Hello:
I have virtual users set up for the various mailing lists that I
subscribe to. Everything has been working well in both Postfix and
Dovecot. Postfix is configured to deliver to a specific mbox file within
my mbox mail root. I can access retrieve and read email via Dovecot
without any i
Bob Eastbrook wrote:
On Fri, Jan 1, 2010 at 3:07 PM, Thomas Løcke wrote:
Hi Bob,
Just to make sure I understand you: Some app is sending emails to
ord...@example.com at the rate of 1000 per second, and another app is
fetching email from ord...@example.com to process them?
Hello,
Actually,
Hello all,
I have an HTPC connected 24/7 to the Internet running Mythbuntu. I
also have a web/email host that runs Dovecot for email and provides
IMAP and POP3 access.
I understand that Dovecot supports Push IMAP and I could, for example,
use Thunderbird to connect to my email host to receive in
On Fri, 2010-01-01 at 19:00 -0500, Charles Marcus wrote:
> >> What has this got to do with anything, It was well before Christmas.
>
> > It was 12/10/09... two weeks... pretty close if you ask me, lots of
> > people take 2-3 week vacations during this time of year.
>
> Oh... and the only messa
These comments coming from you, are not surprising given who you are, so
i wont bother this list with any further reply, because i'm sure the
other trolls and fanbois will come out the woodwork..
On Fri, 2010-01-01 at 18:49 -0500, Charles Marcus wrote:
>
> > he wants people to sub to his useles
I would a method for Dovecot to recalculate the quota usage and rewrite it to
the quota DB (Called on demand by a non-Dovecot POP3 daemon)
I don't want the line deleted in the DB as this would only recalculate next
time the Dovecot LDA or IMAP handles a message, and I want to keep the data
avai
On Sat, 02 Jan 2010 11:09:33 Bob Eastbrook wrote:
> Can anyone describe an architecture which can handle 1000 IMAP or POP
> messages per second? Ideally, it would be hosted in the cloud and
> additional instances could be launched to handle additional load.
>
> Bob
The Courier IMAP server is a fa
>> What has this got to do with anything, It was well before Christmas.
> It was 12/10/09... two weeks... pretty close if you ask me, lots of
> people take 2-3 week vacations during this time of year.
Oh... and the only message that shows up in the archives is the
follow-up you posted yourself o
On 2010-01-01, Noel Butler (noel.but...@ausics.net) wrote:
>> Then again, I might have just missed it. In addition, you do know what
>> time of the year it is, didn't you? Many individuals like myself have
>> better things to do than slave over our PCs waiting to answer questions.
> What has this
On 2009-12-31 7:01 PM, Noel Butler wrote:
> On Thu, 2009-12-31 at 16:21 -0500, Jerry wrote:
>>> Dunno. Above the private field appears to be "-" (the one after
>>> unix). I don't know why Postfix would see it as "--n".
>> Maybe asking Wietse Venema might prove
>> insightful.
> wouldnt do that,
On 1.1.2010, at 18.15, Bob Eastbrook wrote:
> I think it might be difficult to accomplish this via POP since I think
> Dovecot would have to lock the account while doing the POP downloads.
> This makes it difficult to have more than one app downloading at a
> time.
The locking behavior is optiona
Hello people,
First of all a Happy New Year and best wishes to you all.
I've managed to setup dovecot v1.2.9 on a CentOS 5.4
system and I am now, trying to make it auth.
I would prefer virtual users and only want to make the IMAP/
IMAPS part work. I don't need POP3 or anything else. The rest
wil
On Fri, Jan 1, 2010 at 3:07 PM, Thomas Løcke wrote:
> Hi Bob,
>
> Just to make sure I understand you: Some app is sending emails to
> ord...@example.com at the rate of 1000 per second, and another app is
> fetching email from ord...@example.com to process them?
Hello,
Actually, thousands of cus
On Fri, 2010-01-01 at 06:52 -0500, Gerard wrote:
> Second, I totally disagree with your claim that his mail forum is
> useless. I have on several occasions posted quires and received rapid
> responses. By the way, I do not remember seeing your post on the forum.
Yep, I got a copy of it back so i
On Fri, Jan 1, 2010 at 11:23 PM, Bob Eastbrook wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 1, 2010 at 2:09 PM, Bob Eastbrook
> wrote:
>
> > Can anyone describe an architecture which can handle 1000 IMAP or POP
> > messages per second? Ideally, it would be hosted in the cloud and
> > additional instances could be launc
On 31.12.2009, at 22.40, Michael wrote:
> Has anyone been able to get Dovecot LDA working where each user has a
> different UID?
>
> All the howtos on the Internet I have found set the UID of a mailbox as fixed
> for all users.
How about reading the official docs instead of random howtos :)
h
On 1.1.2010, at 2.24, Michael wrote:
> How can I get deliver LDA and IMAP to use separate user DB SQL queries?
Currently you can't really. But there's %s variable that expands to either imap
or lda. You could do some kind of conditional checking with it. For example:
select imap-stuff, .. where
On Fri, 01 Jan 2010 10:01:30 +1000
Noel Butler articulated:
> On Thu, 2009-12-31 at 16:21 -0500, Jerry wrote:
>
>
> > > Dunno. Above the private field appears to be "-" (the one after
> > > unix). I don't know why Postfix would see it as "--n".
> >
> > Maybe asking Wietse Venema might prove
On 1.1.2010, at 17.23, Bob Eastbrook wrote:
> More information: imagine an app which processes orders for concert
> tickets via email. The app connects to a server via POP or IMAP,
> downloads orders, and then deletes them from the server. There aren't
> thousands of users simultaneously accessi
On Fri, Jan 1, 2010 at 2:09 PM, Bob Eastbrook wrote:
> Can anyone describe an architecture which can handle 1000 IMAP or POP
> messages per second? Ideally, it would be hosted in the cloud and
> additional instances could be launched to handle additional load.
More information: imagine an app w
Can anyone describe an architecture which can handle 1000 IMAP or POP
messages per second? Ideally, it would be hosted in the cloud and
additional instances could be launched to handle additional load.
Bob
I'm looking for a spec/rpm file suitable for fedora 11/12,
for dovecot and pidgenhole sieve.
Has anyone done this yet? Otherwise I will attempt to the dovecot 1.2
spec files for f11.
--
Joakim Verona
22 matches
Mail list logo
