Timo Sirainen wrote: > On Thu, 2009-05-21 at 11:47 -0700, Seth Mattinen wrote: >> Yes, that too. My point was not to judge Dovecot's performance based on >> a 0.99 version. ;) I've successfully used several versions of dovecot >> 1.1.x with imapproxyd and IMAP-only webmail clients. > > Do you have any numbers about how much faster it works with imapproxyd > vs. without? >
I've never run it without. I just did it because I'd rather collapse the 10 distinct logins a typical webmail client will make for every click into a single login. ~Seth