15:02 auth-worker.2774
srwxrwxrwx 1 root root 0 Aug 10 15:02
Sorry if I missed the dovecot 2.0.betax managesieve sieve discussions.
I have been looking in my list archive and haven't found a reference
to this yet.
I am trying to convert my dovecot.conf and am getting the following
Fatal error:
/**
doveconf -n -c dovecot/dovecot.conf > dovecot.conve
On Tue, Aug 10, 2010 at 12:52:48PM +0100, Timo Sirainen wrote:
> The point of namespace list was for clients to be able to figure out
> what the namespaces there are. With list=yes and hidden=yes for your
> only namespace you wouldn't be listing any namespaces, so clients
> would think you don't h
Richard Gliebe put forth on 8/10/2010 5:31 AM:
> On 8/10/10 12:25 PM Charles Marcus wrote:
>> Richard Gliebe wrote:
>>> my dovecot IMAP Server (1.0.7-7.el5) is now up and running ;-)
>>
>> So old as to be virtually unworthy of a response...
>>
>> Time to upgrade - and why oh why did you install a N
On 08/10/2010 06:43 AM, Richard Gliebe wrote:
On 8/10/10 12:29 PM Ladislav Pašek wrote:
If your clients are in the Active Directory you could put your server
certificate to domain policy.
Lada
Hi,
the clients are not in a AD, only in a smb workgroup.
You can still download the certificate
Hi,
In behalf of my colleague Daniel I will give additional information.
On 10.08.2010 16:09, Timo Sirainen wrote:
On Tue, 2010-08-10 at 09:35 +0200, Daniel Stoye wrote:
1 list "" "*"
..
* LIST (\HasNoChildren) "/" "FremdeOrdner/user2/Drafts"
* LIST (\HasNoChildren) "/" "FremdeOrdner/user2/I
http://dovecot.org/releases/2.0/rc/dovecot-2.0.rc5.tar.gz
http://dovecot.org/releases/2.0/rc/dovecot-2.0.rc5.tar.gz.sig
Unfortunately v2.0.0 has to be delayed a while longer, because I found
that there were still problems in plugin hook handling when using more
than 2 plugins. Hopefully it's now f
On Tue, 2010-08-10 at 13:46 +0200, Computer Department (Watchtower South
Africa Branch) wrote:
> Reverting http://hg.dovecot.org/dovecot-1.2/raw-rev/2cdfcca171d8 solves
> this problem. Is there a preferred way to fix this issue?
Thanks, fixed: http://hg.dovecot.org/dovecot-1.2/rev/2281223b9cb9
On Tue, 2010-08-10 at 09:35 +0200, Daniel Stoye wrote:
> 1 list "" "*"
..
> * LIST (\HasNoChildren) "/" "FremdeOrdner/user2/Drafts"
> * LIST (\HasNoChildren) "/" "FremdeOrdner/user2/INBOX"
> * LIST (\HasNoChildren) "/" "FremdeOrdner/user3/INBOX"
INBOXes get listed..
> 2 list "" "FremdeOrdner/%"
On Tue, 2010-08-10 at 14:01 +0100, Timo Sirainen wrote:
> /* Maximum number of pending requests before delaying new requests. */
> #define DB_LDAP_MAX_PENDING_REQUESTS 128
A quick look at OpenLDAP code shows that it defaults to 16 worker
threads. I guess I should reduce this to 8 or something. :)
On Tue, 2010-08-10 at 18:13 +0550, Aravind Divakaran wrote:
> >
> > Dovecot never disconnects from LDAP server. You're using
> > passdb/userdb ldap and not pam_ldap, right?
>
> I am using passdb/userdb ldap not pam_ldap.
My googling shows:
"It means there are too many operations active on the g
>
> Dovecot never disconnects from LDAP server. You're using
> passdb/userdb ldap and not pam_ldap, right?
I am using passdb/userdb ldap not pam_ldap.
--
Rgds,
Aravind M D
On 10.8.2010, at 7.16, Aravind Divakaran wrote:
> My server is running with Dovecot 1.2.11 and openldap
> 2.4.17 it was working fine but suddenly my dovecot auth started to
> failing sometimes. After restarting dovecot everything will work fine.
> The slapd log file is showing "deffering operation
On 10.8.2010, at 10.30, Len7hir wrote:
> I did Dovecot profiling on huge e-mail system, and p_strdup was very high on
> list.
>
> I do minor change:
> p_strdup:
> /*
> for (len = 0; (str)[len] != '\0'; )
> len++;
> len++;
> */
> len = strlen(str) + 1;
Committed:
On 10.8.2010, at 10.45, Thomas von Eyben wrote:
> How can I rebuild the maildirsize and why might it be wrong in the
> first place(?)
