I came up with this trick
That is
Since my previous mail server had a bunch of complex procmail recipies
and I am not sure that I can turn them into sieve scripts
I am calling dovecot deliver to drop mail in it's final $DEFAULT
destination.
:0
| /some/path/dovecot/deliver
in order to update
Paul Scott wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> After upgrading dovecot for sid Thunderbird no longer displays the
> contents of any emails
>
> I have had a working IMAP setup for as much as a year even though I
> don't understand dovecot configuration well enough to know how I got it
> to go in the first place.
Neil wrote, On 2/23/09 4:16 AM:
Soapparently I have some messages which are not RFC compliant sitting in
my mailboxes (mostly older ones), and I have some software which is refusing
to handle such messages.
1. Does anyone know of a nice way to verify that all my messages are
compliant/find t
Sendt: Tue, 24 Feb 2009 19:11:43 -0500
Fra: Timo Sirainent
> On Wed, 2009-02-25 at 00:38 +0100, Daniel Aleksandersen wrote:
> > Sendt: Wed, 25 Feb 2009 00:29:17 +0100
> > Fra: Pascal Volk
> > > On 25.02.2009 00:25 Daniel Aleksandersen wrote:
> > > > The recepie assumes I have a group called secmail
Sendt: Wed, 25 Feb 2009 01:36:00 +0100 (CET)
Fra: "Daniel Aleksandersen"
> Sendt: Tue, 24 Feb 2009 19:11:43 -0500
> Fra: Timo Sirainent
> > On Wed, 2009-02-25 at 00:38 +0100, Daniel Aleksandersen wrote:
> > > Sendt: Wed, 25 Feb 2009 00:29:17 +0100
> > > Fra: Pascal Volk
> > > > On 25.02.2009 00:25
On Wed, 2009-02-25 at 00:38 +0100, Daniel Aleksandersen wrote:
> Sendt: Wed, 25 Feb 2009 00:29:17 +0100
> Fra: Pascal Volk
> > On 25.02.2009 00:25 Daniel Aleksandersen wrote:
> > > The recepie assumes I have a group called secmail. I don’t. Am I supposed
> > > to create
> > > a special group for t
On Wed, 2009-02-25 at 00:58 +0100, Daniel Aleksandersen wrote:
> I am using Opera Mail. The folder is listen over telnet and it is shown in
> that test
> of your’s as well. I thus assume it is by design. But should I not be able to
> rename
> it? INBOX does not necessarily mean the same in all la
Sendt: Tue, 24 Feb 2009 16:44:11 -0500
Fra: Timo Sirainen
> On Tue, 2009-02-24 at 22:41 +0100, Daniel Aleksandersen wrote:
> > > What does it contain? Sounds like you have somehow just created a
> > > mailbox called INDEX. You can probably just delete it.
> >
> > It contains new messages. I assume
On 25.02.2009 00:38 Daniel Aleksandersen wrote:
>
> I created the group and set the permissions to deliver as described in the
> recepie. I
> then added just about every user to that group. I still get permission errors
> when
> dovecot tries to access my maildir. Setting permissions of the mail
Sendt: Wed, 25 Feb 2009 00:29:17 +0100
Fra: Pascal Volk
> On 25.02.2009 00:25 Daniel Aleksandersen wrote:
> > The recepie assumes I have a group called secmail. I don’t. Am I supposed
> > to create
> > a special group for this purpose?
>
> Yes, if the group does not exists, you have to create it.
On 25.02.2009 00:25 Daniel Aleksandersen wrote:
> The recepie assumes I have a group called secmail. I don’t. Am I supposed to
> create
> a special group for this purpose?
Yes, if the group does not exists, you have to create it. You could call
it whatever you want.
Regards,
Pascal
--
Ubuntu
Sendt: Wed, 25 Feb 2009 00:09:10 +0100
Fra: Pascal Volk
> On 24.02.2009 23:54 Daniel Aleksandersen wrote:
> > I have tried different options on my maildirs. Dovecot gives me permission
> > errors
> > unless I set it to 775. I have seen that many mention 660 as the best
> > permission
> > setting
On 24.02.2009 23:54 Daniel Aleksandersen wrote:
> I have tried different options on my maildirs. Dovecot gives me permission
> errors
> unless I set it to 775. I have seen that many mention 660 as the best
> permission
> setting for maildirs when used in setups similar to my own. Can anyone expla
Sendt: Tue, 24 Feb 2009 22:28:07 +0100 (CET)
Fra: "Daniel Aleksandersen"
> I am just experimenting with seting up my own email server. I want some tips
> and hints on how to secure my setup to prevent unauthorised assess to my
> email.
