On Sat, 2009-05-30 at 03:00 +0200, heutekinderwirdswasge...@gmx.de
wrote:
> hello list,
>
> under my table I have a NAS station, the Synology DS-207+
> there`s a linux with ipkg.
>
> the dovocot fromo ipkg didnt have mysql support.
>
>
> compiling seems to be also difficult, because of configu
hello list,
under my table I have a NAS station, the Synology DS-207+
there`s a linux with ipkg.
the dovocot fromo ipkg didnt have mysql support.
compiling seems to be also difficult, because of configure cant find
libmysqlclient.
experts, what to do for getting mysql support in dovecot?
be
on 5-29-2009 6:51 AM Eoin Kennedy spake the following:
> Hi,
>
> Here is the situation, I hope somebody can help me.
>
> Our Email server running ubuntu 8.04.1 and dovecot 1.0.10 rebooted, and when
> it came back up the dovecot config had changed.
>
> Prior to the reboot, users stored their
Le 28 mai 09 à 23:51, Timo Sirainen a écrit :
On Tue, 2009-05-26 at 14:35 +0200, Axel Luttgens wrote:
[...]
That looks like a server configuration mistake.
No, it's just a Postfix system quickly and dirtily brought to life for
the sole purpose of testing deliver from within a MTA. ;-)
O
on 5-29-2009 1:42 AM Bernd Petrovitsch spake the following:
> On Thu, 2009-05-28 at 21:28 -0500, Kyle Wheeler wrote:
>> On Friday, May 29 at 09:46 AM, quoth Curtis Maloney:
>>> This is certainly one advantage dbox and maildir have -- not being
>>> limited to the FS file size limit per folder.
>> T
on 5-28-2009 4:46 PM Curtis Maloney spake the following:
> robforrest wrote:
>> What is happening is that as users log in (via thunderbird), they are
>> shown
>> the contents of their mailboxes. However, when they try and access a
>> given
>> email, they get no response even if they wait upwards o
On 5/29/2009 3:22 PM, Stephan Bosch wrote:
>>> I was wondering whether it will handle
>>> recipient delimiters. ie will it be able to map
>>> user+...@example.com to u...@example.com?
>>> I'm not interested in the delivery into folder stuff,
>>> just the plain delivery to inbox.
>> Hmm. Stephan, y
Steffen Kaiser wrote:
The new libsieve library of Stephan Bosch does include a tool called
"sieve-filter". It applies a Sieve script to all messages in a folder.
This is still a work in progress. It is undocumented and ill tested.
In addition there is a "sieve-test" tool that:
"
- -e Turn
Timo Sirainen schreef:
On Fri, 2009-05-22 at 20:45 +0200, John Fawcett wrote:
I read in the list archives about work in progress on
an lmtp delivery agent.As a previous cyrus user
where that was the preferred delivery method
from postfix, this sounds interesting.
I was wondering whether it will
No, it doesn't use password lookups. It still would do auth binding,
but the userdb lookup would be done when bound to the specified dn.
On May 29, 2009, at 9:56 AM, Misha Volodko wrote:
If I use dn and dnpass it'd use password lookups mechanism for this
access to password field on LDAP shoul
Timo Sirainen wrote:
> Anyway it's not an error. It just means that all the rest of the
> mailboxes have future timestamps, and expire-tool has finished its work.
I upgraded to Dovecot 1.1.15, but expire still gives me trouble. I keep
seeing the following error repeatedly now:
dict: db(seconda
it works - after I start ssl-build-param from the host system. :)
should I ( cron ) run this periodically (how often) or only once
Oskar
--
Nur bis 31.05.: GMX FreeDSL Komplettanschluss mit DSL 6.000 Flatrate und
Telefonanschluss nur 17,95 Euro/mtl.!* http://portal.gmx.net/de/go/dsl02
If I use dn and dnpass it'd use password lookups mechanism for this
access to password field on LDAP should be granted to some particular
user. Unfortunately, it's impossible. Thats why I want to use
auth_bind way.
On Thu, May 28, 2009 at 11:57 PM, Timo Sirainen wrote:
> On Mon, 2009-05-25 at 1
hi!
thanks, with dotlock or flock it works - expect the ssl-stuff:
dovecot: 2009-05-29 15:48:49 Info: dovecot v1.1.15 starting up
dovecot: 2009-05-29 15:48:49 Info: Generating Diffie-Hellman parameters for the
first time. This may take a while..
dovecot: 2009-05-29 15:48:49 Error: ssl-build-par
Hi,
Here is the situation, I hope somebody can help me.
Our Email server running ubuntu 8.04.1 and dovecot 1.0.10 rebooted, and when it
came back up the dovecot config had changed.
