On Thu, 2009-05-21 at 21:26 -0700, V S Rao wrote:
> BTW, just to confirm once again, are there any known issues with Dovecot &
> imapproxyd? Because I find it strange that there should be around 8000
> established connections between Squirrelmail and imapproxyd & around 400
> connections betwe
So I guess I will take the problem to imapproxy group and find out if I can get
a clue to the issue I am facing.
BTW, just to confirm once again, are there any known issues with Dovecot &
imapproxyd? Because I find it strange that there should be around 8000
established connections between Sq
Apologies for the confusion.. But I finally got what you meant. Yes, the
version exists, but was omitted in the extract of the email.
--- On Thu, 5/21/09, Charles Marcus wrote:
> From: Charles Marcus
> Subject: Re: [Dovecot] Authenticating with /etc/passwd
> To: dovecot@dovecot.org
> Date: T
Good evening,
While working with Dovecot 1.2rc4 on Fedora 10, I have been trying to
get the Expire plug-in to auto delete messages for us.
When I run the plug-in with the test flag, I receive the following message:
/usr/local/sbin/dovecot --exec-mail ext
/usr/local/libexec/dovecot/expire-tool --t
You can also use pimpstat to monitor the effectiveness of imapproxy. We had
imapproxy running running in front of squirrelmail for a post.office IMAP
server (based on uw-imap). We eventually went into the code for imapproxy
and tweaked some of the SELECT caching and even tweaked some of the
squirre
V S Rao wrote:
> Thanks for the many responses and views.
>
> I have taken RH support for my mail server only and so have to ensure they
> support me. So am going with their recommended version which is 0.99.x.
>
> Now on the webmail I have migrated to RHEL 5.3 and the dovecot being used
> ther
On Thu, 2009-05-21 at 14:08 -0700, V S Rao wrote:
> Now on the webmail I have migrated to RHEL 5.3 and the dovecot being
> used there is 1.0.7.x. So that should support proxying, right?
Yes, but I forgot this before: Dovecot's proxying doesn't do any
connection caching. So there's no benefit in u
Thanks for the many responses and views.
I have taken RH support for my mail server only and so have to ensure they
support me. So am going with their recommended version which is 0.99.x.
Now on the webmail I have migrated to RHEL 5.3 and the dovecot being used there
is 1.0.7.x. So that should
Timo Sirainen wrote:
> On Thu, 2009-05-21 at 11:47 -0700, Seth Mattinen wrote:
>> Yes, that too. My point was not to judge Dovecot's performance based on
>> a 0.99 version. ;) I've successfully used several versions of dovecot
>> 1.1.x with imapproxyd and IMAP-only webmail clients.
>
> Do you have
On Thu, 2009-05-21 at 11:47 -0700, Seth Mattinen wrote:
> Yes, that too. My point was not to judge Dovecot's performance based on
> a 0.99 version. ;) I've successfully used several versions of dovecot
> 1.1.x with imapproxyd and IMAP-only webmail clients.
Do you have any numbers about how much fa
Scott Silva wrote:
> on 5-21-2009 11:33 AM Seth Mattinen spake the following:
>> V S Rao wrote:
>>> Hi Timo,
>>>
>>> Thanks for the response. Apologize, but my responses are going to be a bit
>>> lengthy.
>>>
I have migrated from uw-imap to Dovecot for POP3 & IMAP service. I run
webmail
on 5-21-2009 11:33 AM Seth Mattinen spake the following:
> V S Rao wrote:
>> Hi Timo,
>>
>> Thanks for the response. Apologize, but my responses are going to be a bit
>> lengthy.
>>
>>> I have migrated from uw-imap to Dovecot for POP3 & IMAP service. I run
>>> webmail using squirrelmail. When runn
V S Rao wrote:
> Hi Timo,
>
> Thanks for the response. Apologize, but my responses are going to be a bit
> lengthy.
>
>> I have migrated from uw-imap to Dovecot for POP3 & IMAP service. I run
>> webmail using squirrelmail. When running uw-imap I used to run
>> up.imapproxyd on the webmail server
On Thu, 2009-05-21 at 11:10 -0700, V S Rao wrote:
> So switched to Dovecot 0.99.x (I run the server on RHEL 4.0 and that
> is the max version supported by Redhat for that version).
Oh, no.. I had had hoped people would have stopped running v0.99 by
now :) That's probably the cause of all your pro
Hi Timo,
Thanks for the response. Apologize, but my responses are going to be a bit
lengthy.