> I have read through the wiki and have not found many t
On Tue, 2009-02-24 at 17:41 -0500, Neil wrote:
> Inspired by the "Dovecot as a email storage system" thread...
>
> Is there a way to instruct Dovecot go into read-only mode for an
> account, or a mailbox?
ACL plugin would be one possibility. It won't prevent creating new
mailboxes though.
> Coul
Inspired by the "Dovecot as a email storage system" thread...
Is there a way to instruct Dovecot go into read-only mode for an
account, or a mailbox?
Could I maybe fake it by setting perms on the maildir directory to 440?
Ian P. Christian wrote:
2009/2/24 Timo Sirainen :
Looks like the POP3 proxying code was just broken. Fixed:
http://hg.dovecot.org/dovecot-1.2/rev/98e1115cd8f0
Timo, thank you so much for your amazingly fast response - I really
appreciate it.
Stephan, how often does your apt repos re-bundle t
2009/2/24 Timo Sirainen :
> Looks like the POP3 proxying code was just broken. Fixed:
> http://hg.dovecot.org/dovecot-1.2/rev/98e1115cd8f0
Timo, thank you so much for your amazingly fast response - I really
appreciate it.
Stephan, how often does your apt repos re-bundle the source package from R
On Tue, 2009-02-24 at 22:41 +0100, Daniel Aleksandersen wrote:
> > What does it contain? Sounds like you have somehow just created a
> > mailbox called INDEX. You can probably just delete it.
>
> It contains new messages. I assume this is the root email directory. My email
> client
> cannot renam
On Tue, 2009-02-24 at 21:29 +, Ian P. Christian wrote:
> #1 0x00405fdd in proxy_input (input=0x6533a0,
> output=0x653528, client=0x64e790) at pop3-proxy.c:210
> line = 0x6271b8 "?qb"
> __PRETTY_FUNCTION__ = "proxy_input"
Looks like the POP3 proxying code was just broke
Sendt: Tue, 24 Feb 2009 16:34:34 -0500
Fra: Timo Sirainen
> On Tue, 2009-02-24 at 21:33 +0100, Daniel Aleksandersen wrote:
> > Hi
> >
> > I think there is a technical reason for this, but I am not sure. My IMAP
> > client
> > shows a folder called INDEX. This is my maildir. I wonder if it is poss
On Tue, 2009-02-24 at 21:33 +0100, Daniel Aleksandersen wrote:
> Hi
>
> I think there is a technical reason for this, but I am not sure. My IMAP
> client
> shows a folder called INDEX. This is my maildir. I wonder if it is possible to
> change the name of this folder to something else?
What does
Hope this helps Timo, thanks! Hope I'm not doing anything stupid ;)
(gdb) cont
Continuing.
Program received signal SIGSEGV, Segmentation fault.
i_stream_next_line (stream=0x6533a0) at istream.c:248
248 istream.c: No such file or directory.
in istream.c
(gdb) bt full
#0 i_stream_next_
Hi list
I am just experimenting with seting up my own email server. I want some tips
and hints on how to secure my setup to prevent unauthorised assess to my email.
I have read through the wiki and have not found many tips. I hope to
improve the wiki with tips gathered from the emailing li
Sendt: Tue, 24 Feb 2009 21:12:02 +
Fra: "Ian P. Christian"
> 2009/2/24 Daniel Aleksandersen:
> > I think there is a technical reason for this, but I am not sure. My IMAP
> > client
> > shows a folder called INDEX. This is my maildir. I wonder if it is possible
> > to
> > change the name of th
2009/2/24 Daniel Aleksandersen :
> Hi
>
> I think there is a technical reason for this, but I am not sure. My IMAP
> client
> shows a folder called INDEX. This is my maildir. I wonder if it is possible to
> change the name of this folder to something else?
This is not typical - perhaps you've som
2009/2/24 Roderick A. Anderson :
> Anyone see problems with doing this?
no :)
I was thinking about all the old email I have and don't want to get rid
of and how much space it is taking on my mail server. The idea came to
me to install Dovecot on a server at home then I could drop mail into I
want to save. It doesn't need to receive mail except what that is moved
to it
Hi
I think there is a technical reason for this, but I am not sure. My IMAP client
shows a folder called INDEX. This is my maildir. I wonder if it is possible to
change the name of this folder to something else?