> Will the maildirsize files be regenerated if deleted and when will
> this then happen ( at the next time of the user logging in or…)
Yes, deleting will cause it
On 10.8.2010, at 7.56, Thomas Hummel wrote:
>> But then if you have
>>
>> namespace {
>> prefix =
>> list = no
>> }
>>
>> Now both a and b are exactly the same:
>>
>> ab LIST "" *
>
> You mean it won't list anything, even if I have a mailbox (not a namespace)
> named foo ?
Right. That's w
Hi,
Reverting http://hg.dovecot.org/dovecot-1.2/raw-rev/2cdfcca171d8 solves
this problem. Is there a preferred way to fix this issue?
Duane Hughes
-Original Message-
From: dovecot-bounces+computers=za.jw@dovecot.org
[mailto:dovecot-bounces+computers=za.jw@dovecot.org] On Behalf
William Blunn wrote:
> If you aren't even using Exchange Server, then there is little point
> using Outlook.
I hate being put in the position of defending Microsoft, but the fact
is, Outlooks Calendar is extremely nice, and the calendar integration
with email/contacts/tasks is outstanding (I have
On 10/08/2010 10:51, Richard Gliebe wrote:
my dovecot IMAP Server (1.0.7-7.el5) is now up and running ;-)
Congratulations. You just installed an old unsupported version.
If you want help from the list, you need to be running 1.2.x or later.
If you distro includes an older version, then that i
On 8/10/10 12:29 PM Ladislav Pašek wrote:
If your clients are in the Active Directory you could put your server
certificate to domain policy.
Lada
Hi,
the clients are not in a AD, only in a smb workgroup.
Richard
On 8/10/10 12:25 PM Charles Marcus wrote:
Richard Gliebe wrote:
my dovecot IMAP Server (1.0.7-7.el5) is now up and running ;-)
So old as to be virtually unworthy of a response...
Time to upgrade - and why oh why did you install a NEW server with such
an ancient version???
Its a precompiled
If your clients are in the Active Directory you could put your server
certificate to domain policy.
Lada
Dne 10.8.2010 12:26, Richard Gliebe napsal(a):
Hi,
next problem with outlook 2003
On the IMAP Server (dovecot.x86_64 1.0.7-7.el5) I created a certificate with
"mkcert_dovecot.sh". Some e
Hi,
next problem with outlook 2003
On the IMAP Server (dovecot.x86_64 1.0.7-7.el5) I created a certificate
with "mkcert_dovecot.sh". Some entries as be written to
"/etc/pki/dovecot/dovecot-openssl.cnf".
plaintext paswords are disables.
IMAP Serverport: 993
Server needs SSL
Now the outlook 2
Richard Gliebe wrote:
> my dovecot IMAP Server (1.0.7-7.el5) is now up and running ;-)
So old as to be virtually unworthy of a response...
Time to upgrade - and why oh why did you install a NEW server with such
an ancient version???
> Now I want that all clients have to save there sent messages
Noel Butler wrote:
> it seems I'm missing a lot of your posts, looks likely our SA anti_troll
> rules
Simply being wrong does not a troll make, however...
It was pointed out to you a couple of months ago on the spam-l list that
you are making some really bad decisions wrt your SA/Mailscanner rule
Hi all,
my dovecot IMAP Server (1.0.7-7.el5) is now up and running ;-)
Now I want that all clients have to save there sent messages in the IMAP
folder on the server.
no problem with the thunderbird clients.
BUT, I can't configure the office 2003 clients to save there send
messages to the im
Hi List,
I have (otherwise successfull) migrated a server from cyrus to dovecot
(Mac OS X Server 10.5.8 to 10.6.4 [dovecotd version to be
1.1.20apple0.5]).
There are ca. 300+ users of which a very small handfull (ca. 1 %) are
having reported a usage size that is very different to what 'du'
reports
I did Dovecot profiling on huge e-mail system, and p_strdup was very
high on list.
I do minor change:
p_strdup:
/*
for (len = 0; (str)[len] != '\0'; )
len++;
len++;
*/
len = strlen(str) + 1;
p_strndup:
/*
len = 0;
while (len < max_chars &&
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hello,
On 08/09/10 17:15, Timo Sirainen wrote:
> On Mon, 2010-08-09 at 13:48 +0200, Daniel Stoye wrote:
>> 1 getacl drafts
>> * ACL "drafts" "user2" lrwstipekxacd
>> 1 OK Getacl completed.
>> 1 setacl drafts user1 ilrws
>> 1 NO Internal error occurred
38 matches
Mail list logo