> I have migrated from uw-imap to Dovecot for POP3 & IMAP service. I run
> webmail using squirrelmail. When running uw-imap I used to run
> up.imapproxyd on the webmail server for faster responses. Afte
On Thu, 2009-05-21 at 04:54 +, Alaa Ibrahim wrote:
> I'm trying to put it in a plugin, but when I call
> imap_fetch_handlers_register(), it works
> but all other fetch handlers get removed, my init is
Oh, that's because my code looks like:
struct imap_fetch_context *imap_fetch_init(struct cl
On Thu, 2009-05-21 at 05:21 -0700, V S Rao wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> I have migrated from uw-imap to Dovecot for POP3 & IMAP service. I run
> webmail using squirrelmail. When running uw-imap I used to run
> up.imapproxyd on the webmail server for faster responses. After
> migrating to Dovecot, I find t
On Thu, 2009-05-21 at 11:29 +0200, Arkadiusz Miskiewicz wrote:
> but according to man page crypt() can fail and NULL is returned then. On
> other
> hand glibc info page is silent about such failure.
>
> The thing is that I'm seeing crypt() failure here with new glibc 2.10.1 built
> with nss bac
On 5/21/2009 10:11 AM, June Qiu wrote:
> it is as displayed
So there's some weird dovecot -n bug that doesn't show the dovecot
version if the 'Warning: fd limit...' warning is output?
> --- On Thu, 5/21/09, Charles Marcus wrote:
>
>> From: Charles Marcus
>> Subject: Re: [Dovecot] Authenticatin
it is as displayed
--- On Thu, 5/21/09, Charles Marcus wrote:
> From: Charles Marcus
> Subject: Re: [Dovecot] Authenticating with /etc/passwd
> To: "June Qiu"
> Cc: dovecot@dovecot.org
> Date: Thursday, May 21, 2009, 6:39 PM
> On 5/20/2009, June Qiu (qlj...@yahoo.com)
> wrote:
> > dovecot -n:
Hi All,
I have migrated from uw-imap to Dovecot for POP3 & IMAP service. I run webmail
using squirrelmail. When running uw-imap I used to run up.imapproxyd on the
webmail server for faster responses. After migrating to Dovecot, I find that
up.imapproxyd does not work well with dovecot.
I tri
On 5/20/2009, June Qiu (qlj...@yahoo.com) wrote:
> dovecot -n:
>
> Warning: fd limit 256 is lower than what Dovecot can use under full load
> (more than 768). Either grow the limit or change login_max_processes_count
> and max_mail_processes settings
> # OS: SunOS 5.10 sun4u
> info_log_path: /va
dovecot 1.1.15 in src/auth/password-scheme.c
contains:
static bool
crypt_verify(const char *plaintext, const char *user ATTR_UNUSED,
const unsigned char *raw_password, size_t size)
{
const char *password;
if (size == 0) {
/* the default mycrypt() han
I tested Maildir to.
Point 1 and 2 i don't know the programms.
Point 3: its 1000.
But you help me to another idea. I forgot that nothing works in my
homedir. no ftp, no apache (i had my website there) etc. The other
problems didn't bother me but now i remember.
Is there a possibility to de
pod wrote:
> Richard Hobbs writes:
>
>> 19. Once everything is working perfectly, send an email to the entire
>> company instructing them what to do after the outage and arrange an
>> outage and do the following steps as soon as the outage begins:
>>
>> a. Unplug DMZ switch from firewall to
On Thursday 21 May 2009 12:50:05 Timo Sirainen wrote:
> > I also did a chmod o+r on /home, /home/vmail, /home/vmail/
> > example.com and
> > /home/vmail/example.com/john
>
> chdir() wants +x, not +r.
that doesn't work either
--
regards
Kenneth Gonsalves
Associate
NRC-FOSS
http://nrcfosshelpline.i
On Thursday 21 May 2009 12:40:00 you wrote:
> exec "strace -f -o /tmp/access.log -etrace=file -p "
> then try to access pop3 when fail occurs send us /tmp/access.log
> (gzipped)
attached
--
regards
Kenneth Gonsalves
Associate
NRC-FOSS
http://nrcfosshelpline.in/web/
access.log.gz
Description: G
On May 21, 2009, at 2:58 AM, Kenneth Gonsalves wrote:
greenchilly:/home/lawgon# su vmail -c "echo OK"
OK
greenchilly:/home/lawgon# su vmail -c 'cd /home/vmail/example.com/
john &&
echo Dir:$(pwd)'
Dir:/home/vmail/example.com/john
I also did a chmod o+r on /home, /home/vmail, /home/vmail/
ex
On Thursday 21 May 2009 12:15:12 Kenneth Gonsalves wrote:
> On Wednesday 20 May 2009 18:49:25 Steffen Kaiser wrote:
> > Well, there are lots of "permission denied" problems lately.
> >
> > Are you really absolutely sure that user with uid 5000 may chdir into
> > /home/vmail/example.com/john ??
> >
29 matches
Mail list logo
