dhottin...@harrisonburg.k12.va.us wrote:
Quoting Jack Stewart :
dhottin...@harrisonburg.k12.va.us wrote:
On Wed, 2009-02-11 at 17:27 -0500, dhottin...@harrisonburg.k12.va.us
wrote:
Have there been any issues with dovecot and using outlook express
(imap) as an email client? I have had a
Quoting Jack Stewart :
dhottin...@harrisonburg.k12.va.us wrote:
On Wed, 2009-02-11 at 17:27 -0500, dhottin...@harrisonburg.k12.va.us
wrote:
Have there been any issues with dovecot and using outlook express
(imap) as an email client? I have had a couple of users come up with
random missing
On Wed, 2009-02-11 at 17:35 -0500, Timo Sirainen wrote:
> On Wed, 2009-02-11 at 14:32 -0800, Seth Mattinen wrote:
> > Timo Sirainen wrote:
> > > This is about how to implement multiple msgs/file dbox format. The
> > > current v1.1's one msg/file design would stay pretty much the same and
> > > it w
dhottin...@harrisonburg.k12.va.us wrote:
On Wed, 2009-02-11 at 17:27 -0500, dhottin...@harrisonburg.k12.va.us
wrote:
Have there been any issues with dovecot and using outlook express
(imap) as an email client? I have had a couple of users come up with
random missing emails. Im trying to fi
Thanks I'll check it out. Just what I need, more log files ;-].
take care,
ddh
Quoting Timo Sirainen :
On Wed, 2009-02-11 at 17:27 -0500, dhottin...@harrisonburg.k12.va.us
wrote:
Have there been any issues with dovecot and using outlook express
(imap) as an email client? I have had a coupl
On Wed, 2009-02-11 at 14:32 -0800, Seth Mattinen wrote:
> Timo Sirainen wrote:
> > This is about how to implement multiple msgs/file dbox format. The
> > current v1.1's one msg/file design would stay pretty much the same and
> > it would be compatible with this new design.
> >
>
> Out of curiosit
On Wed, 2009-02-11 at 17:27 -0500, dhottin...@harrisonburg.k12.va.us
wrote:
> Have there been any issues with dovecot and using outlook express
> (imap) as an email client? I have had a couple of users come up with
> random missing emails. Im trying to figure out if it is user error,
> or s
Timo Sirainen wrote:
> This is about how to implement multiple msgs/file dbox format. The
> current v1.1's one msg/file design would stay pretty much the same and
> it would be compatible with this new design.
>
Out of curiosity, what's the advantage to going to multiple messages per
file? Wouldn
Have there been any issues with dovecot and using outlook express
(imap) as an email client? I have had a couple of users come up with
random missing emails. Im trying to figure out if it is user error,
or something wacky in my mailserver. I cant find anything telling in
maillog files o
This is about how to implement multiple msgs/file dbox format. The
current v1.1's one msg/file design would stay pretty much the same and
it would be compatible with this new design.
dbox directories with multiple msgs/file would be like:
~/dbox/storage/ has the actual mail data for all mailboxes
I'm currently trying out 1.2.beta1 and get the following error in 'mail.err'
log file as soon as I stop dovecot:
Feb 11 20:28:30 server dovecot: Fatal: io_loop_handle_add: epoll_ctl(1,
11): Bad file descriptor
Is that anything critical?
Thanks,
e-frog
--
Timo Sirainen wrote:
>
>On Wed, 2009-02-11 at 10:29 -0800, Mark Sapiro wrote:
>> I tried Dovecot 1.2.beta1 yesterday. I had been using 1.1.11.
>>=20
>> I started getting "Panic: POP3(xxx): Trying to allocate 0 bytes"
>
>Yeah, stupid bug: http://hg.dovecot.org/dovecot-1.2/rev/22d70947597c
Thanks T
On 2/11/2009, Harry Lachanas (grha...@freemail.gr) wrote:
> Here is my conf
Please don't snip critical info from dovecot -n output...
There hsould be a version line and a line with info about your system.
--
Best regards,
Charles
On Wed, 2009-02-11 at 10:29 -0800, Mark Sapiro wrote:
> I tried Dovecot 1.2.beta1 yesterday. I had been using 1.1.11.
>
> I started getting "Panic: POP3(xxx): Trying to allocate 0 bytes"
Yeah, stupid bug: http://hg.dovecot.org/dovecot-1.2/rev/22d70947597c
signature.asc
Description: This is a d
I tried Dovecot 1.2.beta1 yesterday. I had been using 1.1.11.
I started getting "Panic: POP3(xxx): Trying to allocate 0 bytes"
There are two kinds of pop3 users. In the attached log.txt file, user
u1 is using a pop3 MUA. For users u2, u3, u4 and u5 fetchmail is
coming through an ssh tunnel and re
On Wed, 2009-02-11 at 20:12 +0200, Harry Lachanas wrote:
> > So you're using multiple UIDs? How about just removing filesystem write
> > permissions from /home/Public?
