Hi, not really a dovecot issue but, im running dovecot 1.0.10 with no issues
for awhile now J.
However I ran into an issue today where postfix didn't have enough
processes to handle incoming smtp connections. This for whatever reason was
causing pop/imap (dovecot) to take a long time to respo
On Fri, 2009-05-08 at 17:11 -0300, Thiago Monaco Papageorgiou wrote:
> This is a snapshot of a top :
> %CPU %MEM
> 60.4 1.8 495:12.52 dovecot
Oh, the dovecot master process is eating the CPU. That's interesting.
This is the first time I've heard it doing that. What does it show when
you do st
hi Steffen, thanks for your reply. Below my replies:
Steffen Kaiser wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
v1.1.6 is pretty old, though.
Right! update is my next step
What's hashdir? Maybe this is a performance killer?
This run in the mail process and it is killed after the en
Hi Curtis, thanks for your replies. below my replies:
Curtis Maloney wrote:
Are your using leaving mail on the server? If not, you may find it
advantageous to disable the indexing, since it's of no real use for
"drive by collect" mail.
Yes, we have some users that leave the messages in the
On Fri, 8 May 2009, Lenthir wrote:
We were waiting for stable version, but now We are going to merge our project
with rc3...
I've been learning mercurial and it has made life so much easier by
using the queues option. The most annoying part is deleting the patch
because Timo fixed it in upstr
On 5/8/2009, Charles Marcus (cmar...@media-brokers.com) wrote:
> Oops, I'm even behind... current is rc, released on 4/16...
that should have been rc3...
On 5/8/2009, Charles Marcus (cmar...@media-brokers.com) wrote:
> You're on beta1, and beta4 was released on March 25th, and I think an RC
> (or another beta) is imminent.
Oops, I'm even behind... current is rc, released on 4/16...
--
Best regards,
Charles
1 delete "some-unexistent-folder"
* BAD Error in IMAP command 1: Unknown command.
2 rename "some-unexistent-folder" "some-other-name"
2 NO [NONEXISTENT] Mailbox doesn't exist: some-unexistent-folder
3 logout
* BYE Logging out
3 OK Logout completed.
If nothing else, build the latest version and in
> I'm trying to phase out procmail and move to dovecot-sieve instead. It
> ain't proving easy. I'll describe my setup:
>
> - Centos 5.2 box with dovecot 1.1.4 and dovecot-sieve 1.1.6 from ATrpms.
>
> - A single user account is used to store all our email (the account is
> called maildb).
>
> - Getm
On Fri, 8 May 2009, Lenthir wrote:
Not exacly this way :/
I checked this scenario and It works for me...
Don't create this folder!
Could you test this scenario?
(after login)
1 delete "kj-test-folder"
1 NO [NONEXISTENT] Folder does not exist
2 rename "kj-test-folder"
2 NO Empty mailbox name.
3
jsie...@psu.edu pisze:
I'm running dovecot 1.2.rc3(hg revision 9018:0bb192fe0abd) on AIX 5.3
with mbox files. Here are my tests:
2 create "kj-test-folder"
2 OK Create completed.
3 rename "kj-test-folder"
3 NO Empty mailbox name.
4 delete "kj-test-folder"
4 OK Delete completed.
5 rename "kj-test-
On Fri, 8 May 2009, Lenthir wrote:
I don't know if this problem exists only in my version of dovecot, or in
all...
To reproduce BUG do this (use gdb):
telnet localhost 143
o login a...@email.sth verystrong_pass
o delete "kj-test-folder"
o rename "kj-test-folder"
o rename "kj-test-folder" "ot
Lenthir:
> :) If I could upgrade I would do this... but this is not simple in my
> case. Shortly - we must merge versions...
I second Charles' opinion that in this case running beta software is a
pretty bad choice.
That aside: what keeps you from installing a recent Dovecot build on a
different
On 5/8/2009, Lenthir (len7...@gmail.com) wrote:
> :) If I could upgrade I would do this... but this is not simple in
> my case. Shortly - we must merge versions...
Then you shouldn't be running beta versions...
Sorry, don't intend to be rude, but thats the way it is...
> I only ask have you the
Charles Marcus pisze:
My version of Dovecot is 1.2beta1.
Do you know anything about this bug?
Well, please don't take this the wrong way, but...
I know Timo appreciates those willing/able to test the beta releases and
report bugs, but if you are going to use beta s/w - ANY beta s/w - you
need
> My version of Dovecot is 1.2beta1.
> Do you know anything about this bug?
Well, please don't take this the wrong way, but...
I know Timo appreciates those willing/able to test the beta releases and
report bugs, but if you are going to use beta s/w - ANY beta s/w - you
need to at least be willin
I don't know if this problem exists only in my version of dovecot, or in
all...
To reproduce BUG do this (use gdb):
telnet localhost 143
o login a...@email.sth verystrong_pass
o delete "kj-test-folder"
o rename "kj-test-folder"
o rename "kj-test-folder" "other-folder"
SIGABRT
Of course kj-test
On 5/8/2009, Steffen Kaiser (skdove...@smail.inf.fh-brs.de) wrote:
>> I looked for some bugs about this, but I didn't find anything. The question
> v1.1.6 is pretty old, though.
Yeah, and a lot of the fixes since then were NFS related...
I'd upgrade and see if it fixes it (can't hurt in any cas
I don't know if this problem exists only in my version of dovecot, or in
all...
To reproduce BUG do this (use gdb):
telnet localhost 143
o login a...@email.sth verystrong_pass
o delete "kj-test-folder"
o rename "kj-test-folder"
o rename "kj-test-folder" "other-folder"
SIGABRT
Of course kj-tes
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Thu, 7 May 2009, Thiago Monaco Papageorgiou wrote:
I looked for some bugs about this, but I didn't find anything. The question
v1.1.6 is pretty old, though.
I attached dovecot -n output. Two important information: we store the
mailboxes in NF
On 24/03/2009 11:25 AM, Timo Sirainen wrote:
dbox format needs at least two tools:
1. Expunging only marks the message having refcount=0. The actual disk
space is freed only after calling a tool pointing to the user's dbox
dir.
2. Ability to force index resync/rebuild in case it doesn't figure
21 matches
Mail list logo