Prior to the reboot, users stored their emails and folders in
/var/mail/~username.
Then the config became /v
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Fri, 29 May 2009, John Fawcett wrote:
Does anyone know of a script to compress old mails stored in a maildir
format by carrying out the steps described at
http://wiki.dovecot.org/Plugins/Zlib
I made this script:
http://www2.inf.fh-bonn-rhein-s
On Qui, 28 Mai 2009, Curtis Maloney wrote:
But what sort of user puts 4GB of mail into a _single_ folder??
Those that never delete the emails nor move them into folders.
Everything they ever received is in the INBOX.
And yes, this happens a lot.
--
Eduardo M KALINOWSKI
edua...@kalinowski.
Hi Scott,
> Are you saying that you can gzip a mailbox, and Dovecot will then
> somehow uncompress that and send the data back out to the Desktop
> Client as a normal looking IMAP box?
>
> I have never heard of this tactic, and I am not finding any references
> to it on google, though I am p
Thank you a lot for the tip.
- Original Message
From: Timo Sirainen
To: Patrick Hemmen
Cc: dovecot@dovecot.org
Sent: Friday, May 29, 2009 12:00:36 AM
Subject: Re: [Dovecot] (no subject)
On Wed, 2009-05-27 at 17:38 +, Patrick Hemmen wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I use a OpenLDAP for authenti
Steffen Kaiser writes:
> > But it seems, that my sieve-scripts on the local dovecot server are not
> > recognised by this combination.
>
> You have to simulate the delivery after synchronisation. However, I wonder
> how this is to work:
>
> 1) you sync news mails from A -> B
> 2) you process t
On Fri, 2009-05-29 at 09:41 +0200, list...@gmx.de wrote:
> (Take care not to use NFS for storage if you take another setup than the here
If you use MailDir you will never have NFS problems, we have multiple
SMTP's, multiple POP3's and 2 x webmail (IMAP) servers, all to a netapp
NAS for mail st
On Thu, 2009-05-28 at 21:28 -0500, Kyle Wheeler wrote:
> On Friday, May 29 at 09:46 AM, quoth Curtis Maloney:
> > This is certainly one advantage dbox and maildir have -- not being
> > limited to the FS file size limit per folder.
>
> That's not *entirely* accurate. Certainly no single message ca
On May 29, 2009, at 4:12 AM, Oskar Eyb wrote:
until its solved, is there a way with dovecot to avoid fctnl?
lock_method setting.
>
> No NFS or any other weird filesystem?
just loopbackmounts with nullfs - but until yesterday everything worked fine..
> Yeah. Clearly the fcntl locking isn't working. I've no idea why. Some
> FreeBSD list would probably be more helpful.
yeah.. "work in progress" (posted already to the f
On May 29, 2009, at 3:46 AM, Oskar Eyb wrote:
on one of my servers (freebsd 7.0-R , Jail) I have a very strange
problem
No NFS or any other weird filesystem?
I guess its something about LOCKing.
..
saslauthd[38127] :main: could not lock pid lock file: /
var/run/saslauthd/sasla
hello!
on one of my servers (freebsd 7.0-R , Jail) I have a very strange problem
I guess its something about LOCKing.
some programs have issued with locking:
saslauthd[38127] :main: could not lock pid lock file:
/var/run/saslauthd/saslauthd.pid.lock
saslauthd[38127] :main
Hi Rick,
at the moment I´m building the same setup than you. I have no further
experience with it, but I made a setup in our testing lab and under testing
conditions it seems to run quite nice.
I took 2 servers with heartbeat1 in active/passive node. Each server has its
own IP, and they have
On May 29, 2009, at 12:06 AM, Timo Sirainen wrote:
On May 29, 2009, at 3:01 AM, Scott Haneda wrote:
No, just a lowly MacBook on wifi at the moment. I have several
other servers in production I am going to give this a quick go on
just to be sure it is not this particular machine.
I'm pret
Does anyone know of a script to compress old mails stored in a maildir
format by carrying out the steps described at
http://wiki.dovecot.org/Plugins/Zlib
thanks,
John
On May 29, 2009, at 3:01 AM, Scott Haneda wrote:
No, just a lowly MacBook on wifi at the moment. I have several
other servers in production I am going to give this a quick go on
just to be sure it is not this particular machine.
I'm pretty sure the problem is your specific machine, given t
I should note, I do not build a ton of software by hand, so I
struggle, and try to learn as best as I can. If I am not clear, let
me know, if I need to read or research more, let me know.
On May 28, 2009, at 11:50 PM, Timo Sirainen wrote:
On May 29, 2009, at 2:39 AM, Scott Haneda wrote:
c
31 matches
Mail list logo
