On Wed, 2009-02-11 at 14:32 -0800, Seth Mattinen wrote: > Timo Sirainen wrote: > > This is about how to implement multiple msgs/file dbox format. The > > current v1.1's one msg/file design would stay pretty much the same and > > it would be compatible with this new design. > > > > Out of curiosity, what's the advantage to going to multiple messages per > file? Wouldn't this have the same problems as mbox?
Multiple per file, not everything in one file. As long as the file size is set "right", it's probably faster than one per file. We'll see :)
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