--
Daniel
Timo Sirainen schreef:
On Tue, 2009-02-24 at 16:14 +, Ian P. Christian wrote:
Feb 24 16:06:07 proxy kernel: pop3-login[6825]: segfault at
0128 rip 004107b5 rsp 7fff77bb6520 error 4
Feb 24 16:06:07 proxy dovecot: child 6825 (login) killed with signal
11 (ip=127.0.1.34
on 2-24-2009 10:46 AM barnaby cockcroft spake the following:
> Can anyone here help me out with a client side Outlook issue? I know
> outlook is a horrible imap client :(
>
> We intermittently have a problem where mail gets "stuck" in Outlook
> users' outboxes.
>
> Might have anything to do with
barnaby cockcroft wrote:
> Can anyone here help me out with a client side Outlook issue? I know
> outlook is a horrible imap client :(
>
> We intermittently have a problem where mail gets "stuck" in Outlook
> users' outboxes.
>
> Might have anything to do with dovecot?
I really doubt so. It could
Can anyone here help me out with a client side Outlook issue? I know
outlook is a horrible imap client :(
We intermittently have a problem where mail gets "stuck" in Outlook
users' outboxes.
Might have anything to do with dovecot? Is there anyway I can
troubleshoot this server side? Are there any
Timo Sirainen wrote:
On Tue, 2009-02-24 at 10:44 -0700, Paul Scott wrote:
Timo Sirainen wrote:
On Tue, 2009-02-24 at 10:31 -0700, Paul Scott wrote:
Hi All,
After upgrading dovecot for sid Thunderbird no longer displays the
contents of any emails
What exactly d
On Tue, 2009-02-24 at 16:14 +, Ian P. Christian wrote:
> Feb 24 16:06:07 proxy kernel: pop3-login[6825]: segfault at
> 0128 rip 004107b5 rsp 7fff77bb6520 error 4
> Feb 24 16:06:07 proxy dovecot: child 6825 (login) killed with signal
> 11 (ip=127.0.1.34)
You can reprodu
On Tue, 2009-02-24 at 10:31 -0700, Paul Scott wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> After upgrading dovecot for sid Thunderbird no longer displays the
> contents of any emails
What exactly does that mean? Does it list mailboxes? Does it list
mailbox contents, but just not open the mail?
See if there's anything i
On Tue, 2009-02-24 at 11:59 +0100, Ulrich Zehl wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 24, 2009 at 08:08:52AM +0100, Ulrich Zehl wrote:
> > On Mon, Feb 23, 2009 at 12:10:29PM -0500, Timo Sirainen wrote:
> > > I suppose looking at a couple of those could verify if it's really just
> > > NFS caching related corruption
Hi All,
After upgrading dovecot for sid Thunderbird no longer displays the
contents of any emails
I have had a working IMAP setup for as much as a year even though I
don't understand dovecot configuration well enough to know how I got it
to go in the first place.
Here is the output of dovecot -
On Tue, 2009-02-24 at 10:54 +0530, Dovecot List wrote:
> --Note: Based on recommendation, kernel was upgraded from 2.6.18 (-
> see below for details) and yet the issue persists.
..
> 1) Server spec used for mail Access
> OS: Linux 2.6.28 i686 CentOS release 5.2 (Final)
> kernel : 2.6.28
> 2
I've tried 2 builds of dovecot, based on a amd64 rebuild of the
experimental package on http://xi.rename-it.nl/debian/
I've tried to include as much useful info as possible, sorry if I've
missed out anything of use. Let me know as I'm more then happy to
assist in any way possible.
$ telnet hos
Please just post output of dovecot -n instead of copy/paste from config
file.
Output of dovecot -n
protocols: imap pop3
listen(default): *:143
listen(imap): *:143
listen(pop3): *:110
ssl_disable: yes
disable_plaintext_auth: no
login_dir: /usr/local/var/run/dovecot/login
login_executable(defaul
On Tue, Feb 24, 2009 at 08:08:52AM +0100, Ulrich Zehl wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 23, 2009 at 12:10:29PM -0500, Timo Sirainen wrote:
> > I suppose looking at a couple of those could verify if it's really just
> > NFS caching related corruption or something else.
>
> Okay, I will post results when I have
On 2/24/2009, Dovecot List (dove...@jigs.in) wrote:
> Conf on both the system as follows =
Please just post output of dovecot -n instead of copy/paste from config
file.
--
Best regards,
Charles
43 matches
Mail list logo