> >
> >
> But this would disable users from dumping mails into the folders right
> ???
No, for example if you had a folde
Kiitos Timo ,,,
On Wed, 2009-02-11 at 19:22 +0200, Harry Lachanas wrote:
Is there a way to prohibit users of creating subfolder(s) under a
Public Namespace ???
..
namespace:
type: public
separator: /
prefix: Public/
location:
maildir:/home/Public:INBOX=~/Maildir:INDEX=~/M
Thomas Hummel wrote:
On Wed, Feb 11, 2009 at 07:22:50PM +0200, Harry Lachanas wrote:
Is there a way to prohibit users of creating subfolder(s) under a
Public Namespace ???
Isn't that (for users (as opposed to admins) to create subfolders in a public
namespacejust impossible with 1.1.
On Wed, 2009-02-11 at 19:22 +0200, Harry Lachanas wrote:
> Is there a way to prohibit users of creating subfolder(s) under a
> Public Namespace ???
..
> namespace:
> type: public
> separator: /
> prefix: Public/
> location:
> maildir:/home/Public:INBOX=~/Maildir:INDEX=~/Maildir/p-idx:CON
On Wed, Feb 11, 2009 at 07:22:50PM +0200, Harry Lachanas wrote:
> Is there a way to prohibit users of creating subfolder(s) under a
> Public Namespace ???
Isn't that (for users (as opposed to admins) to create subfolders in a public
namespacejust impossible with 1.1.x) ?
--
Thomas Hummel
Hi all,
Is there a way to prohibit users of creating subfolder(s) under a
Public Namespace ???
Here is my conf
#--
log_timestamp: %Y-%m-%d %H:%M:%S
protocols: imaps
ssl_ca_file: /etc/postfix/sasl/cacert.pe
On Wed, 2009-02-11 at 11:04 +0100, Sascha Wilde wrote:
> a003 subscribe "user/b...@example.com/foobar"
> a003 NO Unknown subscription namespace.
What kind of namespace configuration do you have? This sounds like your
shared namespace has subscriptions=no, but you don't have a namespace
with empty
On Wed, 2009-02-11 at 11:00 +0100, Sascha Wilde wrote:
> Timo Sirainen writes:
> > http://dovecot.org/releases/1.2/beta/dovecot-1.2.beta1.tar.gz
> > http://dovecot.org/releases/1.2/beta/dovecot-1.2.beta1.tar.gz.sig
>
> Great news! :-)
>
> [...]
> > There isn't really much left to do for v1.2.0
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Wed, 11 Feb 2009, Romer Ventura wrote:
So all the mail gets stored at /home/vmail/%Ud/%Ln/Maildir/ so if i add a
new volume to the VM lets say /dev/disk3 and mount it to /srv/vmail and then
change the user_attrs =
sAMAccountName=mail=maildir:/
Hello,
I am about to add more storage to the mail server and would like to
know if it is as simple as it sounds..? I have:
dovecot.conf
mail_location: maildir:~/Maildir/
and
/etc/dovecot/dovecot-ldap.conf with:
user_attrs = sAMAccountName=mail=maildir:/home/vmail/%Ud/%Ln/Maildir/
So
Hello Timo,
let's say you want to implement several distinct groups of shared mailboxes via
one (several) public namespace(s) with dovecot-1.1.x/Maildir. For instance,
team1, team2 and team3 work on different projects (project1, project2,
project3).
Obviously, as many public namespaces (#team1, #
Achim Hut writes:
[...]
> What i need is a scenario, where user1 can get (for example) full
> access to the folders of user2, read-only access to user3 etc.
> A real world example:
> Secretary has full access to the mailfolders of her boss, boss has
> read-only acces to the sales-department folder
Hi *,
I stumbled across a small bug (missing feature?) in the new shared
name space stuff:
a001 list "" "*"
* LIST (\Noselect \HasChildren) "/" "user"
* LIST (\Noselect \HasChildren) "/" "user/b...@example.com"
* LIST (\HasChildren) "/" "INBOX"
* LIST (\HasNoChildren) "/" "INBOX/bar"
* LIST (\Has
Timo Sirainen writes:
> http://dovecot.org/releases/1.2/beta/dovecot-1.2.beta1.tar.gz
> http://dovecot.org/releases/1.2/beta/dovecot-1.2.beta1.tar.gz.sig
Great news! :-)
[...]
> There isn't really much left to do for v1.2.0 except some small fixing
> to shared mailbox code. And writing document
Hello.
I use expire plugin with dovecot 1.1.10. See my dovecot -n:
# 1.1.10: /usr/local/etc/dovecot.conf
# OS: FreeBSD 6.3-RELEASE-p9 i386 ufs
syslog_facility: local6
protocols: imap imaps managesieve
ssl_cert_file: /etc/ssl/mail/mail.domain.net.cert
ssl_key_file: /etc/ssl/mail/mail.domain.net.k
30 matches
Mail list logo
